scholarly journals Coordination and control – limits in standard representations of multi-reservoir operations in hydrological modeling

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 1365-1388
Author(s):  
Charles Rougé ◽  
Patrick M. Reed ◽  
Danielle S. Grogan ◽  
Shan Zuidema ◽  
Alexander Prusevich ◽  
...  

Abstract. Major multi-reservoir cascades represent a primary mechanism for dealing with hydrologic variability and extremes within institutionally complex river basins worldwide. These coordinated management processes fundamentally reshape water balance dynamics. Yet, multi-reservoir coordination processes have been largely ignored in the increasingly sophisticated representations of reservoir operations within large-scale hydrological models. The aim of this paper is twofold, namely (i) to provide evidence that the common modeling practice of parameterizing each reservoir in a cascade independently from the others is a significant approximation and (ii) to demonstrate potential unintended consequences of this independence approximation when simulating the dynamics of hydrological extremes in complex reservoir cascades. We explore these questions using the Water Balance Model, which features detailed representations of the human infrastructure coupled to the natural processes that shape water balance dynamics. It is applied to the Upper Snake River basin in the western US and its heavily regulated multi-reservoir cascade. We employ a time-varying sensitivity analysis that utilizes the method of Morris factor screening to explicitly track how the dominant release rule parameters evolve both along the cascade and in time according to seasonal high- and low-flow events. This enables us to address aim (i) by demonstrating how the progressive and cumulative dominance of upstream releases significantly dampens the ability of downstream reservoir rules' parameters to influence flow conditions. We address aim (ii) by comparing simulation results with observed reservoir operations during critical low-flow and high-flow events in the basin. Our time-varying parameter sensitivity analysis with the method of Morris clarifies how independent single-reservoir parameterizations and their tacit assumption of independence leads to reservoir release behaviors that generate artificial water shortages and flooding, whereas the observed coordinated cascade operations avoided these outcomes for the same events. To further explore the role of (non-)coordination in the large deviations from the observed operations, we use an offline multi-reservoir water balance model in which adding basic coordination mechanisms drawn from the observed emergency operations is sufficient to correct the deficiencies of the independently parameterized reservoir rules from the hydrological model. These results demonstrate the importance of understanding the state–space context in which reservoir releases occur and where operational coordination plays a crucial role in avoiding or mitigating water-related extremes. Understanding how major infrastructure is coordinated and controlled in major river basins is essential for properly assessing future flood and drought hazards in a changing world.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Songyan Yu ◽  
Hong Xuan Do ◽  
Albert I. J. M. van Dijk ◽  
Nick R. Bond ◽  
Peirong Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract. There is a growing interest globally in the spatial distribution of intermittently flowing streams and rivers, and how their spatial extent varies in relation to climatic factors. However, deriving consistent information on the extent of flow intermittency within river networks is hampered by the fact that streamflow gauges are often sparsely distributed and more often located within the most perennial parts of the river network. Here, we developed an approach to quantify catchment-wide streamflow intermittency over long timeframes and in a spatially explicit manner, using readily accessible and spatially contiguous daily runoff data from a national-scale water balance model. We examined the ability of the water balance model to simulate streamflow in two hydro-climatically distinctive (subtropical and temperate) regions in Australia, with a particular focus on low flow simulations. We also evaluated the effect of model time step (daily vs. monthly) on flow intermittency estimation to inform future model selection. The water balance model showed better performance in the temperate region characterised by steady baseflow than in the subtropical region with flashy hydrographs and frequent cease-to-flow periods. The model tended to overestimate low flow magnitude due to both overestimation of gains (e.g. groundwater release to baseflow) and underestimation of losses (e.g. transmission losses) during low-flow periods. Modelled patterns of flow intermittency revealed highly dynamic behaviour in space and time, with intermittent flows affecting between 29 % and 80 % of the river network over the period of 1911–2016. The daily flow model did not perform better than the monthly flow model in quantifying flow intermittency, and model selection should depend on the intended application of the model outputs. Our general approach to quantifying spatio-temporal patterns of flow intermittency is transferable to other parts of the world, and can inform hydro-ecological understanding and management of intermittent streams where limited gauging data are available.


2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 934-942 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luiz Carlos Pittol Martini

Abstract: The objective of this work was to perform a sensitivity analysis of the main input parameters required for the AquaCrop water balance model, using biomass and grain yield data of a rainfed-simulated corn crop, obtained along the climate data series of 1987-2016 in the South of Brazil. The levels of soil-water stress and the depths of maximum effective rooting were the input parameters that most affected the biomass and grain yields simulated by the model, followed by the crop coefficient, water-use efficiency, soil water storage capacity, and contribution of groundwater to water availability in the root zone. The parameters crop cycle duration, plant density, pattern of soil-water extraction, and field surface practices showed little or no impact on the final results. AquaCrop is a robust water balance model, with small or moderate general sensitivity to variations of the main input parameter values, which makes it applicable to situations with field data limitations.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 5279-5295
Author(s):  
Songyan Yu ◽  
Hong Xuan Do ◽  
Albert I. J. M. van Dijk ◽  
Nick R. Bond ◽  
Peirong Lin ◽  
...  

Abstract. There is a growing interest globally in the spatial distribution and temporal dynamics of intermittently flowing streams and rivers, and how this varies in relation to climatic and other environmental factors. However, biases in the distribution of stream gauges may give a misleading impression of spatial-temporal variations in streamflow intermittency within river networks. Here, we developed an approach to quantify catchment-wide streamflow intermittency over long time frames and in a spatially explicit manner, using readily accessible and spatially contiguous daily runoff data from a national-scale water balance model. We examined the ability of the water balance model to simulate streamflow in two hydro-climatically distinctive (subtropical and temperate) regions in Australia, with a particular focus on low-flow simulations. We also evaluated the effect of model time step (daily vs. monthly) on flow intermittency estimation to inform future model selection. The water balance model showed better performance in the temperate region characterised by steady baseflow than in the subtropical region with flashy hydrographs and frequent cease-to-flow periods. The model tended to overestimate low-flow magnitude mainly due to overestimation of gains (e.g. groundwater release to baseflow) during low-flow periods. Modelled patterns of flow intermittency revealed highly dynamic behaviour in space and time, with cease-to-flow events affecting between 29 and 80 % of the river network over the period of 1911–2016, using a daily streamflow model. The daily flow model did not perform better than the monthly flow model in quantifying flow intermittency at a monthly time step, and model selection should depend on the intended application of the model outputs. Our general approach to quantifying spatio-temporal patterns of flow intermittency is transferable to other parts of the world, and it can inform hydro-ecological understanding and management of intermittent streams where limited gauging data are available.


2014 ◽  
Vol 519 ◽  
pp. 1848-1858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco Pellicer-Martínez ◽  
José Miguel Martínez-Paz

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
pp. 954-975
Author(s):  
Olutoyin Adeola Fashae ◽  
Rotimi Oluseyi Obateru ◽  
Adeyemi Oludapo Olusola

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 3829-3844 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Hoogeveen ◽  
J.-M. Faurès ◽  
L. Peiser ◽  
J. Burke ◽  
N. van de Giesen

Abstract. GlobWat is a freely distributed, global soil water balance model that is used by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) to assess water use in irrigated agriculture, the main factor behind scarcity of freshwater in an increasing number of regions. The model is based on spatially distributed high-resolution data sets that are consistent at global level and calibrated against values for internal renewable water resources, as published in AQUASTAT, the FAO's global information system on water and agriculture. Validation of the model is done against mean annual river basin outflows. The water balance is calculated in two steps: first a "vertical" water balance is calculated that includes evaporation from in situ rainfall ("green" water) and incremental evaporation from irrigated crops. In a second stage, a "horizontal" water balance is calculated to determine discharges from river (sub-)basins, taking into account incremental evaporation from irrigation, open water and wetlands ("blue" water). The paper describes the methodology, input and output data, calibration and validation of the model. The model results are finally compared with other global water balance models to assess levels of accuracy and validity.


2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Welliam Chaves Monteiro Silva ◽  
Aristides Ribeiro ◽  
Júlio Cesar Lima Neves ◽  
Nairam Felix de Barros ◽  
Fernando Palha Leite

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document