Comminution and Mineral Separation—Geological Input to Metallurgy
Editor’s note: The aim of the Geology and Mining series is to introduce early-career professionals and students to various aspects of mineral exploration, development, and mining, in order to share the experiences and insight of each author on the myriad of topics involved with the mineral industry and the ways in which geoscientists contribute to each. Abstract Communication and collaboration during mine development and operation are essential if the maximum value of a mineral deposit is to be realized, since there are many links between the geology and mineralogy of an orebody and the complex task of an effective plant design. This is only achieved when geologists, metallurgists, and mining and environmental engineers jointly assess the results of metallurgical characterization. This requirement is examined here, albeit for only two of the three metallurgical ore-processing activities—comminution and mineral separation. Wealth is not captured (i.e., is destroyed) unless the most efficient and effective methods for comminuting and separating the mineral(s) of value in a deposit are identified. Benchmarking metallurgical test work requirements for the next mine development based solely on past experience does not address the variability that is unique to the mineralogy of each mineral deposit. Metallurgists are now slowly advancing from using a few (so-called) representative samples to assess the processing characteristics of a deposit to applying metallurgical testing to tens, or hundreds, of samples, with the increase in number of samples allowed by technological advances. More still needs to be done. Identifying the characteristics of different mineralization types of a deposit and grouping it into domains are crucially important. These steps simplify processing by separating ore into relatively few (4–6) types with similar expected metallurgical performance. Understanding what metallurgical tests are measuring and how representative the samples and tests are of the orebody domains are essential considerations for a testing program. No knowledge is bad; some is better or more useful than other. Testing for penalty elements (As, Bi, Hg, F, etc.) and, more importantly, for penalty-element minerals allows their effects to be mitigated during design of the processing plant; this should start during the early exploration stage. Continued evolution of orebody knowledge and confidence in processing ores will lead to better performance of the processing plant, thereby reducing investment risk.