scholarly journals Hybrid cross-efficiency approach based on Ideal and Anti-Ideal points and the CRITIC method for ranking decision-making units: A case study on ranking the methods of rice weevil disinfestation

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-392
Author(s):  
Pariwat Nasawat ◽  
Sukangkana Talangkun ◽  
Sirawadee Arunyanart ◽  
Narong Wichapa
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Efficiency Evaluation ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Comprehensive Method ◽  
Ideal Points ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Decision Making Units

A new approach is applied in the process of measuring the efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) through the cross-efficiency evaluation method. Ideal and Anti-Ideal models are generated to form a comprehensive method based on the cross-efficiency evaluation method. The two models are formulated and combined to the Data Envelopment Analysis using the CRITIC method. In a comparative analysis based on three numerical examples, the proposed approach can lead to achieving a more reliable result than one based on an individual method.

scholarly journals Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method with Compete-Cooperate Matrix

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Qiang Hou ◽  
Xue Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Efficiency Evaluation ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Dea Method ◽  
Decision Making Units

Cross-efficiency evaluation method is an effective and widespread adopted data envelopment analysis (DEA) method with self-assessment and peer-assessment to evaluate and rank decision making units (DMUs). Extant aggressive, benevolent, and neutral cross-efficiency methods are used to evaluate DMUs with competitive, cooperative, and nontendentious relationships, respectively. In this paper, a symmetric (nonsymmetric) compete-cooperate matrix is introduced into aggressive and benevolent cross-efficiency methods and compete-cooperate cross-efficiency method is proposed to evaluate DMUs with diverse (relative) relationships. Deviation maximization method is applied to determine the final weights of cross-evaluation to enhance the differentiation ability of cross-efficiency evaluation method. Numerical demonstration is provided to illustrate the reasonability and practicability of the proposed method.

scholarly journals Gap Minimization for Peer-Evaluation in DEA Cross-Efficiency

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Anrong Yang ◽  
Zigang Zhang ◽  
Yishi Zhang ◽  
Dunliang Chen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Peer Evaluation ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Efficiency Evaluation ◽  
Self Evaluation ◽  
Criterion A ◽  
The Cross ◽  
Similarity Distance ◽  
Decision Making Units

Cross-efficiency evaluation is an effective and widely used method for ranking decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). Gap minimization criterion is introduced in aggressive and benevolent cross-efficiency methods to avoid possible extreme efficiency from peer-evaluation and to get equitable results. On the basis of this criterion, a weighted cross-efficiency method with similarity distance that, respectively, considers the aggressive and the benevolent formulations is proposed to determine cross-efficiency. The weights of the cross-evaluation determined by this method are positively influenced by self-evaluation and thus are propitious to resolving conflict. Numerical demonstration reveals the feasibility of the proposed method.

Gangless cross-evaluation in DEA: an application to stock selection

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (2) ◽  
pp. 645-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gholam R. Amin ◽  
Amar Oukil
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Stock Market ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Efficiency Evaluation ◽  
Stock Selection ◽  
Evaluation Approach ◽  
The Cross ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Decision Making Units

This paper discusses the impact of ganging decision making units (DMUs) on the cross-efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis (DEA). A group of DMUs are said to be ganging-together if the minimum and the maximum cross-efficiency scores they give to all other DMUs are identical. This study demonstrates that the ganging phenomenon can significantly influence the cross-efficiency evaluation in favour of some DMUs. To overcome this shortcoming, we propose a gangless cross-efficiency evaluation approach. The suggested method reduces the effect of ganging and generates a more diversified list of top performing units. An application to the Tehran stock market is used to show the benefits of gangless cross-evaluation.

scholarly journals A Cross-Efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Evaluation Criteria Balanced on Interval Weights

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hailiu Shi ◽  
Yingming Wang ◽  
Xiaoming Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Evaluation Criterion ◽  
Peer Evaluation ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Efficiency Evaluation ◽  
Common Set Of Weights ◽  
The Cross ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Evaluation Approaches

Cross-efficiency evaluation approaches and common set of weights (CSW) approaches have long been suggested as two of the more important and effective methods for the ranking of decision making units (DMUs) in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The former emphasizes the flexibility of evaluation and its weights are asymmetric, while the latter focuses on the standardization of evaluation and its weights are symmetrical. As a compromise between these two approaches, this paper proposes a cross-efficiency evaluation method that is based on two types of flexible evaluation criteria balanced on interval weights. The evaluation criteria can be regarded as macro policy—or means of regulation—according to the industry’s current situation. Unlike current cross-efficiency evaluation methods, which tend to choose the set of weights for peer evaluation based on certain preferences, the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on evaluation criterion determines one set of input and output weights for each DMU. This is done by minimizing the difference between the weights of the DMU and the evaluation criteria, thus ensuring that the cross-evaluation of all DMUs for evaluating peers is as consistent as possible. This method also eliminates prejudice and arbitrariness from peer evaluations. As a result, the proposed cross-efficiency evaluation method not only looks for non-zero weights, but also ranks efficient DMUs completely. The proposed DEA model can be further extended to seek a common set of weights for all DMUs. Numerical examples are provided to illustrate the applications of the cross-efficiency evaluation method based on evaluation criterion in DEA ranking.

Aggregating the results of benevolent and aggressive models by the CRITIC method for ranking of decision-making units: A case study on seven biomass fuel briquettes generated from agricultural waste

2021 ◽  
pp. 79-92
Author(s):  
Narong Wichapa ◽  
Porntep Khokhajaikiat ◽  
Kumpanat Chaiphet
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Agricultural Waste ◽  
Ranking Method ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Decision Matrix ◽  
Ranking Models ◽  
Biomass Materials ◽  
Ranking Problems ◽  
Decision Making Units

The ranking of decision-making units (DMUs) is one of the main issues in data envelopment analysis (DEA). Hence, many different ranking models have been proposed. However, each of these ranking models may produce different ranking results for similar problems. Therefore, it is wise to try different ranking models and aggregate the results of each ranking model that provides more reliable results in solving the ranking problems. In this paper, a novel ranking method (Aggregating the results of aggressive and benevolent models) based on the CRITIC method is proposed. To prove the applicability of the proposed ranking method, it is examined in three numerical examples, six nursing homes, fourteen international passenger airlines and seven biomass materials for processing into fuel briquettes. First, benevolent and aggressive models were used to calculate the efficiency rating for each DMU. As a result, the decision matrix was generated. In the decision matrix, the results of benevolent and aggressive models were viewed as criteria and DMUs were viewed as alternatives. Then, the weights of each criterion were generated by the CRITIC method. Finally, each DMU was ranked. In a comparative analysis, the proposed method can lead to achieving a more reliable decision than the method which is based on a stand-alone method.

scholarly journals A Full Ranking for Decision Making Units Using Ideal and Anti-Ideal Points in DEA

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Barzegarinegad ◽  
G. Jahanshahloo ◽  
M. Rostamy-Malkhalifeh
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Real Data ◽  
The Other ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Production Possibility ◽  
Decision Making Unit ◽  
Common Set Of Weights ◽  
Production Possibility Set ◽  
Ideal Points ◽  
Decision Making Units

We propose a procedure for ranking decision making units in data envelopment analysis, based on ideal and anti-ideal points in the production possibility set. Moreover, a model has been introduced to compute the performance of a decision making unit for these two points through using common set of weights. One of the best privileges of this method is that we can make ranking for all decision making units by solving only three programs, and also solving these programs is not related to numbers of decision making units. One of the other advantages of this procedure is to rank all the extreme and nonextreme efficient decision making units. In other words, the suggested ranking method tends to seek a set of common weights for all units to make them fully ranked. Finally, it was applied for different sets holding real data, and then it can be compared with other procedures.

scholarly journals New Approach in Fixed Resource Allocation and Target Setting Using Data Envelopment Analysis with Common Set of Weights

Complexity ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 2022 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Marzieh Ghasemi ◽  
Mohammad Reza Mozaffari ◽  
Farhad Hosseinzadeh Lotfi ◽  
Mohsen Rostamy malkhalifeh ◽  
Mohammad Hasan Behzadi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Resource Allocation ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Target Setting ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Common Set Of Weights ◽  
Programming Techniques ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Decision Making Units

One of the mathematical programming techniques is data envelopment analysis (DEA), which is used for evaluating the efficiency of a set of similar decision-making units (DMUs). Fixed resource allocation and target setting with the help of DEA is a subject that has gained much attention from researchers. A new model was proposed by determining a common set of weights (CSW). All DMUs were involved with the aim of achieving higher efficiency in every DMU after the procedure. The minimum resources and targets allocated to each DMU were commensurate to the efficiency of that DMU and the share of DMU in the input resources and the output productions. To examine the proposed method, other methods in the DEA literature were examined as well, and then, the efficiency of the method was demonstrated through a numerical example.

A Robust Data Envelopment Analysis Method with Bounded Data for Ranking Operations Strategies

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 49-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamad Amin Kaviani ◽  
Mehdi Abbasi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Cement Industry ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Interval Numbers ◽  
Complete Ranking ◽  
Bounded Data ◽  
Decision Making Units

This paper introduces a new robust data envelopment analysis (RDEA) approach for analyzing and ranking the organizations' operations strategies. In the proposed RDEA method, pessimistic and optimistic efficiencies of decision making units (DMUs) obtained from the robust counterpart of the envelopment form and the optimistic counterpart of the multiplier form of DEA are introduced. The inputs and outputs data are assumed to be bounded data (interval numbers) in the proposed models. A case study in the cement industry is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed RDEA approach. The results obtained from the authors' proposed RDEA approach is more robust and their method provides a more complete ranking of the DMUs compared to conventional Likert-based DEA model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document