Nitrogen use efficiency of different slurry management in the pre-alpine grassland region – a 15N tracing experiment

Author(s):  
Marcus Zistl-Schlingmann ◽  
Steve Kwatcho-Kengdo ◽  
Mirella Schreiber ◽  
Bernd Berauer ◽  
Anke Jentsch ◽  
...  

<p>Grasslands of the alpine and pre-alpine region do not only sustain economic soil functions such as fodder production for local dairy and cattle farming but also important ecological soil functions such as water and nutrient retention, erosion and flood protection and habitat provision for extraordinarily high plant and animal biodiversity. The current management in the more intensively used grasslands in this region is based on fertilization with liquid cattle slurry, which is assumed to be prone to high N leaching and gaseous N emissions with their undesired consequences for soil, air and water quality.</p><p>In order to assess the nitrogen use efficiency and trade-offs such as greenhouse gas emissions and nitrate leaching of liquid slurry surface application under the auspices of climate change, we set up a <sup>15</sup>N cattle slurry labeling experiment, combined with a space for time climate change experiment using plant-soil mesocosms and lysimeters. The <sup>15</sup>N signal was traced in the plant-soil-microbe system for an entire year to assess productivity, plant nitrogen use efficiency, soil nitrogen retention and nitrogen losses. We found surprisingly low plant nitrogen use efficiency (recovery of less than ¼ of the applied <sup>15</sup>N in harvested plant biomass), soil N retention (ca ¼ <sup>15</sup>N recovery) and high environmental N losses (ca ½ of the <sup>15</sup>N tracer remained unrecovered). The estimates of N losses based on unrecovered <sup>15</sup>N were in good agreement with independent measurements of gaseous and hydrological N losses. Due to very high productivity and associated N exports with grass harvests, total N exports exceeded total N inputs. Such soil nitrogen mining was especially pronounced in the climate change treatments and was supported by increased soil nitrogen mineralization.</p><p>We also tested alternative slurry management (slurry injection into the soil, slurry acidification) that is supposed to increase nitrogen use efficiency. Slurry acidification but not slurry injection slightly increased plant nitrogen use efficiency and reduced nitrogen losses, however could overall not prevent significant soil nitrogen mining.</p><p>Consequently, both surface application and the more modern techniques of liquid cattle slurry fertilization showed low nitrogen use efficiency and promoted soil nitrogen mining. This is asking for a re-consideration of traditional fertilization regimes based on solid manure mixed with straw, a management that over historical timescales likely contributed to the build up of the large nitrogen stocks in pre-alpine grassland soils.</p>

2009 ◽  
Vol 89 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Bakker ◽  
C. J. Swanton ◽  
A. W. McKeown

An understanding of plant nitrogen accumulation and soil nitrogen dynamics is needed to develop management practices that balance nitrogen requirements of vegetable crops with environmental protection. Field trials were conducted in 2001 and 2002 to determine the interaction of increasing rates of pre-plant nitrogen fertilizer with broccoli tissue nitrogen accumulation and soil nitrogen dynamics. Broccoli cultivars Decathlon and Captain were grown with seven rates of nitrogen (0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 300, 400 kg N ha-1) applied pre-plant as ammonium nitrate. Rate of nitrogen accumulation by the above-ground tissue biomass varied over time and among nitrogen treatments, ranging from 1 to 16 kg N ha-1 d-1. At harvest, tissue nitrogen was high, but nitrogen use efficiency was low when high rates of nitrogen were applied. Soil NO3--N content decreased from planting to harvest. At harvest, soil NO3--N increased with increasing rates of nitrogen, with the majority of NO3--N found in the top 0 to 30 cm of the soil. At 200 kg ha-1 applied nitrogen, plants recovered essentially all of the estimated available nitrogen and there appears to be little risk of nitrogen loss during the growing season. Approximately 130 kg N ha-1 was supplied by the soil during the cropping season. Soil and crop residues at harvest ranged from 96 to 330 kg N ha-1. This residual fertility poses a risk for nitrogen loss. Practical and cost-effective strategies are needed to manage residual nitrogen in the soil and crop residues to minimize loss and retain this nitrogen for subsequent crops. Key words: Brassica oleracea L. italica Plenck, nitrogen budget, nitrogen rates, nitrogen use efficiency, nutrient management


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel McKay Flecher ◽  
Siul Ruiz ◽  
Tiago Dias ◽  
Katherine Williams ◽  
Chiara Petroselli ◽  
...  

<p>Half of the nitrogen applied to arable-fields is lost through several processes linked to soil moisture. Low soil moisture limits nitrogen mobility reducing nitrogen-uptake while wetter conditions can increase nitrogen leaching. Rainfall ultimately governs soil moisture and the fate of nitrogen in soil. However, the interaction between rainfall and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) remains poorly understood.</p> <p>We developed a field-scale modelling platform that describes coupled water and nitrogen transport, root growth and uptake, rainfall, the nitrogen-cycle and leaching to assess the NUE of split fertilisations with realistic rainfall patterns. The model was solved for every possible split fertilisation timing in 200+ growing seasons to determine optimal timings. Two previous field trials regarding rainfall and NUE had contrasting results: wetter years have enhanced fertiliser loss and drier years reduced plant nitrogen uptake. By choosing appropriate fertilisation timings in the model we could recreate the two contrasting trends and maintain variability in the data. However, we found by choosing other fertilisation timings we could mitigate the leaching in wetter years. Optimised timings could increase plant nitrogen uptake by up to 35% compared to the mean in dry years. Plant uptake was greatest under drier conditions due to mitigated leaching, but less likely to occur due to low nitrogen mobility. Optimal fertilisation timings varied dramatically depending on the rainfall patterns. Historic and projected rainfall patterns from 1950-2069 were used in the model. We found optimal NUE has a decrease from 2022-2040 due to increased heavy rainfall events and optimal fertilisation timings are later in the season but varied largely on a season-to-season basis.</p> <p>The results are a step towards achieving improved nitrogen efficiency in agriculture by using the ‘at the right time’ agronomic-strategy in the ‘4Rs’ of improved nitrogen fertilisation. Our results can help determine nitrogen fertilisation timings in changing climates.</p>


Agronomy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oladapo Adeyemi ◽  
Reza Keshavarz-Afshar ◽  
Emad Jahanzad ◽  
Martin Leonardo Battaglia ◽  
Yuan Luo ◽  
...  

Corn (Zea mays L.) grain is a major commodity crop in Illinois and its production largely relies on timely application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers. Currently, growers in Illinois and other neighboring states in the U.S. Midwest use the maximum return to N (MRTN) decision support system to predict corn N requirements. However, the current tool does not factor in implications of integrating cover crops into the rotation, which has recently gained attention among growers due to several ecosystem services associated with cover cropping. A two-year field trail was conducted at the Agronomy Research Center in Carbondale, IL in 2018 and 2019 to evaluate whether split N application affects nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of corn with and without a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cover crop. A randomized complete block design with split plot arrangements and four replicates was used. Main plots were cover crop treatments (no cover crop (control) compared to a wheat cover crop) and subplots were N timing applications to the corn: (1) 168 kg N ha−1 at planting; (2) 56 kg N ha−1 at planting + 112 kg N ha−1 at sidedress; (3) 112 kg N ha−1 at planting + 56 kg N ha−1 at sidedress; and (4) 168 kg N ha−1 at sidedress along with a zero-N control as check plot. Corn yield was higher in 2018 than 2019 reflecting more timely precipitation in that year. In 2018, grain yield declined by 12.6% following the wheat cover crop compared to no cover crop control, indicating a yield penalty when corn was preceded with a wheat cover crop. In 2018, a year with timely and sufficient rainfall, there were no yield differences among N treatments and N balances were near zero. In 2019, delaying the N application improved NUE and corn grain yield due to excessive rainfall early in the season reflecting on N losses which was confirmed by lower N balances in sidedressed treatments. Overall, our findings suggest including N credit for cereals in MRTN prediction model could help with improved N management in the Midwestern United States.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document