scholarly journals Review of "Seismic Assessment Of Multi-Span Steel Railway Bridge In Turkey Base On The Nonlinear Time History Analyses."

Author(s):  
Anonymous
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet F. Yilmaz ◽  
Barlas Ö. Çağlayan

Abstract. It has been seen that bridges are vulnerable to earthquakes by the research studies after important earthquakes like the San Fernando earthquake (1971 USA), the Northridge earthquake (1994 USA), Great Hanshin earthquake (1995 Japan), and Chi-Chi earthquake (1999 Taiwan). These studies show that to do the seismic risk assessments for bridges, fragility curves are useful tools. There are the most used two ways to generate the fragility curves; empirically or analytically. If the damage reports from past earthquakes are available then empirical fragility curves may be developed but otherwise seismic response analysis of structures may be used to develop analytical fragility curves. In Turkey, earthquake damage data are very limited so to develop the fragility curves for the Alasehir bridge, the analytical method is used in this study. The bridge that is studied on is lying on the Manisa-Afyon railway line that is very important for both transportation and freightage. As the most of the country land covers the seismically active zones it is a necessity to find out the vulnerability of the Alasehir bridge. The Alasehir bridge is consists of six 30 m length truss system span with a total span length of 189.43 m supported by 2 abutments and 5 truss piers with height of 12.5 m, 19 m, 26 m, 33 m and 40 m. Sap2000 is used for computer model of the Alaşehir bridge and the model is refined by using field measurements. Then selected 60 different real earthquake data are used for the analysis by using the refined model. Both material nonlinearity and Δ-δ are considered during the analysis. With this study, seismic behavior of Alasehir steel railway bridge is determined. Truss piers reaction and displacements are used to determine the seismic performance of the Alasehir bridge. Different IMs are compared in terms of efficiency, practicality, and sufficiency. Component and system fragility curve are derived for most proper IMs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet F. Yılmaz ◽  
Barlas Ö. Çağlayan

Abstract. Many research studies have shown that bridges are vulnerable to earthquakes, graphically confirmed by incidents such as the San Fernando (1971 USA), Northridge (1994 USA), Great Hanshin (1995 Japan), and Chi-Chi (1999 Taiwan) earthquakes, amongst many others. The studies show that fragility curves are useful tools for bridge seismic risk assessments, which can be generated empirically or analytically. Empirical fragility curves can be generated where damage reports from past earthquakes are available, but otherwise, analytical fragility curves can be generated from structural seismic response analysis. Earthquake damage data in Turkey are very limited, hence this study employed an analytical method to generate fragility curves for the Alasehir bridge. The Alasehir bridge is part of the Manisa–Uşak–Dumlupınar–Afyon railway line, which is very important for human and freight transportation, and since most of the country is seismically active, it is essential to assess the bridge's vulnerability. The bridge consists of six 30 m truss spans with a total span 189 m supported by 2 abutments and 5 truss piers, 12.5, 19, 26, 33, and 40 m. Sap2000 software was used to model the Alasehir bridge, which was refined using field measurements, and the effect of 60 selected real earthquake data analyzed using the refined model, considering material and geometry nonlinearity. Thus, the seismic behavior of Alasehir railway bridge was determined and truss pier reaction and displacements were used to determine its seismic performance. Different intensity measures were compared for efficiency, practicality, and sufficiency and their component and system fragility curves derived.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Lestuzzi ◽  
H. Charif ◽  
S. Rossier ◽  
M. Ferrière ◽  
J.-P. Person

The seismic assessment of a secondary structure of the Chancy-Pougny dam, namely, the upper bridge, is discussed in this paper. A first seismic assessment, performed according to classical force-based methodology, concluded the necessity of an extensive retrofitting for the upper bridge. By contrast, the application of the displacement-based approach showed that the current situation is already satisfactory, and therefore, practically no retrofitting is needed. The paper focuses on the nonlinear time-history analyses which were achieved in order to check the accuracy of the results obtained using the displacement-based method. The structural characteristics of the reinforced concrete upper bridge are similar to those of conventional bridges. However, the piers were built with very little reinforcement and consequently they will exhibit a rocking behavior in case of earthquake loading. Rocking is rather a favorable failure mechanism and is related to a certain amount of displacement capacity. However, this behavior is not linked to plastic energy dissipation which may significantly increase the related displacement demand. In order to determine the real displacement demand, nonlinear time-history analyses were achieved with SDOF systems defined by an “S” shape hysteretic model. Spectrum compatible stationary synthetic accelerograms and slightly modified recorded earthquakes were both used for acceleration time-histories. The results showed that the displacement demand corresponds well with the one determined by usual push-over analysis. The results show a very favorable seismic situation, related to a relatively stiff structure associated to rock soil conditions with an A class soil. The seismic safety of the upper bridge is already satisfactory for the current state (without retrofitting). Consequently, the proposed costly reinforcement for the upper bridge could be significantly reduced.


Actuators ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Osman Hansu ◽  
Esra Mete Güneyisi

This study addresses an alternative use of viscous dampers (VDs) associated with buckling restrained braces (BRBs) as innovative seismic protection devices. For this purpose, 4-, 8- and 12-story steel bare frames were designed with 6.5 m equal span length and 4 m story height. Thereafter, they were seismically improved by mounting the VDs and BRBs in three patterns, namely outer bays, inner bays, and all bays over the frame heights. The structures were modeled using SAP 2000 software and evaluated by the nonlinear time history analyses subjected to the six natural ground motions. The seismic responses of the structures were investigated for the lateral displacement, interstory drift, absolute acceleration, maximum base shear, and time history of roof displacement. The results clearly indicated that the VDs and BRBs reduced seismic demands significantly compared to the bare frame. Moreover, the all-bay pattern performed better than the others.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 4278
Author(s):  
Svetlana Tam ◽  
Jenna Wong

Sustainability addresses the need to reduce the structure’s impact on the environment but does not reduce the environment’s impact on the structure. To explore this relationship, this study focuses on quantifying the impact of green roofs or vegetated roofs on seismic responses such as story displacements, interstory drifts, and floor level accelerations. Using an archetype three-story steel moment frame, nonlinear time history analyses are conducted in OpenSees for a shallow and deep green roof using a suite of ground motions from various distances from the fault to identify key trends and sensitivities in response.


2011 ◽  
Vol 255-260 ◽  
pp. 2330-2334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu Zhang ◽  
Quan Wang Li ◽  
Jian Sheng Fan

The earthquake may attack the structural building from any angle, but in current seismic design codes, this type of uncertainty is seldom accounted. The uncertainty associated with the direction of earthquake excitation was considered in this paper, and its effect on structural responses was investigated. For this purpose, a simple 3-dimensional model with symmetric plan was established, which had fundamental periods ranged from 0.1s to 5.0s, and was subjected to a set of 30 ground motion pairs for which both linear and nonlinear time history analyses were performed. Analyzing results showed that, on average, the elastic roof acceleration is 32% underestimated, and the inelastic roof displacement is 18% underestimated if the variation of earthquake excitation direction is not consider. Recognizing this, a modification factor for the seismic demand was proposed thorough a statistical analysis, which guarantees a probability of 95% design safety


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document