scholarly journals The Care Dependency Levels of the Inpatients in The Palliative Care Center and Influencing Factors

Author(s):  
Hatice PEKİNCE ◽  
Hakime ASLAN
2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 467-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryuya Yamanaka ◽  
Hatsuyo Koga ◽  
Yousuke Yamamoto ◽  
Shinichi Yamada ◽  
Tomomi Sano ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
April Sisson ◽  
Karen C Albright ◽  
Michelle Peck ◽  
Linh M Nguyen ◽  
Michael Lyerly ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: Palliative care is an essential part of ICH care, particularly in patients with high ICH scores given their poor prognosis. Palliative care involves consultation by the Palliative Care Service and includes de-escalation of care, changing code status, and making pain and symptom relief the central goal of management. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients presenting to our tertiary care center from 2008-2013 with primary ICH. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Our sample included only patients who died or were transferred to hospice. We examined the proportion of patients that received an inpatient palliative care consult and compared this group to patients who did not receive an inpatient palliative care consult. Patients were categorized by ICH score. Results: Of the 99 ICH patients who died or were discharged to hospice, only 23% received a palliative care consult. Figure 1 displays death, predicted death, and palliative care consult proportions by ICH score. Patients that received a Palliative Care consult were older (mean age 65 vs. 73, p=0.018) and more frequently had evidence of infection (32% vs. 13%, p=0.038); no other significant differences were found between groups. Conclusions: In our sample of ICH patients, 23% of patients received a palliative care consult. In those with high ICH scores utilization was only 28%, despite 30 day expected mortality of 97% or greater. This raises concern that palliative care may be underutilized in patients who may benefit from it the most.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Annina Seiler ◽  
David Blum ◽  
Caroline Hertler ◽  
Markus Schettle ◽  
Carl Moritz Zipser ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Patients with terminal illness are at high risk of developing delirium, in particular, those with multiple predisposing and precipitating risk factors. Delirium in palliative care is largely under-researched, and few studies have systematically assessed key aspects of delirium in elderly, palliative-care patients. Methods In this prospective, observational cohort study at a tertiary care center, 229 delirious palliative-care patients stratified by age: <65 (N = 105) and ≥65 years (N = 124), were analyzed with logistic regression models to identify associations with respect to predisposing and precipitating factors. Results In 88% of the patients, the underlying diagnosis was cancer. Mortality rate and median time to death did not differ significantly between the two age groups. No inter-group differences were detected with respect to gender, care requirements, length of hospital stay, or medical costs. In patients ≥65 years, exclusively predisposing factors were relevant for delirium, including hearing impairment [odds ratio (OR) 3.64; confidence interval (CI) 1.90–6.99; P < 0.001], hypertonia (OR 3.57; CI 1.84–6.92; P < 0.001), and chronic kidney disease (OR 4.84; CI 1.19–19.72; P = 0.028). In contrast, in patients <65 years, only precipitating factors were relevant for delirium, including cerebral edema (OR 0.02; CI 0.01–0.43; P = 0.012). Significance of results The results of this study demonstrate that death in delirious palliative-care patients occurs irrespective of age. The multifactorial nature and adverse outcomes of delirium across all age in these patients require clinical recognition. Potentially reversible factors should be detected early to prevent or mitigate delirium and its poor survival outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3.5) ◽  
pp. QIM19-127
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Gauvin ◽  
Leigh Selesner ◽  
Marcin Chwistek ◽  
Molly Collins ◽  
Crystal Denlinger ◽  
...  

Background: Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a frequent presentation of advanced abdominal malignancy. Despite the frequency of MBO and the availability of NCCN Guidelines for its management, clinicians struggle to create a personalized care plan accounting for a patient’s current condition, prognosis, and goals of care. The aim of this project is to develop a discussion tool to implement on admission to ensure realistic prognostication and appropriate involvement of the patient, caregivers, and multidisciplinary team in treatment decisions. Methods: At our tertiary care center, a multidisciplinary team composed of surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, palliative care specialists, hospitalists, social workers, and nutritionists developed an algorithm to implement when a patient is admitted with MBO. The algorithm was influenced by the NCCN Guidelines for palliative care but was designed as a single-page checklist that could be easily executed by all team members. Results: The MBO admission checklist is divided into 4 sections. The general assessment section includes information about the etiology, severity, and reversibility of the current and past MBO. Also, the patient’s resuscitation and functional status are reviewed. The cancer care coordination/communication section covers the patient’s oncological history and estimated lifespan, as well as the need for further coordination of care and a goals of care discussion. The subsequent portion covers the management plan, with specific decisions resulting from a goals of care discussion as well as the need for specialized consults. The medical, procedural, and operative interventions the team and patient discussed as options are also documented. A key portion is the risks and benefits discussion for each treatment modality. Lastly, the discussion about future considerations section explores the patient’s wishes for the next episode of MBO. Conclusions: The goal of this checklist is to ensure that a comprehensive discussion is held between the different services involved in a patient’s care at every admission for MBO in order to provide a personalized management plan and improve communication. The next step in our study is to assess the effectiveness of implementation of the checklist as well as its impact on patient satisfaction, quality of life, early hospice referral, and outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document