To the question of the moment of the end of the crime provided for by Article 151.2 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
pp. 129-132
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Igorevna Tsyganova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment

Punishability of the acts of extremist orientation provided by Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

2019 ◽  
pp. 40-54
Author(s):  
Дмитрий Сергеевич Дядькин
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
General Structure ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Russian Society ◽  
Law Enforcement Agencies ◽  
Sharp Growth ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Modern Russian

В статье представлены результаты анализа наказуемости за одно из наиболее распространенных в последнее время в Российской Федерации преступление, предусмотренное ст. 282 УК РФ - возбуждение ненависти либо вражды, а равно унижение человеческого достоинства. В последние годы имеет место резкий рост количества осуждений лиц по ст. 282 УК РФ. Данная практика крайне репрессивна, не поддерживает одобрения в обществе, существенно критикуется и негативно оценивается даже властью, которая в последнее время предприняла действия по изменению сложившейся ситуации. Изменение структуры привлечения и осуждения лиц по ч. 1 и ч. 2 ст. 282 УК РФ - исчезновение квалификации действий лиц по ч. 2 - свидетельствует об изменении характера данных преступлений, способа их совершения, а самое главное - подходов к привлечению лиц к ответственности за совершение преступлений экстремистской направленности. Работа правоохранительных органов полностью переключилась с выявления, пресечения и наказания экстремистских деяний, совершаемых в реальной жизни, и на данный момент абсолютное большинство лиц, привлеченных по ст. 282 УК РФ, - это лица, допустившие те или иные высказывания» в социальных сетях. Ч. 2 ст. 282 УК РФ (квалифицирующие признаки, ее составляющие) на данный момент потеряли свою актуальность и не отвечают современным реалиям. Наказуемость за преступления, предусмотренные ст. 282 УК РФ, атипична по отношению к общей структуре применения наказаний в РФ за преступления в целом: за данное преступление осуждается к условному лишению свободы 61 % лиц, 11 % - к реальному лишению свободы. Данное положение вещей отражает ситуацию, когда дефиниция преступления по своему существу не отвечает ожиданиям современного российского общества, при этом внутреннее убеждение судейского корпуса также находится в определенном диссонансе. Современные российские реалии не позволяют судам выносить оправдательные приговоры в достаточном количестве, и судам приходится применять к лицам, по сути невиновным, наказания крайне незначительные или условно. По ст. 282 УК РФ данная тенденция явно прослеживается. Results of the analysis of punishability for one of the most widespread in the Russian Federation the crime provided by Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are presented recently in article there is an arousing hatred or hostility, and humiliation of human dignity is equal. In recent years the sharp growth of number of condemnations of persons according to Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation takes place. This practice is extremely repressive, does not support approval in society, is significantly criticized and negatively estimated even by the power which took actions for change of a situation to the sphere recently. Change of structure of attraction and condemnation of persons according to Pt. 1 and Pt. 2 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation - disappearance of qualification of actions of persons according to Pt. 2 - demonstrates to change of nature of these crimes, a way of their commission, and the most important - approaches to involvement of persons to responsibility for commission of crimes of extremist orientation. Work of law enforcement agencies completely switched from identification, suppression and punishment of the extremist acts made in real life, and at the moment the vast majority of the persons involved according to Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are faces the allowed these or those statements on social networks. Pt. 2 of Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (the qualifying signs, it making) at the moment lost the relevance and do not answer modern realities. The punishability for the crimes provided by Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is atypical in relation to the general structure of application of punishments in the Russian Federation for crimes in general: for this crime it is condemned to conditional imprisonment 61 % of persons, 11 % - to real imprisonment. This state of affairs reflects a situation when the crime definition on the being does not answer expectations of modern Russian society, at the same time the internal belief of judiciary also is in a certain dissonance. Modern Russian realities do not allow vessels to pronounce justificatory sentences in enough, and vessels should apply to persons, in fact the innocent, punishments extremely insignificant or is conditional. According to Art. 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation this trend is obviously traced.

scholarly journals The use of a knowingly forged passport, identity card or other official document granting rights or relieving from responsibilities: problems of application of Art. 327, Part 3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (3) ◽  
pp. 65-72
Author(s):  
Natal'ya Vishnyakova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Personal Information ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Critical Assessment ◽  
Official Document ◽  
Identity Card ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Definition Of

The article is devoted to the consideration of the problems of application of Art. 327, Part 3 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, related to the operation of the norm in time; with delimitation from the norm covered by Art. 327, Part 5 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; with the content of such an act as use, the moment of its ending, the matching with the counterfeit, as well as with the acquisition, storage and transportation. The author substantiates the conclusion about the need to exclude Part 5 of Art. 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; a broader definition of the concept of “use of a knowingly forged document” is proposed, including not only the submission of such a document in order to obtain (confirm) the rights or relieve from responsibilities, but also the very use of the obtained rights or relieving from responsibilities on the basis of the submitted document; the critical assessment of the actions of a person ordered the forged document with providing personal information is done, such actions are considered as complicity in the forgery. The author’s attention is drawn to the prevalence of incompleteness of the wording of the accusation when qualifying the actions of persons who acquired, stored, transported a forged document in order to use it, and then used it. The article formulates recommendations for solving the issues of applying Part 3 of Article 327 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.

Problems of Qualifying the Acquisition of Narcotic Substances on the Basis of Actus Reus

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 93-100
Author(s):  
E. Ju. Chetvertakova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Complex Nature ◽  
Actus Reus ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Objective Side ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
Narcotic Drugs

The complex nature of the act of the illegal acquisition of narcotic substances, creates problems in determining the boundaries of the intrusion and determining the stage of the crime, which leads to a lack of uniformity in the application of the provisions of Article 228 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The purpose of this article is to identify the problems that arise during the qualification of illegal acquisition of narcotic drugs, and to suggest ways to solve them. Tasks: analysis of the concept of the acquisition of narcotic drugs, the establishment of signs that are part of the objective side of the encroachment, the definition of the boundaries of the objective element to differentiate the stages of the crime. The article is based on an analysis of criminal legislation, doctrinal provisions and judicial practice. The author concludes that the acquisition of a narcotic substances is an act as a result of which a person is able to possess, use and dispose of the drug at his own discretion. The moment of completion of the crime should be associated with the possibility of disposing of the drug received. The seizure of narcotic drugs from the purchaser in the course of law enforcement intelligence operations cannot be considered as a completed crime. When determining the initial stage of the actus reus, the method of committing the crime should be taken into account. The conclusion is substantiated that it is inadmissible to use by analogy the explanation of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the content of the sale of narcotic drugs when interpreting the sign of illegal acquisition.

scholarly journals Calculation of the Amount of Damage Caused by Deliberate Bankruptcy (Article 196 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 47-51
Author(s):  
Anna A. Korennaya ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment

The article discusses the issues of determining the amount of damage from premeditated bankruptcy in several aspects: 1) establishing the structure of damage 2) establishing the value 3) determination of the end of the crime by the moment of causing damage on a large scale. Based on the analysis of the doctrine of criminal law and the practice of applying Art. 196 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, the author sets out his own conclusions, the use of which in law enforcement practice will minimize errors in the qualification of deliberate bankruptcies.

scholarly journals ОСНОВНЫЕ ТЕНДЕНЦИИ УГОЛОВНО-ПРАВОВОЙ ПОЛИТИКИ РОССИИ В СФЕРЕ ЭКОЛОГИЧЕСКОЙ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ: ПРОБЛЕМЫ ПЕНАЛИЗАЦИИ И ДЕПЕНАЛИЗАЦИИ

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-153
Author(s):  
Julia V. Nadtochiy
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
General Trend ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Severe Form ◽  
Qualified Personnel ◽  
Adjacent Structures ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Environmental Crimes

В представленной научной работе анализируются все изменения санкций норм главы 26 УК РФ «Экологические преступления», внесённые законодателем с момента принятия действующего уголовного кодекса Российской Федерации по настоящее время, а также изменения медианы санкций по наиболее стро-гому виду наказания – лишению свободы на определённый срок – в каждой части каждой статьи составов рассматриваемых преступлений. Проведённое по данной методике исследование позволило наглядно продемонстрировать изменения оценки законодателем степени общественной опасности конкретных экологических преступлений на протяжении всего периода действия УК РФ, выявить расхождения в её оценке между смежными составами, а также в соотношении основного и квалифицированного составов. Кроме того, сделан вывод о том, что, несмотря на общую тенденцию к гуманизации и ослаблению уголовной репрессии, на сегодняшний день в рассматриваемой сфере наблюдается перевес пенализационных процессов над депенализационными, за счёт повышенного законодательного интереса к так называемым составам браконьерства. The present research work reviews all changes in the sanctions of the norms of Chapter 26 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation “Environmental Crimes”, introduced by the legislator from the moment of adoption of the current criminal code of the Russian Federation until the present time, as well as the changes in the median of sanctions for the most severe form of punishment – imprisonment for a fixed term in each part of each article that constitutes the crimes under consideration. The study that was carried out by using this methodology made it possible to clearly demonstrate the changes in the legislator’s assessment of the degree of public danger of specific environmental crimes throughout the entire period of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, to reveal the discrepancies in its assessment between adjacent structures, as well as in the ratio of basic and qualified personnel. In addition, it was concluded that, despite the general trend towards humanization and the weakening of criminal repression, today in the area under consideration there is a preponderance of penalization processes over the depenalization ones, due to the increased legislative interest in the so-called poaching compositions.

scholarly journals ABOUT SOME QUESTIONS OF QUALIFICATION OF PETTY THEFT COMMITTED BY A PERSON SUBJECTED TO ADMINISTRATIVE PUNISHMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-46
Author(s):  
K. S. Neshchadimova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Property Crime ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Administrative Punishment ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment ◽  
High Level ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The article examines the problems of administrative prejudice in the criminal law on the example of the operation of regulations stipulated in the Article 1581 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. A legal and technical analysis of the composition of petty theft of other peoples property, committed by a person subjected to administrative punishment. Some controversial issues of qualification of the analyzed criminal offense are considered. Attention is focused on the moment of the end of petty theft of other peoples property, committed by a person subjected to administrative punishment. The issue of necessity and expediency of increasing the cost threshold of petty theft of other peoples property is considered. The article also suggests other ways to improve the criminal legislation of Russia and the practice of its application, aimed at reducing the level of mercenary property crime in the country. It is shown that despite the fact that the appearance of Article 158.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is connected with the introduction of administrative prejudice and, as a result, the criminalization of acts provided for by this Code, the latest law enforcement practice shows an insufficiently high level of effectiveness of this criminal law institution.

Delimitation of tax crimes from related compositions

2021 ◽  
pp. 729-740
Author(s):  
Emil E. Ismailov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment

At the moment, the fight against tax crimes is one of the most important areas of the criminal law policy of Russian Federation. In addition to tax crimes, other socially dangerous acts are also committed, which have some similarities with tax crimes. The problems of correlation of crimes in the field of taxation with other types of crimes are currently insufficiently developed. In this case, it can be problematic for the courts to correctly qualify these elements of crimes. One of the most pressing problems is the ratio of tax crimes and crimes as a result of which the taxpayer receives income, in particular, illegal entrepreneurship (Article 171 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation).The solution of all practical and theoretical problems in the field of the correct restriction of criminal law norms in the field of taxa-tion from related structures will help us to correctly qualify these acts. Based on the analysis of the current legislation, as well as a number of theoretical sources, we reveal that tax crimes in the Russian Federation are criminally punishable acts, the current Criminal Code of the Russian Federation refers to tax crimes articles 198, 199, 199.1, 199.2, 199.3, 199.4. The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation contains a number of norms describing crimes that are closely related to tax.

IMPLEMENTATION PROBLEMS IN THE CRIMINAL LAW COUNTERACTION MECHANISM TO VIOLENT SEIZURE OF POWER

2020 ◽  
pp. 48-53
Author(s):  
Александр Анатольевич Кузнецов
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
State Power ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Constitutional Order ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Implementation Problems

В статье рассматриваются действующие нормы Уголовного кодекса Российской Федерации, непосредственно направленные на борьбу с насильственным (незаконным) захватом государственной власти, а также нормы, которые формируют механизмы противодействия терроризму и экстремизму. Отмечается, что признак насильственного захвата власти на данный момент, помимо ст. ст. 278 и 279 УК РФ, встречается в структуре ряда составов ст. ст. 205.1-205.4, 205.6, 275, 280, 280.1, 282.1-3 УК РФ. На основании действующего законодательства насильственный захват власти относится к проявлениям экстремизма и терроризма. Автором анализируется эффективность имеющегося набора средств уголовно-правовой охраны основ конституционного строя, делается вывод об отсутствии в действующем УК РФ такого механизма уголовно-правового противодействия насильственному захвату власти, который бы позволял эффективно бороться с этим крайне опасным явлением на всех стадиях (этапах) его детерминации вне зависимости от формы осуществления государственного переворота. Предлагается развитие механизма уголовно-правового противодействия насильственному захвату власти, состоящего из комплекса взаимосвязанных и взаимодополняющих уголовно-правовых запретов, с учетом разнообразия проявлений и характера совершаемых действий. The article examines the current norms of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, which are directly aimed at combating the violent (illegal) seizure of state power, as well as the norms that form the mechanisms for countering terrorism and extremism. It is noted that the sign of a violent seizure of power at the moment, in addition to articles 278 and 279 of the Criminal Code, is found in the structure of a number of compositions - art. 205.1-205.4, 205.6, 275, 280, 280.1, 282.1-3 Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Based on current legislation, violent seizure of power is considered to be a manifestation of extremism and terrorism. The author analyzes the effectiveness of the existing set of tools of criminal law protection of the constitutional order, the conclusion about the absence in the current Criminal Code of the Russian Federation this mechanism of criminal legal counteraction to violent seizure of power, which would allow to effectively deal with this extremely dangerous phenomenon in all stages (stages) of its determination regardless of the form of the coup. It is proposed to develop a mechanism of criminal-legal counteraction to the forcible seizure of power, consisting of a set of interrelated and mutually complementary criminal-legal prohibitions, taking into account the variety of manifestations and the nature of the committed actions.

Features of the criminal evaluation of objective signs of timber smuggling (Art. 226.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation)

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (4) ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
Arbi Akiev ◽  
Daria Fisenko
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Modus Operandi ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Structure ◽  
The Moment ◽  
Objective Side ◽  
Enforcement Activity

In the article the authors examine certain problems of qualification of smuggling of timber being one of the types of strategically important goods and resources for the Russian Federation. These problems are stipulated by the specific of the legislative structure, as well as by the difficulties of interpreting this corpus delicti. Within the frame of the research it was established that that most difficulties in law enforcement activity arise in the course of criminal-legal assessment of the objective signs of timber smuggling and, mostly, of the subject of the corpus delicti under consideration and modus operandi of the crime due to the specifics of timber being the object of smuggling. In order to solve problems stated in the article, the authors analyze such ob-jective signs of corpus delicti provided for by Art. 2261 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, as a subject and an objective side on the basis of materials of of-ficial statistics, judicial practice and criminal law doctrine. As a result of the conducted analysis the authors’ recommendations on the qualification of timber smuggling are formulated. Thus, the authors clearly identified the established in the current customs legislation a list of types of timber related to the subject of the crime provided for by Art. 2261 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; the most common modus operandi of timber smuggling in judicial practice are explained; the moment of completion of the criminal encroachment under analysis is clarified, and the amount of damage necessary to qualify the timber smuggling under Art. 2261 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are defined.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document