The Study on the Key Defiance Factors of Probationers under Electronic Monitoring Program

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-90
Author(s):  
Hyunji Lee ◽  
◽  
Younoh Cho
Author(s):  
Ye In (Jane) Hwang ◽  
Paul Leslie Simpson ◽  
Tony Gerard Butler

This study investigates the experiences of victims of domestic violence (DV) involved in a bilateral electronic monitoring (EM) program. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six victims whose associated person of interest participated in an EM program post-release, as well as 13 victim support staff. Thematic analysis revealed seven themes: (1) Safety and validation, (2) Initial anxiety, (3) Minimal intrusion on daily life, (4) Psychological relief and feelings of safety, (5) Freedom to engage in daily activities, (6) Post-EM concerns for safety, and (7) An effective deterrent for some, but not for all. Overall, the experiences reported by victims and support staff were positive and evident of victim-centricity. The main defining experience of the DVEM program for victims was improved feelings of safety during the program and increased autonomy and confidence in going about their daily activities. However, there is an urgent need to consider post-EM safety of victims.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2B) ◽  
Author(s):  
Wagner De Souza Pereira ◽  
Alphonse Kelecom ◽  
Ademir Xavier Da Silva ◽  
José Marquez Lopes ◽  
Alessander Sá Do Carmo ◽  
...  

The Ore Treatment Unit is a deactivated uranium mine and milling situated in Caldas, MG, BR. Although disabled, there are still areas considered controlled and supervised from the radiological point of view. In these areas, it is necessary to keep an occupational monitoring program to ensure the workers' safety and to prevent the dispersion of radioactive material. For area monitoring, the dose rate, in µSv∙h-1, was measured with Geiger Müller (GM) area monitors or personal electronic monitors type GM and thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD), in mSv∙month-1, along the years 2013 to 2016. For area monitoring, 577 samples were recorded; for personal dosimeters monitoring, 2,656; and for TLD monitoring type, 5,657. The area monitoring showed a mean dose rate of 6.42 µSv∙h-1 associated to a standard deviation of 48 µSv∙h-1 with a maximum recorded value of 685 µSv∙h-1. 96 % of the samples were below the derived limit per hour for workers (10 µSv∙h-1). For the personal electronic monitoring, the average of the data sampled was 15.86 µSv∙h-1, associated to a standard deviation of 61.74 µSv∙h-1. 80 % of the samples were below the derived limit and the maximum recorded was 1,220 µSv∙h-1. Finally, the TLD showed a mean of 0.01 mSv∙h-1 (TLD detection limit is 0.2 mSv∙month-1 equivalent to 0.28 µSv∙h-1), associated to a standard deviation of 0.08 mSv∙h-1. 98% of the registered values were below 0.2 mSv∙month-1 and less than 2 % of the measurements had values above the limit of detection. The samples show areas with low risk of external exposure, as can be seen by the TLD evaluation. Specific areas with greater risk of contamination have already been identified, as well as operations at higher risks. In these cases, the use of the individual electronic dosimeter is justified for a more effective monitoring. Radioprotection identified all risks and was able to extend individual electronic monitoring to all risk operations, even with the use of the TLD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Gallagher ◽  
Paul J. Fisher

Numerous cities have enacted electronic monitoring programs at traffic intersections in an effort to reduce the high number of vehicle accidents. The rationale is that the higher expected fines for running a red light will induce drivers to stop and lead to fewer cross-road collisions. However, the cameras also incentivize drivers to accept a greater accident risk from stopping. We evaluate the termination of a monitoring program via a voter referendum using 12 years of geocoded police accident data. We find that the cameras changed the composition of accidents but no evidence of a reduction in total accidents or injuries. (JEL D72, K42, R41)


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18007-e18007
Author(s):  
Noah Xavier Tocci ◽  
Jim Doolin ◽  
Daniel Aaron Roberts ◽  
Christina Cibotti ◽  
Rebekah A Hartwell ◽  
...  

e18007 Background: Patients on oral chemotherapy (OC) often lack consistent education and monitoring, risking toxicity and poor adherence. We developed an OC management program including education and an online tool for active outreach. Methods: In November 2017, we initiated pharmacist-led education for patients newly prescribed OC at a community practice and in the gastrointestinal oncology group at an academic medical center (AMC). An online tool assessing adherence, symptoms, and financial toxicity was emailed to patients three days after starting OC. Non-responders were contacted for phone interviews. A random sample of 28 patients newly started on OC at both sites before the intervention in 2017 was analyzed at baseline. A retrospective chart analysis was done to collect time to symptom assessment, identification and action. A report generated date of first emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization within the AMC. We conducted a Mann Whitney U-Test, using a one-sided p value of 0.025 with Bonferroni correction. Results: Sixty-nine of 106 eligible patients (66%) received education, of whom 36 (52.1%) received the online tool, and 13 (36.1%) responded. There was a significant difference between the intervention and baseline median times to first new/worsening symptoms (p = 0.0105) but otherwise there were no outcome improvements. Eight of 23 patients who did not respond to the electronic tool were interviewed and indicated that their illness impeded their ability to check email (n = 2), and that they never check email (n = 2). Conclusions: This OC management program improved time to detect new/worsening symptoms and could potentially improve outcomes after further patient accrual. Future investigation should examine ways to improve patient responsiveness to electronic patient-reported symptom tools. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 197
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Dyl ◽  
Grzegorz Janicki

Electronic MonitoringSummaryThe main reason for bringing up the idea of electronic monitoring program is not only the bill submitted by a group of members of parliament, but also its advantages for offenders and the society.The concept of electronic monitoring of offenders, first conceived by an American psychologist, Dr. Robert Schweitzgebel in the 1960s, has been developed and implemented in many countries (USA, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, Sweden and Holland.) Programs based on electronic monitoring provide offenders with a more human contact and give opportunities for rehabilitation and reintegration. Electronic monitoring can be used on a number of offenders and suspect groups and situations, including pre-trial defendants, defendants on a conditional release and convicts on probation, parole or house arrest. Electronic monitoring also seems to be an efficient way to keep the budgets under control.The article presents the main problems connected with the idea of electronic monitoring, such as: technical and criminological aspects, aspects related to human rights - the right to privacy, the right to equality - influence on the offender’s family, chances to avoid negative consequences of incarceration. It is certain that bringing electronic monitoring program into effect in Poland should be preceded by a thorough analysis of programs already introduced in other countries - that is why the article tries to compare and contrast programs effective in some of the countries (United Kingdom, Germany, United States, Australia). Furthermore the article presents opinions on the electronic monitoring expressed by Polish probation officers and penal judges as well as their hopes and anxieties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document