scholarly journals Impact of inflammatory bowel disease on daily life: an online survey by the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Sun Kim ◽  
Sung-Ae Jung ◽  
Kang-Moon Lee ◽  
Soo Jung Park ◽  
Tae Oh Kim ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628482110132
Author(s):  
Karoline Soares Garcia ◽  
Bianca Pocopetz Facas ◽  
Marta Brenner Machado ◽  
Fábio Vieira Teixeira ◽  
Luisa Avedano ◽  
...  

Background: In this analysis we aimed to describe Brazilian inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients’ knowledge and perceptions regarding biosimilars and compare with viewpoints from non-Brazilian patients. Methods: An online survey consisting of 19 questions was made available by the European Federation of Crohn’s and Ulcerative Colitis Associations between July 2018 and December 2018. Only respondents who had heard of biosimilars were asked to respond to all of the questions. Results: A total of 102 Brazilian IBD patients responded to the survey. The majority (78.4%) of patients had been exposed to anti-tumor-necrosis-factor drugs and 63.4% of them had heard of biosimilars. Brazilian respondents worried significantly more about biosimilars being less effective than the originator (62.5% versus 47.9%, p value 0.03) and molecular differences between biosimilars and originators (53.1% versus 31.8, p value 0.001) as compared with non-Brazilian IBD patients. The majority of Brazilian (75%) and non-Brazilian (64.1%) respondents thought that the lower cost of biosimilars should not come before their safety and efficacy ( p value 0.09). In addition, 79.1% of Brazilian respondents believed that the arrival of biosimilars will have an impact on the management of IBD. Conclusions: Brazilian patients reported higher rates of misconceptions regarding biosimilars than non-Brazilian IBD patients. Although patients still worry about different aspects regarding biosimilars, they also tend to be confident that biosimilars will have an impact on the management of their disease. With the recent approval of many biosimilars in Brazil and the imminent widespread use of these drugs, our data raise awareness for the need of providing patient education to prevent negative expectations toward switching to biosimilars.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 56-57
Author(s):  
M Painchaud ◽  
S Singh ◽  
R M Penner

Abstract Background Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, clinics were forced to implement telehealth into clinical practice. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are a unique population that require long-term care to achieve and maintain deep remission of disease. Thus, they require stable and continuous contact with healthcare providers, often with multiple appointments. We examined an IBD predominant practice, also providing care for general gastrointestinal (GI) conditions in Kelowna, British Columbia. As telehealth has the potential to become a standard of care for clinics, patient satisfaction must be considered. We hypothesize that with the efficacy and ease of remote appointments, there will be an increase in patient satisfaction, quality of care, and quality of communication. Aims We aim to compare the level of patient satisfaction between in-person appointments pre-pandemic, and current remote appointment telehealth practices. Methods An online survey was sent to the 608 patients who had participated in one or more remote appointment between March 15-June 15, 2020. The survey compared the level of patient satisfaction, quality of care, and quality of communication between patient and doctor before and during the pandemic. It was also determined if patients would elect to continue with remote appointments in the future due to ease of use, and time/financial resources saved. Results Of the 273 participants, 80% were IBD patients while 20% were treated for other GI conditions. A total of 78% reported that they would elect to continue with remote appointments as their primary point of care with their doctor. The remaining 22% reported that they prefer in-person visits due to the necessity of a physical exam, yet specified that communication by these remote means was still of good quality. Levels of patient satisfaction before and during the pandemic remained consistent, where 59% of patients assigned a satisfaction rating of 10 (highest) to their pre-pandemic in-person appointments, and 54% of patients assigned a rating of 10 to their remote appointments during the pandemic. Similar consistent results were found for quality of care and quality of communication. A total of 70% of patients reported that if this service had not been available, they would have sought out other forms of care; 18% of the total responses considering emergency care. Conclusions IBD patients at Kelowna Gastroenterology perceived similar levels of satisfaction, quality of care, and quality of communication with both in-person and telehealth appointments. This suggests that telehealth practices may be a cost-effective, sustainable appointment style that provides comparable quality to in-person appointments. Funding Agencies None


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Huan Wang ◽  
Lei Tu ◽  
Ying Li ◽  
Tao Bai ◽  
Kaifang Zou ◽  
...  

Objectives. The COVID-19 epidemic triggered by coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is rapidly spreading around the globe. This study is aimed at finding out the suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Hubei province, China. We also investigated symptoms, medications, life quality, and psychological issues of IBD patients under the ongoing pandemic. Methods. We conducted a self-reported questionnaire survey via an online survey platform. SARS-CoV-2 infection-related data was collected from IBD patients. The status quo of medications and symptoms of the subjects were investigated. Life quality, depression, and anxiety were measured by clinical questionnaires and rated on scoring systems. Results. A total of 204 IBD patients from Hubei province were included in this study. No suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection case was found in this study. As a result of city shutdown, two-thirds of the patients (138/204) in our series reported difficulty in accessing medicines and nearly half of them (73/138) had to discontinue medications. Apart from gastrointestinal symptoms, systemic symptoms were common while respiratory symptoms were rare in the cohort. Though their quality of life was not significantly lowered, depression and anxiety were problems that seriously affected them during the COVID-19 epidemic. Conclusions. Inaccessibility to medications is a serious problem for IBD patients after city shutdown. Efforts have to be made to address the problems of drug withdrawal and psychological issues that IBD patients suffer from during the COVID-19 outbreak.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joy Lee ◽  
Christian Pedretti ◽  
Gauree Konijeti

Abstract Objectives The aim was to examine the clinical course and dietary patterns among patients incorporating autoimmune protocol (AIP) for management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods An anonymous online survey was sent through electronic newsletters and support groups utilizing AIP. The survey assessed demographics, IBD disease activity, and medication use. Participants were asked about AIP utilization and food group reintroductions. Abdominal pain (AP), stool frequency (SF), and rectal bleeding (RB) were compared at baseline (BL, prior to starting AIP), week 6 (after starting AIP), and present, for both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Results There were 78 respondents. Mean age was 39.4 years, with mean IBD duration 13.2 years. 78% had prior steroid exposure. 35% currently on immunosuppressive agents. 73% perceived achieving clinical remission due to AIP. This was more common among patients not on immunosuppression (76% vs. 24% on immunosuppression, P < 0.001). After starting AIP, 32% reported discontinuing steroids. AIP was initiated according to protocol by 73%, while 27% modified it. Food group reintroductions were started within 0–4 weeks of starting AIP among 8%, while 23% reintroduced within 5–8 weeks, 24% within 2–6 months, 23% within 6–12 months, and 13% after 12 months. Success of food group reintroductions varied (Table 1). Among patients with CD, improvement by ≥1 levels of symptoms by week 6 was reported by 77% for AP, 57% for SF, and 57% for RB. Compared to BL, reported symptoms improved by ≥1 levels in 70% for AP, 53% for SF, and 57% for RB. In contrast, disease worsening by ≥1 levels at week 6 was reported by 7% for AP and none for SF and RB. Among patients with UC, improvement by ≥1 levels by week 6 was reported by 72% for AP, 79% for SF, and 65% for RB. Compared to BL, reported symptoms improved by ≥1 levels in 65% for AP, 67% for SF, and 58% for RB. In contrast, disease worsening by ≥1 levels at week 6 was reported by 2% for AP, 2% for SF, and 5% for RB. Conclusions Patients utilizing AIP for management of IBD report clinical benefit of AIP, reduction of steroid use, and successful food group reintroduction. Dietary interventions could be another form of treatment in patients with IBD to improve symptoms and maintain remission. Funding Sources Not applicable. Supporting Tables, Images and/or Graphs


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. S785-S790
Author(s):  
Iris Dotan ◽  
Remo Panaccione ◽  
Gilaad G Kaplan ◽  
Colm O’Morain ◽  
James O Lindsay ◽  
...  

Abstract Infusion centres are a central part in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] and could be a source of transmission of SARS-COV-2. Here we aimed to develop global guidance for best practices of infusion centres for IBD patients and to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on these centres. Under the auspices of the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease [IOIBD], a task force [TF] was formed, an online survey was developed to query infusion centre protocols during COVID-19, and recommendations were made, based on TF experience and opinion. Recommendations focus mainly on patients screening, infusion centres re-organization, personnel protection, and protocol modifications such as shortening infusion duration or replacing it with subcutaneous alternatives. Implementing these recommendations will hopefully reduce exposure of both IBD patients and care givers to SARS-COV-2 and improve the function and safety of infusion centres during the COVID-19 pandemic as well as potential future threats.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa J Benson ◽  
Sarah V Abelev ◽  
Susan J Connor ◽  
Crispin J Corte ◽  
Lewis J Martin ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Medicinal cannabis (MC) is an increasingly utilized treatment option for various refractory diseases. While robust clinical evidence supporting MC efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is lacking, many IBD patients report using MC to obtain symptomatic relief. Understanding this use and associated outcomes may help inform future clinical trials. Methods A cross-sectional anonymous online survey was conducted involving Australians with IBD. It examined attitudes and experiences with MC in relation to IBD management. The survey included validated sub-questionnaires assessing quality of life, medication adherence, IBD severity, and functional impairment. Results A total of 838 responses were obtained. Results showed 25.3% (n = 212) of respondents were current or previous users of MC (18.1% current, 7.2% previous). Half of the current users also consumed cannabis recreationally although less frequently than for medicinal purposes. Cannabis consumption was via smoking (joints 34.2%; water pipe/bongs 14.5%) or as an oral liquid (19.7%) with products obtained from recreational dealers (44.6%), friends/family (26.1%), or self-grown (9.8%). Only 3 respondents reported using legally accessed products. Clinical ratings of IBD severity did not differ according to cannabis use although users reported more hospitalizations, less engagement with specialist services, and lower medication adherence. IBD symptoms reported as positively affected by cannabis included abdominal pain, stress, sleep, cramping, and anxiety. Most users (92.7%) endorsed cannabis as effective in symptom management. Cannabis-using ulcerative colitis patients reported better quality of life than nonusers on some measures. Conclusion Many patients in Australia are using illicit MC to manage their IBD. Further clinical trials are required to validate, or refute, patient claims around MC efficacy for symptom control in IBD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Firdevs Topal ◽  
Hakan Camyar ◽  
Elif Saritas Yuksel ◽  
Suleyman Gunay ◽  
Fatih Topal ◽  
...  

Background. Beyond the medical treatment in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), there are other issues which influence the quality of life adversely. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of the IBD patients’ illness on working and education life. Method. The participants were invited to participate in the online survey from the Turkish Crohn’s and Ulcerative Colitis Patient Association network. The data was analysed and then discussed to improve the health-related quality of working and education life. Results. One hundred and fifteen patients had ulcerative colitis (UC) (57.2%), and 86 had Crohn’s disease (CD) (42.8%). There was a statistically significant difference in UC between retirement age group 1 (<40 age) and groups 2 (40-49 ages) and 4 (60-65 ages) (p<0.05). There was the same significant difference in CD. Even though the data did not have significant statistical difference, there was clustering around negative perceptions the patients have about their working and education lives. Conclusion. Our survey revealed a very strong causative relationship between work and IBD involving problems before, during, and at the end of employment. Young patients lower their career expectations, and that announces a clear need to support them and improve career guidance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document