scholarly journals Using Innovation and Population Health Management to Protect High Risk and Chronic Disease Patients from Covid-19 by Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCS)

Author(s):  
Miku Sodhi
BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e041370
Author(s):  
Charlie Kenward ◽  
Adrian Pratt ◽  
Sam Creavin ◽  
Richard Wood ◽  
Jennifer A Cooper

ObjectivesTo use Population Health Management (PHM) methods to identify and characterise individuals at high-risk of severe COVID-19 for which shielding is required, for the purposes of managing ongoing health needs and mitigating potential shielding-induced harm.DesignIndividuals at ‘high risk’ of COVID-19 were identified using the published national ‘Shielded Patient List’ criteria. Individual-level information, including current chronic conditions, historical healthcare utilisation and demographic and socioeconomic status, was used for descriptive analyses of this group using PHM methods. Segmentation used k-prototypes cluster analysis.SettingA major healthcare system in the South West of England, for which linked primary, secondary, community and mental health data are available in a system-wide dataset. The study was performed at a time considered to be relatively early in the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.Participants1 013 940 individuals from 78 contributing general practices.ResultsCompared with the groups considered at ‘low’ and ‘moderate’ risk (ie, eligible for the annual influenza vaccination), individuals at high risk were older (median age: 68 years (IQR: 55–77 years), cf 30 years (18–44 years) and 63 years (38–73 years), respectively), with more primary care/community contacts in the previous year (median contacts: 5 (2–10), cf 0 (0–2) and 2 (0–5)) and had a higher burden of comorbidity (median Charlson Score: 4 (3–6), cf 0 (0–0) and 2 (1–4)). Geospatial analyses revealed that 3.3% of rural and semi-rural residents were in the high-risk group compared with 2.91% of urban and inner-city residents (p<0.001). Segmentation uncovered six distinct clusters comprising the high-risk population, with key differentiation based on age and the presence of cancer, respiratory, and mental health conditions.ConclusionsPHM methods are useful in characterising the needs of individuals requiring shielding. Segmentation of the high-risk population identified groups with distinct characteristics that may benefit from a more tailored response from health and care providers and policy-makers.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Klein Klein ◽  
Douglas McCarthy McCarthy ◽  
Alexander Cohen Cohen

Iproceedings ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. e17
Author(s):  
Sashi Padarthy ◽  
Cristina Crespo ◽  
Keri Rich ◽  
Nagaraja Srivatsan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document