scholarly journals Endoscopic 3-S Technique Tympanoplasty: Taking the Convention a Step Ahead

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-185
Author(s):  
Mridul Janweja ◽  
Sayan Hazra ◽  
Arindam Das ◽  
Arya Brata Dubey
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Surgery ◽  
Routine Activity ◽  
Middle Ear Surgery ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Operating Microscope ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction Endoscopic Surgery has immense potential for middle ear surgery and is currently favoured by many surgeons. The 3 (vascular) Strips/ 3 Flap Tympanoplasty with operating microscope is popular but Endoscopic 3-Flap Tympanoplasty remains less explored. Hence this study was conducted to compare advantages and disadvantages of Endoscopic and Microscopic 3-Flap Tympanoplasty. Materials and Methods Forty two patients with large/subtotal perforation of tympanic membrane were divided into two equal groups (Group A & B). Endoscope was used in Group A, whereas, operating microscope in Group B. Temporalis fascia was the graft material in all patients. Patients were followed up for six months. Pre and post-operative audiograms, post-operative pain, graft uptake, time taken for surgery and intra-operative visualization convenience were compared. Results Mean Air-Bone Gap closure at the end of six months was 9.23 dB (SD-0.88 dB) in the endoscope group and 8.95 dB (SD-0.66 dB) in microscope group whereas the graft uptake rate was 95.2% and 90.2% respectively. Post-operative pain, cosmesis, ease of doing surgery and time taken for surgery were better in ‘Endoscope’ as compared to ‘Microscope’ group. Conclusion The three flaps produce adequate exposure in very large or subtotal perforations, very thin anterior rim or with anterior bony overhang. Results in terms of mean hearing gain and graft uptake were comparable. In terms of morbidity (post-op pain), recovery (return to routine activity), mean duration of surgery and cosmesis, endoscopic surgery produced better outcome.

scholarly journals Impact of the Surgical Approach: A Comparative Study between Transcanal and Posterior Tympanotomy Approach for Cochlear Implantation

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (01) ◽  
pp. 10-15
Author(s):  
Neeraj Suri ◽  
Satya Sandilya ◽  
Ruta Sayani ◽  
Amit Anand
Keyword(s):  
Speech Intelligibility ◽  
Rating Scales ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Posterior Tympanotomy ◽  
Auditory Integration ◽  
Group B ◽  
Approach Group

Abstract Introduction The aim of our study is to compare the surgical complications of the transcanal and posterior tympanotomy approach and to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of both techniques. Materials and Methods It is a prospective study involving 252 pediatric cochlear implant patients operated in the Department of ENT, GMERS Medical College and General Hospital, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India. Out of these, 126 patients were operated by transcanal approach (group A) and 126 patients were operated by posterior tympanotomy approach (group B). Results No significant difference in the mean duration of surgery (p > 0.064) was observed in both the groups. Major complications occurred in 60.2% of group A and 3.1% of group B and minor complications occurred in 65% of group A and 3.1% in group B, which is highly significant (p < 0.0134). The categories of auditory perception, speech intelligibility rating scales, meaningful auditory integration scale, and meaningful use of speech scale were assessed in both groups. Conclusion Complication rate in the transcanal approach is higher as compared with posterior tympanotomy approach. A complete alignment and introduction of electrode array into the basal turn of cochlea is more favorable in the posterior tympanotomy approach. Transcanal technique even as an alternative may not be useful. Outcomes may be affected depending upon the technique chosen.

scholarly journals A comparative study between onlay and sublay meshplasty in ventral hernias: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1264
Author(s):  
Tharun Ganapathy Chitrambalam ◽  
Preetham Anguraj ◽  
Jeyakumar Sundaraj ◽  
Manimaran Pethuraj
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Ventral Hernia ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Ventral Hernias

Background: Ventral hernias are one of the most common surgical problems of the modern age. About 15-18% of all the surgical procedures performed around the world comprises of hernia repair. This study aims to compare the two common options of mesh placement in open ventral hernia repairs; over the anterior rectus sheath, the ‘Onlay meshplasty’ and in the retrorectus plane, the ‘Sublay meshplasty’.Methods: A prospective controlled study was done between March 2017 to August 2018 on 150 patients with ventral hernia randomizing patients into 2 groups. Group A (Onlay meshplasty) and Group B (Sublay meshplasty). Duration of surgery, post-operative pain, wound infection, duration of hospital stay and recurrences were analysed with 12 months follow up.Results: The mean duration of surgery in group A was 48.49±0.71 minutes and in group B was 72.84±0.72 minutes. Group B experienced significantly lesser pain when compared with group A. The mean asepsis score in group A was 3.60±1.09 and in group B was 0.47±0.30 with a p value of 0.006. Group A had significantly longer hospital stay (9.39 days) than group B (5.71 days). The recurrences in both the groups were statistically insignificant (Group A- 2 patients; Group B- 1 patient).Conclusions: Sublay meshplasty although requires longer time to perform, proves to be a better alternate in terms of post-operative pain, wound infection and hospital stay.

scholarly journals Comparison Between Paracetamol Vs Voltral Suppositories For Post Operative Pain In Gynaecological Procedure

Esculapio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-194
Author(s):  
Zeeshan Khan ◽  
Saadia Khaleeq ◽  
Abaid ur Rehman ◽  
Aasam Maan ◽  
Umer Farooq ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Score ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Gynaecological Surgery ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Intravenous Paracetamol ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare intravenous paracetamol vs Voltral (Diclofenac) suppositories for post operative pain in gynaecological procedures. Methods: This was a non randomized controlled trial that was carried out at Department of Anaesthesiology, Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Rahim Yar Khan during 01-07-2019 to 31-12-2019 in which all female cases with age range of 20 to 60 year undergoing any gynaecological surgery requiring general anaesthesia were included. The cases were divided into two equal groups and anesthesia was offered in standard doses. Just before reversal the cases in group Awere given intravenous paracetamol in a dose of 1 gm stat and then at 8-hour interval and those in group B were offered diclofenac suppositories in a dose of 50 mg twice a day, 12 hours apart. The pain was assessed at 4,8,12 and 24 hours and was labelled on visual analogue scale (VAS). Results: In this study there were 62 cases (31 in each group). The mean age in group A and B was 45.41±10.21 vs 48.12±11.13 years with p= 0.47. Mean duration of surgery in both groups was 57.51±15.23 vs53.11±14.79 minutes with p= 0.81. There was no significant difference in mean pain score at 4 and 8 hours with p= 0.91 and 0.81 respectively in group A and B. Mean pain score was 4.43±1.67 vs 3.21±1.09 with p= 0.01 at 12 and 4.57±1.71 vs 3.34±1.27 at 24 hours in group A and B with p values of 0.01 each. Mean time taken for rescue analgesia was 9.13±2.11 in group Aand 13.11±1.23 hours in group B with p= 0.001. Conclusion: Voltral (Diclofenac sodium) suppositories are better than paracetamol infusion in controlling pain after gynecological surgeries and this difference is significantly better at 12 and 24 hours. Key words: Gynaecological surgery, Pain, Paracetamol, Voltral suppository How to cite: Khan Z., Khaleeq S., Rehman Ur A., Maan A., Farooq U. Nadeem A. Comparison Between Paracetamol Vs Voltral Suppositories for Post-Operative Pain in Gynaecological Procedures. Esculapio 2021;17(02):191-194.

scholarly journals A comparative study of using temporalis fascia autograft and dehydrated temporal fascia homograft in tympanoplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 1669
Author(s):  
Hemendra Bamaniya ◽  
Padam Chand Ajmera
Keyword(s):  
Graft Material ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Temporalis Fascia ◽  
Suppurative Otitis Media ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Temporal Fascia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of the present study was to compare the results of tympanoplasty operations performed using autograft temporalis fascia with those of dehydrated temporalis fascia homograft.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This prospective study was conducted in the department of ENT of Pacific Medical College and Hospital, Udaipur in duration from February 2014 to January 2015. The study included 90 patients of chronic suppurative otitis media with dry, central perforation of tympanic membrane. The patients were divided into two groups with 45 members in each group. In group A, temporalis fascia autograft was used and in group B, dehydrated temporalis fascia homograft was used for tympanoplasty. Results were evaluated in terms of graft uptake rate and hearing improvement.  </p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> There were 50 male and 40 female patients in the study. Most of the patients (43.33%) were of the age group 21-30 years, followed by age group 31-40 years (24.44%). Post-operatively, 95.55% patients in group A and 91.11% patients in group B showed successful graft uptake. Mean preoperative AB gap in group A patients was 31.46±6.78 dB which was reduced to 13.01±5.61 dB postoperatively. Similarly, in group B patients, AB gap was reduced from 29.81±5.99 to 12.92±6.01 dB postoperatively. No statistically significant difference was observed between groups while comparing pre and postoperative AB gap.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The results of tympanoplasty done by using either homograft or autograft were the same so dehydrated temporalis fascia homograft can be used as an alternative graft material with the same success rate wherever possible with the advantage of reduction in duration of surgery.</p>

scholarly journals A study to evaluate and compare the outcomes of endoscope versus microscope assisted myringoplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 988
Author(s):  
K. Sharath Babu ◽  
R. Shankar
Keyword(s):  
Sinus Tympani ◽  
Graft Take ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
The Difference ◽  
One Year ◽  
Group B

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> In microscope assisted middle ear procedures surgeons can only observe the parts of the tympanic cavity, the hidden areas, such as the facial recess and sinus tympani, would not be visualised which needs to be exposed for performing tympanoplasty. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of microscope versus endoscope assisted myringoplasties in terms of duration of the procedure, graft take up, improvement in hearing and incidence of any complications.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> A prospective comparative study was conducted for a period of one year. A total of 72 patients with CSOM were randomised into two groups of 36 each. Group A patients (n=36) underwent traditional myringoplasty under a microscope and group B patients (n=36) endoscopic assisted myringoplasty was performed. Post-operatively all the patients were followed up for a period of one year. During the follow-up period patients were assessed for the graft take up, hearing improvement, incidence of complications and recurrence rate between the two groups.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Successful graft uptake was observed in 88.8% among patients underwent microscope assisted myringoplasty and it was 94.4% in endoscopic assisted myringoplasty. The mean duration of surgery was 123 mins in microscopic assisted group compared to 92 mins in endoscopic assisted group and the difference was found to be statistically significant. Similarly, the cosmetic results and the post-operative pain were more favorable for endoscopic assisted group than microscopic assisted group and the difference was found to be statistically significant.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Enoscopic assisted procedure could be considered as a better alternative for microscopic assisted myringoplasty.</p>

scholarly journals Microsurgical unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression of degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed I. Refaat ◽  
Amr K. Elsamman ◽  
Adham Rabea ◽  
Mohamed I. A. Hewaidy
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Decompression Surgery ◽  
Microsurgical Decompression ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Background The quest for better patient outcomes is driving to the development of minimally invasive spine surgical techniques. There are several evidences on the use of microsurgical decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar spine stenosis; however, few of these studies compared their outcomes with the traditional laminectomy technique. Objectives The aim of our study was to compare outcomes following microsurgical decompression via unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) of the spinal canal to the standard open laminectomy for cases with lumbar spinal stenosis. Subjects and methods Cases were divided in two groups. Group (A) cases were operated by conventional full laminectomy; Group (B) cases were operated by (ULBD) technique. Results from both groups were compared regarding duration of surgery, blood loss, perioperative complication, and postoperative outcome and patient satisfaction. Results There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the improvement of visual pain analogue, while improvement of neurogenic claudication outcome score was significant in group (B) than group (A). Seventy-three percent of group (A) cases and 80% of group (B) stated that surgery met their expectations and were satisfied from the outcome. Conclusion Comparing ULBD with traditional laminectomy showed the efficacy of the minimally invasive technique in obtaining good surgical outcome and patient satisfaction. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding the occurrence of complications The ULBD technique was found to respect the posterior spinal integrity and musculature, accompanied with less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and shorter recovery periods than the open laminectomy technique.

scholarly journals Monopolar Diathermy Tonsillectomy Versus Dissection Method Tonsillectomy

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
Md Abdus Salam ◽  
Md Mahbub Alam ◽  
Rezwan Ahmed ◽  
Md Sultan Mahmud
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Throat Pain ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Case Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B ◽  
Dissection Method

Background: Tonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide by otorhinolaryngologists for different indications. Tonsillectomy is often performed as day-case surgery, which increases the demands of a satisfactory postoperative pain control and a low risk of early postoperative bleeding. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the Monopolar diathermy and Dissection methods of tonsillectomy and evaluate their advantages and disadvantages during surgery, convalescence. Materials and Methods: Two hundred children were recruited for this study during the period of five years from January, 2014 to December, 2018 at Otolaryngology department of Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College and Hospital (KYAMCH). Subjects between the age of 5 and 25 years listed for tonsillectomy were included. Subjects were recommended not to have aspirin within the 2 weeks before surgery. Results: The mean duration of operation was found 10.6±0.4 minutes in group A and 17.0±0.7 minutes in group B. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) between two groups. At 1st day, 11(11.0%) patients had throat pain in group A and 23(23.0%) in group B. At 2nd day, 14(14.0%) patients had throat pain in group A and 25(25.0%) in group B. Which were statistically significant (p<0.05) between two groups. Conclusion: The monopolar diathermy tonsillectomy appears to cause less bleeding, postoperative pain and less time consuming in compare with the dissection tonsillectomy although patients experience slightly more pain than dissection Method. KYAMC Journal Vol. 10, No.-1, April 2019, Page 21-24

Frequency of port site infection following gall bladder removal through Epigastric vs Umbilical port.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (03) ◽  
pp. 277-281
Author(s):  
Bushra Shaikh ◽  
Imamuddin Baloch ◽  
Azhar Ali Shah ◽  
Abdul Sami Mirani ◽  
Parkash Lal Lund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gall Bladder ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Port Site ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Medical College ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the frequency of port site wound infection following gall bladder removal through umbilical and epigastric port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Study Design: Randomized Control Trial. Setting: Surgical Unit 2, Ghulam Muhammad Mahar Medical College, hospital Sukkur. Period: 1st November 2019 to 30th October 2020. Material & Methods: All cases who underwent four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in two groups. All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. As the last event of surgery gall bladder was retrieved in a glove bag through umbilical port in group A and through epigastric port in group B, both under direct camera vision. Wound infection was considered if there was 3 to 5 grade of wound according to Southampton wound grading system (Figure-1) on 5th postoperative day. All demographics and outcome variables were recorded. Results: Age ranged from 20 to 60 years with mean age of 38.875±8.11 years, BMI 29.973±5.12 Kg/m2, duration of surgery 50.656±8.41 mins and Southampton score was 1.044±1.07 in Group A and mean age of 38.560±6.23 years, BMI 27.437±5.04 Kg/m2, duration of surgery 48.920±8.67 mins and Southampton score was 0.856±0.92 in Group B. In group A, 18 (5.7%)patients developed port site wound infection in contrast to 5 (1.6%) patients in group B (P= 0.006). Conclusion: We conclude that epigastric port retrieval of gall bladder following laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in less port site infection.

scholarly journals Comparison of two different techniques of uterine closure in caesarean section: Continuous single layer technique versus Babu and Magon technique

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 2197
Author(s):  
S. Vinayachandran ◽  
Vedhapriya Sudhakar
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Single Layer ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Caesarean Scar ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Layer Technique ◽  
Observational Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: To compare size of the caesarean scar and residual myometrial thickness (RMT) between continuous single non-interlocking and Babu and Magon technique for uterine closure following primary elective caesarean section (CS).Methods: An observational prospective cohort study was conducted at 6 weeks and 4 months postpartum following primary elective CS. Group A included 25 patients who underwent continuous single layer technique and Group B included 25 patients who underwent Babu and Magon technique for uterine closure. Baseline demographic profile, obstetric score, details of the CS and associated complications were studied. Two-dimensional Transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) measurements of the length, width and depth of the caesarean scar and RMT were compared.Results: Mean age of study population was 29.6 years. Malpresentation (44%) was the most common indication for CS. Mean Bishops score at the time of CS was <4. The duration of surgery (-2.8 min, 37.96 ±5.660min) and estimated amount of blood loss (-51.6 ml, mean 671.20 ±136.208ml) was less in Group A compared to Group B (40.76 ±4.68min, 722.80±132.083ml respectively). The caesarean scar measurements were similar in both groups at both visits. The mean RMT in Group B at 6 weeks and 4 months postpartum (8.05mm±2.06 and 7.10mm±2.04 respectively) was statistically higher than Group A (6.23mm ± 1.76 and 5.36mm ± 1.70 respectively), p=0.002.Conclusions: We conclude that Babu and Magon technique for uterine closure in caesarean section could result in better healing of the scar and probably reduce the adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancies.

scholarly journals Effect of acupuncture TENS versus conventional TENS on post cesarean section incision pain

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 3738
Author(s):  
Priti A. Mehendale ◽  
Mayur T. Revadkar
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Control Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Random Allocation ◽  
Lower Segment Caesarean Section ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Pain Rating Scale

Background: There is evidence regarding beneficial use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on post Lower Segment Caesarean Section (LSCS) incision pain. However, efficacy of different types of TENS following C section pain has not yet been explored adequately.Methods: 96 women who had recently undergone LSCS were included for the study. The subjects were in the age group of 20 to 40 years (25.84±3.96); having pain intensity 4 or more on Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). They were divided into three groups by random allocation method; namely Group A: Acupuncture (Low/Motor) TENS, Group B: Conventional (High/Sensory) TENS and Group C: Control group. Group A and B received specific type of TENS twice a day for 15 minutes. Control group C did not receive any TENS intervention. All subjects received standard post-operative medications and physiotherapy. Pain intensity was recorded on NPRS pre and post intervention.Results: Both Acupuncture TENS and Conventional TENS significantly decreased post-operative pain intensity as compared to control group (p value <0.0001).Conclusions: Both, acupuncture and conventional TENS are equally effective in reducing post LSCS incision pain at a strong and non-painful intensity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document