scholarly journals A Comparative Study of EFL Teachers’ and Intermediate High School Students’ Perceptions of Written Corrective Feedback on Grammatical Errors

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina Jodaie ◽  
Farahman Farrokhi ◽  
Masoud Zoghi
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
School Students ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Efl Teachers

Student Beliefs Towards Written Corrective Feedback: The case of Filipino High School Students

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Balanga Roselle A. ◽  
Fidel Irish Van B. ◽  
Gumapac Mone Virma Ginry P. ◽  
Ho Howell T. ◽  
Tullo Riza Mae C. ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Student Beliefs ◽  
School Students ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback

scholarly journals Effect of teacher and peer written corrective feedback on writing components in EFL classrooms

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-191
Author(s):  
Sonny Elfiyanto ◽  
Seiji Fukazawa
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Senior High School ◽  
School Students ◽  
Writing Performance ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Content Organization ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Senior High School Students

This study aimed to investigate the impact of teacher and peer written corrective feedback (WCF) on Indonesian senior high school students’ writing performance. A total of 71 Indonesian senior high school students from Grade X participated in this study; 36 were provided teacher WCF and 35 peers WCF. To collect and data, the participants were asked to write a legend essay. Using qualitative data analysis, we aimed to reveal the effectiveness of teacher and peer WCF in improving students’ writing performance. Adapted scoring rubric was employed to measure students’ overall writing performance, and competencies in relation to writing components such as content, organization, grammar, vocabulary, and mechanics. The results revealed that peer WCF can better enhance students’ writing abilities compared to teacher WCF. Furthermore, students who received teacher WCF showed substantial improvement in performance relating to all writing components except mechanics. In contrast, peer WCF enhanced students’ organization and vocabulary related performance. HIGHLIGHTS: Peer WCF is more effective than teacher WCF in enhancing Indonesian senior high school students’ writing performance, especially in writing legend texts. Teacher WCF helped significantly improve four components of writing competence: content, organization, vocabulary, and language, while peer WCF positively impacted organization and vocabulary components. Combining both teacher and peer WCF could be more beneficial in improving students’ writing achievement than either type of WCF alone. 

scholarly journals Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Junior High School Students’ Recount Text Composition

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 498-513
Author(s):  
Muhammad Irfan
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
English Teacher ◽  
School Students ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Different Levels

This present study is aimed to investigate the extent to which direct written corrective feedback (CF) assists students in minimizing students’ errors on recount text composition. This qualitative study was carried out in class VIII C at a junior high school in Malang. The Subjects of this study were the English teacher from class VIII C at the school and six students from three different levels of proficiency in this class. This present study found that: (1) Students made six types of errors on their recount text compositions after receiving direct written CF, 2) Direct written CF assists low proficiency students to a little extent in minimizing their errors on recount text compositions, (3) Direct written CF assists average proficiency students to a little extent in minimizing their errors on recount text compositions, (4) Direct written CF assists high proficiency students to a medium extent in minimizing their errors on recount text compositions.

scholarly journals Japanese High School Students’ Attitudes Towards and Usage of Corrective Feedback on Their Written Work

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
David O'Flaherty
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
High School Teachers ◽  
Research Evidence ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
School Students ◽  
Actual Usage ◽  
High School Writing ◽  
Writing Course ◽  
Students Attitudes

The correcting of errors in L2 writing is a problematic task for teachers. A lack of consistent research evidence supporting a given method of corrective feedback, or even the extent to which errors should be corrected, means that teachers are often left to make judgments on what method and focus are best for their students. It is, therefore, important to understand how students interact with the corrective feedback they receive. This study looked at Japanese high school students’ attitudes towards and use of corrective feedback on their written work. Findings suggest that while students felt their teacher should provide extensive corrective feedback and that this feedback had helped them in their written English, their actual usage of the feedback they received was very passive. It is argued that beyond solely providing corrective feedback on students’ writing, high school teachers need to ensure their students actively engage with the feedback they receive. The article concludes with some suggestions for achieving this in the context of a Japanese high school writing course. 第二言語ライティングに於ける課題添削は、教師にとって頭を悩ます仕事である。添削に関する方法論について一貫した研究証拠がないだけでなく、どの程度誤りを修正すべきか等、生徒にとって最良と考える方法や重点を判断することはしばしば教師自身に委ねられている。従って、どのように生徒が添削された課題に向き合っているかを理解することが重要となる。 本研究では、日本の高校生の英文ライティング課題添削に対する捉え方、及び添削された課題をどう活用しているかについて調査をした。調査結果によると、彼らは、教師は詳細な添削をすべきで、添削は英文ライティング力向上に役立つと考えているが、実際に添削された課題の活用方法はかなり受動的であった。本論文では、高校教師は添削結果を生徒に提供するだけでなく、その積極的な活用方法を指導する必要があると説き、日本の高校の英文ライティングクラスにおける、前述の問題の解決方法を示す。

scholarly journals WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN WRITING SKILL: A BRIEF REVIEW

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 209
Author(s):  
Setiyowati Setiyowati ◽  
Hanna Sundari
Keyword(s):  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
Treatment Length ◽  
Written Corrective Feedback ◽  
Grammatical Errors ◽  
Efl Teachers ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
Analysis Design ◽  
Review Study

<p>The study presented here includes collectively selected research papers that emphasize written corrective feedback, particularly Direct Written Corrective Feedback and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback. Writing is considered the most challenging task for students because writing needs the student's creativity to form ideas of their minds into a form of a text. Some difficulties that EFL students in writing usually find are the lack of the knowledge to choose the appropriate vocabulary, and they also have some problems in grammar and syntax. To overcome these, Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) has been used widely to show students grammatical errors in EFL students' writing works and help EFL students minimize their errors. The Written Corrective Feedback also shows students' performance in enhancing their writing accuracy. Five selected research papers have been selected to give some enlightenment about the effectiveness of Written Corrective Feedback. The feedback was given by EFL teachers and lecturers who teach in Indonesia, China, Iran, Malaysia, and Thailand. The method that is used in this literature review study is thematic analysis design. These are divided into five themes. The themes are Participants, Treatment, The Treatment Length, Instruments and Writing Prompt, and The Effectiveness of The Written Corrective Feedback. The findings reveal various results in the use of Direct Written Corrective Feedback and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback.</p>

scholarly journals Back pain and behavioral habits of high school students: a comparative study of two Brazil's regions

2017 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 495-499
Author(s):  
Matias Noll ◽  
Priscilla Rayanne e Silva Noll ◽  
João Luiz Ribeiro Neto ◽  
Vanessa Nunes Leal ◽  
Bruna Nichele da Rosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
School Students
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document