scholarly journals Skill of a global forecasting system in seasonal ensemble streamflow prediction

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naze Candogan Yossef ◽  
Rens van Beek ◽  
Albrecht Weerts ◽  
Hessel Winsemius ◽  
Marc F. P. Bierkens
Keyword(s):  
Information Service ◽  
Brier Score ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Framework Programme Project ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract. In this study we assess the skill of seasonal streamflow forecasts with the global hydrological forecasting system FEWS-World which has been set up within the European Commission 7th Framework Programme project Global Water Scarcity Information Service (GLOWASIS). FEWS-World incorporates the global hydrological model PCR-GLOBWB. We produce ensemble forecasts of monthly discharges for 20 large rivers of the world, with lead times of up to 6 months, forcing the system with bias-corrected seasonal meteorological forecast ensembles from the ECMWF and with probabilistic meteorological ensembles obtained following the ESP procedure. Here, the skill from the ESP ensembles, which contain no actual information on weather, serves as a benchmark to assess the additional skill that may be obtained using ECMWF seasonal forecasts. We use the Brier Score to quantify the skill of the system in forecasting high and low flows, defined as discharges higher than the 75th and lower than the 25th percentiles for a given month respectively. We determine the theoretical skill by comparing the results against model simulations and the actual skill in comparison to discharge observations. We calculate the ratios of actual to theoretical skill in order to quantify the percentage of the theoretical skill that is achieved. The results suggest that the skill of ECMWF S3 forecasts is close to that of the ESP forecasts. While better meteorological forecasts could potentially lead to an improvement in hydrological forecasts, this cannot be achieved yet using the ECMWF S3 dataset.

scholarly journals Skill of a global forecasting system in seasonal ensemble streamflow prediction

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 4103-4114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naze Candogan Yossef ◽  
Rens van Beek ◽  
Albrecht Weerts ◽  
Hessel Winsemius ◽  
Marc F. P. Bierkens
Keyword(s):  
Information Service ◽  
Warning System ◽  
Skill Score ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Global Water

Abstract. In this study we assess the skill of seasonal streamflow forecasts with the global hydrological forecasting system Flood Early Warning System (FEWS)-World, which has been set up within the European Commission 7th Framework Programme Project Global Water Scarcity Information Service (GLOWASIS). FEWS-World incorporates the distributed global hydrological model PCR-GLOBWB (PCRaster Global Water Balance). We produce ensemble forecasts of monthly discharges for 20 large rivers of the world, with lead times of up to 6 months, forcing the system with bias-corrected seasonal meteorological forecast ensembles from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and with probabilistic meteorological ensembles obtained following the ESP procedure. Here, the ESP ensembles, which contain no actual information on weather, serve as a benchmark to assess the additional skill that may be obtained using ECMWF seasonal forecasts. We use the Brier skill score (BSS) to quantify the skill of the system in forecasting high and low flows, defined as discharges higher than the 75th and lower than the 25th percentiles for a given month, respectively. We determine the theoretical skill by comparing the results against model simulations and the actual skill in comparison to discharge observations. We calculate the ratios of actual-to-theoretical skill in order to quantify the percentage of the potential skill that is achieved. The results suggest that the performance of ECMWF S3 forecasts is close to that of the ESP forecasts. While better meteorological forecasts could potentially lead to an improvement in hydrological forecasts, this cannot be achieved yet using the ECMWF S3 dataset.

scholarly journals Bias correcting precipitation forecasts to improve the skill of seasonal streamflow forecasts

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Crochemore ◽  
M.-H. Ramos ◽  
Florian Pappenberger
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Linear Scaling ◽  
Drought Risk ◽  
Seasonal Precipitation ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Distribution Mapping ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract. Meteorological centres make sustained efforts to provide seasonal forecasts that are increasingly skilful, which has the potential to benefit streamflow forecasting. Seasonal streamflow forecasts can help to take anticipatory measures for a range of applications, such as water supply or hydropower reservoir operation and drought risk management. This study assesses the skill of seasonal precipitation and streamflow forecasts in France to provide insights into the way bias correcting precipitation forecasts can improve the skill of streamflow forecasts at extended lead times. We apply eight variants of bias correction approaches to the precipitation forecasts prior to generating the streamflow forecasts. The approaches are based on the linear scaling and the distribution mapping methods. A daily hydrological model is applied at the catchment scale to transform precipitation into streamflow. We then evaluate the skill of raw (without bias correction) and bias corrected precipitation and streamflow ensemble forecasts in sixteen catchments in France. The skill of the ensemble forecasts is assessed in reliability, sharpness, accuracy, and overall performance. A reference prediction system, based on historical observed precipitation and catchment initial conditions at the time of forecast (i.e., ESP method), is used as benchmark in the computation of the skill. The results show that, in most catchments, raw seasonal precipitation and streamflow forecasts are often more skilful than the conventional ESP method in terms of sharpness. However, they are not significantly better in terms of reliability. Forecast skill is generally improved when applying bias correction. Two bias correction methods show the best performance for the studied catchments, each method being more successful in improving specific attributes of the forecasts: the simple linear scaling of monthly values contribute mainly to increasing forecast sharpness and accuracy, while the empirical distribution mapping of daily values is successful in improving forecast reliability.

scholarly journals Skilful seasonal forecasts of streamflow over Europe?

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Arnal ◽  
Hannah L. Cloke ◽  
Elisabeth Stephens ◽  
Fredrik Wetterhall ◽  
Christel Prudhomme ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lead Time ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Seasonal Climate ◽  
Climate Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Meteorological Observations ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract. This paper presents a Europe-wide analysis of the skill of the newly operational EFAS (European Flood Awareness System) seasonal streamflow forecasts, benchmarked against the Ensemble Streamflow Prediction (ESP) forecasting approach. The results suggest that, on average, the System 4 seasonal climate forecasts improve the streamflow predictability over historical meteorological observations for the first month of lead time only. However, the predictability varies in space and time and is greater in winter and autumn. Parts of Europe additionally exhibit a longer predictability, up to seven months of lead time, for certain months within a season. The results also highlight the potential usefulness of the EFAS seasonal streamflow forecasts for decision-making. Although the ESP is the most potentially useful forecasting approach in Europe, the EFAS seasonal streamflow forecasts appear more potentially useful than the ESP in some regions and for certain seasons, especially in winter for most of Europe. Patterns in the EFAS seasonal streamflow hindcasts skill are however not mirrored in the System 4 seasonal climate hindcasts, hinting the need for a better understanding of the link between hydrological and meteorological variables on seasonal timescales, with the aim to improve climate-model based seasonal streamflow forecasting.

Does the application of multiple hydrological models improve seasonal streamflow forecasting skill?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bastian Klein ◽  
Ilias Pechlivanidis ◽  
Louise Arnal ◽  
Louise Crochemore ◽  
Dennis Meissner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Europe ◽  
Bayesian Model Averaging ◽  
Forecast Skill ◽  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Post Processing ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Forecasting System ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

<p>Many sectors, such as hydropower, agriculture, water supply and waterway transport, need information about the possible evolution of meteorological and hydrological conditions in the next weeks and months to optimize their decision processes on a long term. With increasing availability of meteorological seasonal forecasts, hydrological seasonal forecasting systems have been developed all over the world in the last years. Many of them are running in operational mode. On European scale the European Flood Awareness System EFAS and SMHI are operationally providing seasonal streamflow forecasts. In the context of the EU-Horizon2020 project IMPREX additionally a national scale forecasting system for German waterways operated by BfG was available for the analysis of seasonal forecasts from multiple hydrological models.</p><p>Statistical post processing tools could be used to estimate the predictive uncertainty of the forecasted variable from deterministic / ensemble forecasts of a single / multi-model forecasting system. Raw forecasts shouldn’t be used directly by users without statistical post-processing because of various biases. To assess the added potential benefit of the application of a hydrological multi-model ensemble, the forecasting systems from EFAS, SMHI and BfG were forced by re-forecasts of the ECMWF’s Seasonal Forecast System 4 and the resulting seasonal streamflow forecasts have been verified for 24 gauges across Central Europe. Additionally two statistical forecasting methods - Ensemble Model Output Statistics EMOS and Bayesian Model Averaging BMA - have been applied to post-process the forecasts.</p><p>Overall, seasonal flow forecast skill is limited in Central Europe before and after post-processing with a current predictability of 1-2 months. The results of the multi-model analysis indicate that post-processing of raw forecasts is necessary when observations are used as reference. Post-processing improves forecast skill significantly for all gauges, lead times and seasons. The multi-model combination of all models showed the highest skill compared to the skill of the raw forecasts and the skill of the post-processed results of the individual models, i.e. the application of several hydrological models for the same region improves skill, due to the different model strengths.</p>

scholarly journals Bias correcting precipitation forecasts to improve the skill of seasonal streamflow forecasts

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 3601-3618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Crochemore ◽  
Maria-Helena Ramos ◽  
Florian Pappenberger
Keyword(s):  
Bias Correction ◽  
Linear Scaling ◽  
Drought Risk ◽  
Seasonal Precipitation ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Distribution Mapping ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract. Meteorological centres make sustained efforts to provide seasonal forecasts that are increasingly skilful, which has the potential to benefit streamflow forecasting. Seasonal streamflow forecasts can help to take anticipatory measures for a range of applications, such as water supply or hydropower reservoir operation and drought risk management. This study assesses the skill of seasonal precipitation and streamflow forecasts in France to provide insights into the way bias correcting precipitation forecasts can improve the skill of streamflow forecasts at extended lead times. We apply eight variants of bias correction approaches to the precipitation forecasts prior to generating the streamflow forecasts. The approaches are based on the linear scaling and the distribution mapping methods. A daily hydrological model is applied at the catchment scale to transform precipitation into streamflow. We then evaluate the skill of raw (without bias correction) and bias-corrected precipitation and streamflow ensemble forecasts in 16 catchments in France. The skill of the ensemble forecasts is assessed in reliability, sharpness, accuracy and overall performance. A reference prediction system, based on historical observed precipitation and catchment initial conditions at the time of forecast (i.e. ESP method) is used as benchmark in the computation of the skill. The results show that, in most catchments, raw seasonal precipitation and streamflow forecasts are often more skilful than the conventional ESP method in terms of sharpness. However, they are not significantly better in terms of reliability. Forecast skill is generally improved when applying bias correction. Two bias correction methods show the best performance for the studied catchments, each method being more successful in improving specific attributes of the forecasts: the simple linear scaling of monthly values contributes mainly to increasing forecast sharpness and accuracy, while the empirical distribution mapping of daily values is successful in improving forecast reliability.

The benefit of pre- and postprocessing streamflow forecasts for 119 Norwegian catchments, evaluated within the frame of an operational flood-forecasting system

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trine Jahr Hegdahl ◽  
Kolbjørn Engeland ◽  
Ingelin Steinsland ◽  
Andrew Singleton
Keyword(s):  
Lead Time ◽  
Bayesian Model Averaging ◽  
Weather Forecasting ◽  
False Alarms ◽  
Flood Events ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Flood Warning ◽  
Temperature And Precipitation ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Forecasting System

<p>In this work the performance of different pre- and postprocessing methods and schemes for ensemble forecasts were compared for a flood warning system.  The ECMWF ensemble forecasts of temperature (T) and precipitation (P) were used to force the operational hydrological HBV model, and we estimated 2 years (2014 and 2015) of daily retrospect streamflow forecasts for 119 Norwegian catchments. Two approaches were used to preprocess the temperature and precipitation forecasts: 1) the preprocessing provided by the operational weather forecasting service, that includes a quantile mapping method for temperature and a zero-adjusted gamma distribution for precipitation, applied to the gridded forecasts, 2)  Bayesian model averaging (BMA) applied to the catchment average values of temperature and precipitation. For the postprocessing of catchment streamflow forecasts, BMA was used. Streamflow forecasts were generated for fourteen schemes with different combinations of the raw, pre- and postprocessing approaches for the two-year period for lead-time 1-9 days.</p><p>The forecasts were evaluated for two datasets: i) all streamflow and ii) flood events. The median flood represents the lowest flood warning level in Norway, and all streamflow observations above median flood are included in the flood event evaluation dataset. We used the continuous ranked probability score (CRPS) to evaluate the pre- and postprocessing schemes. Evaluation based on all streamflow data showed that postprocessing improved the forecasts only up to a lead-time of 2 days, while preprocessing T and P using BMA improved the forecasts for 50% - 90% of the catchments beyond 2 days lead-time. However, with respect to flood events, no clear pattern was found, although the preprocessing of P and T gave better CRPS to marginally more catchments compared to the other schemes.</p><p>In an operational forecasting system, warnings are issued when forecasts exceed defined thresholds, and confidence in warnings depends on the hit and false alarm ratio. By analyzing the hit ratio adjusted for false alarms, we found that many of the forecasts seemed to perform equally well. Further, we found that there were large differences in the ability to issue correct warning levels between spring and autumn floods. There was almost no ability to predict autumn floods beyond 2 days, whereas the spring floods had predictability up to 9 days for many events and catchments.</p><p>The results underline differences in the predictability of floods depending on season and the flood generating processes, i.e. snowmelt affected spring floods versus rain induced autumn floods. The results moreover indicate that the ensemble forecasts are less good at predicting correct autumn precipitation, and more emphasis could be put on finding a better method to optimize autumn flood predictions. To summarize we find that the flood forecasts will benefit from pre-/postprocessing, the optimal processing approaches do, however, depend on region, catchment and season.</p>

Seasonal streamflow forecasting - Which are the drivers controlling the forecast quality?

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilias Pechlivanidis ◽  
Louise Crochemore ◽  
Thomas Bosshard
Keyword(s):  
A Priori ◽  
Hydrological Regime ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Seasonal Forecasts ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Key Drivers ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow ◽  
Forecast Quality

<p>Streamflow information for the months ahead is of great value to existing decision-making practices, particularly to those affected by the vagaries of the climate and who would benefit from better understanding and managing climate-related risks. Despite the large effort, there is still limited knowledge of the key drivers controlling the quality of the seasonal streamflow forecasts. In this investigation, we show that the seasonal streamflow predictability can be clustered, and hence regionalised, based on a priori knowledge of local hydro-climatic conditions. To reach these conclusions we analyse the seasonal forecasts of streamflow volumes across about 35400 basins in Europe, which vary in terms of climatology, scale and hydrological regime. We then link the forecast quality to various descriptors including physiography, hydro-climatic characteristics and meteorological biases. This allows the identification of the key drivers along a strong hydro-climatic gradient. Results show that, as expected, the seasonal streamflow predictability varies geographically and seasonally with acceptable values for the first lead months. In addition, the predictability deteriorates with increasing lead months particularly in the winter months. Nevertheless, we show that the forecast quality is well correlated to a set of drivers, which vary depending on the initialization month. The forecast quality of seasonal streamflow volumes is strongly dependent on the basin’s hydrological regime, with quickly reacting basins (of low river memory) showing limited predictability. On the contrary, snow and/or baseflow dominated regions with long recessions (and hence high river memory) show high streamflow predictability. Finally, climatology and precipitation biases are also strongly related to streamflow predictability, highlighting the importance of developing robust bias-adjustment methods.</p>

Seasonal streamflow forecasts using mixture-kernel GPR and advanced methods of input variable selection

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 200-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuang Zhu ◽  
Xiangang Luo ◽  
Zhanya Xu ◽  
Lei Ye
Keyword(s):  
Variable Selection ◽  
Gaussian Process Regression ◽  
Quadratic Term ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Factors Analysis ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Random Components ◽  
Flexible Framework ◽  
High Flows ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow

Abstract Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) is a new machine-learning method based on Bayesian theory and statistical learning theory. It provides a flexible framework for probabilistic regression and uncertainty estimation. The main effort in GPR modelling is determining the structure of the kernel function. As streamflow is composed of trend, period and random components. In this study, we constructed a mixture-kernel composed of squared exponential kernel, periodic kernel and a rational quadratic term to reflect different properties of streamflow time series to make streamflow forecasts. A relevant feature-selection wrapper algorithm was used, with a top-down search for relevant features by Random Forest, to offer a systematic factors analysis that can potentially affect basin streamflow predictability. Streamflow prediction is evaluated by putting emphasis on the degree of coincidence, the deviation on low flows, high flows and the error level. The objective of this study is to construct a seasonal streamflow forecasts model using mixture-kernel GPR and the advanced input variable selection method. Results show that the mixture-kernel GPR has good forecasting quality, and top importance predictors are streamflow at 12, 6, 5, 1, 11, 7, 8, 4 months ahead, Nino 1 + 2 at 11, 5, 12, 10 months ahead.

scholarly journals On the Impact of Short-Range Meteorological Forecasts for Ensemble Streamflow Predictions

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 1301-1317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Thirel ◽  
Fabienne Rousset-Regimbeau ◽  
Eric Martin ◽  
Florence Habets
Keyword(s):  
Short Range ◽  
Ensemble Prediction ◽  
Prediction System ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Ensemble Forecasts ◽  
Ensemble Prediction System ◽  
Ensemble Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Prediction Systems ◽  
Set Up ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Ensemble streamflow prediction systems are emerging in the international scientific community in order to better assess hydrologic threats. Two ensemble streamflow prediction systems (ESPSs) were set up at Météo-France using ensemble forecasts from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Ensemble Prediction System for the first one, and from the Prévision d’Ensemble Action de Recherche Petite Echelle Grande Echelle (PEARP) ensemble prediction system of Météo-France for the second. This paper presents the evaluation of their capacities to better anticipate severe hydrological events and more generally to estimate the quality of both ESPSs on their globality. The two ensemble predictions were used as input for the same hydrometeorological model. The skills of both ensemble streamflow prediction systems were evaluated over all of France for the precipitation input and streamflow prediction during a 569-day period and for a 2-day short-range scale. The ensemble streamflow prediction system based on the PEARP data was the best for floods and small basins, and the ensemble streamflow prediction system based on the ECMWF data seemed the best adapted for low flows and large basins.

scholarly journals The benefit of using an ensemble of seasonal streamflow forecasts in water allocation decisions

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (7) ◽  
pp. 3851-3870
Author(s):  
Alexander Kaune ◽  
Faysal Chowdhury ◽  
Micha Werner ◽  
James Bennett
Keyword(s):  
Water Allocation ◽  
Irrigation Season ◽  
Streamflow Forecasting ◽  
Streamflow Prediction ◽  
Additional Time ◽  
Available Water ◽  
Streamflow Forecasts ◽  
Reservoir Inflow ◽  
Seasonal Streamflow ◽  
Allocation Decisions

Abstract. The area to be cropped in irrigation districts needs to be planned according to the allocated water, which in turn is a function of the available water resource. Initially conservative estimates of future (in)flows in rivers and reservoirs may lead to unnecessary reduction of the water allocated. Though water allocations may be revised as the season progresses, inconsistency in allocation is undesirable to farmers as they may then not be able to use that water, leading to an opportunity cost in agricultural production. We assess the benefit of using reservoir inflow estimates derived from seasonal forecast datasets to improve water allocation decisions. A decision model is developed to emulate the feedback loop between simulated reservoir storage and water allocations to irrigated crops and is evaluated using inflow forecasts generated with the Forecast Guided Stochastic Scenarios (FoGSS) model, a 12-month ensemble streamflow forecasting system. Two forcings are used to generate the forecasts: ensemble streamflow prediction – ESP (historical rainfall) – and POAMA (calibrated rainfall forecasts from the POAMA climate prediction system). We evaluate the approach in the Murrumbidgee basin in Australia, comparing water allocations obtained with an expected reservoir inflow from FoGSS against the allocations obtained with the currently used conservative estimate based on climatology as well as against allocations obtained using observed inflows (perfect information). The inconsistency in allocated water is evaluated by determining the total changes in allocated water made every 15 d from the initial allocation at the start of the water year to the end of the irrigation season, including both downward and upward revisions of allocations. Results show that the inconsistency due to upward revisions in allocated water is lower when using the forecast datasets (POAMA and ESP) compared to the conservative inflow estimates (reference), which is beneficial to the planning of cropping areas by farmers. Overconfidence can, however, lead to an increase in undesirable downward revisions. This is more evident for dry years than for wet years. Over the 28 years for which allocation decisions are evaluated, we find that the accuracy of the available water estimates using the forecast ensemble improves progressively during the water year, especially 1.5 months before the start of the cropping season in November. This is significant as it provides farmers with additional time to make key decisions on planting. Our results show that seasonal streamflow forecasts can provide benefit in informing water allocation policies, particularly by earlier establishing final water allocations to farmers in the irrigation season. This allows them to plan better and use water allocated more efficiently.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document