scholarly journals Hak Milik Atas Tanah Adat Di Wilayah Kepulauan

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Mispa Christian Science Paisina ◽  
Adonia Ivone Laturette ◽  
Novyta Uktolseja

Introductioan: The Western Seram Islands have various customary rights that grow and develop in the lives of indigenous peoples and it becomes a rule that is believed by them, so that it becomes a law that binds them in determining their ownership rights to their customary land.Purposes of the Research: This study aims to determine how the position of customary land ownership rights in the national land law system, and what is the legal basis and the way in which customary land ownership rights occur according to customary law.Methods of the Research: This study uses the normative legal research method, which aims to find out how the position of ownership rights over customary land in the national land law system in the areas of Taniwel Timur, Negeri Maloang and Negeri Sohuwe, West Seram Regency, Maluku Province, and to understand what the legal basis and How to Have Land Ownership Rights According to Customary Law in the Taniwel Timur District, Maloang State and Sohuwe State, West Seram Regency, Maluku Province.Results of the Research: In principle, ownership of land rights by a member or group of customary law communities, whether individual or communal / group, has a very binding power de jure and de facto. The principle of ownership in the provision of de jure guarantees in the sense that the customary law community recognizes that if ownership rights are obtained by means of the permission of the head of the association (Kepala Adat or Kepala Soa), to open and manage land for customary law communities it can be said to be a legal act that is legal according to law. adat as long as it does not contradict the prevailing customary law norms, and the principle of ownership in a de facto manner, namely that the principle of ownership has been obtained from generation to generation. This is what the local government must pay attention to in terms of recognition of rights by customary law communities in West Seram District, Maluku Province.

SASI ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Desy Kosita Hallauw ◽  
Jenny Kristiana Matuankotta ◽  
Novyta Uktolseja

Relinquishment of land rights is the relinquishment of legal relations between the holders of land rights and the land under their control by providing compensation on the basis of deliberation. Letter of Waiver of rights is evidence that is made with the aim of releasing land rights. A letter of release of customary land rights (dati) is applied in the same way as the release of land rights in general, as enforced in accordance with Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. The process of registering customary land rights (dati) is based on the release of customary rights (dati) issued by the customary land owner (dati) as the basis for rights. So based on the release of land rights, it can be registered at the Ambon City Land Office to obtain proof of land ownership or certificates. The letter of release of customary land rights (dati) issued by the customary State Government in Ambon City is binding as long as it is carried out based on applicable customary law and can be proven the basis of ownership rights to customary land (dati) from the customary land owner (dati) that issues the release letter the land rights. However, as long as it cannot be proven valid, the letter of release of land rights does not have binding power, thus the release of the customary land rights (dati) becomes invalid and the certificate can be canceled.


Notaire ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 489
Author(s):  
Wimba Roofi Hutama

The Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia recently issued Ministerial Regulation of ATR No. 18 of 2019 concerning Procedures for Administration of Customary Land Community Units of Customary Law. However, the reality is that until now there are still ulayat lands of customary law community units whose management, control and use are based on local customary law provisions and are recognized by the members of the customary law community unit concerned. The research uses normative research, namely normative juridical research, namely research based on applicable laws and legal norms and has binding power to answer the legal issues faced. The results obtained are that the characteristics of customary rights of customary law communities, that customary rights to land are controlled by customary law communities, namely people who live in groups, hereditary based on ties of origin/ancestor or similarity of residence, have the same culture, live in a certain area, have customary property that is jointly owned, have customary institutions containing sanctions, as long as they are still alive according to developments and do not conflict with national law.Keywords: Existence; Customary Rights; Minister of Agrarian Regulation.Menteri Agraria Dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia baru-baru ini menerbitkan Permen ATR No. 18 Tahun 2019 Tentang Tata Cara Penatausahaan Tanah Ulayat Kesatuan Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Namun kenyataannya hingga kini masih terdapat tanah ulayat kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat yang pengurusan, penguasaan dan penggunaannya didasarkan pada ketentuan hukum adat setempat dan diakui oleh para warga kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat yang bersangkutan”. Penelitian dengan menggunakan penelitian normatif, yaitu penelitian yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian didasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan atau norma-norma hukum yang berlaku dan mempunyai kekuatan mengikat guna manjawab isu hukum yang dihadapi. Diperoleh hasil bahwa Karakteristik hak ulayat masyarakat hukum adat, bahwa hak ulayat atas tanah tersebut dikuasai oleh masyarakat hukum adat, yakni masyarakat yang hidup berkelompok, turun menurun berdasarkan ikatan asal usul/leluhur atau kesamaan tempat tinggal, berbudaya sama, hidup dalam satu wilayah tertentu, memiliki harta benda adat milik bersama, mempunyai pranata adat mengandung sanksi, sepanjang masih hidup sesuai perkembangan dan tidak bertentangan dengan hukum nasional.Kata Kunci: Eksistensi; Hak Ulayat; Peraturan Menteri Agraria.


Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Priska Irvine Loupatty ◽  
Julius Sembiring ◽  
Ahmad Nashih Luthfi

Abstract: Land registration through PTSL activities is conducted for all parcels of land throughout Indonesia. However, there are some ohoi in Southeast Maluku regency that refuse the registration of land which has been implemented through PTSL in recent years, whereas almost all of ohoi in Southeast Maluku Regency has already done land registration. This study aims to determine the implementation of PTSL in Ohoi Ngabub and Ohoi Sathean, the reason the Ohoi Sathean indigenous people accepted PTSL activities and the Ohoi Ngabub indigenous people rejected PTSL activities, and the land law system that applies in both ohoi. The research method used is qualitative with a sociolegal approach. The results showed that PTSL-UKM activities carried out in 2017 at Ohoi Sathean received good responses from the Ohoi Government and indigenous people of Ohoi Sathean, while the Ohoi Ngabub government refused to do PTSL activities. This is due to the local land law system that applies in both ohois. The local land law system that applies in Ohoi Sathean is individual land ownership, whereas the local land law system that applies in Ohoi Ngabub is joint land ownership. Keywords: customary land, communal rights, PTSL, indigenous peoples of Kei Intisari: Pendaftaran tanah melalui kegiatan PTSL dilakukan untuk seluruh bidang tanah di seluruh wilayah Indonesia. Akan tetapi terdapat beberapa ohoi (desa) di Kabupaten Maluku Tenggara yang menolak dilaksanakannya pendaftaran tanah melalui PTSL, sedangkan hampir seluruh ohoi sudah dilakukan pendaftaran tanah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan PTSL di Ohoi Ngabub dan Ohoi Sathean, alasan masyarakat adat Ohoi Sathean menerima kegiatan PTSL dan masyarakat adat Ohoi Ngabub menolak kegiatan PTSL, dan sistem hukum pertanahan lokal yang berlaku di kedua ohoi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu kualitatif dengan pendekatan sosiolegal. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kegiatan PTSLUKM yang dilaksanakan pada tahun 2017 lalu di Ohoi Sathean mendapatkan tanggapan yang baik dari perangkat ohoi dan masyarakat adat Ohoi Sathean sedangkan perangkat Ohoi Ngabub menolak untuk dilakukan kegiatan PTSL. Hal ini disebabkan oleh sistem hukum pertanahan lokal yang berlaku di kedua ohoi. Sistem hukum pertanahan lokal yang berlaku di Ohoi Sathean yaitu kepemilikan tanah secara individual, sedangkan sistem hukum pertanahan lokal yang berlaku di Ohoi Ngabub yaitu kepemilikan tanah secara bersama. Kata kunci: tanah adat, hak komunal, PTSL, masyarakat adat kei


2019 ◽  
pp. 181-216
Author(s):  
Martin George ◽  
Antonia Layard

According to Section 17 of England’s Limitation Act 1980, a person who loses the right to recover possession of land also loses his title to that land. The corollary is that the person who takes possession of the land acquires ownership rights. In cases where title is unregistered, English Land Law provides that ownership of land or, more accurately, estates in land, is a relative concept. In a dispute over entitlement to possession of land, the court must determine which of the two claimants has a better right to possess, rather than who is the owner. This chapter explains legal aspects of possessing land titles in England. After providing an overview of land ownership and possession, it discusses the rationale of the statute of limitation, the link between registered land and human rights, limitation under the Limitation Act 1980, the accrual of a right of action, and adverse possession.


Author(s):  
Mark P. Thompson ◽  
Martin George

According to Section 17 of England’s Limitation Act 1980, a person who loses the right to recover possession of land also loses his title to that land. The corollary is that the person who takes possession of the land acquires ownership rights. In cases where title is unregistered, English Land Law provides that ownership of land or, more accurately, estates in land, is a relative concept. In a dispute over entitlement to possession of land, the court must determine which of the two claimants has a better right to possess, rather than who is the owner. This chapter explains legal aspects of possessing land titles in England. After providing an overview of land ownership and possession, it discusses the rationale of the statute of limitation, the link between registered land and human rights, limitation under the Limitation Act 1980, the accrual of a right of action, and adverse possession.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Yanto Sufriadi

This study focuses on the concept of land ownership rights based on Indonesian customary law and Islamic law. This study is a normative legal research with the approach of statutory law, customary law and Islamic law. Data obtained through library research. Based on this study, it is concluded that both Indonesian Customary Law and Islamic Law recognize individual ownership of land, but that ownership has a social function, namely that land rights must provide benefits for welfare, both the welfare of the owner and the welfare of the community. Both Indonesian Customary Law and Islamic Law prohibit land ownership that is detrimental to the welfare of others. This concept is expected to become a reference in formulating the ownership of material rights in Indonesian National Law.


2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 175
Author(s):  
Mustafa Bola

Prove of land ownership by customary land is generally unwritten, just a confession of the surrounding communities with nature sign boundaries. If land ownership cannot be supported by strong evidence, the land may be registered by someone else who has getting physically for 20 years or more in consecutively and qualified on Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. Proof of old rights derived from the customary land law is rationally difficult to prove because there are no written documents. Customary land law does not know written ownership, only physical possession continually so it is very prone to conflict or dispute. In order to develop land administration in Indonesia, the values of customary land law contained in its principles is expected to be reflected in the land administration so it can reduce land conflict in the community. The role of customary land law has a large portion of the national land law. The role of government or ruling is very important to create a conducive condition in the land sector. A land is not allowed for personal or group interests, its use must be adjusted with the condition and the characteristic of their rights so useful, both for the prosperity and helpful to community and state.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yermolenko Iryna ◽  

The article is devoted to the land and legal creativity of a member of the Commission for the Study of Customary Law of Ukraine, established in 1921 at the All-Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, O.S. Dobrov, in particular the peculiarities of the introduction into the mechanism of legal regulation of the then land relations of local customs. As a positive point, the proposed expansion of the historical period of existence of domestic land law, starting from the XVI century. It is stated that modern Ukrainian representatives of legal science have overlooked this fact. A debatable point in the work of O.S. Dobrov is an insufficiently substantiated proposal to apply local customs in land law through the prism of their compliance with the principle of compliance with the Civil Code of compliance with the socio-economic purpose of any civil rights of citizens called to implement solely to develop productive forces. Attention is drawn to the insufficient elaboration of empirical material by the scientist, because the illogical substitution of the basic private law principle of formation of civil rights in order to satisfy private interests on the purely public law principle of achieving state interests ultimately leads to complete leveling of customary land law. Keywords: land law, local customs, customary land law norms, public interests, private interests


1971 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Verdier

SUMMARYTraditional African laws have up till now been little studied, because they are unwritten, adversely affected by the colonial experience, and seen through western categories. Before looking at African land law, one must sketch the main characteristics of African customary law generally—that it was oral; popular; intimately linked with the invisible world; based on the legal and social complementarity of individual and group; that it implied the interdependence of persons and things, and the reciprocity of rights and duties. Colonial contact emphasized the individual aspect at the expense of the community, thus provoking a reaction against individualism from many of the independent African states.Customary land law in Africa operated against a supernatural background, and linked land and family. The first essential feature was that of lineage or family title to land; restriction of land rights within the lineage—“exo-intransmissibilité”, inalienability outside the family—corresponds to exogamy in the realm of marriage. The benefit of land confined within the lineage was periodically redistributed among its members through the law of succession, which was more precise in some societies than in others. The second main feature of customary land law was the role of the “land chief”, distinguishable from the political chief, who represented the first occupant of the land, and mediated between the occupiers and the spirit world through his control of land use. Colonial administrations largely neglected this functionary.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Rachel Farakhiyah ◽  
Maulana Irfan

Pengakuan pemerintah terhadap hukum adat masih setengah hati. Padahal, eksistensi hukum adat memiliki landasan konstitusional yang kuat dalam Pasal 18B ayat (2) UUD 1945. Tubrukan antara proyeksi pembangunan dari pemerintah, kepentingan masyarakat umum, beserta hak ulayat dari masyarakat adat, telah menimbulkan gesekan yang sangat rentan akan timbulnya konflik. Seperti halnya yang memicu terjadinya konflik yang memanas di dalam masyarakat sunda wiwitan atas sengketa lahan. Yang mana perlakuan Jaka yang mengklaim tanah adat menjadi tanah milik pribadi sebagai bentuk pelanggaran hukum adat dan kemudian ditambah dengan putusan PN Kuningan yang memanangkan permintaan Jaka atas hak milih tanah adat seluas 224 m2. Putusan PN tersebut dinilai cacat hukum dan tidak memperhatikan asal usul sejarah. Maka hal tersebut menimbulkan berbagai aksi perlawanan dari pihak kubu masyarakat adat Sunda Wiwitan untuk berusaha memperoleh kembali haknya atas tanah adat mereka. Tujuan penulisan artikel ini yaitu untuk menjelaskan latarbelakang terjadinya konflik dan pemicu terjadinya konflik dengan menggunakan teori identitas yang nantinya dapat dirumuskan resolusi konflik yang efektif. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ini yaitu menggunakan studi litelatur yang diperoleh dari jurnal,buku, dan berbagai macam berita. Hingga saat ini konflik yang bergulir belum menemukan kejelasan karena belum terdapat resolusi konflik yang jelas dan masih sampai kepada tahap digagalkannya proses eksekusi tanah adat seluas 224 m2oleh Pengadilan Negri Kuningan. Government recognition of customary law is still half-hearted. In fact, the existence of customary law has a strong constitutional foundation in Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. Collisions between projected development from the government, the interests of the general public, along with customary rights from indigenous peoples, have created a very vulnerable friction in the emergence of conflict. As is the case that triggered a heated conflict in Sunda Wiwitan society over land disputes. Which is the treatment of Jaka who claimed customary land to be privately owned as a form of violation of customary law and then added with the Kuningan District Court decision to adopt Jaka's request for customary land rights of 225 m2. The Kuningan District Court ruling was deemed legally flawed and did not pay attention to the origin of history. So this caused various acts of resistance from the sides of the Sunda Wiwitan indigenous people to try to regain their rights to their customary lands. The purpose of writing this article is to explain the background of the occurrence of the conflict and the trigger for the occurrence of conflict by using identity theory which can later be formulated effective conflict resolution. The method used in writing this article is to use litelatur studies obtained from journals, books, and various kinds of news. Until now the rolling conflict has not yet found clarity because there is no clear conflict resolution and is still up to the stage where the process of execution of customary land of 225 m2 was thwarted by the Kuningan District Court.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document