scholarly journals THE INFLUENCE OF RETURN ON ASSETS, LEVERAGE, SIZE, AND CAPITAL INTENSITY ON TAX AVOIDANCE

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (01) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Hendrik Maula ◽  
Muhammad Saifullah ◽  
Nurudin Nurudin ◽  
Faris Shalahuddin Zakiy

<p><em>This study aims to examine the effect of Return On Assets, Leverage, Size, and Capital Intensity to tax avoidance. The purpose of this study is to provide empirically evidance about the effect of  Return On Assets, Leverage, Size and Capital Intensity to tax avoidance. The independent variables of this study are Return On Assets, Leverage, Size and Capital Intesity. The dependent variable is tax avoidance measured by Effective Tax Rate (ETR). The population in this study are 48 property and real estate companies listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) in period of 2013–2017. Sample was collected by purposive sampling method, total 28 property and real estate companies were taken as study’s sample. Analysis method of this research used multiple regression. The result showed that the return on assets and leverage signifficant effect on the tax avoidance. While size and capital intensity does not signifficant effect of the tax avoidance.</em><em> </em></p><strong><em>Keywords: </em></strong><em>Capital Intensity, Leverage, Return on Assets, Size, Tax Avoidance</em>

Author(s):  
Syifa Urrahmah ◽  
Aloysius Harry Mukti

This study aims to examine the effect of liquidity, capital intensity, and inventory intensity on tax avoidance with leverage and profitability as control variables. Tax avoidance was measured by Effective Tax Rate (ETR), liquidity was measured by current ratio, capital intensity was measured by capital intensity ratio, inventory intensity was measured by inventory intensity ratio, leverage was measured by Debt to Equity Ratio (DER), and profitability was measured by Return on Assets (ROA). The population in this study are all manufacturing sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2017-2019. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling method and obtained as many as 106 data samples. The analytical method used is multiple linear regression.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-138
Author(s):  
Clarissa Octa Gumono

Taxes are income for the state which are useful for financingstate activities and operations. Unfortunately, taxes are not profitable forcompanies. Taxes can decrease its profit. This situation triggers the companyto take action related to agency theory. This actions taken by managingtax financing so that it can be effective and efficient without violatingexisting regulations. That actions called tax avoidance. Tax avoidance takesadvantages of the grey area in the tax regulations so that the actions takenlegally. Tax avoidance in this study is used as the dependent variable bycalculating the cash effective tax rate (cash ETR). Independent variable inthis study are return on assets (ROA), leverage, and capital intensity. Theexistence of these variables are used to support the purpose of this study.The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of ROA, Leverageand Capital intensity on tax avoidance. The data used are from the financialreports and annual reports of mining sector companies listed in IndonesiaStock Exchange during the Jokowi - JK’s era.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-60
Author(s):  
FAHREZA UTAMA ◽  
DWI JAYA KIRANA ◽  
KORNEL SITANGGANG

The aim of this study is to test the influence of tax avoidance towards the cost of debt moderated by institutional ownership. In this research, tax avoidance measured by proxy of Book Tax Different (BTD) and Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR). The population in this research is manufacturing firms that listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with 2015-2017 time periods. The amount of sample before outlier is 198 datas collected with purposive sampling method, then the amount of sample after outlier is 187 datas for first model and 186 datas for second model. Cross section data is used in this research. Multiple linear regression, determination coefficients, and partial test (t-test) is used with some help of programming data using SPSS (Statistical Product and Service Solution) 23th version to analize in this research. The result of this study indicate tax avoidance has not significant influence towards the cost of debt, and institutional ownership can’t moderate the relationship between tax avoidance and the cost of debt.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Basuki Basuki

Things that need to be done in order to prove independentcommissioners, audit committee, capital intensity and corporate risk ontax avoidance in companies engaged in Indonesia Stock Exchange(IDX). In this study, tax avoidance uses the Cash Effective Tax Rate(CETR) proxy. The research period is 4 years, ie during 2013-2016. Thestudy population covers all manufacturing companies of the industrialsector of goods in the period 2013-2016ALAH 148 companies. Thesampling technique used purposive sampling technique. Based on thecriteria set in the sample of 84 corporate data. Types of data which aresecondary data obtained from the Indonesia Stock Exchange website.The process of data analysis that is panel analysis of regression data.The results showed that independent commissioners and capital intensitydid not have a significant effect, while audit committee and corporaterisk had a significant effect on tax evasion.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-69
Author(s):  
Elvis Nopriyanti Sherly ◽  
Desi Fitria

The purpose of this study is to prove the effect of tax avoidance, institutional ownership, and profitability on cost of debt. The sample consisted of 71 manufactured firms in listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2011-2015 by using a purposive sampling method. The results of the study showed that the tax avoidance had negative effect on cost of debt. The meaning is getting smaller Cash Effective Tax Rate the cost of debt incurred greater. The results of this study also showed that the institutional ownership doesn’t had effect on cost of debt. Furthermore, the result of Return on Assets (ROA) as proxy profitability had a negative effect on cost of debt. The meaning that the higher the profitability of the company then the company will have a high internal funds that can be used in making the use of debt financing is getting smaller which causes the cost of debt also becomes smaller.


SIMAK ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (01) ◽  
pp. 152-173
Author(s):  
Sasongko Wahyu Widodo ◽  
Sartika Wulandari

This research aimed to investigate the effect of profitability, leverage, capitalintensity, sales growth, and firm size against tax avoidance. Measurement of taxavoidance in this research used effective tax rate (ETR). This research usedmanufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2019. Thesample selection method used purposive sampling technique and obtained 140sample. The data analysis used was multiple linear regression test. The result ofthe analysis showed that profitability and firm size has no effect on tax avoidance.Meanwhile leverage and capital intensity has significant positive effect on taxavoidance. The result of the test showed that sales growth has a significantnegative effect on tax avoidance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 320-331
Author(s):  
Ledya Akmal Syaflet Bandaro ◽  
Stefanus Ariyanto

This research aims to study the factors affecting Effective Tax Rate as a ratio indicates the efficiency of tax burden management by companies. The factors are Return on Assets (ROA), Ukuran Perusahaan (SIZE), Leverage (LEV), Managerial Ownership (KPM) dan Capital Intensity Ratio (CIR). Research sample were taken from the population of public manufacturing companies in Indonesia for the period 2016-2018, selected with predetermined criteria, resulting 55 companies from the population. The data is analysed using linear regression technique. This research reveals that the only variable that has significant influence towards Effective Tax Rate is Return on Assets and all the variables are simultaneously have effect towards Effective Tax Rate.   Keywords: Return on Assets, leverage ratio, Firm Size, Managerial Ownership, Capital intensity, tax avoidance, effective tax rate.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lustina Rima

Abstract : This study aims to analyze the effect of profitability, corporate governance, firm size, and capital intensity on tax avoidance in property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2016-2018. Corporate governance in this study uses leverage variables and independent commissioners. The population of this study is 54 property and real estate companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2016-2018. Determination of samples using purposive sampling method and obtaining 23 companies with certain criteria. The analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression. The results showed that the profitability and firm size variables had a significant negative effect on tax avoidance, while the leverage variable, independent commissioner, and capital intensity did not affect tax avoidance.Keywords : Profitabilitas, Corporate Governance, Firm Size, Capital Intensity, Tax Avoidance


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Chytia Chytia ◽  
Bayu Laksma Pradana

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of capital intensity, institutional ownership, debt to asset ratio (DAR), and return on assets (ROA) on the effective tax rate (ETR). This study uses secondary data in the form of financial reports that have been audited by auditors, where this data is obtained from the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (idx.co.id). Testing in this study was assisted by using the SPSS 25 program by using multiple linear regression analysis hypothesis testing. The sample technique used in this research is purposive sampling method. The criteria taken by the author in this study are companies engaged in the property sector and have complete financial reports for 4 (four) years, from 2016-2019. The sample taken is 25 property companies for 4 years, which means that it has a total sample of 100 companies. From the existing sample, the classical assumption test was carried out consisting of the normality test, autocorrelation test, multicollinearity test, and heteroscedasticity test along with the regression coefficient similarity test consisting of the t test, F test, and the coefficient of determination (R2) test.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 570-584
Author(s):  
Yenni Mangoting ◽  
Oviliani Yenty Yuliana ◽  
Jesslyn Effendy ◽  
Lovena Hariono ◽  
Viennie Melinda Lians

This research intends to investigate whether tax risk is associated with tax avoidance, which is proxied by Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR). Tax risk is measured by six tax risk components: transactional risk, compliance risk, operational risk, financial accounting risk, managerial risk, and reputational risk. The samples in this research are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX). With a purposive sampling method, there are 168 firm years which we analyzed with OLS regression. The result in this study showed that tax risk is positively associated with CETR. It implied that choices of tax strategies and activities are involved in high tax risk, but firms still choose to comply with tax regulations, which can be seen in high CETR values. This research found that firms need tax risk management to ensure that tax strategies do not impact the firms’ future losses from additional tax payments and fines. Other than that, this research gives a new option for future researchers to measure tax risk using scoring methods and indicators that are engaged in each of the tax risk components.DOI: 10.26905/jkdp.v25i3.5629


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document