scholarly journals Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Monitoring Technique of Physical Blowing Agent Concentration in Foam Injection Molding Processes

Seikei-Kakou ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 176-181
Author(s):  
Shunsuke Hosoe ◽  
Yuta Hikima ◽  
Masahiro Ohshima ◽  
Masahiro Watari ◽  
Akihiro Naito
2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 791-796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohit P. Rao ◽  
Michael J. Danduran ◽  
Rohit S. Loomba ◽  
Jennifer E. Dixon ◽  
George M. Hoffman

Polymers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Llewelyn ◽  
Rees ◽  
Griffiths ◽  
Jacobi

Unfilled and talc-filled Copolymer Polypropylene (PP) samples were produced through low-pressure foam-injection molding (FIM). The foaming stage of the process has been facilitated through a chemical blowing agent (C6H7NaO7 and CaCO3 mixture), a physical blowing agent (supercritical N2) and a novel hybrid foaming (combination of said chemical and physical foaming agents). Three weight-saving levels were produced with the varying foaming methods and compared to conventional injection molding. The unfilled PP foams produced through chemical blowing agent exhibited the strongest mechanical characteristics due to larger skin wall thicknesses, while the weakest were that of the talc-filled PP through the hybrid foaming technique. However, the hybrid foaming produced superior microcellular foams for both PPs due to calcium carbonate (CaCO3) enhancing the nucleation phase.


2016 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 491-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Volpe ◽  
Roberto Pantani

Foam injection molding is a processing technology particularly interesting for biodegradable polymers, which present a very narrow processing window, with the suitable processing temperatures close to the degradation conditions. The addition of a physical blowing agent, besides decreasing the final part weight, reduces both the viscosity and the glass transition temperature of the polymer melt, allowing the processability of these materials at lower temperatures. In this work, structural foams of polylactic acid with nitrogen as physical blowing agent were obtained by foam injection molding. In particular, the effects of back pressure, namely the pressure imposed inside of the cylinder when the screw is returning back to prepare a new amount of material to be injected, and of the injection flow rate on foaming and mechanical properties of the molded parts was assessed. It was found that the samples molded adopting a higher injection flow rate are shorter than those injected at lower flow rate, and this result was ascribed to the large compressibility of the injected shot. As far as the mechanical properties of the foamed parts, it was found that the modulus decreases with decreasing density. However, the density reduction is not the only significant parameter, but also the morphology of the foams should be taken into account in order to justify the differences between tensile and flexural modulus.


1992 ◽  
Vol 67 (4 Spec No) ◽  
pp. 407-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y A Wickramasinghe ◽  
L N Livera ◽  
S A Spencer ◽  
P Rolfe ◽  
M S Thorniley

Author(s):  
Chang Dae Han

There are two processes used in the production of thermoplastic foams, namely, foam extrusion and structural foam injection molding (Benning 1969; Frisch and Saunders 1973). Foam extrusion, in which either chemical or physical blowing agents are used, is the focus of this chapter. Investigations of foam extrusion have dealt with the type and choice of process equipment (Collins and Brown 1973; Knau and Collins 1974; Senn and Shenefiel 1971; Wacehter 1970), the effect of die design (Fehn 1967; Han and Ma 1983b), the effect of blowing agents on foaming characteristics (Burt 1978, 1979; Han and Ma 1983b; Hansen 1962; Ma and Han 1983), and relationships between the foam density, cell geometry, and mechanical properties (Croft 1964; Kanakkanatt 1973; Mehta and Colombo 1976; Meinecke and Clark 1973). Chemical blowing agents are generally low-molecular-weight organic compounds, which decompose at and above a critical temperature and thereby release a gas (or gases), for example, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, or carbon monoxide. Examples of physical blowing agents include nitrogen, carbon dioxide, fluorocarbons (e.g., trichlorofluoromethane, dichlorodifluoromethane, and dichlorotetrafluoroethane), pentane, etc. They are introduced as a component of the polymer charge or under pressure into the molten polymer in the barrel of the extruder. It is extremely important to control the formation and growth of gas bubbles in order to produce foams of uniform quality (i.e., uniform cell structure). The fundamental questions one may ask in thermoplastic foam processing are: (1) What is the optimal concentration of blowing agent in order to have the minimum number of open cells and thus the best achievable mechanical property? (2) How many bubbles will be nucleated at the instant of nucleation? (3) What is the critical pressure at which bubbles nucleate in a molten polymer? (4) What are the processing–property relationships in foam extrusion and structural foam injection molding? Understandably, the answers to such questions depend, among many factors, on: (1) the solubility of the blowing agent in a molten polymer, (2) the diffusivity of the blowing agent in a molten polymer, (3) the concentration of the blowing agent in the mixture with a molten polymer, (4) the chemical structure of the polymers, (5) the initial pressure of the system, and (6) the equilibrium (or initial) temperature of the system.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document