scholarly journals Intellectual Property in the Context of Global Ethics

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 218-229
Author(s):  
Cristina Lazariuc ◽  
◽  
Ecaterina Lozovanu ◽  

Today we are the subjects and witnesses of the continuous development and transformation of society, which has made rapid leaps from modern to the informational and knowledge-based society. In this sense, in order to ensure technological, economic and social progress, Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) must become the only key element for protecting ideas, stimulating innovation and creativity, designing and contributing to the creation of technology. In this article the authors emphasize the need to address IPR in the context of global ethics, because IPR is also the social responsibility and moral duty of every global citizen, whether creative or consumer, to respect the cultural and intellectual heritage of humanity and to contribute to its diversification and to overcome the challenges of the contemporary world in the digital age. In the current context of the globalization of economic, social and even spiritual life, the need for morality of people is becoming more and more pressing, on which we will continue to focus our concerns, because any new issue addressed includes a component of global ethics.

2022 ◽  
Vol 354 ◽  
pp. 00023
Author(s):  
Ciprian Trocan ◽  
Marian Mocan ◽  
Ben-Oni Ardelean ◽  
Larisa Ivascu

Social responsibility for sustainability has become an important dimension in the current context. More and more industries are evaluating this responsibility and are actively involved in addressing human resources to increase motivation, communication and reduce negative factors. The mining industry is important, especially from the perspective of sustainability. For these reasons, this paper reviews the social impact in the mining industry and provides a framework of social indicators for this industry. The methodology used is based on a qualitative assessment of the importance of indicators for industry. This framework is developed based on various social impact reporting tools. This approach can be extended to other fields of activity following the adaptation of its applicability. The main conclusions show that social responsibility is important for the mining industry.


Teisė ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 24-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mindaugas Kiškis

Straipsnyje analizuojamos istoriškai svarbiausios tradicinės, taip pat šiuolaikinės intelektinės nuosavy­bės teisių filosofinės doktrinos, siekiama atskleisti intelektinės nuosavybės teisių tikslus ir paskirtį, išana­lizuoti teorijų įtaką teisėkūrai ir teisei taikyti. The article revises traditional historically significant, as well as modern philosophical doctrines of intellectual property rights, emphasizes the social goals and purposes of intellectual property rights, weights up the impact that philosophic doctrines have on intellectual property legislation and interpre­tation thereof.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Anis Mashdurohatun ◽  
Hayyan Ul Haq ◽  
Sony Zulhuda

The purpose of this study is to examine and to analyze the construction of social functions of Intellectual Property Rights. Furthermore, it is also intended to know the urgency of social functions of Intellectual Property Rights and to reconstruct the social function of Intellectual Property Rights based on the value of Justice. The method used was doctrinal and non doctrinal approach by using primary and secondary data source. Moreover, the data was analyzed by using analytical descriptive. The result of the research shows that, the construction of social function of IPR has not been in accordance with Pancasila justice value. The urgency of social functions of IPR is as a form of crystallization of communal, inclusive and religious values. While the reconstruction of the social function of IPR was based on the value of Justice, namely by harmonizing the principle of Corporate Social Responsibility with the crystallization of communal, inclusive and religious values in using the IPR products, especially for copyrights and patents.


foresight ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey B. Kulikov

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present the modeling of industrial–postindustrial transition in Russian society. The very special part of this process concerns the relations between lordship and bondage. The relations between Lordship and Bondage in a context of so-called Master–Slave dialectic can elucidate a way to the knowledge-based society as a kind of modern capitalistic society. Design/methodology/approach An author uses a complex of methods. He applies a phenomenological approach, mixed with the dialectics and analytical approach. Phenomenological approach presupposes the neediness of attention on a work of the conscious actions within formation of the social experiences. The modification of dialectics helps to make the comprehension of the history of social relations as a game of forces in self-consciousness, which nowadays bases on the attitudes between leaders and led people. A variant of analytic methodology helps to understand each problem as a puzzle. Findings As a result, author finds a spirit of the processes within development of knowledge-based society and innovative economy depends on so-called Master–Slave dialectic. In Europe, Master–Slave dialectic caused the leading role of scientists. In Russia, scientists depended on the Government and played secondary role in economy. Research limitations/implications Research is the philosophical treatise, which demonstrates the speculative evaluation of industrial–postindustrial transition in Russian society. Practical implications Practical implications is the constructing the prognosis of the development of the Russian society. Social implications Research can help to improve the understanding of the mechanisms of leadership in society. Originality/value Originality of the paper is the reconstruction of social forms, which caused the social progress in Russia.


Author(s):  
Trevor Reed

This chapter discusses the origins, methodology, and preliminary results of the Hopi Music Repatriation Project (HMRP), a community-partnered initiative aimed at securing the return of Hopi ceremonial song recordings and their associated intellectual property rights back to the Hopi Tribe. While scholars have extensively documented the legal and ethical imperatives for the repatriation of Indigenous documentary materials from archives, museums, and other institutions, relatively little has been written about how to conceptualize and carry out a reincorporation of archived ancestral voices back into Indigenous communities. This chapter grapples with a methodology for recirculating archived Indigenous voices in ways that resist dependence on settler-imposed legal frameworks, relying instead on the social and political relationships that already govern ownership of and access to Indigenous knowledge, creativity, and ritual expression. Ultimately, community-based theorizing of repatriation methodologies is necessary to carry out a decolonizing repatriation of archived Indigenous voices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document