scholarly journals Influence of high-latitude geomagnetic pulsations on recordings of broadband force-balanced seismic sensors

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Kozlovskaya ◽  
A. Kozlovsky
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Geomagnetic Latitude ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Auroral Oval ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Geomagnetic Pulsations ◽  
Seismic Sensors ◽  
Magnetic Poles ◽  
Magnetic Disturbances

Abstract. Seismic broadband sensors with electromagnetic feedback are sensitive to variations of surrounding magnetic field, including variations of geomagnetic field. Usually, the influence of the geomagnetic field on recordings of such seismometers is ignored. It might be justified for seismic observations at middle and low latitudes. The problem is of high importance, however, for observations in Polar Regions (above 60° geomagnetic latitude), where magnitudes of natural magnetic disturbances may be two or even three orders larger. In our study we investigate the effect of ultra-low frequency (ULF) magnetic disturbances, known as geomagnetic pulsations, on the STS-2 seismic broadband sensors. The pulsations have their sources and, respectively, maximal amplitudes in the region of the auroral ovals, which surround the magnetic poles in both hemispheres at geomagnetic latitude (GMLAT) between 60° and 80°. To investigate sensitivity of the STS-2 seismometer to geomagnetic pulsations, we compared the recordings of permanent seismic stations in northern Finland to the data of the magnetometers of the IMAGE network located in the same area. Our results show that temporary variations of magnetic field with periods of 40–150 s corresponding to regular Pc4 and irregular Pi2 pulsations are seen very well in recordings of the STS-2 seismometers. Therefore, these pulsations may create a serious problem for interpretation of seismic observations in the vicinity of the auroral oval. Moreover, the shape of Pi2 magnetic disturbances and their periods resemble the waveforms of glacial seismic events reported originally by Ekström (2003). The problem may be treated, however, if combined analysis of recordings of co-located seismic and magnetic instruments is used.

scholarly journals Influence of high-latitude geomagnetic pulsations on recordings of broad-band force-balanced seismic sensors

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Kozlovskaya ◽  
A. Kozlovsky
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Broad Band ◽  
Geomagnetic Latitude ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Auroral Oval ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Geomagnetic Pulsations ◽  
Seismic Sensors ◽  
Magnetic Disturbances

Abstract. Seismic broad-band sensors with electromagnetic feedback are sensitive to variations of surrounding magnetic field, including variations of geomagnetic field. Usually, the influence of the geomagnetic field on recordings of such seismometers is ignored. It might be justified for seismic observations at middle and low latitudes. The problem is of high importance, however, for observations in Polar Regions (above 60° geomagnetic latitude), where magnitudes of natural magnetic disturbances may be two or even three orders larger. In our study we investigate the effect of ultra-low frequency (ULF) magnetic disturbances, known as geomagnetic pulsations, on the STS-2 seismic broadband sensors. The pulsations have their sources and, respectively, maximal amplitudes in the region of the auroral ovals, which surround the magnetic poles in both hemispheres at geomagnetic latitude (MLAT) between 60° and 80°. To investigate sensitivity of the STS-2 seismometer to geomagnetic pulsations, we compared the recordings of permanent seismic stations in northern Finland to the data of the magnetometers of the IMAGE network located in the same area. Our results show that temporary variations of magnetic field with periods of 40–150 s corresponding to regular Pc4 and irregular Pi2 pulsations are seen very well in recordings of the STS-2 seismometers. Therefore, these pulsations may create a serious problem for interpretation of seismic observations in the vicinity of the auroral oval. Moreover, the shape of Pi2 magnetic disturbances and their periods resemble the waveforms of glacial seismic events reported originally by Ekström (2003). The problem may be treated, however, if combined analysis of recordings of collocated seismic and magnetic instruments is used.

Determining the Polar Cusp Longitudinal Location from Pc5 Geomagnetic Field Measurements at a Pair of High Latitude Stations

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (S335) ◽  
pp. 139-141
Author(s):  
Stefania Lepidi ◽  
Patrizia Francia ◽  
Lili Cafarella ◽  
Domenico Di Mauro ◽  
Martina Marzocchetti
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Satellite Data ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Geomagnetic Latitude ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Field Measurements ◽  
Polar Cap ◽  
Polar Cusp ◽  
Local Noon

AbstractWe use low frequency geomagnetic field measurements at two Antarctic stations to statistically investigate the longitudinal location of the polar cusp. The two stations are both located in the polar cap at a geomagnetic latitude close to the cusp latitude; they are separated by one hour in magnetic local time. At each station the Pc5 power maximizes when the station approaches the cusp, i.e. around magnetic local noon. The comparison between the Pc5 power at the two stations allows to determine the longitudinal location of the cusp. Our analysis is conducted considering separately different orientation of the interplanetary magnetic field. The results, which indicate longitudinal shifts of the polar cusp depending on the selected conditions, are discussed in relation to previous studies of the polar cusp location based on polar magnetospheric satellite data.

scholarly journals Magnetoreception in laboratory mice: sensitivity to extremely low-frequency fields exceeds 33 nT at 30 Hz

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (81) ◽  
pp. 20121046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank S. Prato ◽  
Dawn Desjardins-Holmes ◽  
Lynn D. Keenliside ◽  
Janice M. DeMoor ◽  
John A. Robertson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Static Field ◽  
Laboratory Mice ◽  
Extremely Low Frequency ◽  
Ambient Magnetic Field ◽  
Detection Mechanisms ◽  
Biological Endpoint

Magnetoreception in the animal kingdom has focused primarily on behavioural responses to the static geomagnetic field and the slow changes in its magnitude and direction as animals navigate/migrate. There has been relatively little attention given to the possibility that weak extremely low-frequency magnetic fields (wELFMF) may affect animal behaviour. Previously, we showed that changes in nociception under an ambient magnetic field-shielded environment may be a good alternative biological endpoint to orientation measurements for investigations into magnetoreception. Here we show that nociception in mice is altered by a 30 Hz field with a peak amplitude more than 1000 times weaker than the static component of the geomagnetic field. When mice are exposed to an ambient magnetic field-shielded environment 1 h a day for five consecutive days, a strong analgesic (i.e. antinociception) response is induced by day 5. Introduction of a static field with an average magnitude of 44 µT (spatial variability of ±3 µT) marginally affects this response, whereas introduction of a 30 Hz time-varying field as weak as 33 nT has a strong effect, reducing the analgesic effect by 60 per cent. Such sensitivity is surprisingly high. Any purported detection mechanisms being considered will need to explain effects at such wELFMF.

scholarly journals Spiral structures and regularities in magnetic field variations and auroras

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. I. Feldstein ◽  
L. I. Gromova ◽  
M. Förster ◽  
A. E. Levitin
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Current System ◽  
Temporal Distribution ◽  
Auroral Oval ◽  
Auroral Zone ◽  
Upper Atmosphere ◽  
Polar Coordinates ◽  
Magnetospheric Substorms ◽  
Field Lines

Abstract. The conception of spiral shaped precipitation regions, where solar corpuscles penetrate the upper atmosphere, was introduced into geophysics by C. Störmer and K. Birkeland at the beginning of the last century. Later, in the course of the XX-th century, spiral distributions were disclosed and studied in various geophysical phenomena. Most attention was devoted to spiral shapes in the analysis of regularities pertaining to the geomagnetic activity and auroras. We review the historical succession of perceptions about the number and positions of spiral shapes, that characterize the spatial-temporal distribution of magnetic disturbances. We describe the processes in the upper atmosphere, which are responsible for the appearance of spiral patterns. We considered the zones of maximal aurora frequency and of maximal particle precipitation intensity, as offered in the literature, in their connection with the spirals. We discuss the current system model, that is closely related to the spirals and that appears to be the source for geomagnetic field variations during magnetospheric substorms and storms. The currents in ionosphere and magnetosphere constitute together with field-aligned (along the geomagnetic field lines) currents (FACs) a common 3-D current system. At ionospheric heights, the westward and eastward electrojets represent characteristic elements of the current system. The westward electrojet covers the longitudinal range from the morning to the evening hours, while the eastward electrojet ranges from afternoon to near-midnight hours. The polar electrojet is positioned in the dayside sector at cusp latitudes. All these electrojets map along the magnetic field lines to certain plasma structures in the near-Earth space. The first spiral distribution of auroras was found based on observations in Antarctica for the nighttime-evening sector (N-spiral), and later in the nighttime-evening (N-spiral) and morning (M-spiral) sectors both in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. The N- and M-spirals drawn in polar coordinates form an oval, along which one observes most often auroras in the zenith together with a westward electrojet. The nature of spiral distributions in geomagnetic field variations was unabmibuously interpreted after the discovery of the spiral's existence in the auroras had been established and this caused a change from the paradigm of the auroral zone to the paradigm of the auroral oval. Zenith forms of auroras are found within the boundaries of the auroral oval. The oval is therefore the region of most frequent precipitations of corpuscular fluxes with auroral energy, where anomalous geophysical phenomena occur most often and with maximum intensity. S. Chapman and L. Harang identified the existence of a discontinuity at auroral zone latitudes (Φ ∼ 67°) around midnight between the westward and eastward electrojets, that is now known as the Harang discontinuity. After the discovery of the auroral oval and the position of the westward electrojet along the oval, it turned out, that there is no discontinuity at a fixed latitude between the opposite electrojets, but rather a gap, the latitude of which varies smoothly between Φ ∼ 67° at midnight and Φ ∼ 73° at 20:00 MLT. In this respect the term ''Harang discontinuity'' represents no intrinsic phenomenon, because the westward electrojet does not experience any disruption in the midnight sector but continues without breaks from dawn to dusk hours.

scholarly journals GEODYNAMICS

GEODYNAMICS ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2(11)2011 (2(11)) ◽  
pp. 284-286
Author(s):  
V. Semenov ◽  
◽  
J. Vozar ◽  
Yu. P. Sumaruk ◽  
B. Ladanivskyy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Outer Ring ◽  
Current Position ◽  
Earth’S Magnetic Field ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Ring Currents ◽  
Geomagnetic Pole ◽  
Earth's Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Poles

It is known that magnetic poles of the Earth is accelerated and is now being ≈ 50 km/year (Olsen & Mandea, 2007) while the geomagnetic pole (the dipole part), which is computed (fictitious) value, has much less velocity. It is believed that the magnetospheric outer ring currents are held by the dipole part of the Earth’s magnetic field. The low frequency magnetic variations of that source allow determine the current position of the source axis and its corresponding pole which as shown experimentally precesses around the geomagnetic pole.

scholarly journals Review Article: On the relation between the seismic activity and the Hurst exponent of the geomagnetic field at the time of the 2000 Izu swarm

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2189-2194 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Masci ◽  
J. N. Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Geomagnetic Activity ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Seismic Activity ◽  
Hurst Exponent ◽  
Field Data ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Magnetic Disturbances

Abstract. Many papers document the observation of earthquake-related precursory signatures in geomagnetic field data. However, the significance of these findings is ambiguous because the authors did not adequately take into account that these signals could have been generated by other sources, and the seismogenic origin of these signals have not been validated by comparison with independent datasets. Thus, they are not reliable examples of magnetic disturbances induced by the seismic activity. Hayakawa et al. (2004) claim that at the time of the 2000 Izu swarm the Hurst exponent of the Ultra-Low-Frequency (ULF: 0.001–10 Hz) band of the geomagnetic field varied in accord with the energy released by the seismicity. The present paper demonstrates that the behaviour of the Hurst exponent was insufficiently investigated and also misinterpreted by the authors. We clearly show that during the Izu swarm the changes of the Hurst exponent were strongly related to the level of global geomagnetic activity and not to the increase of the local seismic activity.

scholarly journals Magnetic field-aligned plasma currents in gravitational fields

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. E. Garcia ◽  
E. Leer ◽  
H. L. Pécseli ◽  
J. K. Trulsen
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Slow Motion ◽  
Steady State Solution ◽  
Plasma Pressure ◽  
Analytical Models ◽  
Polar Regions ◽  
Gravitational Fields ◽  
Field Lines

Abstract. Analytical models are presented for currents along vertical magnetic field lines due to slow bulk electron motion in plasmas subject to a gravitational force. It is demonstrated that a general feature of this problem is a singularity in the plasma pressure force that develops at some finite altitude when a plasma that is initially in static equilibrium is set into slow motion. Classical fluid models thus do not allow general steady-state solutions for field-aligned currents. General solutions have to be non-stationary, varying on time scales of many periods of a plasma equivalent to the Brunt–Väisälä frequency. Except for very special choices of parameters, a steady-state solution exists only in an average sense. The conditions at large altitudes turn out to be extremely sensitive to even small changes in parameters at low altitudes. Low frequency fluctuations detected at large altitudes in the polar regions need not be caused by local low frequency instabilities, but merely reflect small fluctuations in conditions at low altitudes.

scholarly journals The Effect of Extremely Low Frequency Alternating Magnetic Field on the Behavior of Animals in the Presence of the Geomagnetic Field

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia A. Belova ◽  
Daniel Acosta-Avalos
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Fields ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Alternating Magnetic Field ◽  
Magnetic Alignment ◽  
Resonance Model ◽  
Transduction Mechanisms ◽  
Alternating Magnetic Fields ◽  
The Magnetic Field

It is known that the geomagnetic field can influence animal migration and homing. The magnetic field detection by animals is known as magnetoreception and it is possible due to two different transduction mechanisms: the first one through magnetic nanoparticles able to respond to the geomagnetic field and the second one through chemical reactions influenced by magnetic fields. Another behavior is the magnetic alignment where animals align their bodies to the geomagnetic field. It has been observed that magnetic alignment of cattle can be disrupted near electric power lines around the world. Experimentally, it is known that alternating magnetic fields can influence living beings, but the exact mechanism is unknown. The parametric resonance model proposes a mechanism to explain that effect on living beings and establishes that, in the presence of a constant magnetic field, molecules associated with biochemical reactions inside cells can absorb resonantly alternating magnetic fields with specific frequencies. In the present paper, a review is made about animal magnetoreception and the effects of alternating magnetic fields in living beings. It is suggested how alternating magnetic fields can interfere in the magnetic alignment of animals and a general conclusion is obtained: alternating magnetic field pollution can affect the magnetic sensibility of animals.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document