CONSIDERING SENTENCE FOR PREDICATE OFFENSE

2021 ◽  
pp. 111-122
Author(s):  
PREDRAG VULEVIĆ
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Previous Measurement ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Whole Process ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Made In

The process of sentencing means individualization and customization types and extent of sentencing the crime and its perpetrator. In that way, the purpose of criminal law, which consists in the last defense of the society from crime, is best realized. The whole process of keeping the pre-trial and criminal proceedings has the ultimate goal of sentencing the defendant. Furthermore, the procedure of execution of the sentence is based on its previous measurement and adjustment of the personality of the convicted person. Hence, the case law abounds with examples in which an inadequately measured sentence has called into question the criminal procedure itself and the defensive function of criminal law in the society. The issue of sentencing in modern criminal law has been resolved in accordance with modern trends in the field of punishing perpetrators of criminal offenses. Therefore, we can distinguish between regular sentencing, which means that the perpetrator goes to court for one criminal offense. However, in court practice, it is not uncommon for the perpetrator to go to court due to multiple predicate offenses made in ideal or real time. In this case, special sentencing rules apply, which take into account the fact that several criminal offenses are tried at the same time. In criminal doctrine, there are several modalities of sentencing for predicate offenses. Their number varied in different time intervals. Our legislator has incorporated into its norms three ways of sentencing for predicate offenses. These are the systems: absorptions, asperations, and cumulations. In this paper, we will point out the advantages, disadvantages and applicability of each of these systems that sentencing predicate offenses.

scholarly journals Circumstances to Be Clarified under the Investigation of Interference into Law Enforcement Officer’s Activity

2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 97-103
Author(s):  
V. O. Gusieva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Enforcement Officer ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Procedural Costs ◽  
Detailed List ◽  
Law Enforcement Officer

The author has substantiated the need to establish the circumstances to be clarified and has determined their significance during the investigation. It has been emphasized that the circumstances to be clarified include the circumstances to be proved in criminal proceedings, criminal and forensic characteristics of a criminal offense. In order to determine the circumstances to be clarified during the investigation of interference in the activities of a law enforcement officer, the author has studied the circumstances to be clarified within the group of criminal offenses related to obstruction of the activities of a law enforcement officer, as well as during the investigation of interference in the activities of a forensic expert. Taking into account the specified scientific provisions, the author has defined a detailed list of circumstances to be clarified during the investigation of interference in the activities of a law enforcement officer. It has been established that the circumstances to be clarified during the interference in the activities of a law enforcement officer include: 1) circumstances related to the criminal offense, namely: time, place, situation and traces of a criminal offense, methods of its commission (preparation, direct commission and concealment), tools and means used during the interference, the scope of procedural costs; circumstances that are the basis for ceasing criminal proceedings; the reasons and conditions that contributed to the commission of a criminal offense; 2) circumstances related to the identity of the victim, including: socio-demographic characteristics of the victim, place of work, position held; official and functional responsibilities, the victim’s belonging to a law enforcement agency during the commission of a criminal offense against him; the type and scope of damage caused to the victim; 3) circumstances related to the identity of the offender, namely: socio-demographic data of the offender, physiological and psychological condition, gender, citizenship, financial status, place of work, the record of criminal conviction and the facts of bringing to administrative liability; the presence of dependent disabled people; the presence of guilt in the form of direct intent, the purpose of the action; circumstances that aggravate or mitigate the punishment of the offender are grounds for releasing from criminal liability or punishment that exclude criminal liability; presence of accomplices.

scholarly journals CRIMINAL CHARACTERISTICS AS AN ELEMENT OF THE METHODOLOGY OF INVESTIGATION OF CRIMINAL OFFENSES AGAINST PUBLIC ORDER

2020 ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
О. А. Антонюк
Keyword(s):  
Public Order ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Illegal Acts

The relevance of the article is that the forensic characteristics should be based on the study of materials of criminal cases and proceedings, as well as have a direct practical direction. That is, to solve specific tasks of the investigation: to provide opportunities for the development of versions, to build correlations between individual elements, to ensure better planning of the investigation, and so on. Otherwise, it will really be a "phantom", ie an ineffective tool of investigation. At the same time, scientists continue to investigate illegal acts in terms of constructing their forensic characteristics. The scientific article is devoted to the study of some aspects of the investigation of criminal offenses against public order. The peculiarities of forensic characteristics as an element of the methodology of investigation of a certain category of criminal offenses are considered. The author emphasizes that the forensic characteristics should be based on the study of materials of criminal cases and proceedings, as well as has a direct practical direction. That is, to solve specific tasks of the investigation: to provide opportunities for proposing versions, building correlations between individual elements, ensuring better planning of the investigation, and so on. Otherwise, it will really be a "phantom", ie an ineffective tool of investigation. At the same time, scientists continue to investigate illegal acts in terms of constructing their forensic characteristics. In our opinion, this is really important for the methodology of investigation of any criminal offense, so we will try to solve the problem of its construction in the studied category of actions: against public order. The notion of forensic characteristics is formulated as a set of data on forensically important features and properties of an illegal act, which is due to the natural connections between its individual elements and provides construction and verification of versions to solve specific problems of criminal proceedings.

Legal challenges in bringing AI evidence to the criminal courtroom

2021 ◽  
pp. 203228442110570
Author(s):  
Katherine Quezada-Tavárez ◽  
Plixavra Vogiatzoglou ◽  
Sofie Royer
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Fair Trial ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Challenges ◽  
Criminal Courtroom ◽  
European Criminal Law ◽  
Applications Of Ai

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the criminal justice system. One of the promising applications of AI in this field is the gathering and processing of evidence to investigate and prosecute crime. Despite its great potential, AI evidence also generates novel challenges to the requirements in the European criminal law landscape. This study aims to contribute to the burgeoning body of work on AI in criminal justice, elaborating upon an issue that has not received sufficient attention: the challenges triggered by AI evidence in criminal proceedings. The analysis is based on the norms and standards for evidence and fair trial, which are fleshed out in a large amount of European case law. Through the lens of AI evidence, this contribution aims to reflect on these issues and offer new perspectives, providing recommendations that would help address the identified concerns and ensure that the fair trial standards are effectively respected in the criminal courtroom.

Part III The Right to Justice, C Restrictions on Rules of Law Justified By Action to Combat Impunity, Principle 23 Restrictions on Prescription

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pinzauti Giulia
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Theoretical Framework ◽  
Historical Background ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
The Right

Principle 23 deals with statutory limitations (prescription, in French) aimed at protecting defendants from stale claims that might be difficult to counter. Statutory limitations refer to legal norms that regulate the effects of the passage of time in domestic systems. In criminal law, they provide for a maximum timeframe, or prescription period, within which criminal proceedings can be instituted or sentences enforced. The passage of time makes the gathering of evidence more difficult and may also reduce the effectiveness of criminal prosecution. Significant delays in criminal action may thus impair the accused’s right to a fair trial. Furthermore, criminal proceedings tend to lose legitimacy as time passes. After providing a contextual and historical background on Principle 23, this chapter discusses its theoretical framework and how the statutory limitations have been applied in practice under multilateral treaties, domestic legislation and case-law. It also examines the practice of United Nations organs.

scholarly journals Criminal offenses - a new institute of criminal legislation of Ukraine

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kovalova Svitlana ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The article analyzes the feasibility of introducing the institution of criminal offense. The focus is on reforming the criminal justice system. It was found out that one of the directions of reforming the criminal justice of Ukraine is the introduction of the institute of criminal misdemeanor in the criminal legislation. According to the results of the study, different approaches to the expediency of establishing liability for misconduct in the criminal legislation of Ukraine have been identified. It is reasonable that changing the understanding of the concept of crime and the criteria for its evaluation is not an easy path, but in today's conditions the introduction of criminal offenses is a progressive, timely and unalterable step, as no scientific developments can solve law enforcement problems. Keywords: criminal proceedings, institute of criminal offense, crime, reforming, criminal legislation, Concept of reforms, criminal justice

scholarly journals Interaction between investigator and operational units in pretrial investigation of criminal offenses

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 272-276
Author(s):  
Maksym Ocheretyatyy
Keyword(s):  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Factual Information ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Theoretical Generalization

The article analyzes the essence of the outlined problem, focuses on the importance of the investigator's interaction with operational units in the pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses, outlines the concept, which is defined as a comprehensive and purposeful process of communication between different actors involved in criminal proceedings. , is the ultimate goal, which makes it possible to obtain factual information about the event of a criminal offense. This gave grounds for distinguishing the essence of this process, which in general is distinguished by the fact that the investigator is a procedural person who is directly responsible for the quality of pre-trial investigation, its planning and effectiveness of investigative (search) actions, their timeliness and consistency. It is also argued that the issues of theoretical generalization of the elements of the process of interaction of the investigator in the pre-trial investigation were effectively and accurately formulated in the above stages, which partially duplicate the stages of the pre-trial investigation. However, the proposed approach of individual researchers to differentiate the interaction not only in terms of criminal procedural law, but also from the standpoint of operational and investigative activities, as a process can also be useful in planning a pre-trial investigation. This logically gives grounds to claim that the interaction with operational units is based on close and coordinated cooperation within the current legislation, on the initiative of both parties, as well as the planned conduct of any investigative or non-public investigative (search) actions. The author, as a result of the received interpretations of basic terms it was given an opportunity to investigate its stages. Therefore, the approaches of scientists to determine the stages of interaction in the pre-trial investigation of criminal offenses are analyzed, they are generalized, and the most effective approach totheir structuring for theory and practice is determined.

scholarly journals Protection of privacy related to criminal procedure

2016 ◽  
pp. 53-65
Author(s):  
Milana Pisaric
Keyword(s):  
Information Technology ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
General Interest ◽  
Right To Privacy ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
The Right To Privacy ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Methods And Techniques ◽  
The Right

Every person has the right to privacy and protection of personal data and these rights may be restricted only in order to protect the general interest or the preservation of important values in society. If there is a certain degree of suspicion that a person committed a criminal offense, the competent authorities are authorized to limit his/her privacy rights and to collect and process personal data for the purposes of criminal proceedings, by taking certain actions and measures in accordance with the law. On the basis of legal authorization certain subjects may take regular and special evidentiary actions and measures, but possible privacy infringement and data collection should be limited to the extent necessary to suppress a specific criminal offense in accordance with the principle of proportionality. It is necessary and useful to apply the methods and techniques of information technology in order to detect and prove criminal offenses. However, uncritical regulation and voluntary application of advanced methods and techniques of surveillance and monitoring of user?s activities (whose daily activities increasingly rely on information technology) would create a real risk of expanding and deepening the scope of spheres of life to be monitored to a much greater extent than legitimate monitoring within the concept of pro?activity and creation of a complete and panoptic surveillance of personal data. This could not be justified by the needs to oppose even the most severe forms of criminal offenses. Thus, actions and measures based on the use of these techniques and methods should be laid down and applied in accordance with the principles of specificity, necessity and proportionality, and with control of the judicial authorities, so the right to privacy would not be jeopardized. It is necessary to find a proper balance between the needs of criminal proceedings and respect for human rights, with regard to regulating powers of investigative bodies in collecting data of individuals. In online environment, the protection of the right to legal personality and the right to free development of personality through the right to privacy as well as the protection of personal data are necessary to be provided by legal regulations containing even stricter and more precise rules (comparing to offline environment) that determine the scope of powers of the authorities to collect evidence for the purposes of criminal proceedings, because certain actions or measures can greatly interfere with the private sphere of individuals in the direction of a complete privacy annulment.

scholarly journals Criminal misdemeanors as a novelty of criminal and criminal procedure legislation

2020 ◽  
pp. 365-368
Author(s):  
Andrii Begma ◽  
Galyna Muliar ◽  
Oleksii Khovpun
Keyword(s):  
Expert Opinion ◽  
Video Recording ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Medical Examinations

The scientific article pays attention to the consideration of the concepts of “criminal offense”, “criminal offense”, “crime” andtheir implementation in criminal and criminal procedure legislation. Amendments to the legislation that came into force in connectionwith the adoption of the Law of Ukraine “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Simplification of Pre-trial Inves -tigation of Certain Categories of Criminal Offenses” are considered. The issue devoted to the new subject of criminal procedure – thecoroner and the head of the inquiry body is investigated.The article considers the types of evidence that are taken into account in the investigation of criminal offenses. Such evidenceshould include: explanations of persons, results of medical examination, expert opinion, testimony of technical devices and technicalmeans that have the functions of photography and filming, video recording, or means of photography and filming, video recording. Thepossibility of using evidence in the investigation of crimes is considered.During the criminal proceedings, a new entity is identified, which is actually engaged in the investigation of criminal offenses,such an entity is the investigator. Inquiry is a new unit that investigates criminal offenses. Inquiries are carried out by inquiry subdivisionsor authorized persons of other subdivisions.A criminal offense is an act (action or omission) provided by the Criminal Code, for which the main penalty is a fine of not morethan three thousand non-taxable minimum incomes or other punishment not related to imprisonment. Procedural sources of evidencein criminal proceedings on criminal offenses, in addition to certain Art. 84 of the CPC, there are also explanations of persons, the resultsof medical examinations, expert opinion, indications of technical devices and technical means that have the functions of photographyand filming, video recording, or means of photography and filming, video recording.The legislator does not rule out that the sources of evidence are testimony, physical evidence, documents, expert opinions, but infact the explanations of persons, the results of medical examinations, expert opinion, indications of technical devices and equipmentthat have the functions of photography and filming, video or photo – and filming, video recordings are also identified as sources of evidence.The purpose of such a division is to distinguish between sources of evidence that can be used to prove crimes and criminal offenses.In addition, there is a misunderstanding – what exactly can we use to form the evidence base in criminal proceedings.

A SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO OTHER INTERESTS AS A CRITERION FOR SUBSTANTIAL HARM AT CRIMINAL LAW

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (85) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Jurijs Lomonovskis
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Historical Development ◽  
Direct Object ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Basic Composition ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Additional Object ◽  
Court Practice

The aim of the article “A significant threat to other interests as a criterion for substantial harm at criminal law” is to examine the problems of understanding the concept of “substantial harm” in criminal law; to analyse whether the “significant threat to other interests” component of substantial harm is properly understood in practice. The lack of understanding of the concept determines the topicality of the article. To reach the goal of the article, such tasks are solved: 1. to consider the historical development of a law framework of “substantial harm”; 2. to get acquainted with the types of substantial harm in criminal law; 3. to compare the court practice with the basic legal doctrine; 4. to make a statement about the content of the concept of “significant threat to other interests” both in the framework of basic and qualifying criminal offenses. The article consists of 5 parts: introduction, understanding concept of other interests protected by law, connection of other interests protected by law with the direct object of the criminal offense, threat of other interests protected by law as qualifying attribute, conclusions. The novelty of the article is related to the lack of research into substantial harm problems in criminal law. The conclusions of the article are about court practice does not correspond to the basic of legal doctrine. In the conclusion of the article, the author expresses the thesis for basic composition of criminal offense: substantially harmed interests are those in the direct object of the criminal offense; as well as those included in additional objects, if specifically designated by the legislator. Regarding the determination of interests in qualifying composition of a criminal offense, the author of the article expresses the following http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/acj.v4i85.3673 thesis: substantial harm as a characteristic of the composition of a qualified criminal offense indicates the threat of an additional object of a criminal offense.

scholarly journals Consent in criminal offences against sexual freedom and sexual inviolability of a person

2021 ◽  
pp. 15-17
Author(s):  
Tetiana ZAVHORODNIA
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Violence ◽  
Sexual Intercourse ◽  
Violence Against Women ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Sexual Freedom ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Offenses ◽  
Voluntary Consent

Introduction. Combating sexual violence still remains one of the most important issues arisen in criminal law study. It should be noted that Istanbul Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence is still not ratified by Ukraine, which shall facilitate quality of criminal law concerning criminal offences against sexual freedom and sexual inviolability of a person. The purpose of the paper is to define meaning and content of consent in criminal offenses against sexual freedom and sexual inviolability of a person provided for in Section IV of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Results. The paper establishes that lack of consent is a constructive sign of rape (article 152 of the Criminal Code), sexual violence (article 153 of the Criminal Code) and coercion to have sexual intercourse (article 154 of the Criminal Code). The ways of solving arisen problems during the qualification of situations in which a person mistakenly believes that consent was given, as well as when consent was not given explicitly, have been determined. It is recommended to clarify the content of "voluntary consent" by indicating in the note to Article 152 of the Criminal Code, actions which shall not indicate voluntariness of consent. The paper notes that using the collocation "without voluntary consent" is superfluous in Articles 153 and 154 of the Criminal Code, since "coercion" and "violence" also indicate absence of voluntary consent. It has been established that consent is a distinguishing feature of a criminal offense provided for in Article 155 of the Criminal Code from Articles 152 and 153 of the Criminal Code, thus sexual intercourse with a person from 14 to 16 years with her consent indicates the commission of a criminal offense under Art. 155 of the Criminal Code. It is proposed to supplement Article 155 of the Criminal Code with the clause “in the absence of signs of criminal offenses under Art. 152 and art. 153 of the Criminal Code”. Conclusion. The paper provides that consent shall be both constructive and distinguishing feature of criminal offences against sexual freedom and sexual inviolability. Several problems of consent in such crimes are defined as well as ways of their solution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document