Restorative Justice, Domestic Violence, and the Law

Author(s):  
Tod Augusta-Scott ◽  
Leigh Goodmark ◽  
Joan Pennell
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 450-459
Author(s):  
Artha Sebayang ◽  
Utary Maharany Barus ◽  
M. Citra Ramadhan

The purpose of this study was to determine the legal rules of restorative justice in the settlement of cases of Domestic Violence (KDRT) at the North Sumatra Regional Police. According to Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Police and the factors that cause restorative justice to not work. Research on the Settlement of Domestic Violence Cases through Restorative Justice the North Sumatra Police Case Study is a normative legal research. Normative legal research aims to examine library legal materials. In the Domestic Violence Law No. 23 of 2004 which is a criminal act of complaint and the reporter and victim are people who live within the scope of the household, but the law only confirms that there are no criminal provisions prioritizing the settlement of restorative justice for domestic violence which is minor and constitutes a criminal complaint. The concept of restorative justice is another method used to handle criminal cases. This concept prioritizes the integrity of perpetrators, victims and society as a unit to find solutions and return to a good relationship pattern between victims and perpetrators of criminal acts and one way that can be done in this concept is penal mediation.


Author(s):  
Zorica Saltirovska Professor ◽  
Sunchica Dimitrijoska Professor

Gender-based violence is a form of discrimination that prevents women from enjoying the rights and liberties on an equal level with men. Inevitably, domestic violence shows the same trend of victimizing women to such a degree that the term “domestic violence” is increasingly becoming synonymous with “violence against women”. The Istanbul Convention defines domestic violence as "gender-based violence against women", or in other words "violence that is directed against a woman because she is a woman or that affects women disproportionately." The situation is similar in the Republic of Macedonia, where women are predominantly victims of domestic violence. However, the Macedonian legal framework does not define domestic violence as gender-based violence, and thus it does not define it as a specific form of discrimination against women. The national legislation stipulates that victims are to be protected in both a criminal and a civil procedure, and the Law on Prevention and Protection from Domestic Violence determines the actions of the institutions and civil organizations in the prevention of domestic violence and the protection of victims. The system for protection of victims of domestic violence closely supports the Law on Social Protection and the Law on Free Legal Aid, both of which include provisions on additional assistance for women victims of domestic violence. However, the existing legislation has multiple deficiencies and does not allow for a greater efficacy in implementing the prescribed measures for the protection of victims of domestic violence. For this reason, as well as due to the inconsistent implementation of legal solutions of this particular issue, the civil sector is constantly expressing their concern about the increasingly wider spread of domestic violence against women and about the protection capabilities at their disposal. The lack of recognition of all forms of gender-based violence, the trivial number of criminal sentences against persons who perform acts of domestic violence, the insufficient support offered to victims – including victim shelters, legal assistance, and counseling, and the lack of systematic databases on domestic violence cases on a national level, are a mere few of the many issues clearly pointing to the inevitable conclusion that the protection of women-victims of domestic violence is inadequate. Hence, the functionality and efficiency of both the existing legislation and the institutions in charge of protection and support of women – victims of domestic violence is being questioned, which is also the subject for analysis in this paper.


Since its Broadway debut, Hamilton: An American Musical has infused itself into the American experience: who shapes it, who owns it, who can rap it best. Lawyers and legal scholars, recognizing the way the musical speaks to some of our most complicated constitutional issues, have embraced Alexander Hamilton as the trendiest historical face in American civics. This book offers a revealing look into the legal community's response to the musical, which continues to resonate in a country still deeply divided about the reach of the law. Intellectual property scholars share their thoughts on Hamilton's inventive use of other sources, while family law scholars explore domestic violence. Critical race experts consider how Hamilton furthers our understanding of law and race, while authorities on the Second Amendment discuss the language of the Constitution's most contested passage. Legal scholars moonlighting as musicians discuss how the musical lifts history and law out of dusty archives and onto the public stage. This collection of minds, inspired by the phenomenon of the musical and the Constitutional Convention of 1787, urges us to heed Lin-Manuel Miranda and the Founding Fathers and to create something new, daring, and different.


2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 238
Author(s):  
Rena Yulia

AbstractThe victim of domestic violence had needed of protection concept thatdifferent with another victim of violent crime. Participation of victim haswant to give justice for all. It is, because punishment to offender brings theimpact for victim. Restorative justice is a concept in criminal justice systemwhich is participation victim with it. The present of criminal justice system isthe offender oriented. Victim has not position to considerate offenderpunishment. Only offender can get the right and the victim hopeless. In thedomestic violence, victim and offender have relationship. Because there area family. · So, probability they have some interest in economic and relation.When wife become a victim and husband as offender, his wife hasdependency economic from her husband. It means, if husband get a decisionfrom judge, his wife will be suffer. Domestic violence is different crime. So, itis necessQ/y to made some different concept. In this article, will discussedabout alternative of legal protection for victim of domestic violence incriminal justice system to protect the victim


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-192
Author(s):  
Ana Indah Cahyani ◽  
Yulia Monita ◽  
Elizabeth Siregar

ABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan memahami pengaturan sanksi pidana dalam kasus kekerasan dalam rumah tangga menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga berikut dan  implementasi pidana denda sebagai alternatif pemidanaan pada tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis empiris, penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pidana denda sebagai alternatif pemidanaan pada tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga belum terlaksana. Pidana denda sebagai alternatif pidana penjara pada tindak pidana kekerasan dalam rumah tangga perlu dikembangkan. Karena pidana denda mampu memberikan efek jera dan selaras dengan tujuan penghapusan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga. Selain itu, pidana denda lebih mengutamakan keutuhan rumah tangga yang harmonis dan sejahtera guna mengurangi kemungkinan perceraian. Maka dari itu pada kasus kekerasan dalam rumah tangga yang tidak terlalu berat perlu diterapkan pidana denda sebagai alternatif dari pidana penjara agar terciptanya keadilan, kepastian, dan kemanfaatan terutama bagi masyarakat, korban dan terpidana itu sendiri. ABSTRACT The objectives to be achieved in this study are: 1) to know and understand the regulation of criminal sanction in cases of domestic violence according to the Law Number 23 Year 2004 Elimination of Domestic Violence. 2) to find out the implementation of criminal fine as an alternative punishment in the crime of domestic violence. Using the empirical juridical method, the study has found that criminal fines as an alternative to criminal acts in domestic violence have not been implemented. Criminal fines as an alternative to imprisonment in domestic violence should be developed because it is able to provide a detterent effect and are aligned with the aim of eliminating domestic violence. Criminal fines prioritize the integrity of a harmonious and prosperous household in order to reduce the possibility of diorce. Therefore in cases of domestic violence that are not too severe it is necessary to apply criminal fines as an alternative to imprisonment in order to create justice, certainty and benefits especially for the community, victims and convicts themselves.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-85
Author(s):  
Moh Rasyid

Children need protection and guidance from adult people to become a quality generation. Relationship between children and adult people in their surrounding community plays significant role in children development. However, in some case, adult people cause suffering for children such as in the case of child abuse or violence. Meanwhile, the regulation concerning child fails to provide protection for children. Due to the rise of crime against children, President Joko Widodo signed Perppu No 1/2016, later on became the Law no 17/2016, which threatened the actor of child abused to be emasculated. Human right activists and medical experts were opposing the law. Despite the debate between the proponents and the opponents of castration, including among Moslems, the Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI) did not published fatwa concerning this matter. The most important thing is protecting children from being abused by empowering education and restorative justice.


2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. A158.1-A158
Author(s):  
Saija Sambou ◽  
Pia Slögs

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document