De onrealistische evaluatie van arbeidsmarktbeleid

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arie Glebbeek

The unrealistic evaluation of labour market policies The unrealistic evaluation of labour market policies Active labour market policies have come under severe attack by the results of evaluation studies in various countries. In addition to this, labour economists ask for still more rigid evaluation methods, preferably based on experimental designs. The assumptions of these methods can be contrasted with Pawson & Tilley’s ‘Realistic Evaluation’ approach. From this we conclude that the current emphasis by economists on ‘pure effects’ and ‘net results’ (1) can lead to undue corrections that reflect an unrealistic view of policy measures and (2) does not fit well into the peculiarities of the labour market. A more realistic evaluation approach is called for, directed towards the testing and improvement of substantive policy theories. “What works for whom under which circumstances?” should be the leading question in evaluation research.

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Koning

Does the evaluation of active labour market policies have any future? Does the evaluation of active labour market policies have any future? The literature on the effectiveness of welfare-to-work services (i.e. schooling and job counseling) in the Netherlands provides a gloomy picture. First, only a few studies take proper account of selectivity and endogeneity biases. Second, the results of this (subset of) studies suggest that both schooling and counseling have only a modest, or no significant impact. In this article, I discuss various explanations for these findings. Furthermore, I describe various avenues for future research in this area, as well as the organization of more sound evaluation studies.


2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jaap de Koning

Active labour market policies: more effective than is often assumed Active labour market policies: more effective than is often assumed Active labour market policy aims at improving the functioning of the labour market. By providing employers and jobseekers with labour market information and job mediation and applying specific reintegration measures to the unemployed, it tries to improve the matching between vacancies and jobseekers, to reduce the level of unemployment, to make job chances more equal and to stimulate employment. A review of the international literature shows that a majority of the available studies point to positive effects of active policies on job entry chances. However, there are strong differences between the different types of measures. For incentives for jobseekers (sanctions, bonuses, etc.), job counseling and placement subsidies the evidence for favourable (net) effects is clear. The available studies show mixed results for training. For subsidized (‘artificial’) labour most studies find no effects or negative effects. The results also differ between groups. Active policies seem to be more effective for women than for men, more effective for older persons than for the young and more effective for the disadvantaged than for those with a relative good profile in the labour market. The effects on job entry chances are probably small on average. The latter is also true for the macroeconomic effects. The effects might be bigger if one knew more about the effectiveness of the various measures for different groups. Then a more optimal use of measures might be possible. Evaluation is needed to get this information. However, currently hardly any evaluation research is done in the Netherlands.


Author(s):  
Vanessa Puig-Barrachina ◽  
Pol Giró ◽  
Lucía Artazcoz ◽  
Xavier Bartoll ◽  
Imma Cortés-Franch ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Christer Hyggen ◽  
Janikke Solstad Vedeler

Using Work Training in Norway as a case, this article provides insight into motivation and structural factors that impact employer engagement with active labour market policies (ALMP) targeting young people. Drawing on mixed-methods data, we find a substantial proportion of Norwegian employers engage in Work Training. Both social responsibility and the economic interests of the company influence employers’ motivation for committing to Work Training. The findings reveal that the structural factors of business size and sector are crucial determinants of employer behaviour when it comes to hiring Work Training candidates. Although improved outreach activities by local job centres may be important, the article argues that efforts towards opening up sectors closed by sector-specific regulations on hiring, and increased awareness of structural constraints, are similarly important.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document