scholarly journals RESEARCH PAPER Structural changes of corn starch during fuel ethanol production from corn flour

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 333-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daria Szymanowska-Powałowska ◽  
Grażyna Lewandowicz ◽  
Wioletta Błaszczak ◽  
Artur Szwengiel
2000 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.S. Krishnan ◽  
F. Taylor ◽  
B.H. Davison ◽  
N.P. Nghiem

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Paula Jacobus ◽  
Jeferson Gross ◽  
John H. Evans ◽  
Sandra Regina Ceccato-Antonini ◽  
Andreas Karoly Gombert

Abstract Fuel ethanol is produced by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae mainly from corn starch in the United States and from sugarcane sucrose in Brazil, which together manufacture ∼85% of a global yearly production of 109.8 million m3 (in 2019). While in North America genetically engineered (GE) strains account for ∼80% of the ethanol produced, including strains that express amylases and are engineered to produce higher ethanol yields; in South America, mostly (>90%) non-GE strains are used in ethanol production, primarily as starters in non-aseptic fermentation systems with cell recycling. In spite of intensive research exploring lignocellulosic ethanol (or second generation ethanol), this option still accounts for <1% of global ethanol production. In this mini-review, we describe the main aspects of fuel ethanol production, emphasizing bioprocesses operating in North America and Brazil. We list and describe the main properties of several commercial yeast products (i.e., yeast strains) that are available worldwide to bioethanol producers, including GE strains with their respective genetic modifications. We also discuss recent studies that have started to shed light on the genes and traits that are important for the persistence and dominance of yeast strains in the non-aseptic process in Brazil. While Brazilian bioethanol yeast strains originated from a historical process of domestication for sugarcane fermentation, leading to a unique group with significant economic applications, in U.S.A., guided selection, breeding and genetic engineering approaches have driven the generation of new yeast products for the market.


2012 ◽  
Vol 160 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 229-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Shen ◽  
Jin-Song Guo ◽  
You-Peng Chen ◽  
Hai-Dong Zhang ◽  
Xu-Xu Zheng ◽  
...  

Fuel ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 87 (17-18) ◽  
pp. 3640-3647 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Pérez ◽  
I. Ballesteros ◽  
M. Ballesteros ◽  
F. Sáez ◽  
M.J. Negro ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Francis Digman ◽  
Kevin J. Shinners ◽  
Richard E. Muck ◽  
Bruce S. Dien

2012 ◽  
Vol 554-556 ◽  
pp. 990-993
Author(s):  
Jian Zou ◽  
Hai Yan Gao ◽  
Jie Zeng

Scanning electron microscopy of samples showed that corn flour granules by fermented and wet-milling were angular, pentagonal or elliptical similar to native starches while samples with extruding and cooking were irregularly fibrous and large granules. Protein of samples with wet-milling exhibited an obvious DSC endotherm, To 85.81°C, Tp 92.95°C, Tc 101.73°C and ΔH 1.614J/g.While the fermented and extruded samples had no endotherm. Ultra-violet absorption spectrometry showed that absorbance of fermented and extruded samples increased and the λmax were slightly red shift. The λmax were 294nm, 297nm and 310nm for wet-milling , fermented and extruded flour, respectively. SDS-PAGE patterns of wet-milling flour contained four bands, fermented samples only three bands while extruded samples had same bands with dry-milling.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document