scholarly journals Mediation as an Alternative for Settlement of Medical Disputes Between Doctors and Patients in Therapeutic Agreements

2021 ◽  
Vol 04 (06) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariep Mulyadi ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Medical Disputes ◽  
Litigation Process ◽  
Medical Dispute ◽  
Sharp Criticism ◽  
Dispute Mediation

The therapeutic transaction agreement is an agreement between a doctor and a patient which is a legal relationship. Therefore, it gives birth to rights and obligations between doctors and patients which have the potential to cause medical disputes between doctors and patients (malpractice). There are two ways to process medical dispute resolution, namely litigation (through court) and non-litigation (outside court). The litigation process is costly and time-consuming, and often results in one party being the winner and the other party being the loser. The protracted process in court causes a lot of sharp criticism of the judiciary when carrying out its functions, therefore it is necessary to improve the judicial system towards being effective and efficient, especially in medical disputes between doctors and patients. So the medical dispute mediation route between doctors and patients can be an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) that is more effective and efficient. The purpose of this study was to analyze the elements of a therapeutic agreement based on contract law in the Civil Code. And Analyzing mediation as an alternative to dispute resolution of therapeutic agreements for doctors and patients. To achieve this objective, research was conducted using normative juridical legal research methods. So this research approach uses the Statute Approach or research approach to legal products, by examining all laws and regulations related to what will be researched.

scholarly journals Kajian Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik di Indonesia

Wajah Hukum ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 200
Author(s):  
Supeno Supeno
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Level Of Education ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Medical Disputes ◽  
Present Context ◽  
Medical Dispute ◽  
Two Sides

The higher level of education and welfare of the community will make the level of legal awareness of the community higher too, in the present context health care is not only seen as an ordinary relationship but has become a legal relationship between health workers and patients, in that relationship disputes can occur between the two sides parties, in fact many cases / medical disputes are directly processed criminally, Indonesian law has stipulated that if a case occurs then it can be resolved through administrative, civil and criminal law, the purpose of this study is to examine the main priorities of medical dispute resolution in case of suspected error and / or negligence committed by health workers. This paper is an idea and legal study that the author peels normatively. The results of the study indicate that if there is a suspicion of error and / or negligence made by a health worker must be checked first by an honorary assembly and sought as far as possible mediated.

ASAS KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN ASAS KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK SEBAGAI PERTIMBANGAN UTAMA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERBANKAN SYARIAH (Kajian Yuridis Putusan MK Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012)

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Edi Hudiata
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Islamic Banking ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Ideal Norm ◽  
Freedom Of Contract ◽  
Binding Force

Since the verdict of the Constitutional Court (MK) Number 93/PUU-X/2012 pronounced on Thursday, August 29, 2013, concerning the judicial review of Law No. 21 of 2008 on Islamic Banking, it is no longer dualism dispute resolution. The verdict as well as strengthen the jurisdiction of Religious Court to resolve Islamic banking disputes. In consideration of the judges, judges agreed stating that Article 55 paragraph (2) and (3) of Law No. 21 of 2008 which is an ideal norm, contains no constitutional problems. The problem is the explanation of the constitutional article 55 paragraph (2) of the Act. The emergence of the Constitutional Court verdict No. 93/PUU-X/2012 which substantially states that the explanation of Article 55 paragraph (2) of Law No. 21 of 2008 does not have binding force, basically does not violate the principle of freedom of contract which is common in contract law. The parties are allowed to make a dispute resolution agreement out of religious court based on provisions as Act No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. Keywords: dispute resolution, legal certainty and the principle of freedom of contract

scholarly journals Penal Mediation as Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-380
Author(s):  
Anggita Anggraeni
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Law Reform ◽  
Alternative Form ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Descriptive Data ◽  
Long Time ◽  
First Time

In the minor crime, the solving of cases process through formal process in the court is the prosess that is taking much cost and long time it aint suitable with detriments of the crime impact, these all are contrary with the principal fast, simple and unexpensive judicature. Writing this thesis aims to know the legal certainty of implementing Penal Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution and prospects of applying Alternative Dispute Resolution in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. The approach used in this research is a qualitative research approach that produces descriptive data in the form of people's written or oral words and observable behavior. The type of research that will be used in this research is doctrinal research. Penal mediation is an alternative form of resolving disputes outside the court (commonly known as ADR or "Alternative Dispute Resolution" and some call it "Apropriate Dispute Resolution"). Penal mediation for the first time is known in positive legal terminology in Indonesia since the issuance of KAPOLRI No. Pol: B / 3022 / XII / 2009 / SDEOPS dated December 14, 2009 concerning Handling Cases through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), even though they are partial. In essence, the principles of mediation of the penalties referred to in this KAPOLRI letter emphasize that the settlement of criminal cases using ADR, must be agreed by the parties that litigate, but if there is no new agreement resolved in accordance with applicable legal procedures in a professional and proportional manner.

Labour Law

Japanese Law ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 405-430
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Oda
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Second World War ◽  
World War ◽  
Labour Law ◽  
The Us ◽  
Second World

Basic labour laws were introduced into Japan after the Second World War from the US. A new law—Labour Contract Law—was enacted in 2007. This law more or less codifies the existing case law. A new alternative dispute resolution (ADR) system for employment disputes was introduced.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Sengketa Para Pihak Yang Telah Terikat Dalam Perjanjian Arbitrase (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-123
Author(s):  
Ni Made Intan Maharani ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Class I ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
The Way

Aside from going through the courts, there are alternatives that can be passed through the dispute, namely negotiation, mediation and arbitration. Arbitration institutions are bodies chosen by the parties to the dispute to provide decisions regarding certain disputes, these institutions can also provide a binding opinion of a legal relationship from matters that have not arisen yet. The formulation of the problem raised in this study is how this arrangement for dispute resolution of parties who have been bound in an arbitration agreement, as well as how the judges' legal considerations in resolving disputes in an arbitration agreement. This research is a normative legal research. Arrangement for dispute resolution of parties that have been bound in the arbitration agreement is contained in law number 30 of 1999 concerning arbitration and alternative dispute resolution, in which the dispute resolution is handed over by professional Arbitrators who will act as judges or private courts who will apply the procedure the way the peace law has been mutually agreed upon by the parties to arrive at a final and binding decision. Judge's Legal Considerations in the Case Verdict of the Denpasar District Court Class I A Number 3/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Dps. that is based on Article 3 of Law Number 30 of 1999 Concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution, which states that the District Court is not authorized to adjudicate disputes of parties who have been bound in an arbitration agreement Selain melalui pengadilan, teruntuk mengatasi kasus sengketa ada suatu alternatif yang dapat dilalui, yaitu dengan cara negosiasi, mediasi, dan arbitrase. Lembaga arbitrase merupakan badan yang dipilih oleh para pihak yang bersengketa untuk memberikan putusan mengenai sengketa tertentu, lembaga tersebut juga dapat memberikan pendapat yang mengikat dari sebuah keterkaitan hukum dari hal yang belum timbul sengketa. Adapun rumusan masalah yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana ini pengaturan penyelesaian sengketa para pihak yang telah terikat dalam perjanjian arbitrase, serta bagaimana pertimbangan hukum hakim dalam penyelesaian sengketa dalam perjanjian arbitrase. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normative. Pengaturan penyelesaian sengketa para pihak yang telah terikat dalam perjanjian arbitrase yaitu terdapat pada undang-undang nomor 30 tahun 1999 tentang arbitarse dan alternatif penyelesaian sengketa umum, yang dimana penyelesaian sengketa tersebut diserahkan Arbiter yang profesional yang akan bertindak sebagai hakim atau peradilan swasta yang akan menerapkan tata cara hukum perdamaian yang telah disepakati bersama oleh para pihak tersebut untuk sampai pada putusan yang final dan mengikat. Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Putusan Perkara Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Kelas I A Nomor 3/Pdt.G/2017/PN.Dps. yaitu didasarkan pada Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, yang menyatakan bahwa Pengadilan Negeri tidak berwenang untuk mengadili sengketa para pihak yang telah terikat dalam perjanjian arbitrase.

scholarly journals The Urgency of Restorative Justice on Medical Dispute Resolution in Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 362-392
Author(s):  
Lego Karjoko ◽  
I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani ◽  
Abdul Kadir Jaelani ◽  
Jaco Barkhuizen ◽  
Muhammad Jihadul Hayat
Keyword(s):  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Maximum Output ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Medical Disputes ◽  
Medical Dispute

Medical disputes in Indonesia are regulated by a host of laws. The important question that needs to be asked, however, is whether those laws have guaranteed justice for patients and doctors. This study aims to analyze the urgency of restorative justice in medical disputes. It explores secondary data and is normative legal research. The data was gathered through library research consisting of data collection activities based on several publications. This study focuses on legal principles with a doctrinal approach. It concludes that restorative justice is urgent to use in medical, criminal, and civil cases. This is evident in the will of the Health Law which prioritizes mediation as the first mechanism before being brought to trial. Furthermore, the use of restorative justice in medical dispute resolution is driven by the presence of three conditions: First is structural challenges among law enforcers and their limited capabilities in dealing with complex medical cases; Second is the condition of Indonesian correctional institutions which is overburdened and unable to provide maximum output, and the third is the relatively low number of Indonesian health workers. (Sengketa Medis di Indonesia telah diatur dalam beberapa peraturan perundang-undangan. Namun, pertanyaan penting yang perlu diajukan yaitu apakah peraturan yang ada telah menjamin kedilan bagi pasien dan dokter. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis urgensi prinsip keadilan restoratif dalam penyelesaian sengketa medis. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang mengkaji data sekunder. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi pustaka (library research), yaitu kegiatan pengumpulan data yang berasal dari berbagai literatur. Penelitian ini fokus pada asas-asas hukum dengan pendekatan dokrinal. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa prinsip keadilan restoratif penting diterapkan dalam kasus medis, pidana, maupun perdata. Ini misalnya dapat dilihat dari i’tikad baik dalam Hukum Kesehatan yang mempriorotaskan mediasi sebagai mekanisme pertama sebelum dibawa ke pengadilan. Dalam konteks sengketa medis, prinsip keadilan restoratif menjadi urgen untuk diterapkan sedikitnya karena tiga hal; pertama adalah tantangan struktural di kalangan para penegak hukum serta kemampuan mereka yang terbatas dalam menghadapi kasus medis yang biasanya kompleks. Kedua, kondisi lembaga pemasyarakatan Indonesia yang over kapastias sehingga tidak mampu memberikan output yang maksimal; dan ketiga adalah jumlah tenaga kesehatan di Indonesia yang relatif rendah.

scholarly journals Family mediation as a form of alternative dispute resolution in Poland

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-17
Author(s):  
Dorota Rynkowska
Keyword(s):  
Social Change ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Alternative Dispute Resolution ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Close Relationships ◽  
Family Mediation ◽  
Dispute Mediation

For years, mediation has been unused as an institutionalised form of dispute resolution. The introduction of methods for alternative dispute resolution (ADR) into social life, including the use of impartial mediation in the practice of the Polish justice system, signals some social change. The practice and procedure of mediation is of particular importance in cases regarding close relationships between people. This article explains and promotes family mediation as a form of ADR. Experience shows that mediation in family matters brings a number of benefits to conflicted parties and the justice system.   Keywords: Conflict, dispute, mediation, family.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document