scholarly journals Superficial Surgical Site Infection after Primary Closure Versus Delayed Primary Closure of Wound in Perforated Appendicitis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 94-97
Author(s):  
Yabinda Sahrish ◽  
Zainab Abdullah Kaludi ◽  
Shamaila Ayub ◽  
Khurram Zia ◽  
Muhammad Athar Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Immunosuppressive Agents ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
P Value ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Delayed Primary Closure ◽  
Perforated Appendix

Objective: To assess the superficial surgical site infection after primary closure versus delayed primary closure of wound in perforated appendicitis. Study Design and Setting: This was an observational study conducted at Darul Sehat Hospital & Civil Hospital Karachi during March 2019 to August 2019 Methodology: All patients of either gender between 18-50 years of age undergoing open Appendectomy through standard gridiron incision in emergency having consented for participation in the study prior to surgery and with per-operative finding of perforated appendix in emergency were included. Patients on steroids or immunosuppressive agents, smoker staking 5 or more cigarettes per day, patients with history of Diabetes Mellitus, chronic liver disease and chronic renal failure were excluded from the study. Patients with perforated appendix were randomly allocated into two Groups. Group A received delayed primary closure at 3rd post-operative day while in Group B primary closure was done immediately after appendectomy. All patients were examined for signs and symptoms of superficial surgical site infection at the 5th postoperative day before discharge from the hospital. SPSS version 13 was used for data analysis. Chi square test was applied to compare the outcome (superficial surgical site infection) in both groups. P-value <0.05 was considered as significant. Results: A total sixty patients were allocated in each group. Wound infection was very high among patients with immediate closure (40%) as compared to group which received delayed primary closure (15%) (p=0.020). Conclusion: The superficial surgical site infection was significantly higher after primary closure versus delayed primary closure of wound in perforated appendicitis.

scholarly journals A comparative study on surgical site infections after primary closure and delayed primary closure in clean contaminated laparotomy cases

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 989
Author(s):  
T. J. Pauly ◽  
T. V. Haridas ◽  
E. Manoj Prabhakar ◽  
Roshjo Roshan
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
P Value ◽  
Skin Closure ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Delayed Primary Closure ◽  
Laparotomy Wound ◽  
Clean Contaminated

Background: Surgical site infection is a significant cause of post operative morbidity. Timing of skin closure following a surgery and its relation to incidence of infection has been studied. The debate whether primary or delayed primary closure have been around for a long time. The aim of this study is to compare the rate of infection in a laparotomy wound in clean contaminated laparotomy cases after primary and delayed primary closure.Methods: 132 patients who underwent laparotomy for clean contaminated were selected. Of this primary closure of the skin was done in 66 cases and delayed primary closure at 48 hours were done in the other 66 patients. Wounds were followed up till post op day 7. The results between two groups were compared using chi square test.Results: two out of 66 cases developed SSI in the delayed primary sutured group whereas 8 out of 66 cases developed SSI in primary suturing group. The results were compared using chi square test and the chi square statistic was 3.8951 and the p value is 0.048428 (<0.05) proving the result significant.Conclusions: The incidence of surgical site infection in laparotomy wound after a primary closure was higher compared to delayed primary closure in clean contaminated laparotomy wounds and the difference is significant based on statistical evaluation.

scholarly journals Delayed Primary Closure of Wound Prevents Wound Infection after Surgery in Patients with Obstructive Jaundice

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-40
Author(s):  
Md Aslam Hossain ◽  
Md Julfiqur Rahman Khan ◽  
SM Rokonuzzaman ◽  
Md Maniruzzaman Khan ◽  
Md Mobaraque Hossain Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Obstructive Jaundice ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Septic Complications ◽  
Delayed Primary Closure ◽  
Experimental Group

Surgery in jaundiced patients is associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications compared with surgery in non jaundiced patients. These complications primarily consists of septic complications, hemorrhage, superficial surgical site infection (SSSI), wound dehiscence and renal disorders. Of them Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is found more commonly than other. This study was done to evaluate the effect of delayed primary closure on preventing wound infection than that of primary closure of wound after surgery in patients with obstructive jaundice. This randomized clinical trial was carried out at the Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic division of Department of Surgery in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka from July 2012 to June 2013. A total of 88 patients were included in this study who underwent surgical intervention for obstructive jaundice. These patients were divided into two groups randomly; control group (n=44) who underwent primary closure of the wound and experimental group (n=44) who underwent delayed primary closure of the wound. Patients demography, clinical presentation, comorbidities, pre, per and post operative variables and outcome were compared between two groups. Mean age of the patients of experimental and control group was 47.91± 14.63 and 42.25±12.13 years respectively. Duration of jaundice was significantly higher in experimental group 4.91±2.87 months than in control group 3.10±1.62 months. Postoperative wound infection was found significantly higher in control group (43.2%) than that of experimental group (11.4%). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in control group (18.77± 6.24 days) than in experimental group (13.52±3.61 days). Delayed primary closure of wound reduces wound infection significantly than primary closure of wound in patients with obstructive jaundice. Faridpur Med. Coll. J. Jan 2019;14(1): 37-40

scholarly journals SURGICAL SITE INFECTION;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1770-1774
Author(s):  
Syed Muhammad Asar Hussain ◽  
Saadat Ali Janjua ◽  
Amna Fareed ◽  
Asrar Ahmad ◽  
Irum Saleem
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Study Design ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Military Hospital ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Trial Duration ◽  
Primary Wound Closure ◽  
Delayed Primary Closure ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objectives: To compare the frequency of surgical site infection after primaryand delayed primary wound closure in dirty abdominal wounds. Study Design: Randomizedcontrolled trial. Duration and Setting: This study was carried out over a period of six monthsfrom 07-02-2014 to 06-08-2014 in the department of surgery combined military hospital Quetta.Methodology: A total of 190 patients were included in this study. wound was observed fordevelopment of surgical site infection post operatively within seven days by the assignedinvestigator who was unaware of the wound study design. surgical site infection was assessedusing Southampton wound grading. Results: Mean age of the patients was 30.89±10.38 and32.74±9.52 in group A and B, respectively. in group-A, 73 patients (76.8%) and in group-B 66patients (69.5%) were male while 22 patients (23.2%) of group-A and 29 patients (30.5%) ingroup-B were female.in group-A surgical site infection was observed in 29 patients (30.5%)and in group-B 12 patients (12.6%) were having surgical site infection. statistically significantdifference was found between two groups (p=0.003). Conclusion: The frequency of surgicalsite infection was significantly lower after delayed primary closure of dirty wounds as comparedto primary closure.

COMPARISION OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTION BETWEEN OPEN APPENDECTOMY AND LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY

2021 ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
J. Sudhakar ◽  
Manoj Karthik Gera
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Operative Complications ◽  
Bowel Movements ◽  
Perforated Appendix ◽  
Health Care Associated Infection

Appendectomy is most common surgical procedure in emergency surgery. Inamed appendix can be removed laparoscopically (laparoscopic appendectomy) or openly (open appendectomy). Surgical site infection is representative of health care associated infection in which it may effect on patients' morbidity and mortality. The aim of the study is to compare laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy in terms of surgical site infection. The frequency of 60 patients who underwent appendectomy open appendectomy-40;laparoscopic appendectomy-20 between September 2019- march2020 which were retrospectively reviewed for demographic and pathological characteristic, recovery of bowel movements, length of hospital stay and post-operative complications. The frequency of purulent/gangrenous or perforated appendix were Laparoscopic appendectomy-10% and in open appendectomy 20%. The time of rst atus after surgery were 2.9 days and in open appendectomy were 2.97 days in laparoscopic appendectomy. Length of hospital stay were relatively short in laparoscopic appendectomy group and in open appendectomy group The frequency of overall surgical site infection were not that difference between the two groups laparoscopic appendectomy -15% open appendectomy group were22%But that of supercial surgical site infection was signicantly lower in laparoscopic appendectomy group5% open appendectomy group 15%.

scholarly journals Comparing SSI In Purse-String Versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal

Esculapio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-19
Author(s):  
Sabih Nofal ◽  
Anum Arif ◽  
Ahsan Khan ◽  
Sundus Saif ◽  
Abdul Waheed Khan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
P Value ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Purse String ◽  
Stoma Reversal ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the frequency of Surgical Site Infection ( SSI ) and mean length of hospital stay between the Purse-string closure and conventional primary closure techniques for stoma reversal. Methods: The study was carried out in Surgical Unit-III, Lahore General Hospital Lahore from January 5, 2018 to July 5, 2018. The study designed as a Observational Study. Patients undergoing surgery for Ileostomy were randomly divided into two groups, Group-A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). All the patients were called for follow up checkup on 14th days after operation and after one month. Both of the groups were checked and recorded for SSI after operation and hospital stay. The data was statistically analyzed by using SPSS v23.0.t test (independent sample) used for the comparison of hospital stay mean. Chi-square was also used for the comparison of the frequencies of SSI. Data were stratified for gender and age. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered as significant. Results: A total of 140 patients were enrolled for this study. Patients were divided into two groups i.e. Group- A (Purse-string closure) and Group-B (Conventional primary closure). In group-A, mean duration of hospital stay was 5.7±1.0 days, while 7.3±1.1 days in group-B, which is statistically significant with a p-value of 0.000. In group-A, surgical site infection was in 4(5.7%) patients, while 11(15.7%) patients of group-B, which is statistically significant with a p-value of 0.046. Conclusion: The frequency of surgical site infection and mean length of hospital stay after stoma reversal, purse-string suturing technique is significantly less than conventional primary closure technique. Key Words: Surgical stoma; Ileostomy; Closure; Infection. How to cite: Nofal S., Arif A., Khan A., Saif. S., Khan W.A., Arif A. Comparing SSI in Purse-String Versus Conventional Primary Closure Following Stoma Reversal. Esculapio 2021; 17(01): 15-19

Clinical outcome of V-Y flap with latissimus dorsi and gluteal advancement for treatment of large thoracolumbar myelomeningocele defects: a comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-84
Author(s):  
Mohammad Sadegh Masoudi ◽  
Mohammad Ali Hoghoughi ◽  
Fariborz Ghaffarpasand ◽  
Shekoofeh Yaghmaei ◽  
Maryam Azadegan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Latissimus Dorsi ◽  
Primary Closure ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Gluteal Muscle ◽  
Operative Duration ◽  
Csf Leakage

OBJECTIVESurgical repair and closure of myelomeningocele (MMC) defects are important and vital, as the mortality rate is as high as 65%–70% in untreated patients. Closure of large MMC defects is challenging for pediatric neurosurgeons and plastic surgeons. The aim of the current study is to report the operative characteristics and outcome of a series of Iranian patients with large MMC defects utilizing the V-Y flap and with latissimus dorsi or gluteal muscle advancement.METHODSThis comparative study was conducted during a 4-year period from September 2013 to October 2017 in the pediatric neurosurgery department of Shiraz Namazi Hospital, Southern Iran. The authors included 24 patients with large MMC defects who underwent surgery utilizing the bilateral V-Y flap and latissimus dorsi and gluteal muscle advancement. They also retrospectively included 19 patients with similar age, sex, and defect size who underwent surgery using the primary or delayed closure techniques at their center. At least 2 years of follow-up was conducted. The frequency of leakage, necrosis, dehiscence, systemic infection (sepsis, pneumonia), need for ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion, and mortality was compared between the 2 groups.RESULTSThe bilateral V-Y flap with muscle advancement was associated with a significantly longer operative duration (p < 0.001) than the primary closure group. Those undergoing bilateral V-Y flaps with muscle advancement had significantly lower rates of surgical site infection (p = 0.038), wound dehiscence (p = 0.013), and postoperative CSF leakage (p = 0.030) than those undergoing primary repair. The bilateral V-Y flap with muscle advancement was also associated with a lower mortality rate (p = 0.038; OR 5.09 [95% CI 1.12–23.1]) than primary closure. In patients undergoing bilateral V-Y flap and muscle advancement, a longer operative duration was significantly associated with mortality (p = 0.008). In addition, surgical site infection (p = 0.032), wound dehiscence (p = 0.011), and postoperative leakage (p = 0.011) were predictors of mortality. Neonatal sepsis (p = 0.002) and postoperative NEC (p = 0.011) were among other predictors of mortality in this group.CONCLUSIONSThe bilateral V-Y flap with latissimus dorsi or gluteal advancement is a safe and effective surgical approach for covering large MMC defects and is associated with lower rates of surgical site infection, dehiscence, CSF leakage, and mortality. Further studies are required to elucidate the long-term outcomes.

Association of Wound Infection with Various Surgical Technique Applied for Appendectomy in Diabetic and Hypertensive Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2163-2165
Author(s):  
Muhammad Armughan ◽  
Imran Sadiq ◽  
Shafqat Mukhtar ◽  
Hafiz Ahmad Altaf
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Wound Infections ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Perforated Appendix

Background: Perforated appendix in diabetic as well as hypertensive patients is associated with elevated risks of postoperative infectious complications such as wound infection and intra-abdominal abscess. Objective: To identify better appendectomy procedure for diabetic and hypertensive patients. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial Place and Duration of Study: Department of Surgery, Unit l, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur from 10th October 2020 to 9th April 2021. Methodology: Ninety eight patients meeting the criteria of perforated appendix were divided in two groups; one group consisted of 49 patients who were managed by open surgical procedure. Second group was consisted of 49 patients who were managed by laparoscopic surgical procedure. Patient outcomes in-terms of wound infections, operative time and duration of surgery was assessed. Results: Mean age of patients was 25.49±6.03 years. There were 17 hypertensive while 15 diabetic patients. Wound infection was seen in 21% and 28% open surgery diabetic and hypertensive patients respectively in comparison to 10%and 8% in laparoscopic appendectomy diabetic and hypertensive patients respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is associated with significantly lower rates of post-operative wound infections and shorter hospital stay in comparison to open appendectomy in diabetic and hypertensive patients of perforated appendicitis. Key Words: Perforated appendix, laparoscopic, open appendectomy

Compare the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection after Appendectomy Wound Irrigation with Normal Saline and Imipenem Solutions

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2184-2186
Author(s):  
Ahmad Shah ◽  
Nazeer Ahmad Sasoli ◽  
Farrukh Sami
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Saline Solution ◽  
Abscess Formation ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Wound Irrigation ◽  
Group I ◽  
Perforated Appendix ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Objective: To compare the incidence of surgical site infection after appendectomy wound irrigation with regular saline solution and imipenem solution. Study Design: Comparative randomized control trial Place and Duration of Study: Department of Surgery Unit-1, Sandeman Provincial Hospital Quetta from 1st September 2020 to 30th April 2021. Methodology: Eighty patients of both genders were presented in this study. Patients detailed demographics age, sex and body mass index were recorded after taking informed written consent. Patients underwent for appendectomy wound irrigation were included. Patients were equally divided into two equal groups, I and II. Group I had 40 patients and received imipenem and group II irrigated with saline solution with 40 patients. Outcomes were surgical site infection, deep abscess formation was observed post-operatively. Results: The mean age of the patients in group I was 26.11±2.03 years with mean BMI 23.61±3.32 kg/m2 and in group II mean age was 25.14±3.12 years with mean BMI 22.14±4.88 kg/m2. In group I, 32 (80%) patients had inflamed appendix, perforated appendix was in 7 (17.5%) and gangrenous appendix in 1 (2.5%) while in group II inflamed appendix in 34 (85%), perforated appendix in 4 (10%) and gangrenous appendix 2 (5%). Surgical site infection in group I was 3 (7.5%) and abscess formation in 2 (5%) cases while in group II SSI in 6 (15%) and abscess formation in 3 (7.5%) cases. Conclusion: Imipenem irrigation after appendectomy reduces wound infection. Healthcare costs and patient suffering due to infection can be reduced. Keywords: Imipenem solution, Wound irrigation with saline, Appendectomy wound infection

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document