scholarly journals Proposal of Project Management Methods and Tools Oriented Maturity Model

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-23
Author(s):  
Jana Kostalova ◽  
Libena Tetrevova
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
User Friendliness ◽  
Management Tools ◽  
Financial Flexibility ◽  
Maturity Models ◽  
Predominant Type ◽  
Project Life Cycle ◽  
User Friendly ◽  
Project Life

Project management maturity greatly influences the success rate of the project implementation. However, available project management maturity models (PMMMs) are costly, time-consuming and demanding in terms of organization and competence when it comes to application. Moreover, there is no PMMM that evaluates in detail the usage of recommended project management methods and tools. The goal of this article is to design a user-friendly PMMM that would evaluate the project management maturity based on assessment of the usage of project management tools and methods within each stage of project life cycle taking into account the predominant type of projects implemented. The authors used the critical and comparative analysis, based on that the available project management maturity models were assessed and the new PMMM was designed using analogy, deduction, and induction, based on the synthesis of the acquired knowledge combined with the expert experience of the practitioners. It is a unique PMMM, characterized by complexity, user friendliness and financial flexibility. In addition, it is a model that can be used not only in companies of various branches, but also in organizations of other institutional sectors.

scholarly journals Evaluating critical success factors and level of challenges in project life cycle (PLC)

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2.29) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Sallaudin Hassan ◽  
Natasha Farhana ◽  
Siti Aishah ◽  
Siti Mahirah ◽  
Khairul Firdaus Jimisiah. J
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Project Management ◽  
Critical Success Factors ◽  
Success Factors ◽  
Team Work ◽  
Success Factor ◽  
Critical Success Factor ◽  
Critical Success ◽  
Project Life Cycle ◽  
Project Life

This research aims to evaluate the Critical Success Factors (CSF) of project management and  to assess the level of challenges at each steps in Project Life Cycle (PLC). Five Independent Variable (IV)  is been selected as Critical Success Factors which is Leadership, Effective Communication, Teamwork,  Organization and Project Nature. There are four main stage in project which is Defining, Planning,  Executing and Closure. The scope of this research is on projects/events   conducted under Student  Development and Campus Life Style (SDCL). Five projects has been selected for assessment in this research.  Survey questionnaire is been used as primary data collection. LIKERT Scale is been used to rank the answer from respondents. 50 respondents are involve in this research. Data is analyzed by using SPSS version 21. Result shows that the most critical success factors in project is Team Work while the least Critical Success Factor is Leadership. Meanwhile, the most challenges stage in project management is Executing, while the least challenges stage is Defining. The finding in this research is considered important discovery. More efforts should be focus on identified Critical Success Factor and the most challenges stage in Project Life Cycle.  It is suggested that the scope of study to be extended to other universities or industries in future research.  

scholarly journals PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT BASED ON A SET OF BEST PRACTICES

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 79-86
Author(s):  
Agnieszka JĘDRUSIK
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Life Cycle ◽  
Project Management ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Project Manager ◽  
Project Risk Management ◽  
Project Risk ◽  
Golden Triangle ◽  
Project Life Cycle ◽  
Project Life

The purpose of this article is to present the process of risk management in project management. The analysis was based on a comparison of two best practices of IPMA and PRINCE. Risk management differs significantly between the two approaches, but it is up to the organization to choose its own management, monitoring and methodology tailored to the specific industry or sector. Risk management is an important aspect of the entire project life cycle and must be monitored throughout the project life cycle to protect not only the budget but all areas of the so-called "golden triangle". A very important aspect is the organization's awareness that risk management is everyone's responsibility, not just the project manager. This paper presents two different approaches to project risk management in two different methodologies.

scholarly journals An Actor–Network Approach to Developing a Life Cycle BIM Maturity Model (LCBMM)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 13273
Author(s):  
Ruwini Edirisinghe ◽  
Zelinna Pablo ◽  
Chimay Anumba ◽  
Saratu Tereno
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Actor Network Theory ◽  
Facilities Management ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Actor Network ◽  
Practice Guide ◽  
Depth Analysis ◽  
Project Life Cycle ◽  
Building Information ◽  
Project Life

Building information modelling (BIM) has considerable potential for addressing sustainability issues in construction, but its benefits can be constrained by the failure to adopt BIM across the full project life cycle. Systematic whole-of-life BIM adoption can be supported by maturity models, but most models are limited by a lack of theoretical grounding, socio-technical dichotomies and the failure to adequately consider the full asset life cycle, often by overlooking the operations phase. This study aims to (1) develop a BIM maturity model that addresses these limitations by (2) using an in-depth analysis of an early adopter case study, thus addressing the lack of empirical research in BIM adoption experiences. A single interpretive research study was conducted to qualitatively analyse a US-based university. The data were gathered through interviews, field visits and document analysis. Actor–network theory (ANT) concepts scaffolded the analytical approach. The findings show that a complex BIM socio-technical network emerged, developed and converged during the project management stage but struggled to achieve durability as an ongoing solution to facilities management. By analysing the elements of success and failure across each stage, the researchers distilled five key lessons to achieve whole-of-life BIM maturity and proposed a life cycle BIM maturity model (LCBMM) supported by a practice guide.

scholarly journals An Evolutionary Software Project Management Maturity Model for Mauritius

10.28945/3158 ◽  
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aneerav Sukhoo ◽  
Andries Barnard ◽  
Mariki Eloff ◽  
John Andrew van der Poll
Keyword(s):  
Project Management ◽  
European Countries ◽  
Software Project ◽  
Maturity Model ◽  
Software Project Management ◽  
Maturity Models ◽  
Management Framework ◽  
Capability Maturity ◽  
Software Professionals ◽  
Western European

Software project management is a relatively recent discipline that emerged during the second half of the 20th century (Kwak, 2003). Many of the software project management methodologies available today were developed in Western/European countries and research showed that there was a need to formalise a software project management framework for developing countries, in particular Africa (Muriithi & Crawford, 2003). Based on surveys and discussions with software professionals, a methodology for software project management is being proposed. The methodology is based on a maturity model as Mauritius is faced with a shortage in skilled professionals. So far, few organisations in Mauritius have been found to be using software project management methodologies developed in Western/European countries. Most maturity models, for example Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) and Kerzner’s maturity model, have five maturity levels. The trend is towards the development of maturity models that have fewer maturity levels. For example, the Organisational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3) and Prince 2 Maturity Model have been developed with three maturity levels.

scholarly journals Effective Project Management and the Role of Quality Assurance throughout the Project Life Cycle

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 84-88
Author(s):  
Hengameh Fakhravar ◽  
Monier Madison Ouabira
Keyword(s):  
Quality Assurance ◽  
Project Management ◽  
Research Approach ◽  
Project Implementation ◽  
Project Development ◽  
Implementation Quality ◽  
Development Cycle ◽  
Project Life Cycle ◽  
Project Life

Quality is a fundamental requirement in effective project management. Effective project management entails a steady focus on quality management as well as achievement of all user requirements as defined during the requirements engineering phase of project implementation. Quality assurance must be executed throughout the project development cycle as a new normal in reducing errors and challenges during project development. Conducting quality assurance throughout the project development cycle has many benefits to both the project as well as the project development team. Understanding the research approach to use is critical in achieving high-quality findings in projects. There is a need to understand how to utilize deductive, inductive, and abductive research reasoning when conducting project implementation.

scholarly journals Project Communication in Functions, Process and Project-Oriented Industiral Companies

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (Special-Number) ◽  
pp. 120-125
Author(s):  
Jana Samáková ◽  
Kristína Koltnerová ◽  
Rudolf Rybanský
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Project Management ◽  
Communication Management ◽  
Industrial Enterprises ◽  
Project Life Cycle ◽  
Process Oriented ◽  
Project Life

Abstract The article is focused on the project communication management. Industrial enterprises, which use project management must constantly search the new ways for improving. One of the possibilities is the change of management from a functional oriented to the projectoriented or process-oriented. Process-oriented and project-oriented companies have better project communication management during the all project life cycle. Communication in the project is a very important factor. According to the arguments of several authors, one of the biggest problem is that threaten the success of the project is just the communication. In each project is an important pillar - and that is communication. Only on the base of communication can the project move forward and achieve the target.

scholarly journals DEVELOPING A PROJECT PORTFOLIO SELECTION MODEL FOR CONTRACTOR FIRMS CONSIDERING THE RISK FACTOR

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 879-889 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamidreza Abbasianjahromi ◽  
Hossein Rajaie
Keyword(s):  
Construction Industry ◽  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Project Selection ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Project Life Cycle ◽  
User Friendly ◽  
Project Life ◽  
Portfolio Selection Model ◽  
A Company

Regarding to the high importance of project selection in the project life cycle, solving bid/no-bid problems, especially in the construction industry, is a subject of most recent research. Portfolio selection has been the most interesting area in the last two decades in management research but there is poor investigation in the construction industry. Taking into account the risk, which is inherent in the construction industry and especially in the project selection phase is inevitable. This paper intends to propose a model for project selection and developing two main concepts including company portfolio and risk. The main innovation of this paper is presenting a new framework, which attempts to optimize project selection based on the endurable risk level of a company with regard to the existing portfolio. Considering the user-friendly characteristic of the model, this paper has applied the fuzzy multi criteria decision-making approaches. Finally, the model is implemented in a real case study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document