scholarly journals Evaluation of the use of radar-derived precipitation in water balance simulations: A case study in small-medium catchments in Saxony, Germany

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanh Thi Luong ◽  
Ivan Vorobevskii ◽  
Judith Pöschmann ◽  
Rico Kronenberg
Keyword(s):  
Water Balance ◽  
Spatial Information ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Water Balance Components ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Radar Imagery

<p>Water balance estimation/modeling is highly dependent on good-quality precipitation data and often lacks enough spatial information about it. Quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) using radar data is recognized to have a good potential to significantly enhance the spatial depiction of precipitation compared to conventional rain gauge-based methods. However, precipitation measurements are often underestimated by wind drift or funnel evaporation, so that a correction such as Richter’s method is required before the data can be applied in the model. In this study, the Richter correction is applied for the first time to a radar-based QPE, namely RADKLIM-RW, to model water balance in ten selected catchments in Saxony, Germany. The modelled water balance components for the period 2001-2017 were evaluated by means of comparison of radar- and gauge-based precipitation inputs. The results showed that RADKLIM-RW was able to produce reliable simulations of discharge and water balance (KGE = 0.56 and 0.71 on the daily and monthly scales respectively). Application of the Richter correction improved the model performance by 5.5% and 8.9 % (for rain gauge-based and RADKLIM precipitation respectively). The study concluded that radar data as precipitation input to (pseudo)distributed hydrologic model shows immense potential to improve water balance simulations.</p><p><strong>Hightlights</strong>:</p><ul><li>Comparison of precipitation derived from sensor networks and radar imagery for small catchments</li> <li>Evaluation of potential application of radar precipitation in water balance simulation at regional scale</li> <li>Effect of wind correction (“Richter” correction) on radar precipitation products</li> <li>Evaluating corrected precipitation on water balance processes</li> </ul><p><strong>Keywords</strong>: HRU, radar climatology, RADKLIM RW (RADOLAN), Richter correction, Open sensor network, water balance simulation, BROOK90</p>

scholarly journals Precipitation Estimation Methods in Continuous, Distributed Urban Hydrologic Modeling

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1340
Author(s):  
Woodson ◽  
Adams ◽  
Dymond
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Modeling ◽  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Uniform Estimate ◽  
Mean Field ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Urban Watersheds ◽  
Precipitation Estimation

Quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) remains a key area of uncertainty in hydrological modeling and prediction, particularly in small, urban watersheds, which respond rapidly to precipitation and can experience significant spatial variability in rainfall fields. Few studies have compared QPE methods in small, urban watersheds, and studies that have examined this topic only compared model results on an event basis using a small number of storms. This study sought to compare the efficacy of multiple QPE methods when simulating discharge in a small, urban watershed on a continuous basis using an operational hydrologic model and QPE forcings. The research distributed hydrologic model (RDHM) was used to model a basin in Roanoke, Virginia, USA, forced with QPEs from four methods: mean field bias (MFB) correction of radar data, kriging of rain gauge data, uncorrected radar data, and a basin-uniform estimate from a single gauge inside the watershed. Based on comparisons between simulated and observed discharge at the basin outlet for a six-month period in 2018, simulations forced with the uncorrected radar QPE had the highest accuracy, as measured by root mean squared error (RMSE) and peak flow relative error, despite systematic underprediction of the mean areal precipitation (MAP). Simulations forced with MFB-corrected radar data consistently and significantly overpredicted discharge, but had the highest accuracy in predicting the timing of peak flows.

Evolving Multisensor Precipitation Estimation Methods: Their Impacts on Flow Prediction Using a Distributed Hydrologic Model

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1414-1431 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kitzmiller ◽  
Suzanne Van Cooten ◽  
Feng Ding ◽  
Kenneth Howard ◽  
Carrie Langston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Freezing Level ◽  
Distributed Hydrologic Model ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates

Abstract This study investigates evolving methodologies for radar and merged gauge–radar quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) to determine their influence on the flow predictions of a distributed hydrologic model. These methods include the National Mosaic and QPE algorithm package (NMQ), under development at the National Severe Storms Laboratory (NSSL), and the Multisensor Precipitation Estimator (MPE) and High-Resolution Precipitation Estimator (HPE) suites currently operational at National Weather Service (NWS) field offices. The goal of the study is to determine which combination of algorithm features offers the greatest benefit toward operational hydrologic forecasting. These features include automated radar quality control, automated Z–R selection, brightband identification, bias correction, multiple radar data compositing, and gauge–radar merging, which all differ between NMQ and MPE–HPE. To examine the spatial and temporal characteristics of the precipitation fields produced by each of the QPE methodologies, high-resolution (4 km and hourly) gridded precipitation estimates were derived by each algorithm suite for three major precipitation events between 2003 and 2006 over subcatchments within the Tar–Pamlico River basin of North Carolina. The results indicate that the NMQ radar-only algorithm suite consistently yielded closer agreement with reference rain gauge reports than the corresponding HPE radar-only estimates did. Similarly, the NMQ radar-only QPE input generally yielded hydrologic simulations that were closer to observations at multiple stream gauging points. These findings indicate that the combination of Z–R selection and freezing-level identification algorithms within NMQ, but not incorporated within MPE and HPE, would have an appreciable positive impact on hydrologic simulations. There were relatively small differences between NMQ and HPE gauge–radar estimates in terms of accuracy and impacts on hydrologic simulations, most likely due to the large influence of the input rain gauge information.

scholarly journals Intercomparison of Rain Gauge, Radar, and Satellite-Based Precipitation Estimates with Emphasis on Hydrologic Forecasting

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koray K. Yilmaz ◽  
Terri S. Hogue ◽  
Kuo-lin Hsu ◽  
Soroosh Sorooshian ◽  
Hoshin V. Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Model Performance ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Soil Moisture Accounting ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimates ◽  
System Maps ◽  
Accounting Model ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

Abstract This study compares mean areal precipitation (MAP) estimates derived from three sources: an operational rain gauge network (MAPG), a radar/gauge multisensor product (MAPX), and the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks (PERSIANN) satellite-based system (MAPS) for the time period from March 2000 to November 2003. The study area includes seven operational basins of varying size and location in the southeastern United States. The analysis indicates that agreements between the datasets vary considerably from basin to basin and also temporally within the basins. The analysis also includes evaluation of MAPS in comparison with MAPG for use in flow forecasting with a lumped hydrologic model [Sacramento Soil Moisture Accounting Model (SAC-SMA)]. The latter evaluation investigates two different parameter sets, the first obtained using manual calibration on historical MAPG, and the second obtained using automatic calibration on both MAPS and MAPG, but over a shorter time period (23 months). Results indicate that the overall performance of the model simulations using MAPS depends on both the bias in the precipitation estimates and the size of the basins, with poorer performance in basins of smaller size (large bias between MAPG and MAPS) and better performance in larger basins (less bias between MAPG and MAPS). When using MAPS, calibration of the parameters significantly improved the model performance.

scholarly journals On the selection of precipitation products for the regionalisation of hydrological model parameters

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 5805-5837
Author(s):  
Oscar M. Baez-Villanueva ◽  
Mauricio Zambrano-Bigiarini ◽  
Pablo A. Mendoza ◽  
Ian McNamara ◽  
Hylke E. Beck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Temporal Distribution ◽  
Hydrological Regime ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Spatial Proximity ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Ungauged Catchments ◽  
Water Balance Components ◽  
Feature Similarity

Abstract. Over the past decades, novel parameter regionalisation techniques have been developed to predict streamflow in data-scarce regions. In this paper, we examined how the choice of gridded daily precipitation (P) products affects the relative performance of three well-known parameter regionalisation techniques (spatial proximity, feature similarity, and parameter regression) over 100 near-natural catchments with diverse hydrological regimes across Chile. We set up and calibrated a conceptual semi-distributed HBV-like hydrological model (TUWmodel) for each catchment, using four P products (CR2MET, RF-MEP, ERA5, and MSWEPv2.8). We assessed the ability of these regionalisation techniques to transfer the parameters of a rainfall-runoff model, implementing a leave-one-out cross-validation procedure for each P product. Despite differences in the spatio-temporal distribution of P, all products provided good performance during calibration (median Kling–Gupta efficiencies (KGE′s) > 0.77), two independent verification periods (median KGE′s >0.70 and 0.61, for near-normal and dry conditions, respectively), and regionalisation (median KGE′s for the best method ranging from 0.56 to 0.63). We show how model calibration is able to compensate, to some extent, differences between P forcings by adjusting model parameters and thus the water balance components. Overall, feature similarity provided the best results, followed by spatial proximity, while parameter regression resulted in the worst performance, reinforcing the importance of transferring complete model parameter sets to ungauged catchments. Our results suggest that (i) merging P products and ground-based measurements does not necessarily translate into an improved hydrologic model performance; (ii) the spatial resolution of P products does not substantially affect the regionalisation performance; (iii) a P product that provides the best individual model performance during calibration and verification does not necessarily yield the best performance in terms of parameter regionalisation; and (iv) the model parameters and the performance of regionalisation methods are affected by the hydrological regime, with the best results for spatial proximity and feature similarity obtained for rain-dominated catchments with a minor snowmelt component.

Global BROOK90: validation, uncertainties, current progress and future outline.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Vorobevskii ◽  
Rico Kronenberg
Keyword(s):  
Water Balance ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Low Flow ◽  
Easy Access ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Water Balance Components ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
Small Catchment ◽  
Wide Range

<p>‘Just drop a catchment and receive reasonable model output’ – still stays as motto and main idea of the ‘Global BROOK90’ project. The open-source R-package is build-up on global land cover, soil, topographical, meteorological datasets and the lumped hydrological model as a core to simulate water balance components on HRU scale all over the world in an automatic mode. First introduced in EGU2020 and followed by GitHub code release including an publication of methodology with few examples we want to continue with the insights on the current state and highlight the future steps of the project.</p><p>A global validation of discharge and evapotranspiration components of the model showed promising results. We used 190 small (median size of 64 km<sup>2</sup>) catchments and FLUXNET data which represent a wide range of relief, vegetation and soil types within various climate zones. The model performance was evaluated with NSE, KGE, KGESS and MAE. In more than 75 % of the cases the framework performed better than the mean of the observed discharge. On a temporal scale the performance is significantly better on a monthly vs daily scale. Cluster analysis revealed that some of the site characteristics have a significant influence on the performance. Additionally, it was found that Global BROOK90 outperforms GloFAS ERA5 discharge reanalysis (for the category with smallest catchments).</p><p>A cross-combination of three different BROOK90 setups and three forcing datasets was set up to reveal uncertainties of the Global BROOK90 package using a small catchment in Germany as a case study. Going from local to regional and finally global scale we compared mixtures of model parameterization schemes (original calibrated BROOK90, EXTRUSO and Global BROOK90) and meteorological datasets (local gauges, RaKlida and ERA5). Besides high model performances for a local dataset plus a calibrated model and weaker results for ERA5 and the Global BROOK90, it was found that the ERA5 dataset is still able to provide good results when combined with a regional and local parameterization. On the other side, the combination of a global parameterization with local and regional forcings gives still adequate, but much worse results. Furthermore, a hydrograph separation revealed that the Global BROOK90 parameterization as well as ERA5 discharge data perform weaker especially within low flow periods.</p><p>Currently, some new features are added to the original package. First, with the recent release of the ERA5 extension, historical simulations with the package now are expanded to 1950-2021 period. Additionally, an alternative climate reanalysis dataset is included in the framework (Merra-2, 0.5x0.625-degree spatial resolution, starting from 1980). A preliminary validation shows insignificant differences between both meteorological datasets with respect to the discharge based model performance.</p><p>Further upgrades of the framework will include the following core milestones: recognition of forecast and climate projections and parameter optimization features. In the nearest future we plan to utilize full power of the Climate Data Store for easy access to seasonal forecasts (i.e. ECMWF, DWD, NCEP) as well as climate projections (CMIP5) to extend the package’s scope to predict near and far future water balance components.</p>

scholarly journals Impact of the Altitudinal Gradients of Precipitation on the Radar QPE Bias in the French Alps

Atmosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Faure ◽  
Guy Delrieu ◽  
Nicolas Gaussiat
Keyword(s):  
Ground Level ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Altitudinal Gradients ◽  
French Alps ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Radar Data Processing

In the French Alps the quality of the radar Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) is limited by the topography and the vertical structure of precipitation. A previous study realized in all the French Alps, has shown a general bias between values of the national radar QPE composite and the rain gauge measurements: a radar QPE over-estimation at low altitude (+20% at 200 m a.s.l.), and an increasing underestimation at high altitudes (until −40% at 2100 m a.s.l.). This trend has been linked to altitudinal gradients of precipitation observed at ground level. This paper analyzes relative altitudinal gradients of precipitation estimated with rain gauges measurements in 2016 for three massifs around Grenoble, and for different temporal accumulations (yearly, seasonal, monthly, daily). Comparisons of radar and rain gauge accumulations confirm the bias previously observed. The parts of the current radar data processing affecting the bias value are pointed out. The analysis shows a coherency between the relative gradient values estimated at the different temporal accumulations. Vertical profiles of precipitation detected by a research radar installed at the bottom of the valley also show how the wide horizontal variability of precipitation inside the valley can affect the gradient estimation.

scholarly journals Observations and Forecasts from the Landfall of Tropical Cyclones John, Lane, and Paul (2006) over Northwestern Mexico

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 1373-1393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis M. Farfán ◽  
Rosario Romero-Centeno ◽  
G. B. Raga
Keyword(s):  
Tropical Cyclones ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Intensity Change ◽  
Strong Wind ◽  
Intensity Changes ◽  
Radar Imagery ◽  
Northwestern Mexico ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

Abstract This study focuses on track and intensity changes of three tropical cyclones that, during the season of 2006, developed in the eastern North Pacific basin and made landfall over northwestern Mexico. Observational datasets, including satellite and radar imagery and a rain gauge network, are used to document regional-scale structures. Additionally, gridded fields are applied to determine the large-scale environment. John made landfall as a category-2 hurricane on the Saffir–Simpson scale and moved along the Baja California Peninsula during more than 40 h, resulting in total rainfall of up to 506 mm. The largest accumulations were located over mountains and set new records with respect to daily rates from the 1969–2005 period. Later in the season, Lane and Paul made landfall over the mainland and brought moderate rainfall over the coastal plains. Lane became a category-3 hurricane and was the third strongest hurricane to make landfall since 1969. In contrast, Paul followed a recurving track to reach the coastline as a weakening tropical depression. Strong wind shear, associated with a midlatitude trough, is found to be related to the intensity change. Examination of the official forecasts reveals that first inland positions were predicted several days before the actual landfall events. An assessment of the forecasts issued 1–3 days prior to landfall shows large track errors associated with some of the above tropical cyclones and this resulted in a westward bias. It is suggested that the track errors are due to an inadequate representation of the large-scale environment that steered the tropical cyclones.

scholarly journals A meteorological–hydrological regional ensemble forecast for an early-warning system over small Apennine catchments in Central Italy

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 3135-3156
Author(s):  
Rossella Ferretti ◽  
Annalina Lombardi ◽  
Barbara Tomassetti ◽  
Lorenzo Sangelantoni ◽  
Valentina Colaiuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Regional Scale ◽  
Central Italy ◽  
Warning System ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Ensemble Forecast ◽  
Precipitation Forecast ◽  
Statistical Indicator ◽  
Abruzzo Region

Abstract. The weather forecasts for precipitation have considerably improved in recent years thanks to the increase of computational power. This allows for the use of both a higher spatial resolution and the parameterization schemes specifically developed for representing sub-grid scale physical processes at high resolution. However, precipitation estimation is still affected by errors that can impact the response of hydrological models. To the aim of improving the hydrological forecast and the characterization of related uncertainties, a regional-scale meteorological–hydrological ensemble is presented. The uncertainties in the precipitation forecast and how they propagate in the hydrological model are also investigated. A meteorological–hydrological offline coupled ensemble is built to forecast events in a complex-orography terrain where catchments of different sizes are present. The Best Discharge-based Drainage (BDD; both deterministic and probabilistic) index, is defined with the aim of forecasting hydrological-stress conditions and related uncertainty. In this context, the meteorological–hydrological ensemble forecast is implemented and tested for a severe hydrological event which occurred over Central Italy on 15 November 2017, when a flood hit the Abruzzo region with precipitation reaching 200 mm (24 h)−1 and producing damages with a high impact on social and economic activities. The newly developed meteorological–hydrological ensemble is compared with a high-resolution deterministic forecast and with the observations (rain gauges and radar data) over the same area. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) statistical indicator shows how skilful the ensemble precipitation forecast is with respect to both rain-gauge- and radar-retrieved precipitation. Moreover, both the deterministic and probabilistic configurations of the BDD index are compared with the alert map issued by Civil Protection Department for the event showing a very good agreement. Finally, the meteorological–hydrological ensemble allows for an estimation of both the predictability of the event a few days in advance and the uncertainty of the flood. Although the modelling framework is implemented on the basins of the Abruzzo region, it is portable and applicable to other areas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document