Physical Development Planning in the Anglophone Caribbean: The Re-articulation of Formal State Power

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 230-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.Z. Abd-Razak ◽  
N.K.F Mustafa ◽  
A.I. Che-Ani ◽  
N.A.G. Abdullah ◽  
M.F.I Mohd-Nor

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 2902-2908

One of the alternatives, the national program for rural community empowerment was regarded the most effective way by the government of Banyumas Regency. The implementation of the program in extending credit had hit the accurate target, but was not successful in terms of opening new employment and increasing the income of woman’s business groups because of relatively small amount of entrepreneurial loan, relatively high interest of 17% per year, and short repayment period of 1 year. Poor traders encounter tight competition, lack of information, lack of skills and low motivation to thrive. As a supporting factor, the implementation of physical development was not effective because the poor as the target group were not involved much in development planning discussion represented by recognized local figures, representatives of several villages and village apparatuses who had authority to take the initiative for designing the program. The decision regarding the physical development was preferably designated for their own interest rather than the business orientation of poor housewives group in rural areas. In addition, low education and low social status of the poor business group cause the tendency to inferiority, which lead to be apathy and passiveness in planning and supervision of the rural community empowerment program


2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M.Z. Abd-Razak ◽  
Nur Akmal Goh Abdullah ◽  
Muhammad Farihan Irfan Mohd Nor ◽  
Ismar M.S. Usman ◽  
Adi Irfan Che-Ani

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 212-226
Author(s):  
Peribadi Peribadi ◽  
Megawati Asrul Tawulo

The study aims to develop a strategic formulation by means of integrating and synthesizing traditional typical planning pattern called Meobu-Obu and  Musrenbang (Community consultation on development planning held annually from village level to national level) as participatory development planning  occurring so far in the area of South Konawe Regency Government. The attempts of reconstructing and functionalizing rural social institutions were developed through community studies, participatory studies and eclectic case studies. The results show that the process of utilizing Village Funds (VF) still focuses more on physical development aspect rather than the aspect of community socio-economic empowerment. Meanwhile, the process of organizing the Musrenbang tends to be formalistic to merely abort the procedural aspects. Similarly, the institution of kalosara still wrestles with ritualistic field of un sich continuosly, so that the sacralization of kalosara culture has not entered the developmental field yet. It is exactly in this context that the result of research offers a formulation of Musrenbang based on cultural value of kalosara to be used in the future in the attempt of building the rural areas, particularly in the mainland of Southeast Sulawesi Province.


2011 ◽  
Vol 71-78 ◽  
pp. 4313-4316 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.Z Abd Razak ◽  
Nangkula Utaberta ◽  
Nag Abdullah ◽  
M Tahir ◽  
Ai Che Ani

The issue of sustainability has been around for a long time. However, it has become a hot issue after the Earth Summit taking place in 1992 in Rio de Janeiro and in 2002 in Johannesburg. Conference in 1992 led to the formulation of Agenda 21, an action plan containing broad principles to help governments and other institutions in carrying out the policies and programs for sustainable development in their respective countries. The aim of this research was to examine the effectiveness of campus physical development planning in Malaysia in creating a sustainable living on campus by assessed the problems that exist. The study was conducted in four public university campuses and limited to only the campus physical planning. Selected campuses are the research universities campus. The case studies were conducted on each campus. The methodology used in this study is qualitative and quantitative techniques. Quantitative technique involves collecting data using questionnaires distributed among 100 respondents for each campus. Meanwhile, the qualitative technique involves collecting comments and opinions from the respondents obtained from questionnaires, behavioral observation and visual research. The results were then compared for each campus for an explanation of the problem. The findings revealed that all campuses had a similar problem. However, there are some differences about the extent or severity of the problems based on campus physical development plan that is different. The result showed that there are minimal problems occurs on the campus that planned more compact compare to a wide and dispersed campus. It also indicates that a compact campus tend to create a sustainable life on campus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document