Elastic properties of rocks: Why shouldn’t they be constant?
<pre><span lang="EN-US">&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; Over past decades, different approaches have been suggested for assessing the elastic constants of materials. In mechanics, the elastic properties are evaluated according to Hooke&#8217;s law from the static stress-strain curves, in the strain range before the material failure. In rock mechanics, this approach is used as well for characterizing elastic constants of rocks. Moreover, thanks to development of seismology and applied geophysics, seismic wave velocities were found to allow evaluating rock elastic properties. This approach has been largely developed by the rock physics/petrophysics community as a simple and non-destructive &#160;mean of characterization of rock elastic constants.</span></pre> <pre><span lang="EN-US">&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; Ideally, being expected to probe the same material constants, the two approaches should yield the same results. However, in practice, the results seldom compare for a number of potential reasons, such as strains rate and amplitude. </span></pre> <pre><span lang="EN-US">This work aims to investigate, discuss and &#8211; possibly &#8211; reconcile these two approaches. Different igneous and sedimentary rocks are tested in the laboratory to investigate the influence of different potential factors. Three measuring methods are used: i) static stress-strains, ii) ultrasonic waves velocities, iii) stress-strains oscillations of varying amplitude. The experimental results are then discussed on the basis of existing theories.&#160; </span></pre>