scholarly journals Stratospheric ozone trends for 1985–2018: sensitivity to recent large variability

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (19) ◽  
pp. 12731-12748 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. Ball ◽  
Justin Alsing ◽  
Johannes Staehelin ◽  
Sean M. Davis ◽  
Lucien Froidevaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Montreal Protocol ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Large Variability ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Ozone Trends

Abstract. The Montreal Protocol, and its subsequent amendments, has successfully prevented catastrophic losses of stratospheric ozone, and signs of recovery are now evident. Nevertheless, recent work has suggested that ozone in the lower stratosphere (< 24 km) continued to decline over the 1998–2016 period, offsetting recovery at higher altitudes and preventing a statistically significant increase in quasi-global (60∘ S–60∘ N) total column ozone. In 2017, a large lower stratospheric ozone resurgence over less than 12 months was estimated (using a chemistry transport model; CTM) to have offset the long-term decline in the quasi-global integrated lower stratospheric ozone column. Here, we extend the analysis of space-based ozone observations to December 2018 using the BASICSG ozone composite. We find that the observed 2017 resurgence was only around half that modelled by the CTM, was of comparable magnitude to other strong interannual changes in the past, and was restricted to Southern Hemisphere (SH) midlatitudes (60–30∘ S). In the SH midlatitude lower stratosphere, the data suggest that by the end of 2018 ozone is still likely lower than in 1998 (probability ∼80 %). In contrast, tropical and Northern Hemisphere (NH) ozone continue to display ongoing decreases, exceeding 90 % probability. Robust tropical (>95 %, 30∘ S–30∘ N) decreases dominate the quasi-global integrated decrease (99 % probability); the integrated tropical stratospheric column (1–100 hPa, 30∘ S–30∘ N) displays a significant overall ozone decrease, with 95 % probability. These decreases do not reveal an inefficacy of the Montreal Protocol; rather, they suggest that other effects are at work, mainly dynamical variability on long or short timescales, counteracting the positive effects of the Montreal Protocol on stratospheric ozone recovery. We demonstrate that large interannual midlatitude (30–60∘) variations, such as the 2017 resurgence, are driven by non-linear quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) phase-dependent seasonal variability. However, this variability is not represented in current regression analyses. To understand if observed lower stratospheric ozone decreases are a transient or long-term phenomenon, progress needs to be made in accounting for this dynamically driven variability.

scholarly journals Stratospheric ozone trends for 1985–2018: sensitivity to recent large variability

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. Ball ◽  
Justin Alsing ◽  
Johannes Staehelin ◽  
Sean M. Davis ◽  
Lucien Froidevaux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Seasonal Variability ◽  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Montreal Protocol ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Large Variability ◽  
Ozone Trends ◽  
Ozone Depleting Substances ◽  
Made In

Abstract. The Montreal Protocol has successfully prevented catastrophic losses of stratospheric ozone, and signs of recovery are now evident. Nevertheless, recent work suggests that ozone in the lower stratosphere ( 95 %, 30° S–30° N) decreases dominate the quasi-global integrated decrease (99 % probability); the integrated tropical stratospheric column (1–100 hPa, 30° S–30° N) displays a significant overall decrease, with 95 % probability. These decreases do not reveal an inefficacy of the Montreal Protocol. Rather, they suggest other effects to be at work, mainly dynamical variability on long or short timescale, counteracting the protocol's regulation of halogenated ozone depleting substances (hODS). We demonstrate that large inter-annual mid-latitude variations (30° –60° ), such as the 2017 resurgence, are driven by non-linear QBO phase-dependent seasonal variability. However, this variability is not represented in current regression analyses. To understand if observed lower stratospheric decreases are a transient or long-term phenomenon, progress needs to be made in accounting for this dynamically-driven variability.

scholarly journals Ozone trends derived from the total column and vertical profiles at a northern mid-latitude station

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 7081-7112 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Nair ◽  
S. Godin-Beekmann ◽  
J. Kuttippurath ◽  
G. Ancellet ◽  
F. Goutail ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Linear Trend ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Solar Flux ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Latitude Station ◽  
Ozone Trends ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column

Abstract. The trends and variability of ozone are assessed over a northern mid-latitude station, Haute-Provence Observatory (OHP – 43.93° N, 5.71° E), using total column ozone observations from the Dobson and Système d'Analyse par Observation Zénithale spectrometers, and stratospheric ozone profile measurements from Light detection and ranging, ozonesondes, Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II, Halogen Occultation Experiment and Aura Microwave Limb Sounder. A multi-variate regression model with quasi biennial oscillation (QBO), solar flux, aerosol optical thickness, heat flux, North Atlantic oscillation (NAO) and piecewise linear trend (PWLT) or Equivalent Effective Stratospheric Chlorine (EESC) functions is applied to the ozone anomalies. The maximum variability of ozone in winter/spring is explained by QBO and heat flux in 15–45 km and in 15–24 km, respectively. The NAO shows maximum influence in the lower stratosphere during winter while the solar flux influence is largest in the lower and middle stratosphere in summer. The total column ozone trends estimated from the PWLT and EESC functions are of −1.39±0.26 and −1.40±0.25 DU yr−1, respectively over 1984–1996 and about 0.65±0.32 and 0.42±0.08 DU yr−1, respectively over 1997–2010. The ozone profiles yield similar and significant EESC-based and PWLT trends in 1984–1996 and are about −0.5 and −0.8 % yr−1 in the lower and upper stratosphere, respectively. In 1997–2010, the EESC-based and PWLT trends are significant and of order 0.3 and 0.1 % yr−1, respectively in the 18–28 km range, and at 40–45 km, EESC provides significant ozone trends larger than the insignificant PWLT results. Therefore, this analysis unveils ozone recovery signals from total column ozone and profile measurements at OHP, and hence in the mid-latitudes.

scholarly journals Merging of ozone profiles from SCIAMACHY, OMPS and SAGE II observations to study stratospheric ozone changes

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 2423-2444
Author(s):  
Carlo Arosio ◽  
Alexei Rozanov ◽  
Elizaveta Malinina ◽  
Mark Weber ◽  
John P. Burrows
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Stratospheric Aerosol ◽  
Montreal Protocol ◽  
Inversion Algorithm ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Large Variability ◽  
Stratospheric Temperature

Abstract. This paper presents vertically and zonally resolved merged ozone time series from limb measurements of the SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY) and the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) Limb Profiler (LP). In addition, we present the merging of the latter two data sets with zonally averaged profiles from Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II. The retrieval of ozone profiles from SCIAMACHY and OMPS-LP is performed using an inversion algorithm developed at the University of Bremen. To optimize the merging of these two time series, we use data from the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) as a transfer function and we follow two approaches: (1) a conventional method involving the calculation of deseasonalized anomalies and (2) a “plain-debiasing” approach, generally not considered in previous similar studies, which preserves the seasonal cycles of each instrument. We find a good correlation and no significant drifts between the merged and MLS time series. Using the merged data set from both approaches, we apply a multivariate regression analysis to study ozone changes in the 20–50 km range over the 2003–2018 period. Exploiting the dense horizontal sampling of the instruments, we investigate not only the zonally averaged field, but also the longitudinally resolved long-term ozone variations, finding an unexpected and large variability, especially at mid and high latitudes, with variations of up to 3 %–5 % per decade at altitudes around 40 km. Significant positive linear trends of about 2 %–4 % per decade were identified in the upper stratosphere between altitudes of 38 and 45 km at mid latitudes. This is in agreement with the predicted recovery of upper stratospheric ozone, which is attributed to both the adoption of measures to limit the release of halogen-containing ozone-depleting substances (Montreal Protocol) and the decrease in stratospheric temperature resulting from the increasing concentration of greenhouse gases. In the tropical stratosphere below 25 km negative but non-significant trends were found. We compare our results with previous studies and with short-term trends calculated over the SCIAMACHY period (2002–2012). While generally a good agreement is found, some discrepancies are seen in the tropical mid stratosphere. Regarding the merging of SAGE II with SCIAMACHY and OMPS-LP, zonal mean anomalies are taken into consideration and ozone trends before and after 1997 are calculated. Negative trends above 30 km are found for the 1985–1997 period, with a peak of −6 % per decade at mid latitudes, in agreement with previous studies. The increase in ozone concentration in the upper stratosphere is confirmed over the 1998–2018 period. Trends in the tropical stratosphere at 30–35 km show an interesting behavior: over the 1998–2018 period a negligible trend is found. However, between 2004 and 2011 a negative long-term change is detected followed by a positive change between 2012 and 2018. We attribute this behavior to dynamical changes in the tropical middle stratosphere.

The impact of iodine on ozone trends in the lower stratosphere

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martyn Chipperfield ◽  
Wuhu Feng ◽  
Sandip Dhomse ◽  
Yajuan Li ◽  
Ryan Hossaini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Ozone Layer ◽  
Small Contribution ◽  
Chemical Transport Model ◽  
Heterogeneous Processes ◽  
Ozone Trends ◽  
Phase Chemistry ◽  
The Impact

&lt;p&gt;Depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer by chlorine and bromine species has been a major environmental issue since the early 1970s. Following controls on the production of the long-lived halocarbons which transport chlorine and bromine to the stratosphere, the ozone layer is expected to recover over the course of this century. Decreases in the stratospheric loading of chlorine and bromine have been observed and there are signs of this resulting in an increase in ozone in the upper stratosphere and the Antarctic lower stratosphere. However, in contrast to this expectation of increasing stratospheric ozone, Ball et al. (ACP doi:10.5194/acp-18-1379-2018, 2018, ACP doi:10.5194/acp-19-12731-2019, 2019) have reported evidence for an ongoing decline in lower stratospheric ozone at extrapolar latitudes between 60&amp;#176;S and 60&amp;#176;N. Chipperfield et al. (GRL, doi:10.1029/2018GL078071, 2018) analysed these results using the TOMCAT 3-D chemical transport model (CTM). They reported that much of the observed ozone decrease could be explained by dynamical variability. Furthermore, they investigated the potential role for bromine and chlorine from very short-lived species (VSLS) but found only a small contribution.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Very recently, Koenig et al. (PNAS, doi:10.1073/pnas.1916828117, 2020) have reported quantitative observations of almost 1 pptv iodine in the lower stratosphere. They show that this iodine is an important contribution to the local iodine loss budget and speculate that a trend in iodine could therefore explain the observed downward trend in ozone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Here we use an updated version of the TOMCAT CTM to investigate the impact of iodine on lower stratospheric ozone trends. We repeat the simulations of Chipperfield et al. (2018), using both ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalyses (to compare the quantification of the dynamical contribution). We use assume trends in the stratospheric injection of iodine to quantify the possible impact of this on global ozone trends through both gas-phase chemistry and novel heterogeneous processes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Evidence for a continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsetting ozone layer recovery

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 1379-1394 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. Ball ◽  
Justin Alsing ◽  
Daniel J. Mortlock ◽  
Johannes Staehelin ◽  
Joanna D. Haigh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Ozone Layer ◽  
Montreal Protocol ◽  
Downward Trend ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Ozone Depleting Substances ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column

Abstract. Ozone forms in the Earth's atmosphere from the photodissociation of molecular oxygen, primarily in the tropical stratosphere. It is then transported to the extratropics by the Brewer–Dobson circulation (BDC), forming a protective ozone layer around the globe. Human emissions of halogen-containing ozone-depleting substances (hODSs) led to a decline in stratospheric ozone until they were banned by the Montreal Protocol, and since 1998 ozone in the upper stratosphere is rising again, likely the recovery from halogen-induced losses. Total column measurements of ozone between the Earth's surface and the top of the atmosphere indicate that the ozone layer has stopped declining across the globe, but no clear increase has been observed at latitudes between 60° S and 60° N outside the polar regions (60–90°). Here we report evidence from multiple satellite measurements that ozone in the lower stratosphere between 60° S and 60° N has indeed continued to decline since 1998. We find that, even though upper stratospheric ozone is recovering, the continuing downward trend in the lower stratosphere prevails, resulting in a downward trend in stratospheric column ozone between 60° S and 60° N. We find that total column ozone between 60° S and 60° N appears not to have decreased only because of increases in tropospheric column ozone that compensate for the stratospheric decreases. The reasons for the continued reduction of lower stratospheric ozone are not clear; models do not reproduce these trends, and thus the causes now urgently need to be established.

scholarly journals Ozone trends derived from the total column and vertical profiles at a northern mid-latitude station

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (20) ◽  
pp. 10373-10384 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Nair ◽  
S. Godin-Beekmann ◽  
J. Kuttippurath ◽  
G. Ancellet ◽  
F. Goutail ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Solar Flux ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Latitude Station ◽  
Ozone Trends ◽  
Column Ozone ◽  
Total Column

Abstract. The trends and variability of ozone are assessed over a northern mid-latitude station, Haute-Provence Observatory (OHP: 43.93° N, 5.71° E), using total column ozone observations from the Dobson and Système d'Analyse par Observation Zénithale spectrometers, and stratospheric ozone profile measurements from light detection and ranging (lidar), ozonesondes, Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II, Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE) and Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS). A multivariate regression model with quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO), solar flux, aerosol optical thickness, heat flux, North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and a piecewise linear trend (PWLT) or equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC) functions is applied to the ozone anomalies. The maximum variability of ozone in winter/spring is explained by QBO and heat flux in the ranges 15–45 km and 15–24 km, respectively. The NAO shows maximum influence in the lower stratosphere during winter, while the solar flux influence is largest in the lower and middle stratosphere in summer. The total column ozone trends estimated from the PWLT and EESC functions are of −1.47 ± 0.27 and −1.40 ± 0.25 DU yr−1, respectively, over the period 1984–1996 and about 0.55 ± 0.30 and 0.42 ± 0.08 DU yr−1, respectively, over the period 1997–2010. The ozone profiles yield similar and significant EESC-based and PWLT trends for 1984–1996, and are about −0.5 and −0.8% yr−1 in the lower and upper stratosphere, respectively. For 1997–2010, the EESC-based and PWLT estimates are of the order of 0.3 and 0.1% yr−1, respectively, in the 18–28 km range, and at 40–45 km, EESC provides significant ozone trends larger than the insignificant PWLT results. Furthermore, very similar vertical trends for the respective time periods are also deduced from another long-term satellite-based data set (GOZCARDS–Global OZone Chemistry And Related trace gas Data records for the Stratosphere) sampled at northern mid-latitudes. Therefore, this analysis unveils ozone recovery signals from total column ozone and profile measurements at OHP, and hence in the northern mid-latitudes.

scholarly journals Validation and Trend Analysis of Stratospheric Ozone Data from Ground-Based Observations at Lauder, New Zealand

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 109
Author(s):  
Leonie Bernet ◽  
Ian Boyd ◽  
Gerald Nedoluha ◽  
Richard Querel ◽  
Daan Swart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Microwave Radiometer ◽  
Detailed Comparison ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Montreal Protocol ◽  
Atmospheric Composition ◽  
Ozone Trends ◽  
Institute Of Technology

Changes in stratospheric ozone have to be assessed continuously to evaluate the effectiveness of the Montreal Protocol. In the southern hemisphere, few ground-based observational datasets exist, making measurements at the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) station at Lauder, New Zealand invaluable. Investigating these datasets in detail is essential to derive realistic ozone trends. We compared lidar data and microwave radiometer data with collocated Aura Microwave Limb sounder (MLS) satellite data and ERA5 reanalysis data. The detailed comparison makes it possible to assess inhomogeneities in the data. We find good agreement between the datasets but also some possible biases, especially in the ERA5 data. The data uncertainties and the inhomogeneities were then considered when deriving trends. Using two regression models from the Long-term Ozone Trends and Uncertainties in the Stratosphere (LOTUS) project and from the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), we estimated resulting ozone trends. Further, we assessed how trends are affected by data uncertainties and inhomogeneities. We find positive ozone trends throughout the stratosphere between 0% and 5% per decade and show that considering data uncertainties and inhomogeneities in the regression affects the resulting trends.

Temporal changes in the structure of the UTLS and their potential impact on lower stratospheric ozone

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Kunkel ◽  
Franziska Weyland ◽  
William Ball ◽  
Peter Hoor
Keyword(s):  
Lower Stratosphere ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Source Region ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Montreal Protocol ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Internal Dynamic ◽  
Linear Modeling ◽  
Ozone Trends ◽  
Column Ozone

&lt;p lang=&quot;en-US&quot;&gt;&lt;span&gt;Although a general recovery of stratospheric ozone is expected after the successful implementation of the Montreal Protocol, strong indications for a decline in lower stratospheric ozone in the extratropics are still evident. Related studies attribute this decline to internal dynamic variability affecting the UTLS, in particular associated to the QBO and the exchange of air masses between tropical and extratropical regions. The dynamics affect the transport of ozone from the source region in the tropics into the extratropical lower stratosphere. More so, dynamics affect the structure of the lower stratosphere. In particular, the locations of the tropopause and of isentropic surfaces in the lower stratosphere, i.e., the region up to ~25 km altitude, affect the vertical profile of ozone and as such the integrated column ozone in the lower stratosphere. &lt;br /&gt;This study aims to address the relation between the changing altitude of the tropopause and isentropic surfaces in the lower stratosphere and the declining ozone in the extratropical UTLS. For this we use reanalysis data from ECMWF and dynamic linear modeling to study trends of the dynamic tropopause and of the thermodynamical structure and the potential consequences of these trends for lower stratospheric ozone. In particular, we ask the question: do ozone trends still show a decline if we use a dynamic instead of a fixed coordinate system to calculate these trends?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

scholarly journals Ozone trends at northern mid- and high latitudes – a European perspective

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1207-1220 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. R. P. Harris ◽  
E. Kyrö ◽  
J. Staehelin ◽  
D. Brunner ◽  
S.-B. Andersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Linear Trend ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Montreal Protocol ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
High Latitudes ◽  
Residual Circulation ◽  
Cycle Number ◽  
Ozone Loss ◽  
Ozone Trends

Abstract. The EU CANDIDOZ project investigated the chemical and dynamical influences on decadal ozone trends focusing on the Northern Hemisphere. High quality long-term ozone data sets, satellite-based as well as ground-based, and the long-term meteorological reanalyses from ECMWF and NCEP are used together with advanced multiple regression models and atmospheric models to assess the relative roles of chemistry and transport in stratospheric ozone changes. This overall synthesis of the individual analyses in CANDIDOZ shows clearly one common feature in the NH mid latitudes and in the Arctic: an almost monotonic negative trend from the late 1970s to the mid 1990s followed by an increase. In most trend studies, the Equivalent Effective Stratospheric Chlorine (EESC) which peaked in 1997 as a consequence of the Montreal Protocol was observed to describe ozone loss better than a simple linear trend. Furthermore, all individual analyses point to changes in dynamical drivers, such as the residual circulation (responsible for the meridional transport of ozone into middle and high latitudes) playing a key role in the observed turnaround. The changes in ozone transport are associated with variations in polar chemical ozone loss via heterogeneous ozone chemistry on PSCs (polar stratospheric clouds). Synoptic scale processes as represented by the new equivalent latitude proxy, by conventional tropopause altitude or by 250 hPa geopotential height have also been successfully linked to the recent ozone increases in the lowermost stratosphere. These show significant regional variation with a large impact over Europe and seem to be linked to changes in tropospheric climate patterns such as the North Atlantic Oscillation. Some influence in recent ozone increases was also attributed to the rise in solar cycle number 23. Changes from the late 1970s to the mid 1990s were found in a number of characteristics of the Arctic vortex. However, only one trend was found when more recent years are also considered, namely the tendency for cold winters to become colder.

scholarly journals Continuous decline in lower stratospheric ozone offsets ozone layer recovery

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. Ball ◽  
Justin Alsing ◽  
Daniel J. Mortlock ◽  
Johannes Staehelin ◽  
Joanna D. Haigh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Health ◽  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Ultra Violet ◽  
Ozone Layer ◽  
Montreal Protocol ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Ozone Trends ◽  
Ozone Depleting Substances ◽  
Column Ozone

Abstract. Ozone forms in the Earth's atmosphere from the photodissociation of molecular oxygen, primarily in the tropical stratosphere. It is then transported to the extratropics by the Brewer-Dobson circulation (BDC), forming a protective ozone layer around the globe. Human emissions of halogen-containing ozone-depleting substances (hODSs) led to a decline in stratospheric ozone until they were banned by the Montreal Protocol (MP), and since 1998 ozone in the upper stratosphere shows a likely recovery. Total column ozone (TCO) measurements of ozone between the Earth's surface and the top of the atmosphere, indicate that the ozone layer has stopped declining across the globe, but no clear increase has been observed at latitudes outside the polar regions (60–90). Here we report evidence from multiple satellite measurements that ozone in the lower stratosphere between 60° S and 60° N has declined continuously since 1985. We find that, even though upper stratospheric ozone is recovering in response to the MP, the lower stratospheric changes more than compensate for this, resulting in the conclusion that, globally (60°&amp;tinsp;S–60° N), stratospheric column ozone (StCO) continues to deplete. We find that globally, TCO appears to not have decreased because tropospheric column ozone (TrCO) increases, likely the result of human activity and harmful to respiratory health, are compensating for the stratospheric decreases. The reason for the continued reduction of lower stratospheric ozone is not clear, models do not reproduce these trends, and so the causes now urgently need to be established. Reductions in lower stratospheric ozone trends may partly lead to a small reduction in the warming of the climate, but a reduced ozone layer may also permit an increase in harmful ultra-violet (UV) radiation at the surface and would impact human and ecosystem health.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document