scholarly journals A review of available herbal medicine options for the treatment of chronic insomnia

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 1589-1598
Author(s):  
Z. Poursaleh ◽  
M. Khodadoost ◽  
E. Vahedi ◽  
M. M. A. Attari ◽  
M. Jafari ◽  
...  

Background: Insomnia is a universal health problem that affects the health and quality of life of people worldwide. During the last decade treatment of insomnia with herbal has been introduced to be effective but unfortunately, the safety and efficacy of these medicines are currently uncertain. However, the administration of various herbal medicines for insomnia is increasing mainly due to the diversity of various adverse effects of western medication. Objective: The present study is aimed to investigate available herbal medicine options for the treatment of chronic insomnia. Method: All demanded data were retrieved from electronic databases, Natural Medicines, TCMID, Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database, MedlinePlus, PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Among them, randomized clinical trials were chosen precisely to be investigated more for seeking any additional information related to the treatment of chronic insomnia. All related papers in English and Persian languages included in the study criteria. At first, 162 articles were chosen to be investigated, then after screening all articles based on the PRISMA method, 83 qualified articles remained to be investigated carefully. Results: Herbal plants with medical properties as sedative agents are obtaining more and more attention because they contain various types of natural bioactive metabolites with the lowest rate of adverse effects. Moreover, these novel medicines are highly economic, with high efficacy while could be available easily. Conclusion: The data from this study demonstrated that medical plants could yield sedative activity and some of them are effective for insomnia, but we must not forget that further clinical trials are demanded to approve this. Keywords: Sleep disorders, Chronic insomnia, Herbal medicine, Alternative medication, Treatment.

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 242-252
Author(s):  
Monirsadat Sahebkar- Khorasani ◽  
Lida Jarahi ◽  
Holger Cramer ◽  
Mohammad Safarian ◽  
Hamideh Naghedi-Baghdar ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
David N. Churchill

The objective was to review the rationale for the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) recommendations for adequacy of peritoneal dialysis and to evaluate the impact of these recommendations on clinical practice and patient survival. The K/DOQI recommendations were based on large observational studies; the target weekly Kt/V value of 2.0 assumed equivalence of peritoneal and renal clearances. This assumption is no longer considered correct. The impact on clinical practice was evaluated by an examination of temporal trends before and after publication of the guidelines in 1997. In the United States and The Netherlands, there had been a trend toward increased delivered total Kt/V prior to 1997, and there was no acceleration in this trend after 1997. Two randomized clinical trials have implemented these guidelines with increased peritoneal Kt/V (or creatinine clearance) used to achieve the K/DOQI target in the intervention group. This was not associated with improved survival, compared to a lower Kt/V, in either of the randomized clinical trials. Among the explanations for the failure to improve outcome are potential adverse effects of increasing the dialysis dose. These include increased intraperitoneal pressure associated with increased exchange volume, failure to increase clearance of middle molecules, and increased exposure to glucose. Strategies that increase peritoneal clearance without exposure to these potential adverse effects include more-frequent exchanges rather than increased exchange volume, and decreased exposure to glucose and glucose degradation products. Pending such studies, current K/DOQI guidelines should be updated in a timely manner.


2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Orr ◽  
Santosh Deshpande ◽  
Sonja Sawh ◽  
Philip M. Jones ◽  
Kamini Vasudev

Objective: A systematic review was conducted to examine the efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of asenapine compared with other antipsychotics in the treatment of psychotic disorders. Methods: Four databases, 8 trial registries, and conference presentations were searched for randomized clinical trials of asenapine versus any comparator for the treatment of any psychotic illness. Primary outcome measures were changes in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score and the incidence of withdrawal due to adverse effects. Results: Eight randomized clinical trials, encompassing 3765 patients, that compared asenapine with placebo ( n = 5) and olanzapine ( n = 3) were included. No differences were found between asenapine and olanzapine in terms of changes to PANSS total or PANSS negative subscale scores. Patients taking asenapine were more likely to experience worsening schizophrenia and/or psychosis than were those taking olanzapine. No differences were found between asenapine and olanzapine in rates of discontinuation due to adverse drug reactions or lack of efficacy, but those taking asenapine had higher rates of withdrawal for any reason than those taking olanzapine. Asenapine caused less clinically significant weight gain or increases in triglycerides than olanzapine and was more likely to cause extrapyramidal symptoms than olanzapine. In comparison to placebo, either no difference or superiority was demonstrated in favour of asenapine on all efficacy measures. Conclusion: The current evidence is limited, as asenapine has been compared only with placebo or olanzapine. In the randomized clinical trials analysed, asenapine was similar or superior to placebo and similar or inferior to olanzapine on most efficacy outcomes. While asenapine demonstrated fewer adverse metabolic outcomes than olanzapine, rates of extrapyramidal symptom–related adverse effects were higher.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Jing Guo ◽  
Bin Li ◽  
Wenbin Wu ◽  
Zhichao Wang ◽  
Fei Wang ◽  
...  

Background. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a major global health problem. The prevalence of the disease appears to be increasing. There is no curative therapy for IPF except lung transplantation. Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs) are showing promise for treatment of IPF. However, their effectiveness and safety are still unclear and deserve further investigation. The aim of this systematic review is to access the efficacy and safety of CHMs in treating IPF. Methods. The protocol of this review is registered at PROSPERO. We searched seven main databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on CHMs for IPF from their inception to June 4, 2018. The methodological quality of RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. All trials included were analyzed according to the criteria of the Cochrane Handbook. Review Manager 5.3, R-3.5.2 software, and Grade pro GDT web solution were used for data synthesis and analysis. Results. Thirteen randomized clinical trials enrolling 733 patients were included. All trials included had clear outcome indicators. The methodological quality of included trials was generally “poor.” Few trials reported methods of randomization. One trial on Xuefu-zhuyu capsule assessed rate of acute exacerbation and mortality after treatment for 72 weeks and found no statistically significant difference between two groups. This meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in QOL of IPF patients when CHMs was applied or combined with conventional medicine treatment. 6MWT was significantly improved in IPF patients after using CHMs or combined with conventional medicine treatment. CHMs treatment also had a certain improvement in TLC and DLCO, but the effect on FVC was not significant. Besides, CHMs failed to provide benefits in terms of PaO2. The reported adverse events were not obvious and severe. Conclusions. Some CHMs seem effective and safe as alternative remedies for patients with IPF, suggesting that further study of CHMs in the treatment of IPF is warranted. Although this systematic review suggests that CHMs may have positive effect on quality of life, 6-minute walk test distance, and lung function (TLC, DLOC%) and seem to be relatively safe during the course of treatment, the results must be treated with great caution because of the methodological flaws of the included trials. Long-term and high-quality trials are needed in the future to provide clear evidence for the use of CHMs.


2008 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 670-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick G Clay ◽  
Laura E Voss ◽  
Charlott Williams ◽  
Eric C Daume

Objective: To review clinical data on bone ossification agents that may be considered for use in the treatment of osteoporosis and osteopenia in HIV-infected patients. Data Sources: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE (1950-January 2008), EMBASE, PubMed, and abstracts from major HIV conferences (February 2001-October 2007). These searches were limited to human data published in English and used the key words bisphosphonates, calcitonin, raloxifene. teriparatide, HAART, osteopenia, osteoporosis, and HIV/AIDS. Additional articles were retrieved from citations of selected references. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Relevant information on the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of available treatment with hormonal and nonhormonal agents was selected. Greater emphasis was placed on randomized clinical trials than on retrospective studies. Data Synthesis: Osteoporosis in HIV-infected persons is at least as prevalent as in postmenopausal women, yet this population is not listed in primary care guidelines as one that should be considered for screening. In addition to bisphosphonates, calcitonin, raloxifene, and teriparatide are used to treat bone disorders. Three clinical trials to date have evaluated the use of a bisphosphonate in HIV-infected persons. The trials showed a marked increase in bone mineral density in patients taking alendronate versus those in the control groups (with/without calcium, exercise, and/or vitamin D in 1 or both arms). Dosing restrictions complicate the use of these agents; diet, exercise, and calcium supplementation remain the foremost recommended strategies to prevent bone loss. The use of estrogen, testosterone, calcitonin, and teriparatide is less studied in HIV-positive patients, but may be considered in select cases. There are some investigational drugs and agents not available in the US; however, there are not enough data to support their use. Conclusions: Alendronate appears to be a promising treatment option for HIV-infected patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia. Further research is required to determine the safety and efficacy of other available drugs. Until additional information is provided, and with available knowledge on the metabolism profiles of antiretroviral and bone ossification agents, alendronate appears to be the preferred agent to use in this population.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhan Zheng ◽  
William Chi-Shing Cho ◽  
Ling Xu ◽  
Juyong Wang ◽  
Daniel Man-Yuen Sze

This paper is a systematic review of evidence-based studies of the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) in the treatment of liver cancer. After a detailed analysis of the literature, five animal studies and four human clinical trials met the criteria for inclusion. Analysis revealed that results of the clinical trials, whilst encouraging, need to be interpreted with caution as problems with study designs may lead to apparent benefits being attributable to various forms of bias. However, as each of the CHM agents used in these studies appeared to be potentially beneficial, further well-designed and controlled randomized clinical trials are warranted. The second part of this review focused on the lessons learned from the relationships between Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) theory, TCM Syndrome Differentiation, and modern scientific understanding of mechanisms of action of CHM agents. The understanding of TCM Syndrome Differentiation may allow identification of different patterns of disharmony and may provide important guidance to the prescription of CHM. Furthermore, quality control using both biological and chemical fingerprinting of CHM is important to ensure batch-to-batch consistency to deliver sustained therapeutic benefit. Also, careful assessment of herb-drug interactions is paramount for safety and integrative use of western chemotherapeutic and CHM agents.


Maturitas ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 86 ◽  
pp. 64-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoyoung Lee ◽  
Tae-Young Choi ◽  
Chang-Seon Myung ◽  
Ju Ah Lee ◽  
Myeong Soo Lee

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document