scholarly journals Analysing student achievement of advanced pharmacy practice experience learning outcomes

2021 ◽  
pp. 838-843
Author(s):  
Richard O'Brocta ◽  
Nicole Paolini Albanese
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
General Medicine ◽  
Care Community ◽  
Practice Experience ◽  
Practice Readiness ◽  
Met Expectations

Objectives: To assess the learning outcome achievement of the required Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences (APPE) for the purposes of accreditation, quality improvement, and practice readiness. Methods: At the end of each APPE rotation, students were evaluated on 11 professionalism criteria and 25 skills criteria via a rubric. For the four required rotations (ambulatory patient care, community pharmacy, inpatient general medicine patient care and hospital/health system pharmacy), professionalism and skills outcomes data for the class of 2020 were analysed. Results: A total of 6,293/6,303 (99.84%) of the professionalism ratings met expectations (received a score > 2). The median professionalism rating was 3. A total of 14,286/14,325 (99.7%) of the skills ratings met expectations (received a score > 3). The median skills rating was 4. Conclusion: Calculating and analysing APPE student achievement of learning outcomes supports accreditation standards, can be used for quality improvement and measures practice readiness.

Improving student education and patient care through an innovative introductory pharmacy practice experience

2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. 655-660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul C. Walker ◽  
Kathy S. Kinsey ◽  
Michael D. Kraft ◽  
Nancy A. Mason ◽  
John S. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Student Education ◽  
Practice Experience

Providing quality improvement training in an advanced pharmacy practice experience elective

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Mathura ◽  
Dillon H. Lee ◽  
Ann Thompson ◽  
Natalie McMurtry ◽  
Narmin Kassam
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Practice Experience

scholarly journals Preceptor tips for navigating generational differences with introductory and advanced pharmacy practice experience students

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 2176
Author(s):  
Melinda J. Burnworth ◽  
Tracy K. Pettinger ◽  
Melissa S. Medina ◽  
Mary Niemczyk
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Generation X ◽  
Generational Differences ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Learning Preferences ◽  
Pharmacy Education ◽  
Practice Experience ◽  
Case Vignettes ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Meaningful Interaction

Ideally, precepting during introductory and advanced pharmacy practice experiences should be tailored to meet the individualized needs of learners. Understanding generational similarities and differences that exist between both learners and educators will facilitate meaningful interaction and improve learning outcomes. A common pitfall among preceptors is to judge the values of their pharmacy learners based on the stereotypes of the generations. This tends to be more evident when the preceptor’s generation differs from the generation of the learner. The following article describes generational attributes that influence experiential learning with general tips for how preceptors can use this information to enhance their interactions with learners. By comparing and contrasting the predominant generations in the current pharmacy education landscape (Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Millennials), the article will demonstrate how multi-generational interactions impact pharmacy education. As Millennials are the majority of experiential learners, the focus will be on their learning preferences and how preceptors can help engage these learners. Practical advice and tools on engaging Millennial learners will be reviewed. Case vignettes will demonstrate how to identify ways to tailor precepting to meet the needs of the learner, avoid common pitfalls, facilitate meaningful interaction, and, ultimately, improve learning outcomes.

Prevalence and Impact of Pharmacy Students as Patient Care Extenders in Medically Underserved Community Pharmacies

2019 ◽  
pp. 089719001988106
Author(s):  
Nicole White ◽  
Kimberly Galt ◽  
John E. Ridgway ◽  
Maryann Z. Skrabal ◽  
Rhonda Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Care ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Pharmacy Students ◽  
Medically Underserved ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Student Placement ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Practice Experience ◽  
Underserved Community ◽  
Care Activity

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the prevalence and describe the patient care impact of student pharmacists completing community pharmacy rotations in medically underserved areas (MUAs) in Nebraska. Methods: A list of pharmacy student advanced pharmacy practice experience placements over a 3-year period were obtained from 2 pharmacy schools in Nebraska and then mapped in relation to MUAs in the state. A mixed-methods approach was used to compare and relate findings of a student-logged patient care activity database and semistructured interviews with pharmacy preceptors of participating students. Results: Pharmacy students were placed in 21 (13%) of 159 identified pharmacies located in MUAs. Pharmacy preceptors felt students improved the quality of patient care provided as a result of more uninterrupted time with the patient. Preceptors also indicated that student presence assists both the student and the practicing pharmacist engage in more patient care services. Conclusion: There exists a significant opportunity to utilize advanced pharmacy practice students to extend patient care services and address health-care needs in underserved communities, but student placement in MUAs should be optimized.

scholarly journals Scaling Community Pharmacy Transformation with the ‘Flip the Pharmacy’ Implementation Model: Program Origins

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Anne Marie Kondic ◽  
Troy Trygstad ◽  
Randy McDonough ◽  
Matt Osterhaus
Keyword(s):  
Community Pharmacy ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Care Community ◽  
Implementation Model ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Community Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Payment Models

The rising costs of healthcare, increased chronic illnesses, and healthcare provider burnout has led to an environment desperate for scalable solutions to ease practice burdens. With a projected shortage in the number of primary healthcare providers available to provide team-based care, community-based pharmacy practitioners are accessible and eager to assist. In order to provide enhanced patient care services to aid their clinician colleagues, community-based pharmacists will have to transform their practices to support the provision of enhanced services and medication optimization in value-based payment models. The purpose of this article is to define how multiple factors in pharmacy, healthcare, technology and payment models aligned to create an opportunity for the Community Pharmacy Foundation and CPESN® USA to implement a nationwide community pharmacy practice model called ‘Flip the Pharmacy’.  This new model aims to scale community pharmacy practice transformation and move beyond filling prescriptions at a moment-in-time to caring for patients over time through a 24-month step-wise program paired with in-person pharmacist coaching. Preliminary observations from the first six months of the program highlight community pharmacy as a site of care with community-based pharmacist practitioners providing and documenting targeted patient care interventions.    Article Type: Commentary

scholarly journals The Role of the Pharmacist in Patient Care (Book Review)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-18
Author(s):  
B.K Khanam
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Pharmacy Education ◽  
Care Process ◽  
Education Standards ◽  
Care Community ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Patient Care Process

Most people on the outside of the health care profession are not familiar with this new role of the pharmacist. The general public has created a stereotypical pharmacist's picture as being a person who stands behind a counter, dispenses medicine with some instructions to the respective consumer. Pharmacy practice has changed substantially in recent years. Today’s pharmacists have unique training and expertise in the appropriate use of medications and provide a wide array of patient care services in many different practice settings. As doctors are busy with the diagnosis and treatment of patients, the pharmacist can assist them by selecting the most appropriate drug for a patient. Interventions by the pharmacists have always been considered as a valuable input by the health care community in the patient care process by reducing the medication errors, rationalizing the therapy and reducing the cost of therapy. The development and approval of the Pharmacists’ Patient Care Process by the Joint Commission of Pharmacy Practitioners and incorporation of the Process into the 2016 Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education Standards has the potential to lead to important changes in the practice of pharmacy, and to the enhanced acknowledgment, acceptance, and reimbursement for pharmacy and pharmacist services. As an author, it is my heartiest believe that the book will adjoin significant apprehension to future pharmacists in patient care as most of the portion created from recently published articles focusing pharmacists in patient care settings.

scholarly journals Position Paper on Critical Care Pharmacy Services (Executive Summary): 2020 Update

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (19) ◽  
pp. 1619-1624
Author(s):  
Ishaq Lat ◽  
Christopher Paciullo ◽  
Mitchell J Daley ◽  
Robert MacLaren ◽  
Scott Bolesta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Pharmacy Practice ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Pharmacy Services ◽  
Training And Education

Abstract Objectives Provide a multiorganizational statement to update the statement from a paper in 2000 about critical care pharmacy practice and make recommendations for future practice. Design The Society of Critical Care Medicine, American College of Clinical Pharmacy Critical Care Practice and Research Network, and the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists convened a joint task force of 15 pharmacists representing a broad cross-section of critical care pharmacy practice and pharmacy administration, inclusive of geography, critical care practice setting, and roles. The Task Force chairs reviewed and organized primary literature, outlined topic domains, and prepared the methodology for group review and consensus. A modified Delphi method was used until consensus (>66% agreement) was reached for each practice recommendation. Previous position statement recommendations were reviewed and voted to either retain, revise, or retire. Recommendations were categorized by level of ICU service to be applicable by setting, and grouped into five domains: patient care, quality improvement, research and scholarship, training and education, and professional development. Main Results There are 82 recommendation statements: forty-four original recommendations and 38 new recommendation statements. Thirty-four recommendations were made for patient care, primarily relating to critical care pharmacist duties and pharmacy services. In the quality improvement domain, 21 recommendations address the role of the critical care pharmacist in patient and medication safety, clinical quality programs, and analytics. Nine recommendations were made in the domain of research and scholarship. Ten recommendations are in the domain of training and education and eight recommendations regarding professional development. Conclusions The statements recommended by this taskforce delineate the activities of a critical care pharmacist and the scope of pharmacy services within the ICU. Effort should be made from all stakeholders to implement the recommendations provided, with continuous effort toward improving the delivery of care for critically ill patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document