Adhesive Bond Strengths Using Self- and Light-Cured Composites

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 25-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Walter ◽  
Georgia V. Macedo ◽  
Gustavo M. S. Oliveira ◽  
Edward J. Swift

Abstract Aim To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of four adhesive systems to dentin, using self- and light-cured resin composites. Methods and Materials Crowns of human molars were separated from the roots, and the occlusal surfaces were ground to obtain flat superficial dentin. Three etch-and-rinse adhesives—All-Bond 2, One-Step Plus, and OptiBond Solo Plus—and one self-etching primer system, Peak SE, were evaluated. Each adhesive group was divided into two subgroups according to the type of resin composite used. A self-cured (Bisfil 2B) or light-cured (Filtek Supreme Plus) resin composite build-up was incrementally inserted to the dentin after each adhesive system was applied. The bonded specimens were stored in water for 24 h and sectioned into beams. Microtensile testing was done, and the data were subjected to ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test. Results The μTBS of All-Bond 2 and One- Step Plus was not affected by the type of resin composite used (p=0.3131 and p=0.1562, respectively). The μTBS of OptiBond Solo Plus was significantly reduced when used with selfcured resin composite (p<0.0001). Peak SE formed no bond of self-cured resin composite to dentin. Conclusions Some adhesives do not effectively bond self-cured resin composite to dentin. Clinical Significance Incompatibility between adhesives with low pH and certain self-cured resin composites can cause clinical debonding of restorations. Citation Walter R, Macedo GV, Oliveira GMS, Swift Jr EJ. Adhesive Bond Strengths Using Self- and Light-Cured Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2009 Nov; 10(6):025-032. Available from: http://www.thejcdp.com/journal/ view/volume10-issue6-walter.

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 426-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Li ◽  
B Chen ◽  
N Hong ◽  
S Wu ◽  
Y Li

SUMMARY Objective: In an attempt to increase resin-dentin bonding quality, this study used baicalein as a preconditioner in an etch-and-rinse adhesive to evaluate its effect on matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and adhesive durability. Methods: As a MMP inhibitor and potential collagen cross-linking agent, baicalein was used as a preconditioner in an etch-and-rinse adhesive system. The degree of conversion was evaluated by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. EnzChek gelatinase/collagenase assay kits were then used to detect the MMP inhibitory effect of different concentrations of baicalein (0.1, 0.5, 2.5, and 5.0 μg/mL) on dentin powders. During in vitro bonding procedures, flat dentin surfaces on sound third molars were preconditioned with 2.5 μg/mL baicalein after being acid-etched; this step was followed by continuation of adhesive processes and build-up of resin composite. After resin-dentin stick preparation, bonding strength, failure mode, and interface nanoleakage were respectively evaluated via microtensile testing, stereomicroscopy, and field emission scanning electron microscopy either immediately or after storage in artificial saliva for three or six months. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (α=0.05). Results: Baicalein at a concentration of 0-5.0 μg/mL did not influence the conversion of adhesives. However, it inhibited the activities of dentin-bond gelatinase and collagenase, especially at a concentration of 2.5 μg/mL, while effectively increasing microtensile bonding strength and decreasing nanoleakage in vitro, both immediately and after aging. Conclusions: Baicalein used as preconditioner in an etch-and-rinse adhesive system has an anti-MMP function and effectively improves resin-dentin bonding durability in vitro, which has potential value in clinical bonding procedures.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Rafael Avellar de Carvalho Nunes ◽  
Flávia Lucisano Botelho do Amaral ◽  
Fabiana Mantovani Gomes França ◽  
Cecilia Pedroso Turssi ◽  
Roberta Tarkany Basting

<p class="Corpo"><strong>Objective</strong>: the aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of adding different concentrations of chitosan to an experimental two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system on the bond strength and failure mode to dentin. <strong>Material</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Methods</strong>: thirty-two flat dentin surfaces were obtained from extracted human third molars and divided into four groups  (n=8) for application of the adhesive systems: AD - conventional two-step adhesive system (Adper Single Bond 2); EXP – experimental two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system; Chi0.2% - EXP with addition of 0.2% Chitosan; Chi0.5% - EXP with addition of 0.5% Chitosan. Resin composite build-ups were made and the composite/dentin specimens were sectioned to obtain rectangular beams with a bond area of approximately 1mm<sup>2</sup>. After 24 hours, the sticks were submitted to microtensile bond strength tests in a universal test machine. The fracture pattern was evaluated under a stereoscopic loupe at 40X magnification. <strong>Results</strong>: one-way analysis of variance showed that the type of adhesive system had no significant effect on the bond strength values (p = 0.142), showing the mean bond strength values (standard deviation), in MPa, for the groups as follows: AD=20.1 (5.4); EXP=16.6 (2.3); Chi0.2%=16.1 (2.8); Chi0.5%=16.9 (2.3). In all the groups there was predominance of cohesive fractures in dentin, representing 68 to 82% of the failure modes. <strong>Conclusion</strong>: the addition of 0.2 or 0.5% of chitosan had no influence on the bond strength and failure mode of an experimental two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive system to dentin.</p><p class="Corpo"><strong>Keywords</strong></p><p class="Corpo">Chitosan; Dental Adhesives; Failure Mode; Microtensile Bond Strength.</p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 705-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina Kato Carneiro ◽  
Marcia Margarete Meier ◽  
Clenilton Costa dos Santos ◽  
Adeilton Pereira Maciel ◽  
Ceci Nunes Carvalho ◽  
...  

Abstract To evaluate the effect of incorporating niobium phosphate bioactive glass (NbG) into commercial etch-and-rinse adhesive systems, with and without silane, on their degree of conversion (DC) (%) and microtensile bond strength (μTBS). The NbG micro-filler was added to two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems: One Step (OS) and Prime & Bond (PB) at 40% concentration. The following groups were formed: control without glass addition OS; addition of unsilanized NbG (OSNbG); addition of silanized NbG (OSNbGS); control without glass PB; addition of unsilanized NbG (PBNbG); addition of silanized NbG (PBNbGS). The DC was determined using total Fourier spectroscopy reflection (FTIR/ATR). For μTBS testing, 48 human third molars (n=8) were restored and sliced to obtain specimens (0.8 mm2) and they were tested at two different time intervals: immediately and after 6 months. The fracture mode was evaluated with a stereoscopic loupe (40×) and by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The data were subjected to ANOVA and Tukey tests (a=0.05). NbG addition did not compromise the adhesive system DC values (p>0.05). Furthermore, the NbG added to the adhesive systems did not affect μTBS values (p>0.05). Fracture occurred predominantly at the dentin-adhesive interface. NbG bioactive glass did not affect the DC or microtensile bond strength results.


2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 610-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
RL Quock ◽  
JA Barros ◽  
SW Yang ◽  
SA Patel

SUMMARY The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of the cariostatic and preventive agent silver diamine fluoride (SDF) on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to dentin. Forty-two caries-free, extracted molars were flattened occlusally and apically using a diamond saw, and the exposed occlusal dentin was polished with a series of silicon carbide papers, all under water irrigation. The teeth were then randomly divided into six groups of seven teeth each that were treated as follows: 1) Peak SE self-etch bonding agent; 2) 12% SDF + Peak SE; 3) 38% SDF + Peak SE; 4) Peak LC etch-and-rinse bonding agent; 5) 12% SDF + Peak LC; and 6) 38% SDF + Peak LC. Four-millimeter buildups of Amelogen Plus were incrementally placed on all teeth; after a 24-hour storage period in distilled water, the specimens were sectioned perpendicular to the adhesive interface to produce beams of cross-sectional surface area measuring approximately 1 mm2. The beams were placed on a microtensile testing machine, which utilized a single-speed pump motor and force gauge at 20 kgf × 0.01 second to record maximum tensile force before failure occurred. Two-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests were performed to compare the effects of the SDF on microtensile bond strength, with statistical significance set at α = 0.05. None of the experimental groups treated with different concentrations of SDF showed a significant difference in bond strength compared to the control groups, and there was no significant difference in bond strength between self-etch and etch-and-rinse groups. However, the effect of SDF on self-etch bonded teeth compared to etch-and-rinse bonded teeth was statistically significant (p=0.0363), specifically at the 12% concentration. SDF does not adversely affect the bond strength of resin composite to noncarious dentin.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e201662
Author(s):  
Maria Luísa de Alencar e Silva Leite ◽  
Caroline de Farias Charamba ◽  
Renally Bezerra Wanderley e Lima ◽  
Sônia Saeger Meireles ◽  
Rosângela Marques Duarte ◽  
...  

Aim: This study evaluated the influence of dentin wettability on the immediate and extended microtensile bond strength (mTBS) of a universal adhesive system used in the etch-and-rinse strategy. Methods: Twenty human third molars were selected and divided into four groups according to the adhesive system and dentin wettability. The mTBS values of each group were registered 24 h and one year after adhesive system application and resin composite block build-up (n=30). Data were analyzed by the t-test (p<0.05). Results: When both adhesive systems were compared, there was no statistically significant difference when they were applied following wet bonding (p>0.05). However, the dry bonding reduced μTBS values of the Adper Single Bond 2 adhesive (p<0.05). Regarding storage time, both groups presented similar μTBS values at 24 h and one year (p>0.05). Conclusions: Therefore, the Scotchbond Universal Adhesive can be applied to dry or wet dentin without compromising the etch-and-rinse bonding quality and the durability of the restorations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Michele Tepedino ◽  
Maciej Iancu Potrubacz ◽  
Antonella Imperiale ◽  
Claudio Chimenti ◽  
Mario Capogreco ◽  
...  

The aim of the present study was to in vitro evaluate the effect of dentin conditioning with hydroabrasion on the microtensile bond strengths of three adhesive systems, compared to the standard etch-and-rinse technique. Sixty extracted human third molars were collected, and their midcoronal occlusal dentin was used for the microtensile bond strength test. Teeth were randomly assigned to three groups according to the adhesive system used: ExciTE F DSC, ENA Bond, and Scotchbond Universal. Specimens from each group were further divided into four subgroups: control specimens were treated with standard adhesive procedures; hydroabraded (HA) specimens were subjected to preventive hydroabrasion with three different intensity levels. After bonding procedures, composite crowns were incrementally built up. After thermocycling, specimens were subsequently sectioned into 1 × 1 mm sticks, and microtensile bond strengths were measured. Data were statistically analyzed. Failure mode analysis was performed. There were no significant differences in terms of bond strength between standard adhesion protocols and adhesion with HA preconditionings. On the other hand, the type of adhesive used had a significant effect on the tensile bond strength. Subgroups treated with hydroabrasion at higher intensity showed a slightly increased frequency of cohesive fractures. In conclusion, hydroabrasion can be used for dentin cavity preparation or finishing, since it does not seem to affect the bonding effectiveness.


Materials ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (20) ◽  
pp. 3395
Author(s):  
Rene Steiner ◽  
Daniel Edelhoff ◽  
Bogna Stawarczyk ◽  
Herbert Dumfahrt ◽  
Isabel Lente

This study investigated the influence of several dentin bonding agents, resin composites and curing modes on push-out bond strength to human dentin. 360 extracted caries-free third molars were prepared, cut into slices, embedded in epoxy resin and perforated centrally. One half of the specimens (180) were treated by using one-step adhesive systems and the other half (180) with multi-step adhesive systems. Subsequently, the cavities were filled with either universal, flowable or bulk-fill resin composite according to the manufactures’ product line and cured with either turbo or soft start program. After storage the push-out test was performed. The data was analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, three- and one-way ANOVA followed by the Scheffé post-hoc test, unpaired two-sample t-test (p < 0.05). The strongest influence on push-out bond strength was exerted by the resin composite type (partial eta squared ηP2 = 0.505, p < 0.001), followed by the adhesive system (ηP2 = 0.138, p < 0.001), while the choice of the curing intensity was not significant (p = 0.465). The effect of the binary or ternary combinations of the three parameters was significant for the combinations resin composite type coupled adhesive system (ηP2 = 0.054, p < 0.001), only. The flowable resin composites showed predominantly mixed, while the universal and bulk-fill resin composite showed adhesive failure types. Cohesive failure types were not observed in any group. Multi-step adhesive systems are preferable to one-step adhesive systems due to their higher bond strength to dentin. Flowable resin composites showed the highest bond strength and should become more important as restoration material especially in cavity lining. The use of a soft start modus for polymerization of resin composites does not enhance the bond strength to dentin.


2013 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 315-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Andrea Salvio ◽  
Vinicius Di Hipólito ◽  
Adriano Luis Martins ◽  
Mario Fernando de Goes

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the hybridization quality and bond strength of adhesives to dentin. Materials and Methods: Ten human molars were ground to expose the dentin and then sectioned in four tooth-quarters. They were randomly divided into 5 groups according to the adhesive used: Two single-step self-etch adhesives - Adper Prompt (ADP) and Xeno III (XE), two two-step self-etching primer systems - Clearfil SE Bond (SE) and Adhe SE (ADSE), and one one-step etch-and-rinse system - Adper Single Bond (SB). Resin composite (Filtek Z250) crown buildups were made on the bonded surfaces and incrementally light-cured for 20 s. The restored tooth-quarters were stored in water at 37΀C for 24 h and then sectioned into beams (0.8 mm 2 in cross-section). Maximal microtensile bond strength (μ-TBS) was recorded (0.5 mm/min in crosshead speed). The results were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey′s test (α = 0.05). Thirty additional teeth were used to investigate the hybridization quality by SEM using silver methenamine or ammoniacal silver nitrate dyes. Results: SE reached significantly higher μ-TBS (P < 0.05); no significance was found between ADSE and XE (P > 0.05), and between SB and ADP (P > 0.05); ADSE and XE were significantly higher than SB and ADP (P < 0.05). The bonding interface of SB showed the most intense silver uptake. SE and ADSE showed more favorable hybridization quality than that observed for ADP and XE. Conclusions: The bond strength and hybridization quality were affected by the interaction form of the adhesives with dentin. The hybridization quality was essential to improve the immediate μ-TBS to dentin.


2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Gunaydin ◽  
AR Yazici ◽  
ZC Cehreli

SUMMARY This study evaluated the effect of 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) pretreatment of dentin on the immediate and aged microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of different adhesives to dentin in vivo and in vitro. Class I cavities were prepared in 80 caries-free human third molars of 40 patients in a split-mouth fashion. In each tooth pair, one tooth received 2% CHX pretreatment after which both teeth were randomly assigned to one of the following groups with respect to the type of adhesive system applied: Adper Single Bond 2 (etch-and-rinse), Clearfil SE Bond (two-step self-etch), Clearfil S3 Bond (one-step self-etch), and Adper Prompt-L-Pop (all-in-one self-etch). The teeth were restored with resin composite and extracted for μTBS testing either immediately or after six months in function. In vitro specimen pairs were prepared as with the clinical protocol in intact, freshly extracted human molars, and thereafter, subjected to testing immediately or after 5000× thermocycling. Data were analyzed with four-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bonferroni test was utilized for pair-wise comparisons. The immediate bond strength values were significantly higher than “aged” ones for all tested adhesives (p=0.00). The in vitro immediate bond strength values were statistically higher than in vivo bond strength values (p&lt;0.05). While the bond strength of in vitro aged, CHX-treated samples were higher than their in vivo counterparts (p&lt;0.05), no difference was observed in non-CHX treated groups (p&gt;0.05). In the absence of CHX pretreatment, all adhesives showed significantly higher immediate bond strength values than CHX-treated groups, while all “aged”, non-pretreated adhesives exhibited significantly lower bond strength values (both p&lt;0.05). By contrast, chlorhexidine pretreatment resulted in significantly higher aged bond strengths, regardless of the adhesive system and testing condition. Aging-associated decline in dentin bond strength of etch-and rinse and self-etch adhesives can be counteracted by chlorhexidine application.


2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. S. Kimmes ◽  
W. W. Barkmeier ◽  
R. L. Erickson ◽  
M. A. Latta

Clinical Relevance Self-etch adhesive systems are promoted as being more efficient for bonding procedures by using fewer treatment steps to condition tooth surfaces for bonding resin-based materials. Concern has been expressed regarding the ability of the newer self-etch adhesives to yield strong, durable bonds when compared to more traditional etch-and-rinse systems. Extending the treatment time of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives does not appear to result in relevant increases in the bond strength of resin composites to enamel or dentin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document