Key Practices and Interventions for Training and Transitioning UR Students from an HBCU into Advanced Degree Programs in the Biomedical Sciences

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-102
Author(s):  
James E Raynor ◽  
Juliette B Bell ◽  
Sherrice V Allen ◽  
Dawayne Whittington ◽  
Cathy Baldwin ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 91-102
Author(s):  
James E. Raynor, Jr. E. Raynor, Jr. ◽  
Juliette B. Bell B. Bell ◽  
Sherrice V. Allen ◽  
Dawayne Whittington ◽  
Cathy Baldwin Baldwin ◽  
...  

For more than 30 years, institutions funded by NIH had less than an impressive record for achieving diversity in the bio- medical workforce.   To address this concern, NIH recently implemented a series of bold initiatives to bridge the gaps in NIH training programs to further promote diversity. However, critical to the success of these initiatives is the timely report- ing, from institutions with large diverse populations such as HBCUs, of evidence-based practices, strategies, and interven- tions for training and transitioning individuals underrepre- sented (UR) in the biomedical sciences from baccalaureate to Ph.D. degree programs. To this end, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the 10-year success of the NIH-funded MBRS Fayetteville State University (FSU) Research Initiative for Scientific Enhancement (FSU-RISE) program for training and subsequent transitioning of UR students from the baccalaure- ate degree into advanced degree programs in the biomedical sciences. We hypothesized that the FSU-RISE program would significantly increase the number of well-prepared under- graduate UR biology and chemistry students who would graduate and transition into advanced degree programs in the biomedical sciences. This article provides evidence-based findings on practices, strategies and interventions for prepar- ing UR individuals from a Historically Black College and Uni- versity (HBCU) for successful entry into Ph.D. programs


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Allison Brandt Anbari

[ACCESS RESTRICTED TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI AT AUTHOR'S REQUEST.] There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that an increased number of bachelor's prepared nurses at the bedside improves patient safety and outcomes. However, these studies do not stratify their sample into four-year BSNs and ADN to BSN graduates. There must be underlying reasons why the BSN degree as an entirety (BSN, accelerated BSN, and ADN to BSN completion) improves patient care and outcomes, but a gap in the literature remains. To begin to address this gap, a qualitative study was conducted to investigate potential differences in patient safety meaning among differently educated nurses, specifically BSNs and ADN to BSNs graduates and to better understand how/if the advanced BSN education for ADNs enhanced their understanding of patient safety. Guided by the theory of Language Convergence/Meaning Divergence, interview data from 8 BSN and 8 ADN to BSN graduates were analyzed. Findings indicate there are two meaning levels, including understanding the meaning of patient safety at the local level as well as at the systemic level. The local level was where the meaning of patient safety is focused at the patient's bedside is regulated by the nurse. The systemic level encompasses the local level, but also includes the notion that health system factors such as policies and staffing are paramount to keeping patients safe. More frequently, ADN to BSN graduates' meaning of patient safety was at the local level, while BSNs' meaning centered at the systemic level. In addition, ADN to BSN graduates were asked to discuss components of their degree programs that they perceived to influence their ability to keep patients safe. The graduates pursued their degrees for career advancement purposes, and did not correlate the advanced degree with their ability to keep patients safe. Additional research is needed to further explore patient safety meaning differences among differently educated nurses and the potential impact those differences might have on patient care and outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S568-S568
Author(s):  
Roma S Hanks

Abstract Educational pipelines are effective in medical education with minority student populations. The University of South Alabama has a successful medical pipeline in the NIH/NIMHD-funded USA Center of Excellence – but no formal pipeline to support entry into careers in aging. In Gerontology and Geriatrics, the preponderance of pipelines focuses on students in advanced degree programs. The need remains largely unmet to inform young students about careers and research pathways in Gerontology before career and academic plans are established. The USA Gerontology Club initiated a student-led outreach to deliver information about careers in aging and academic programs in Gerontology and Geriatrics to high schools in communities with high health disparities. The program seeks to develop peer relationships with high school students to introduce them to careers in aging and related academic opportunities. The presentation includes barriers identified and development of a multi-phased, multi-disciplinary model leading to a formal pipeline for Gerontology.


The Advisor ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne Ogrodzinski ◽  
Erica Wehrwein ◽  
Kevin Kelly ◽  
James M. Poteracki ◽  
Valerie VanRyn ◽  
...  

Abstract The Physiology Majors Interest Group (P-MIG), a grassroots organization of educators, has collected data on the history and characteristics of Physiology and highly related undergraduate programs (ex: Human Biology, Pre-Medicine, Biomedical Sciences, etc.) that serve a common population of prehealth students. Data was obtained as part of an online survey sent out to P-MIG conference attendees at the 2017-2019 annual meetings (n=30). Participating institutions indicate that 25.9% have degrees called Physiology aligned with 28% being housed in a department of physiology, 75.9% are a Bachelor of Science program, 34.9% are affiliated with a College of Arts and Sciences, and 80% have a human/integrative physiology emphasis. Further, 47.6% of programs are greater than 10 years old and 100% have seen either no change or an increase in enrollment over the past 5 years. Most programs have a dedicated advising staff (68.2%) and formalized learning objectives for the major (61.9%). 34.1% have a curriculum committee who oversees the major. Program sizes vary widely from less than 50 to over 2000 students. While there is diversity in departmental organization and management structure in the programs, a commonality is that all programs are preparing students with aspirations in careers in healthcare. We report the similarities and differences between these programs to allow for advisors to better understand the broad landscape of pre-health programs at the undergraduate level.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 23S-35S
Author(s):  
Kai Hsiang Young ◽  
Leandris Liburd ◽  
Ana Penman-Aguilar

Established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the goal of the CDC Undergraduate Public Health Scholars (CUPS) program is to expose students underrepresented in public health and medicine to careers in public health; ultimately, increasing the membership of these groups in these fields including biomedical sciences. CDC implemented a retrospective outcome evaluation of 1,047 students who participated in the program from 2012 to 2017. Seventy-four percent (775) of students responded to the survey that captures their academic attainment and employment status, as well as their perception of the program’s and mentors’ influence on their career path. As of 2020, 639 (83.4%) of 775 participants have enrolled in an advanced degree program, with over 80% of 639 participants pursuing degrees in biomedical sciences, public health, or health care (BSPHHC)–related fields. Two thirds (374/566) of participants who reported they had ever been employed in a career position are working/have worked in BSPHHC-related fields. Overall, 77.4% (600) of 775 participants reported either the program or the mentors, or both were extremely or very influential to their career path. Students claimed the CUPS program had “opened their eyes,” inspired their interest, cultivated their passion for the field of public health, and fueled their drive to find solutions to and in social determinants of health and contribute to health equity. The opportunity to gain work and research experience through internship placements in CUPS has “opened doors” to first jobs and advanced education and training opportunities for many students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document