Off the Page and Into Practice: Advocating for Implementation of the Gifted Programming Standards

2021 ◽  
pp. 255-268
Author(s):  
E. Wayne ◽  
Jane Clarenbach
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 31
Author(s):  
Jonathan Wai ◽  
Benjamin J. Lovett

Fully developing the talents of all students is a fundamental goal for personal well-being and development and ultimately for global societal innovation and flourishing. However, in this paper we focus on what we believe is an often neglected and underdeveloped population, that of the gifted. We draw from the cognitive aptitude and gifted education research literatures to make the case that solutions to consequential real-world problems can be greatly enhanced by more fully developing the talents of the intellectually gifted population, which we operationalize in this paper as roughly the top 5% of cognitive talent. Should well-supported high achievers choose to solve them, these problems span health, science, economic growth, and areas unforeseen. We draw from longitudinal research on intellectually precocious students and retrospective research on leaders and innovators in society, showing that mathematical, verbal, and spatial aptitudes are linked to societal innovation. We then discuss two remaining fundamental challenges: the identification of disadvantaged and marginalized groups of students who have traditionally been neglected in selection for gifted programming suited to their current developmental needs, and the building of skills beyond academic ones, specifically in the related areas of open-minded thinking and intellectual humility.


Author(s):  
Samantha Goodowens ◽  
Jessica Cannaday

This chapter discusses the lived experiences of one parent of a profoundly gifted student. Parental perceptions of gifted programming in the public school system, parental reasons for leaving the public school system, and the alternative schooling designs of homeschooling and unschooling are discussed. Further discussed is the parental perception of the general lack of knowledge teacher educators possess in regards to highly, exceptionally, and profoundly gifted students. Parent recognition and discussion of the incompatibility between the traditional schooling system and their child's personal characteristics is a main theme. Parental design of new educational experiences to meet the unique needs of their individual child is shared. Insights into the alternative education practices of homeschooling and unschooling for highly and profoundly gifted students, as well as one parent's perspective of the current school system, are shared with teacher education faculty preparing new teachers to work with gifted students.


2022 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Kristen Seward ◽  
Marcia Gentry

The equitable identification of youth from all cultural, linguistic, and economic groups for gifted programming is a longstanding and tragic problem in gifted education. Many factors contribute to fallible, discriminatory identification practices, including identification based on manifest gifted behaviors alone (as opposed to gifted potential), on high cut-off scores on nationally normed instruments that yield differential results, and on exclusionary procedures where students must meet several criteria for identification or pass through a nomination gate for consideration. This chapter provides guidance for addressing access, equity, and missingness of underserved students in gifted education. Emphasis is placed on talent development, substantial changes to identification and programming, policy, and urgency to address systemic racism as steps critical to developing equitable, inclusive, socially just, and effective gifted education programming.


2022 ◽  
pp. 150-170
Author(s):  
Rachelle Kuehl ◽  
Carolyn M. Callahan ◽  
Amy Price Azano

Limited economic resources and geographic challenges can lead rural schools in areas experiencing poverty to deprioritize gifted education. However, for the wellbeing of individual students and their communities, investing in quality rural gifted education is crucial. In this chapter, the authors discuss some of the challenges to providing equitable gifted programming to students in rural areas and present approaches to meeting those challenges (e.g., cluster grouping, mentoring). They then describe a large-scale federally-funded research project, Promoting PLACE in Rural Schools, which demonstrated methods districts can use to bolster gifted education programming. With 14 rural districts in high-poverty areas of the southeastern United States, researchers worked with teachers and school leaders to establish universal screening processes for identifying giftedness using local norms, to teach students the value of a growth mindset in reducing stereotype threat, and to train teachers on using a place-based curriculum to provide more impactful language arts instruction to gifted rural students.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonia Szymanski ◽  
Laurie Croft ◽  
Brian Godor

The purpose of this study is to explore teacher attitudes toward gifted students in several distinct areas and to provide psychometric evidence of reliability and validity for the use of an instrument titled “Determining Attitudes Toward Ability” (DATA) to measure specific components of teacher attitudes. Subscales of Focus on Others, Problems With Acceleration, Grade Skipping, Identification, and Curriculum/Policy and ranking the goals of gifted programming allow precise understanding of teacher attitudes regarding important factors in gifted education. This study represents the initial efforts to provide a psychometrically evaluated instrument that reflects developments in the field of gifted education.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-100
Author(s):  
Brittany N. Anderson

In current research and theoretical models that address racial inequity or gender disparities in gifted education, there is a missing narrative around high-achieving/gifted Black girls and their experiences, as well as their disproportionate underrepresentation in gifted programming, services, and Advanced Placement (AP) courses. This article highlights literature on adolescent gifted Black girls, in addition to exploring barriers and issues of marginalization that constrain the talent identification and development of this population. The study explores the narratives of gifted Black women and explores their counternarratives using Critical Race Theory and Frasier’s Talent Assessment Profile (F-TAP) framework. The article urges educators to use an intersectional lens to understand and address the needs of adolescent gifted Black girls, and provides practical tools to identify and develop talent.


1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16
Author(s):  
Marilynn J. Kulieke ◽  
John C. Hillary ◽  
Dick Person ◽  
Wayne Wagner ◽  
Schnabl Meriam

1992 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice L. Matthew ◽  
Anne K. Golin ◽  
Mary W. Moore ◽  
Carol Baker

To increase the proportion of elementary minority students identified as gifted, the System of Multicultural Pluralistic Assessment (SOMPA) was employed with minority disadvantaged children in a large urban school district. A group of African-American students in second through fifth grades became eligible for gifted programming when their IQ scores were adjusted using SOMPA procedures. The performance of these SOMPA students on the Ross Test of Higher Cognitive Processes and other measures did not differ from that of a group of African-American gifted students who were identified on the basis of traditional criteria. There were also no significant differences between the groups in Ross subtest scores seven months later. The SOMPA procedures used to identify these gifted students may provide an alternative method to increase the proportion of minority students in gifted programs; particularly in states that use IQ cut-off scores for placement decisions.


1979 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald L. Rubenzer ◽  
James A. Twaite

The purpose of this study was to provide recommendations for teacher preparation in gifted education to directors of inservice and university training programs. Recommendations were based on the responses of 1,220 kindergarten through 12th educators to a modified Likert attitude scale regarding gifted identification, programming, behavioral characteristics, and teacher recommendations for gifted programming and teacher preparation. Also investigated were the relationships between five teacher characteristics and attitudes toward the gifted/talented. The most salient teacher preparation needs were found to be: increasing the accuracy and scope of talent identification, acquiring accurate information regarding acceleration techniques and consequences, and encouraging creative and affective development of the gifted/talented. Significant differences in attitudes were related to number of years of teaching experience, grade level and gifted/talented inservice experience.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document