The Development of Memory and Reasoning Skill in Argumentative Contexts: Evaluating, Explaining, and Generating Evidence

2019 ◽  
pp. 285-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy L. Stein ◽  
Christopher A. Miller
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 01002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esen Ersoy ◽  
Belgin Bal-Incebacak
Keyword(s):  

EDUSAINS ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-37
Author(s):  
Nur Arviyanto Himawan ◽  
Jumadi Jumadi ◽  
Edy Purwanto

AbstractReasoning skill is essential for students to have to face the challenges of the 21st century. This study aims to determine the percentage of students' reasoning skills based on deductive hypothesis, inductive hypothesis, and reflective abstraction. This research used a descriptive method involving 26 students of Islamic Senior High School 4 Bantul. The data from tests were analyzed quantitatively, while the data from interviews were analyzed qualitatively as supporting data. The results showed that the indicators of deductive hypothesis: Aspects of explaining a fact, there are 62% of students explained the facts correctly but were incomplete and 38% of students explained the facts incorrectly; Aspects of making conclusions deductively, there are 77% of students made correct conclusions but were incomplete and 23% of students made incorrect conclusions. Based on inductive hypothesis indicators: Aspects of making conclusions inductively, all students can make conclusions, but incorrect in associating equations; Aspects of giving reasons, all students gave incorrect reasons. Based on indicators of reflective abstraction: Aspects of developing concepts, there are 50% of students who can connect concepts in a case correctly and 50% of students incorrectly connect concepts in a case. This showed that students' reasoning skill is still low. AbstrakKemampuan penalaran penting dimiliki oleh siswa untuk menghadapi tantangan abad 21. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui persentase kemampuan penalaran siswa berdasarkan hipotesis deduktif, hipotesis induktif dan abstraksi reflektif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif yang melibatkan 26 siswa MAN 4 Bantul. Data dari tes dianalisis secara kuantitatif, sedangkan data dari wawancara dianalisis secara kualitatif sebagai data pendukung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pada indikator hipotesis deduktif: Aspek menjelaskan fakta, terdapat 62% siswa yang menjelaskan fakta secara tepat namun kurang lengkap dan 38% siswa kurang tepat dalam menjelaskan fakta; Aspek membuat kesimpulan secara deduktif, terdapat 77% siswa membuat kesimpulan dengan tepat namun kurang lengkap dan 23% siswa membuat kesimpulan yang kurang tepat. Berdasarkan indikator hipotesis induktif: Aspek membuat kesimpulan secara induktif, semua siswa dapat membuat kesimpulan, namun tidak tepat dalam mengaitkan persamaan; Aspek memberi alasan, semua siswa memberikan alasan yang kurang tepat. Berdasarkan indikator abstraksi reflektif: Aspek pengembangan konsep, sebanyak 50% siswa mampu menghubungkan konsep dalam suatu kasus secara tepat dan 50% siswa kurang tepat dalam menghubungkan konsep pada suatu kasus. Hal ini menunjukkan kemampuan penalaran siswa masih rendah. 


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pingyuan Gong ◽  
Fuchang Zhang ◽  
Xu Lei ◽  
Xiaodong Wu ◽  
Dongmei Chen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-35
Author(s):  
Ayu Fitri ◽  
Haerudin ◽  
Tridays

Pengabdian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh penilaian siswa terfokus terhadap hasil belajar siswa bukan kemampuan siswa, kurangnya pengetahuan guru tentang kemampuan matematika siswa, letak sekolah yang terpencil dekat dengan pantai. Kegiatan ini dilaksanakan di SD Negeri Sedari I Desa Sedari Kecamatan Cibuaya Kabupaten Karawang – Jawa Barat. Metode yang digunakan ekspositori, diskusi dan simulasi. Hasil kegiatan dapat dilihat dari persentasi kemampuan pemahaman siswa sebesar 90% dalam simulasi pembelajaran Ikan Veves dalam mengembagkan kemampuan pemahaman siswa pada materi bilangan romawi di SD Negeri Sedari I. Kata Kunci : Srategi Pembelajaran Ikan Veves, Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematika This service is motivated by student assessment focused on student learning outcomes rather than student abilities, lack of teacher knowledge about students' mathematical abilities, the location of remote schools close to the beach. This activity was carried out at SDN Sedari I Sedari Village, Cibuaya District, Karawang Regency, West Java. The method used expository, discussion and simulation. The results of the activity can be seen from the percentage of students 'understanding ability by 90% in the Fish Veves learning simulation in developing students' understanding abilities in roman numerals material at SDN Sedari I. Key Words: Ikan Veves Strategy, Reasoning Skill Mathematic


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 233
Author(s):  
Mutia Handayani

This study aims to determine effectiveness of Multiple Intelligences (MI) strategy to the skills of imitating mathematical reasoning fourth grade students of elementari school. The research design used is quasi experimental design with form none equivalent control group design. Data analysis technique in this reasearch include independet sample t test to determine whether there is difference effect in imitating mathematical reasoning skills between the control calss and experiment class. Then, one sample t-test to determine the effectiveness of MI strategy to students’ imitating mathematical reasoning skills. Based on the result of the hypothesis test using independent sample t test, the values of treuslt is 3,351 (ttable2,032) by significance values 0,002. Next, the result of one sample t test showed the value of tresultis 7,880 (ttable 2,110) by value of significance is 0,000. Refer from the result obtained, It can be concluded 1) there are differences of students; imitating mathematical reasoning skill among the students who use the MI strategy with students who use the conventional strategy; 2) the MI strategy is effective to increase of students’ imitating mathematical reasoning skill.


1991 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 953-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton E. Lawson ◽  
Christine B. McElrath ◽  
Margaret S. Burton ◽  
Bart D. James ◽  
Roy P. Doyle ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document