Feasibility and safety in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies; a single surgeon experience.

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
City Hospital ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background: laparoscopic cholecystectomy is commonly used for the treatment of gallstones. Objective: To determine the feasibility and safety of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Methodology: This cross sectional study was based on retrospective collection of data from patient records, including 323 patients with difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomies was conducted in Department of Surgery, Sharif Medical City Hospital, and Rasheed Hospital, Lahore from June 2010 to December 2019. Difficult cholecystectomy was defined on intraoperative findings based on Nassar intraoperative scoring system. Feasibility was defined as successful accomplishment of procedure without complication and safety was defined as having no intraoperative or postoperative complications. Results: There were 75 (23.21%) male and mean age was 48±8 years. Class I difficulty was observed in 185 (57.3%) patients, class II difficulty in 83 (25.7%) patients, class III difficulty in 44 (13.6%) patients and class IV difficulty in 11 (3.4%) patients. Mean duration of surgery and mean hospital stay were 98.87±11.76 minutes and 1.91±1 days, respectively. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was done in 10 (3.1%). The procedure was feasible in 313 (96.9%) patients. Overall complications were seen in 19 (5.9%) patients. The complications included Common Bile Duct injury in 1 (0.31%) patient, intraoperative bleeding in 1 (0.3%) patients, bile leakage in 2 (0.62%) patients, postoperative jaundice in 3 (0.93%) patients, superficial infections in 10 (3.1%) patients and deep infections in 2 (0.62%) patients. Safety of laparoscopic surgery was seen in 304 (94.1%) patients. Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in difficult situations was found to be feasible and safe in majority of patients. However, it was associated with a longer operative time.

scholarly journals Factors Affecting Conversion From Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Cholecystectomy at a Tertiary Care Facility in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 104 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 166-170
Author(s):  
Thamer Nouh ◽  
Faris Alanazi ◽  
Abdulellah S. Abunayan ◽  
Abdallah F. Alsaadoun ◽  
Mohamed A. Alsehly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Preoperative Factors

Background: Despite the growing importance and increased use of laparoscopy for gallbladder diseases in Saudi Arabia, several factors reportedly result in conversion to open surgery. This leads to increased operative time and increased hospital resource utilization, and, importantly, it impacts patient welfare. Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its conversion rates have been investigated in Saudi Arabia, there is little information on the factors associated with this conversion. Therefore, we analyzed the prevalence and factors associated with the conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. Materials and methods: This was a quantitative, retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study. We reviewed the health care records of all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy during the study period (January 2014–December 2015). We analyzed patient demographics, preoperative factors, ultrasound findings, and intraoperative factors associated with higher conversion rates. We calculated means, SDs, and medians for numerical variables and percentages and frequencies for nominal variables. The χ2 and two-tailed t tests were used to compare the categorical and continuous variables, respectively, between patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and those who underwent conversion to open cholecystectomy to analyze their relationship with the possibility of conversion. Statistical significance was considered at P < 0.05. Results: Age > 40 years, diabetes, history of admission for gallstones, and increased total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase levels were the preoperative factors and adhesions, bleeding, and stone spillage were the intraoperative factors associated with conversion. Conclusion: Recognizing the factors for conversion would improve treatment planning and help predict when conversion may be necessary.

scholarly journals A comparative study of open cholecystectomy and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pramod Singh ◽  
Sumit Kumar Gupta ◽  
Mukesh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
City Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Cholelithiasis is a major cause of morbidity among Indians with a female preponderance. Most of the cases of gallstones are asymptomatic. For a long time, open cholecystectomy (OC) used to be the surgical treatment for cholelithiasis. But with the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) there has been a gradual shift in the treatment with most surgeons preferring LC over OC. Apart from the benefits of decreased hospital stay, lesser postoperative pain and earlier return to normal activity LC are also cosmetically better as compared to OC. Longer operative time and increased incidence of biliary leakage are some pitfalls of LC in initial phase of surgical practice.Methods: A prospective study of 100 patients was carried out in the department of surgery in IQ city medical college and Durgapur city hospital, Durgapur between January 2017 and August 2017 with the aim of comparing open cholecystectomy with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups. Group A consisted of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery while Group B patients underwent open surgery for cholelithiasis.Results: Duration of surgery was longer in OC than LC (72.4min versus 44.7min.). Mean duration of post-operative pain was 18.3hrs in group A as compared to mean duration of 30.7hrs in group B patients. The mean period of post-operative hospital stay was 1.8 days in group A and 4.8 days in group B. Post-operative resumption of normal diet was possible in 2.1 days in OC while it took lesser time (1.2 days) in LC. The rate of surgical site infection was higher in OC as compared to LC.Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be recommended as first choice operative treatment for patients with cholelithiasis as it provides better cosmetic results, lesser pain, lesser post-operative hospital stay and fewer incidence of surgical site infection.

scholarly journals Early versus late laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute cholecystitis: a retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 3897
Author(s):  
Deepu Thiyagarajan ◽  
Prince Deva Ruban
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Late Complications ◽  
Aged Patients ◽  
Early Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a life-saving procedure in the management of acute cholecystitis as it helps in prevention of late complications like development of adhesions, haemorrhage and sepsis. The study aims at comparing the outcomes of early versus late laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the management of acute cholecystitis.Methods: A retrospective study was done by analyzing the past 5 years medical records of 250 patients admitted to the emergency department with diagnosis of acute cholecystitis established according to the Tokyo criteria. The relevant clinio-social demographic data of the patients, clinical and radiological parameters, intra-operative and post-operative findings and follow-up data were compared between early and late LC group of patients.Results: The study included 125 middle aged patients who underwent early LC (within 24 hours) and 125 patients who underwent late LC (after 24 4hours). The complication rate, conversion to open cholecystectomy and duration of surgery showed no significant differences between early and late laparoscopic cholecystectomy except for an increased duration of stay among the late LC group.Conclusions: Early LC is an efficient procedure for acute cholecystitis but it has risks of complications which can be minimized by careful selection of patients after clear clinical and radiological evaluation. 

RETROSPECTIVE STUDY ON OUTCOME OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN THE ELDERLY AT JSS HOSPITAL, MYSURU

2021 ◽  
pp. 34-35
Author(s):  
Sudhir S. ◽  
Deepak Naik P ◽  
Deepak R. Sridhar
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Elderly Age ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

(a) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a widely performed surgery in India and across the world for a wide range of indications. It is one of the most commonly performed surgeries, and hence a study based on outcomes of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly would go a long way in determining the safety and success of Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly, and could help in timing surgery more effectively to avoid complications and difculties. (b) Materials and methods: Out of 250 patients who underwent Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy at JSS Hospital in the period starting January 2019 onwards who were selected by randomization, 65 patients t the criteria (age > 60 years) while 185 patients were aged <60. Data regarding comorbidities, duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay, conversion to open cholecystectomy was compiled and studied. (c) Results: A signicant number of the patients in the elderly age group had associated comorbidities. Duration of surgery was prolonged by a mean duration of 9.5 minutes in the elderly. Duration of hospital stay was increased by a mean of 2.2 days in the elderly. Incidence of conversion to open cholecystectomy was also higher in the elderly. (d) Conclusions: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a relatively safe and easy surgery with few complications. However, one may experience difculties while operating on the elderly, viz. Adhesions, contracted gall bladder with hepatic adhesions etc., Which may result in longer duration of surgery and higher rates of conversion to open cholecystectomy.

scholarly journals National Trends in the Adoption of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy over 7 Years in the United States and Impact of Laparoscopic Approaches Stratified by Age

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anahita Dua ◽  
Abdul Aziz ◽  
Sapan S. Desai ◽  
Jason McMaster ◽  
SreyRam Kuy
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Discharge Disposition ◽  
Open Versus ◽  
National Trends

Introduction. The aim of this study was to characterize national trends in adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and determine differences in outcome based on type of surgery and patient age.Methods. Retrospective cross-sectional study of patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Trends in open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy by age group and year were analyzed. Differences in outcomes including in-hospital mortality, complications, discharge disposition, length of stay (LOS), and cost are examined.Results. Between 1999 and 2006, 358,091 patients underwent cholecystectomy. In 1999, patients aged ≥80 years had the lowest rates of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, followed by those aged 65–79, 64–50, and 49–18 years (59.7%, 65.3%, 73.2%, and 83.5%, resp.,P<0.05). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was associated with improved clinical and economic outcomes across all age groups. Over the study period, there was a gradual increase in laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed among all age groups during each year, though elderly patients continued to lag significantly behind their younger counterparts in rates of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Conclusion. This is the largest study to report trends in adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the US in patients stratified by age. Elderly patients are more likely to undergo open cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy - A Cross Sectional Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Pari A. Pulate ◽  
Tushar Narkhede ◽  
Sushma S. Chandak
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Chronic Cholecystitis ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Early Recovery ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Complications Of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bladder Polyp

<strong>Aims and Objectives:</strong> 1. To study the clinical profile of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 2. To study the post operative complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. <strong>Methodology:</strong> Ultrasound confirmed 48 cases of either sex admitted in department of surgery with cholelithiasis, gall bladder polyp, acute or chronic cholecystitis were included in this survey. These patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy after preoperative preparation during August 2011-December 2013. <strong>Results:</strong> Highest age incidence was seen in 4<sup>th</sup> decade with female preponderance. Most common presenting symptom was pain in abdomen followed by nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia and fever. Only 1 procedure was converted to open cholecystectomy with conversion rate of 2.08%. It was due to dense adhesions from chronic infection. The overall post-operative complication rate was 6.25% with wound infection being the most common occurring in 2 cases and prolonged ileus in 1 case. Chronic cholecystitis was the major histopathological diagnosis. The median post-operative stay in our study was 3 days. <strong>Conclusion:</strong> Chronic cholecystitis is the most common presentation of cholelithiasis with female pre-ponderance and incidence more in the 4<sup>th</sup> decade. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and feasible treatment with less complication rate and early recovery.

scholarly journals Open conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration: subspecialisation safely reduces the conversion rates

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad H. M. Nassar ◽  
Hisham El Zanati ◽  
Hwei J. Ng ◽  
Khurram S. Khan ◽  
Colin Wood
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Emergency Case ◽  
Open Conversion ◽  
Subtotal Cholecystectomy ◽  
Conversion Rates ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy

Abstract Background Open conversion rates during laparoscopic cholecystectomy vary depending on many factors. Surgeon experience and operative difficulty influence the decision to convert on the grounds of patient safety but occasionally due to technical factors. We aim to evaluate the difficulties leading to conversion, the strategies used to minimise this event and how subspecialisation influenced conversion rates over time. Methods Prospectively collected data from 5738 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by a single surgeon over 28 years was analysed. Routine intraoperative cholangiography and common bile duct exploration when indicated are utilised. Patients undergoing conversion, fundus first dissection or subtotal cholecystectomy were identified and the causes and outcomes compared to those in the literature. Results 28 patients underwent conversion to open cholecystectomy (0.49%). Morbidity was relatively high (33%). 16 of the 28 patients (57%) had undergone bile duct exploration. The most common causes of conversion in our series were dense adhesions (9/28, 32%) and impacted bile duct stones (7/28, 25%). 173 patients underwent fundus first cholecystectomy (FFC) (3%) and 6 subtotal cholecystectomy (0.1%). Morbidity was 17.3% for the FFC and no complications were encountered in the subtotal cholecystectomy patients. These salvage techniques have reduced our conversion rate from a potential 3.5% to 0.49%. Conclusion Although open conversion should not be seen as a failure, it carries a high morbidity and should only be performed when other strategies have failed. Subspecialisation and a high emergency case volume together with FFC and subtotal cholecystectomy as salvage strategies can reduce conversion and its morbidity in difficult cholecystectomies.

scholarly journals Complications of Two Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy-Studyof 50 Cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-37
Author(s):  
Nasir Uddin Mahmud ◽  
Ghyas Uddin ◽  
Md Anwarul Haque ◽  
ANM Mozammel Haque ◽  
AKM Golam Kibria
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gall Bladder ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gallstone Disease ◽  
Bile Leakage ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Minimal Scarring ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Port Infection ◽  
Good Cosmesis

Background: For the management of Gallstone disease, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been the the gold standard and is preferred over open cholecystectomy. As patients’ demand has increased for improved postoperative quality of life and cosmesis, surgeons have continued to decrease the number of ports for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To meet these expectations we adopted two-port techniques at Comilla, Bangladesh. For the last three years we have selected 50 patients where two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy was trialled. The procedure were successfully performed in 47(94%) & conversion were required in 3(6%) with some accepted complications like epigastric port infection & herniation, post cholecystectomy syndrome, reactionary haemorrhage, bile leakage & biloma, significant epigastric port pain postoperatively & stricture of CBD. The present two port technique not only overcoming specimen extraction difficulties but also contributes to good cosmesis. Objectives: To see the outcome of two port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Methods: Consecutive 50 patients were admitted in surgery ward of Central medical college, Comilla with gallstone disease over a 3 years period. Diagnosis is confirmed by ultrasound with the assessment of operative feasibility. Data collection sheet was maintained by Microsoft Excel. Data were analyzed manually. Results: In this study 50 patients were included. Among them 34 (68%) were females and 16 (32%) were males (ratio = 2.1:1). Mean age was 35.7 years (range 20–55years).All patient were undergone two port laparoscopic cholecystectomy & successfully accomplished in 47 (94%),conversion were required in 3 (6%) patients. Most common (62%) sonological findings were cholelithiasis with normal size & shape of gall bladder. Mean operative time was 50 minutes. Among the per operative difficulties bleeding were 14%, perforation of gall bladder 10%, spillage of gallstones 6%, epigastric forceps manipulation difficulties 4%,conversion to open cholecystectomy 6%. Most of the patients(80%) admitted in hospital for 2-3 days. 4 (8%) patient had epigastric port infection & 1 (2%) patient developed this site herniation, 3 (6%) patient had post cholecystectomy syndrome,1 (2%) patient had reactionary haemorrhage, 1 (2%) bile leakage & biloma,4(8%) patient had significant epigastric port pain postoperatively, 1 (2%) patient developed delayed stricture of CBD. In all other patients wound healed nicely with minimal scarring, with very less postoperative pain, with no problem so far in 3 years follow up. Most patients (90%) returned to work within 2 weeks. Conclusion: Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure & cosmetically rewarding. TAJ 2018; 31(1): 29-37

scholarly journals Advantage of fundus first method over conventional approach in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1613
Author(s):  
Braja Mohan Mishra ◽  
Rabi Narayana Guru ◽  
Sunil Kumar Kar
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Gall Stone ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Female Age ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Difficult Cases

Background: Fundus first method is a widely accepted and practiced procedure in open cholecystectomy to deal the difficult cases but laparoscopic surgeons still have reserved opinion regarding use of fundus first approach in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC). As in open cholecystectomy fundus first laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FFC) can have advantages over conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC) in DLC. So many preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative information were collected in both CLC and FFC and compared to evaluate whether FFC has any advantage over CLC in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: A total 73 cases were included in the study that underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for gall stone diseases and intraoperatively found to be difficult cases. They were distributed into 4 classes i.e. Class I, Class II, Class III and Class IV according to the type of difficulty encountered during surgery.Results: Out of the 73 patients 24 were male and 49 were Female. Age of patient ranged from 14 to 70 years with mean age of 42.64 years. Out of 38 cases operated with FFC 6 cases (15.78%) needed conversion to open cholecystectomy as compared to 26 out of 35 (71.14%) cases that underwent CLC where conversion was done. Mean duration of hospital stay is 4.19±3.053. Mean hospital stay in FFC is 2.58±1.869 days and that of CLC is 5.14±3.143 which is clearly much higher and statistically significant (p< 0.001) than mean hospital stay in case of FFC.Conclusions: FFC has advantages over CLC in difficult LC i.e. reduced conversion rate, lesser hospital stay and less duration of antibiotic use.

LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madan Goyal ◽  
R K Goel
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Acute Cholecystitis ◽  
Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Critical View Of Safety ◽  
Recent Onset ◽  
Conversion To Open Cholecystectomy ◽  
Threatening Condition ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Fluid Collections ◽  
A Prospective Study

Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a potentially life-threatening condition. LC was initially considered to be a relative contraindication for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), but with increase in general expertise, early LC was recommended in selected patients1. Aprospective study of LC in grade 1 and 2 AC patients with mild to moderate inflammatory changes in the gallbladder and no significant organ dysfunction, was performed during October 2016 to July 2019. A total of 78 patients, out of 408 cholecystectomies performed during this period, were included in this study. Criteria for diagnosing AC was, recent onset of pain in right hypochondrium, fever, leucocytosis, pericholecystic fluid collections, subserosal oedema on ultrasound, pyocele and other pathological evidence of AC. Patients presented and operated within 4 days of onset of symptoms showed better results as compared to those who could be operated after 4 days and within 14 days. Five patients required conversion to open cholecystectomy because of complex adhesions in 2, critical view of safety was unachievable in 2 and in 1 for troublesome bleeding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document