scholarly journals SELECTION OF ALTERNATIVES FOR OIL FIELD DEVELOPMENT BY GENETIC ALGORITHMS

2002 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvan J. Túpac ◽  
Marley Maria B.R. Vellasco ◽  
Marco Aurélio C. Pacheco

This paper presents a Genetic Algorithm application for selecting the best alternative for oil field development under certainty. The alternatives in this study are related to the arrangement of wells in a known and delimited oil reservoir and serve as a basis for calculating the net present value, which is used to assess the optimization process: the optimal alternative is the one that maximizes the Net Present Value of the field. The results obtained have revealed that the Genetic Algorithm model was able to find good alternatives for the oil field development, achieving good results for the Net Present Value.

2002 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvan J. Túpac ◽  
Marley Maria B.R. Vellasco ◽  
Marco Aurélio C. Pacheco

This paper presents a Genetic Algorithm application for selecting the best alternative for oil field development under certainty. The alternatives in this study are related to the arrangement of wells in a known and delimited oil reservoir and serve as a basis for calculating the net present value, which is used to assess the optimization process: the optimal alternative is the one that maximizes the Net Present Value of the field. The results obtained have revealed that the Genetic Algorithm model was able to find good alternatives for the oil field development, achieving good results for the Net Present Value.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vil Syrtlanov ◽  
Yury Golovatskiy ◽  
Ivan Ishimov

Abstract In this paper the simplified way is proposed for predicting the dynamics of liquid production and estimating the parameters of the oil reservoir using diagnostic curves, which are a generalization of analytical approaches, partially compared with the results of calculations on 3D simulation models and with actual well production data.


1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. Bitner-Gregersen ◽  
J. Lereim ◽  
I. Monnier ◽  
R. Skjong

A quantitative analysis of economic risk associated with large investments in offshore oil and gas field development and production is presented. The analysis is intended as a supporting tool in decision-making faced with uncertainty and risk, to study the effect of alternative decisions in an easy manner. The descriptors for the project assessment, such as the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Net Present Value (NPV) are applied. The study demonstrates first the impacts of early pilot production (EPP) prior to a main oil field development on the field economy of an oil field development and production installation. Furthermore, the result of cases which reflect relevant situations connected with cost overruns are presented, as well as derivation of rational decision criteria for termination/continuation of a project subjected to cost overruns. Finally, an oil field development project scheduling is demonstrated.


2013 ◽  
Vol 671-674 ◽  
pp. 142-145
Author(s):  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Bang Hua Liu ◽  
Qing Min Gan ◽  
Hai Xia Shi ◽  
Jun Feng Liu

To get the accurate gas pool dynamic measurement is the one of the basic work of oil field development. The geologic conditions, one of the aspects, limited the gas pool. It often appears reshooting another layer to commingled production or block off the seriously water producer in layer adjustment, calculation of reserves depends on the alteration of the model condition. Through the material balance and its further work, set the gas pool reserves calculation methods under the layer adjustment condition. The closed constant volume gas pool, its drawdown curve becomes the transition with the adjustment of the layer. Through the original formation pressure with two different slope straight lines before and after adjustment, Using linear extrapolation can get the reserves before and after adjusted.


2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 546
Author(s):  
J.J. Hebberger Jr. ◽  
S.P. Franklin ◽  
W.H. Uberawa ◽  
A.M.Pytte

Iagifu-Hedinia oil field was discovered in 1986 in the remote Highlands of PNG following a multi-year exploration effort. Exploration and subsequent field development of PNG's first petroleum export project were carried out without the aid of seismic data due primarily to the intense karst development in the area. Because of historically low oil prices and the remote and difficult environment, the decision to develop the field did not occur until late 1990. First oil was produced in June 1992, with successful development dependent upon an intense focus on cost management, land owner and government relations, and most critically an early commitment to active reservoir management by an empowered and multi-disciplinary reservoir management team (MDRM team). This MDRM team added as much as an incremental 70 MMBBL oil and US$240 million of net present value to the project. This resulted from its being given responsibility for reservoir characterisation, reserve estimation, economic analysis, and active reservoir management. At its core the team consisted of both petroleum engineers and earth scientists, but incorporated numerous other disciplines as they were needed. Key to this success was the support and endorsement of management to a truly empowered team.


Author(s):  
D.A. Chernokozhev ◽  
◽  
K.I. Kuznetsova ◽  
R.R. Gazimov ◽  
A.S. Zasedatelev ◽  
...  

The article presents the results of modeling tracer studies of the process of flooding of an oil reservoir. As a result of the studies, the dependences on the time of the change in the volume occupied by the injected water were obtained. Formulas are given that allow us to calculate the values of the coefficient of coverage of the reservoir area by flooding as a whole and the contribution of each injection well to flooding. The technology is implemented by continuously pumping the tracer into the injection well. Continuous injection of different tracers into different injection wells allows for operational monitoring of oil field development


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document