Nighttime Appendectomy is Safe and has Similar Outcomes as Daytime Appendectomy: A Study of 1198 Appendectomies

Introduction: Although it is controversial whether appendectomy can be safely delayed, it is often unnecessary to postpone operation as a shorter delay may increase patient comfort, enables quicker recovery, and decreases costs. In this study, we sought to study whether the time of day influences the outcomes among patients operated on for acute appendicitis. Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy at Tampere University Hospital between 1 September 2014 and 30 April 2017 for acute appendicitis were included. Primary outcome measures were postoperative morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, and amount of intraoperative bleeding. Appendectomies were divided into daytime and nighttime operations. Results: A total of 1198 patients underwent appendectomy, of which 65% were operated during daytime and 35% during nighttime. Patient and disease-related characteristics were similar in both groups. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 4.8% and 0.2%, respectively. No time categories were associated with risk of complications or complication severity. Neither was there difference in operation time and clinically significant difference in intraoperative bleeding. Patients undergoing surgery during night hours had a shorter hospital stay. In multivariate analysis, only complicated appendicitis was associated with worse outcomes. Discussion: We have shown that nighttime appendectomy is associated with similar outcomes than daytime appendectomy. Subsequently, appendectomy should be planned for the next available slot, minimizing delay whenever possible.

Download Full-text

Delayed appendicectomy in patients with non-perforated acute appendicitis

International Surgery Journal ◽

10.18203/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20173415 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 4 (8) ◽

pp. 2766

Author(s):

Anandaravi B. N. ◽

Krishna S. R. ◽

Pradeep Kumar H. D. ◽

Mayank Garg

Keyword(s):

Acute Appendicitis ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Readmission Rate ◽

Operative Time ◽

Perforated Appendicitis ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Perforation Rate ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Emergency Group ◽

Delayed Group

Background: Appendicitis remains one of the most common diseases encountered by the surgeon in practice. Appendicectomy is the most common urgent or emergency general surgical operation performed. Emergency appendicectomy is believed to be the standard treatment protocol for patients with acute appendicitis. This study was conducted to verify whether acute non-perforated appendicitis requires immediate surgery or can be delayed to be taken up on elective basis.Methods: This is a retrospective study of all the cases undergoing appendicectomy for acute appendicitis over the period of January 2016 to December 2016 in K. R. hospital, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. The cases were divided into two comparison groups: emergency group (operated within 12 hours of admission) and delayed group (operated between 12-72 hours). Parameters like age, sex, duration of symptoms, total leucocytes count, temperature, haemoglobin, radiological investigations, operative procedure, operative time, length of hospital stay, length of post-operative stay were collected and the end points for comparison were: Operative time, perforation rate, post-operative complication, length of hospital stay, readmission rate. Cases of perforated appendicitis in preoperative diagnosis, interval appendicectomy and appendicectomy done in association with other abdominal conditions were excluded from the study.Results: During this one-year period 283 patients have undergone appendicectomy. Out of this 189 (66.8%) patients have undergone surgery within 12 hours of admission and 94 (33.2%) have undergone surgery between 12 to 72 hours of admission. There was no significant difference between the two groups in operative time, per operative perforation rate, post-operative complication rate, readmission rate. Length of the hospital stay was greater in delayed group as compared to emergency group. But there was no significant difference between the post-operative length of hospital stay.Conclusions: Acute appendicitis can be treated surgically in a delayed elective basis without increasing morbidity.

Download Full-text

816 Managing Acute Appendicitis During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study

British Journal of Surgery ◽

10.1093/bjs/znab259.478 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽

Author(s):

A Lotfallah ◽

A Aamery ◽

G Moussa

Keyword(s):

Acute Appendicitis ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Interquartile Range ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Alvarado Score ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic provoked a change to normal surgical practice and led to a higher proportion of acute appendicitis (AA) patients being treated conservatively with antibiotics. We aim to analyse patients presenting with AA during the first wave of the pandemic, comparing surgically and conservatively managed patients. Method All patients presenting to our centre with AA between March and July 2020 were included. Six-month follow-up data was collected retrospectively using electronic records. Patients were categorised into surgically and conservatively managed groups. The primary outcome was the complication rate (post-operative complications vs failure of antibiotic treatment) and the secondary outcome was length of hospital stay. Results Fifty-seven patients (n = 57) were admitted with AA, 45.6% (n = 26) managed conservatively compared to 54.4% (n = 31) treated surgically. Higher complication rates were observed amongst the conservatively managed group, although not statistically significant (16% vs 35%; p = 0.131). There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay observed between the two groups (surgical: median, 2; interquartile range, 2-3 vs conservative: median, 3; interquartile range, 2-4). White cell count (WCC) and Alvarado score were higher on admission in the surgical group with statistical significance (p = 0.012 and p = 0.028 respectively). Conclusions Stratification criteria, such as Alvarado score and WCC may identify patients more suitable for conservative management. Longer term follow-up will be carried out, which may alter complication rates in either group. We suggest all patients treated conservatively should undergo computerised tomography (CT) to exclude complicated appendicitis. Further UK-based studies will add to the evidence-base surrounding management of AA during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Download Full-text

Characteristics and Outcomes of Acute Appendicitis Cases During the COVID-19 Pandemic

10.21203/rs.3.rs-94523/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Murat Başer ◽

Mehmet Kağan Katar

Keyword(s):

Acute Appendicitis ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Open Surgery ◽

Open Appendectomy ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Operation Time ◽

Complication Rates ◽

Duration Of Symptoms ◽

Conversion To Open Surgery ◽

Group B

Abstract Background: Our aim in this study was to investigate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute appendicitis cases.Methods: This study was designed as a single-center, retrospective, and observational study. The patients were divided into three groups relative to the date of the first COVID-19 case in Turkey, which was March 10, 2020 (Group A: before the pandemic; Group B: pandemic period; Group C: the same period one year before the pandemic). A total of 413 patients were included in the study.Results: In terms of treatment modality, the rate of open appendectomy was significantly higher in group B (p<0.001). Rates of conversion to open surgery, as well as rates of complicated appendicitis were also significantly higher in group B (p=0.027, p=0.024, respectively). While there was no difference between the groups in terms of preoperative hospitalization duration (p=0.102), it was found that the duration of symptoms, operation time, and postoperative length of hospital stay were significantly higher in Group B (p<0.001, p=0.011, p=0.001, respectively). In addition, the complication rate in group B (8.9%) was also significantly higher than in the other two groups (p=0.023).Conclusion: We found that the rate of open surgery, the rate of conversion of laparoscopic surgery to open surgery, complication rates, mean operation time, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly higher in acute appendicitis patients that underwent surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic period. We believe that the main reason for this negative outcome is the late admission of the patients to the hospital.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness and Safety of Wide Awake Local Anesthesia no Tourniquet (WALANT) Technique in Hand Surgery

Revista de Chimie ◽

10.37358/rc.19.10.7602 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 70 (10) ◽

pp. 3587-3591

Author(s):

Mihaela Pertea ◽

Oxana Madalina Grosu ◽

Bogdan Veliceasa ◽

Natalia Velenciuc ◽

Petru Ciobanu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Correlation Coefficient ◽

Local Anesthesia ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Hand Surgery ◽

Patient Comfort ◽

Intraoperative Bleeding ◽

Positive Direct ◽

Wide Awake ◽

No Tourniquet

The aim of the study was to confirm the effectiveness and safety of wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) technique in hand surgery, to present our results and to encourage its use on Romania and all over the world. The study group consisted of 120 patients in which local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine and 1: 100,000 epinephrine solution was used. The conditions requiring surgery were Dupuytren disease (DD) stages II and III affecting one or two digital rays, carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), trigger finger (TF), rupture of the flexor pollicis longus�(FPL) tendon. The amount of anesthetic used, onset time, intraoperative bleeding, surgeon�s comfort during surgery, patient�s comfort, operative time, the immediate postoperative complications and length of hospital stay were evaluated, correlations between these parameters being made with the help of SPSS 20.0 software using regressions (ANOVA), and taking into account Pearson correlation coefficients with statistical significance, alpha at most .05 and CI 95%. In the group of 120 operated patients (58 men - M and 62 female -F) (M/F ratio = 0.93), no cases of digital necrosis or other vascular complications were recorded. Also, the absence of tourniquets did not result in intraoperative bleeding causing discomfort to the surgeon. The amount of anesthetic varied, being less than that recommended in the literature in approximately 40% of the cases. In all cases, patient comfort and satisfaction were highest, and length of hospital stay was several hours. Phentolamine, an antidote used to reverse the effects of epinephrine, was not used in any case. The correlation coefficient between the amount of anesthetic and waiting time = 0.3372 (p = 0.0001) � positive, direct, moderate, and statistically significant correlation. The correlation coefficient between the amount of anesthetic and length of hospital stay = 0.2700 (p = 0.002) - positive, direct, weak and statistically significant correlation. Correlation coefficient between age and length of hospital stay = 0.1361 (p = 0.1380) - positive, direct, weak correlation, but statistically insignificant. WALANT technique is safe and has many advantages: no need it is not necessary to use the tourniquet and intravenous sedation, surgeon and patient comfort is maximum, there is no risk of finger necrosis, intraoperative collaboration and last but not the least, hospital stay is short and costs are minimal.

Download Full-text

Observation of the Efficacy of Laparoscopic Resection of Anterior Rectal Cancer in Treating Rectal Cancer

Proceedings of Anticancer Research ◽

10.26689/par.v3i4.1054 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 3 (4) ◽

Author(s):

Hao Zhang

Keyword(s):

Rectal Cancer ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Laparoscopic Resection ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Operation Time ◽

Treatment Method ◽

Postoperative Recovery ◽

Control Group ◽

Observation Group ◽

Significant Difference

Objective: To analyze the efficacy of laparoscopic resection of anterior rectal cancer in treating rectal cancer. Methods: Fifty patients with rectal cancer who were treated in Gucheng County Hospital of Hebei Province from September 2017 to September 2019 were selected and recruited in the present study. These patients were divided into two groups, namely the control group and observation groups, by random number table method. Each group consisted of 25 patients. The control group underwent laparoscopic assisted transanorectal mesorectal excision, whereas the observation group underwent laparoscopic resection of anterior rectal cancer. The two groups were compared for related indicators, indicators pertaining to postoperative recovery, and complications. Results: There was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissections between the two groups (P>0.05). The amount of intraoperative blood loss, surgical operation time, and incision length in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The time of getting out of bed, anal exhaust, and duration of hospital stay were shorter in the observation group than those of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopic resection of anterior rectal cancer is effective for rectal cancer patients. This treatment method can effectively reduce the amount of intraoperative bleeding, shorten the operation time, the time of anal exhaust, get out of bed, and the length of hospital stay, as well as improve condition of the patients.

Download Full-text

ACUTE APPENDICITIS: DELAYED SURGERY DOES NOT INCREASE THE NUMBER OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS

Visuomenės sveikata ◽

10.5200/sm-hs.2018.019 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 28 (2) ◽

pp. 52-56

Author(s):

Romualdas Riauka ◽

Povilas Ignatavičius ◽

Žygimantas Tverskis ◽

Žilvinas Dambrauskas

Keyword(s):

Postoperative Complications ◽

Acute Appendicitis ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Operating Time ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Pathology Report ◽

Perforation Rate ◽

Group I ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Group Ii

Introduction. Historically appendicitis is tending to be operated as soon as possible to prevent future complications. Recent discussions show, that urgent operation does not always reduce the rate of postoperative complications. Immediate appendectomy can be delayed in some cases. Methods. Retrospective, non-randomized, single center, cohort study was performed. During one-year period 167 consecutive patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis were included in the study. The study population was divided into two groups according to the time from the onset of the symptoms to the operation. Group I (≤ 24 hours) - 74 patients and Group II (≥ 24 hours) – 93 patients. Primary (postoperative complications) and secondary (operating time, length of hospital stay and perforation rate at the final pathology report) endpoints were evaluated and compared. Results. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative complications when comparing both groups. In Group I – 21.9% patients (87.5% Grade I) and in Group II – 25.8% patients (83% Grade I) had postoperative complications. Operating time was similar between the groups (72.97±29.1 (Group I) vs 79.95±35.4 minutes (Group II)). Length of hospital stay was longer in Group II, but no statistically significant difference was found (2.85±2.3 vs 3.34±4.88 days accordingly). Perforation rate at the final pathology report was twice higher in Group II (8 (10.8%) vs 17 (18.3%)), but no statistically significant difference was found. Conclusions. This study findings support earlier reports showing that delayed appendectomy is safe surgical procedure without higher rate of postoperative complications and may be applied in certain cases.

Download Full-text

Defining treatment strategy for uncomplicated appendicitis based on patient satisfaction feedback: A cross-sectional study

10.21203/rs.3.rs-31365/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Kyota Tatsuta ◽

Shinichiro Miyazaki ◽

Masahito Ogiku ◽

Takashi Harada ◽

Nishiwaki Yoshiro

Keyword(s):

Patient Satisfaction ◽

Blood Loss ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽

Surgical Intervention ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Operation Time ◽

Uncomplicated Appendicitis ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Degree Of Satisfaction

Abstract Background Two surgical strategies are available for appendicitis: emergency laparoscopic appendectomy and interval laparoscopic appendectomy. However, timing of surgical intervention remains debatable. This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of emergency laparoscopic appendectomy (ELA) and interval laparoscopic appendectomy (ILA) and conduct a questionnaire survey to investigate the use of ELA and patient satisfaction with regard to treatment. Methods We included 162 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy at our hospital. Outcomes were assessed by operation time, blood loss, postoperative fasting time, length of hospital stay, and complication rate. Patient satisfaction was measured by questionnaire addressing degree of satisfaction, pre-surgery anxiety, and length of hospital stay. Continuous variables were compared by Student’s t-test, and discrete variables, expressed as percentages, were analyzed via chi-squared test. Results Of 162 patients, 74 (46%) and 88 (54%) received emergency and ILA, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the operation time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, or complication rate. Among 66 patients who responded to the questionnaire (28 emergency, 38 interval), a significant difference was observed only in the degree of satisfaction regarding the timing of the surgical intervention (p = 0.04). Conclusions Surgical outcomes of emergency and interval appendectomy were equivalent; however, patient satisfaction favored emergency appendectomy, suggesting it is a preferable approach for the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis. Trial registration: NA

Download Full-text

Implementation of multi-mode nursing insulation program for patients receiving surgery for spine tumor: a propensity score-matched analysis

BMC Surgery ◽

10.1186/s12893-021-01463-1 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Juan Liu ◽

Chunyan Gao ◽

Hailong Fu ◽

Xiaonan Zhou ◽

Li Zhang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Operation Time ◽

Spinal Tumor ◽

Management Plan ◽

Anesthesia Induction ◽

Large Area ◽

Confounding Bias ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Multi Mode

Abstract Background Spinal tumor surgery usually involved long operation time, large area of soft tissue resection and long wound, and was prone to hypothermia during the operation. Therefore, actively promoting insulation and optimizing the intraoperative insulation program have great potential in reducing the incidence of hypothermia and reducing the incidence of postoperative complications. In this study, we compared patients who did not implement multi-mode nursing insulation program (MNIP) with those who implemented MNIP, observing and comparing clinical outcomes, and complications in both groups, with the aim of developing an optimal management plan for the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods, respectively. Methods We selected 2 periods of 1 year, before (n = 120 patients) and after MINP implementation (n = 120 patients). Data were collected on patient demographics, operative, perioperative details, temperature changes, anesthesia recovery effect, incidence of postoperative wound infection, length of hospital stay and complications. PS analyses were used for dealing with confounding bias in this retrospective observational study. Results After PS matching, the outcomes of 120 well-balanced pairs of patients were compared (No-MNIP vs MNIP). There was no significant difference concerning the satisfaction survey. The results indicated that the MNIP had better insulation effect at 90 min, 120 min, 150 min after anesthesia induction and after surgery. There were 16 cases of complications in the No-MNIP group and 5 cases in the MNIP group postoperative, which have significant statistical difference. Conclusion In this study, the incidence of intraoperative hypothermia was effectively reduced by adopting the multi-mode insulation scheme, thus reducing the incidence of incision infection and shortening the length of hospital stay of patients.

Download Full-text

Effect of Chewing Gum on Bowel Motility in Women Undergoing Post-Operative Cesarean Section

International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science ◽

10.23958/ijirms/vol03-i06/04 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 3 (06) ◽

Author(s):

Dr.Randa Mohammed AboBaker

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Section ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Chewing Gum ◽

Control Group ◽

Controlled Clinical Trial ◽

Bowel Motility ◽

Gum Chewing ◽

Significant Difference

Postoperative Ileus (POI) is one of the most common problems after obstetrics, gynecologic and abdominal surgeries. Sham feeding, such as gum chewing, accelerates the return of bowel function and the length of hospital stay. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of chewing gum on bowel motility in women undergoing post-operative cesarean section. Intervention study was used at the Postpartum Department of Maternity and Children Hospital, KSA. A randomized controlled clinical trial research design. Through a convenience technique, 80 post Caesarian Section (CS) women were included in the study. Data were collected through three tools: Tool (I): Socio-demographic data and reproductive history interview schedule. Tool (II): Postoperative Assessment Sheet. Tool (III): Outcomes of gum chewing and the length of hospital stay. Method: subjects were assigned randomly into two groups of (40) the experimental and (40) the control. Subjects in the study group were asked to chew two pieces of sugarless gum for 30 min/three times daily in the morning, noon, and evening immediately after recovery from anesthesia and in Postpartum Department; while subjects in the control group followed the hospital routine care. Each woman in both groups was tested abdominally using a stethoscope to auscultate the bowel sounds and asked to report immediately the time of either passing flatus or stool. Results: illustrated that a highly statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning their gum chewing outcomes. Where, P = 0.000. The study concluded that gum chewing is safe, well tolerated and appears to be effective in reducing the incidence and consequences of POI following CS.

Download Full-text

Stereotactic Electroencephalography Is Associated With Reduced Pain and Opioid Use When Compared with Subdural Grids: A Case Series

Operative Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/ons/opab040 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Jonathan P Scoville ◽

Evan Joyce ◽

Joshua Hunsaker ◽

Jared Reese ◽

Herschel Wilde ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Chart Review ◽

Statistical Tests ◽

Case Series ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Opioid Use ◽

Pain Scores ◽

Surgical Methods ◽

Significant Difference

Abstract BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has been shown to decrease length of hospital stay and opioid use. OBJECTIVE To identify whether surgery for epilepsy mapping via MIS stereotactically placed electroencephalography (SEEG) electrodes decreased overall opioid use when compared with craniotomy for EEG grid placement (ECoG). METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for epilepsy mapping, either SEEG or ECoG, were identified through retrospective chart review from 2015 through 2018. The hospital stay was separated into specific time periods to distinguish opioid use immediately postoperatively, throughout the rest of the stay and at discharge. The total amount of opioids consumed during each period was calculated by transforming all types of opioids into their morphine equivalents (ME). Pain scores were also collected using a modification of the Clinically Aligned Pain Assessment (CAPA) scale. The 2 surgical groups were compared using appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS The study identified 43 patients who met the inclusion criteria: 36 underwent SEEG placement and 17 underwent craniotomy grid placement. There was a statistically significant difference in median opioid consumption per hospital stay between the ECoG and the SEEG placement groups, 307.8 vs 71.5 ME, respectively (P = .0011). There was also a significant difference in CAPA scales between the 2 groups (P = .0117). CONCLUSION Opioid use is significantly lower in patients who undergo MIS epilepsy mapping via SEEG compared with those who undergo the more invasive ECoG procedure. As part of efforts to decrease the overall opioid burden, these results should be considered by patients and surgeons when deciding on surgical methods.

Download Full-text