scholarly journals Evaluation of mericon E. coli O157 Screen Plus and mericon E. coli STEC O-Type Pathogen Detection Assays in Select Foods: Collaborative Study, First Action 2017.05

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 739-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Bird ◽  
M Joseph Benzinger ◽  
Benjamin Bastin ◽  
Erin Crowley ◽  
James Agin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pathogen Detection ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Automated Extraction ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Automated Dna Extraction ◽  
Inspection Service

Abstract QIAGEN mericon Escherichia coli O157 Screen Plus and mericon E. coli Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) O-Type Pathogen Detection Assays use Real-Time PCR technology for the rapid, accurate detection of E. coli O157 and the “big six” (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, O145) (non-O157 STEC) in select food types. Using a paired study design, the assays were compared with the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook Chapter 5.09 reference method for the detection of E. coli O157:H7 in raw ground beef. Both mericon assays were evaluated using the manual and an automated DNA extraction method. Thirteen technicians from five laboratories located within the continental United States participated in the collaborative study. Three levels of contamination were evaluated. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD) statistical model. Results obtained for the low-inoculum level test portions produced a difference between laboratories POD (dLPOD) value with a 95% confidence interval of 0.00 (–0.12, 0.12) for the mericon E. coli O157 Screen Plus with manual and automated extraction and mericon E. coli STEC O-Type with manual extraction and –0.01 (–0.13, 0.10) for the mericon E. coli STEC O-Type with automated extraction. The dLPOD results indicate equivalence between the candidate methods and the reference method.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the iQ-Check®Salmonella II Assay in Select Foods: Collaborative Study, First Action 2017.06

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 1043-1057
Author(s):  
Patrick Bird ◽  
M Joseph Benzinger ◽  
Benjamin Bastin ◽  
Erin Crowley ◽  
James Agin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
The United States ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Milk Chocolate ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Dog Food ◽  
Interlaboratory Reproducibility

Abstract The iQ-Check Salmonella II Real-Time PCR test kit utilizes Salmonella-specific oligonucleotide probes and primers for the rapid and specific detection of Salmonella species in select food types. The alternative method was evaluated by using 375 g test portions in an unpaired study design for two matrices, milk chocolate and dry dog food. Each matrix was compared with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method. Fourteen technicians from 12 laboratories, including academia and industry, located within the United States and Canada participated in the collaborative study. Three levels of contamination were evaluated for each matrix: an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (0.2–2 CFU/test portion), and a high inoculum level (2–5 CFU/test portion). The statistical analysis was conducted according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model. The results obtained for the low inoculum level test portions produced a difference in the candidate presumptive and confirmatory results (dLPOD) value with a 95% confidence interval of −0.05, (−0.15, 0.06) for the milk chocolate and 0.10, (−0.01, 0.21) for the dry dog food. The dLPOD results indicate an equivalence between the candidate method and reference method for the matrices evaluated, and the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. False positive and false negative rates were determined for each matrix and produce values of <2%. Based on the data generated, the method demonstrated acceptable interlaboratory reproducibility data and statistical analysis.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Solus One Salmonella Assay in Select Foods: Collaborative Study: First Action 2020.03

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 1568-1581
Author(s):  
Benjamin Bastin ◽  
M Joseph Benzinger ◽  
Erin S Crowley ◽  
James Agin ◽  
Raymond Wakefield
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Control Level ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
The United States ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
The Matrix

Abstract Background The Solus One Salmonella immunoassay utilizes Salmonella specific selective media and automated liquid handling, for the rapid and specific detection of Salmonella species in select food types. Objective The candidate method was evaluated using 375 g test portions in an unpaired study design for a single matrix, instant non-fat dry milk (NFDM) powder. Method The matrix was compared to the United States Food and Drug Administration/Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA/BAM) Chapter 5 Salmonella reference method. Eleven participants from 10 laboratories within academia and industry, located within the United States, Mexico, South Africa, Germany, and the United Kingdom, contributed data for the collaborative study. Three levels of contamination were evaluated for each matrix: an uninoculated control level [0 colony forming units (CFU)/test portion], a low inoculum level (0.2–2 CFU/test portion) and a high inoculum level (2–5 CFU/test portion). Statistical analysis was conducted according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model. Results Results obtained for the low inoculum level test portions produced a dLPOD value with a 95% confidence interval between the candidate method confirmed (both alternative and conventional confirmation procedures) and the reference method of 0.07 (−0.02, 0.15). Conclusions The dLPOD results indicate equivalence between the candidate method and the reference method for the matrix evaluated and the method demonstrated acceptable inter-laboratory reproducibility as determined in the collaborative evaluation. False positive and false negative rates were determined for the matrix and produce values of <2%. Highlights Based on the data generated, the method demonstrated acceptable inter-laboratory reproducibility data and statistical analysis.

Evaluation of the GENE-UP ® Listeria monocytogenes Method for the Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in a Variety of Foods and Select Environmental Surfaces: Collaborative Study, First Action 2019.11

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Johnson ◽  
John Mills ◽  
Jean-Louis Pittet ◽  
Olivier Mathia ◽  
Patrick Bird ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Control Level ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Cottage Cheese ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Environmental Surfaces

Abstract Background The GENE-UP®Listeria monocytogenes 2 (LMO 2) assay (Performance Tested MethodSM 121804) uses real-time PCR technology and a proprietary detection platform, the GENE-UP® Thermocycler, to detect Listeria monocytogenes in a variety of foods and environmental surfaces. Objective The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method’s interlaboratory performance and submit the result to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as First Action Official MethodSM for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in a variety of foods and select environmental surfaces. Method The GENE-UP® method was evaluated in a multi-laboratory study as part of the AFNOR NF VALIDATION certification process using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, full-cream goat milk cottage cheese (8.4% fat). The candidate method was compared to the ISO 11290-1/Amd.1:2004 reference method. Sixteen participants from 15 laboratories throughout the European Union participated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a non-inoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (∼2 CFU/test portion) and a high inoculum level (∼10 CFU/test portion). Data from the study were analyzed according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model as presented in the AOAC validation guidelines. Results The dLPODC values with 95% confidence interval for each comparison were; -0.02 (-0.07, 0.03), -0.08 (-0.31, 0.16) and 0.00 (-0.03, 0.03) for the non-inoculated, low and high contamination levels respectively. Conclusion The dLPODC results demonstrate no difference in performance between the candidate method and reference method for the matrix evaluated. Highlights The GENE-UP LMO method demonstrated accuracy and precision in detecting and discerning L. monocytogenes from other Listeria species.

Romer Labs RapidChek®Listeria monocytogenes Test System for the Detection of L. monocytogenes on Selected Foods and Environmental Surfaces

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
pp. 1490-1507
Author(s):  
Gregory Juck ◽  
Verapaz Gonzalez ◽  
Ann-Christine Olsson Allen ◽  
Meredith Sutzko ◽  
Kody Seward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Listeria Monocytogenes ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Test System ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Detection Analysis ◽  
Media System ◽  
Reference Methods ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Inspection Service

Abstract The Romer Labs RapidChek®Listeria monocytogenes test system (Performance Tested Method 011805) was validated against the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA-FSIS/MLG), U.S. Food and Drug Association Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA/BAM), and AOAC Official Methods of Analysis (AOAC/OMA) cultural reference methods for the detection of L. monocytogenes on selected foods including hot dogs, frozen cooked breaded chicken, frozen cooked shrimp, cured ham, and ice cream, and environmental surfaces including stainless steel and plastic in an unpaired study design. The RapidChek method uses a proprietary enrichment media system, a 44–48 h enrichment at 30 ± 1°C, and detects L. monocytogenes on an immunochromatographic lateral flow device within 10 min. Different L. monocytogenes strains were used to spike each of the matrixes. Samples were confirmed based on the reference method confirmations and an alternate confirmation method. A total of 140 low-level spiked samples were tested by the RapidChek method after enrichment for 44–48 h in parallel with the cultural reference method. There were 88 RapidChek presumptive positives. One of the presumptive positives was not confirmed culturally. Additionally, one of the culturally confirmed samples did not exhibit a presumptive positive. No difference between the alternate confirmation method and reference confirmation method was observed. The respective cultural reference methods (USDA-FSIS/MLG, FDA/BAM, and AOAC/OMA) produced a total of 63 confirmed positive results. Nonspiked samples from all foods were reported as negative for L. monocytogenes by all methods. Probability of detection analysis demonstrated no significant differences in the number of positive samples detected by the RapidChek method and the respective cultural reference method.

Evaluation of VIDAS® UP Salmonella (SPT) Assay for the Detection of Salmonella in a Variety of Foods and Environmental Samples: Collaborative Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (4) ◽  
pp. 808-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Bird ◽  
Kiel Fisher ◽  
Megan Boyle ◽  
Travis Huffman ◽  
Marc Juenger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Intervals ◽  
Environmental Samples ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
The United States ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract The VIDAS® UP Salmonella (SPT) uses recombinant phage proteins to detect Salmonella species in human and animal food products and production environmental samples after 18–26 h of enrichment. The VIDAS SPT assay is performed with the automated VIDAS or mini-VIDAS instruments. The VIDAS SPT method was compared in a multilaboratory collaborative study to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service-Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (USDA/FSIS-MLG) 4.05 (2011) Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg and Catfish Products reference method following the current AOAC guidelines. A total of 15 laboratories representing government, academia, and industry throughout the United States participated. One matrix, raw ground beef, was analyzed using two different test portion sizes, 25 and 375 g. Each test portion was artificially contaminated with Salmonella at three inoculation levels, an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (0.2–2 CFU/test portion), and a high inoculum level (2–5 CFU/test portion). In this study, 1656 unpaired replicate samples were analyzed. Of those unpaired replicates, 476 were presumptive positive by the VIDAS method, with 475 confirmed positive by the traditional confirmation procedures and 476 confirmed positive by an alternative confirmation procedure. There were 411 confirmed positive replicates by the USDA/FSIS-MLG reference method. Statistical analysis was conducted according to the probability of detection (POD). For the low-level 375 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.01 (−0.12, +0.15) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation; 0.02 (−0.18, +0.2) for samples confirmed following traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP; and 0.03 (−0.18, +0.24) for samples confirmed following the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. For the low-level 25 g test portions, the following dLPOD values, with 95% confidence intervals, were obtained: 0.41, (0.32, +0.49) for samples confirmed following the traditional confirmation, the traditional confirmation on IBISA and ASAP, and the alternative confirmation on IBISA and ASAP. With 0.0 within the confidence intervals for the 375 g test portions, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of positive samples detected by the VIDAS SPT method and the USDA/FSIS-MLG method at the 0.05 level. For the 25 g test portions, a statistically significant difference was observed between the VIDAS SPT method and the reference method for the low inoculum level, where the VIDAS SPT method recovered a higher number of positive results than the reference method. It is recommended that the VIDAS SPT method with the optional ASAP and IBISA agar confirmation method be adopted for Official First Action status for the detection of Salmonella in a variety of foods and environmental samples.

Evaluation of the 3M™ Petrifilm™ Salmonella Express System for the Detection of Salmonella Species in Selected Foods: Collaborative Study

2014 ◽  
Vol 97 (6) ◽  
pp. 1563-1575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Bird ◽  
Jonathan Flannery ◽  
Erin Crowley ◽  
James Agin ◽  
David Goins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Control Level ◽  
Ground Beef ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Isolation And Identification ◽  
Inoculum Level ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
Dog Food ◽  
The U.S

Abstract The 3M™ Petrifilm™Salmonella Express (SALX) System is a simple, ready-to-use chromogenic culture medium system for the rapid qualitative detection and biochemical confirmation of Salmonella spp. in food and food process environmental samples. The 3M Petrifilm SALX System was compared using an unpaired study design in a multilaboratory collaborative study to the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Safety and Inspection Service (USDA/FSIS) Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook (MLG) 4.07 (2013) Isolation and Identification of Salmonella from Meat, Poultry, Pasteurized Egg and Catfish Products and Carcass and Environmental Sponges for raw ground beef and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual (FDA/BAM) Chapter 5, Salmonella (2011) reference method for dry dog food following the current AOAC validation guidelines. For this study, a total of 17 laboratories located throughout the continental United States evaluated 1872 test portions. For the 3M Petrifilm SALX System, raw ground beef was analyzed using 25 g test portions, and dry dog food was analyzed using 375 g test portions. For the reference methods, 25 g test portions of each matrix were analyzed. The two matrices were artificially contaminated with Salmonella at three inoculation levels: an uninoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low inoculum level (0.2–2 CFU/test portion), and a high inoculum level (2–5 CFU/test portion). Each inoculation level was statistically analyzed using the probability of detection statistical model. For the raw ground beef and dry dog food test portions, no significant differences at the 95% confidence interval were observed in the number of positive samples detected by the 3M Petrifilm SALX System versus either the USDA/FSIS-MLG or FDA/BAM methods.

Method Modification for the Atlas Listeria Environmental LE Detection Assay Using FoodChek Actero Listeria Enrichment Media and Half-Fraser Media for the Detection of Listeria spp. from Environmental Surfaces

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 562-576
Author(s):  
Brett Maroni ◽  
Tucker Lopez ◽  
Cambria Neal ◽  
Sarah Verver ◽  
Celina Puente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Common Species ◽  
Sample Volume ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Department Of Agriculture ◽  
Environmental Surfaces ◽  
Detection Assay ◽  
Inspection Service ◽  
High Level

Abstract Two candidate method modifications for the Atlas Listeria Environmental LE Detection Assay were compared with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)-Food Safety and Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook 8.09 (MLG 8.09) method for detection of Listeria spp. on stainless steel, polyvinyl chloride (PVC), and sealed concrete surfaces. For LE candidate method 1, samples were enriched in FoodChek Actero Listeria Enrichment Media [ALEM; Performance Tested MethodSM (PTM) 111201] at 35 ± 2°C for 18 to 24 h and evaluated for a range of analytical sample volumes. For LE candidate method 2, the current Roka PTM using 90 mL of Half-Fraser broth for enrichment at 35 ± 2°C was evaluated at 24 h with a reduced sample volume. These comparisons were made in multiple studies across the three environmental surfaces. Within each method and study, a total of 5 samples were uninoculated, 20 samples were inoculated with Listeria spp. at a low level to target fractional positivity, and 5 samples were inoculated with Listeria spp. at a high level to approach a probability of detection of 1. Inclusivity and exclusivity studies were also conducted for the LE method in combination with Half-Fraser and ALEM. The Atlas Listeria Environmental LE Detection Assay detected all 50 inclusive organisms, including 25 strains of L. monocytogenes and 5 strains of each of the other five common species of Listeria (L. innocua, L. welshimeri, L. ivanovii, L. seeligeri, and L. grayi) and none of the 30 exclusive organisms across all media and with both 200 and 2000 µL sample volumes. For the LE candidate method 1 studies, no significant differences were observed within the Roka ALEM method at 18, 20, or 24 h and for both the 200 and 2000 µL sample volumes as compared with the paired culture outcome. However, the ALEM method performed significantly better as compared with the unpaired reference method for sealed concrete and stainless steel. For the LE candidate method 2 studies, no significant differences were observed within the Roka HF method at 24 h for the 200 and 2000 µL samples as compared with the paired culture outcomes and unpaired reference method outcomes across the surfaces. The independent laboratory studies observed no significant differences in performance between the USDA/MLG 8.09 reference method and candidate methods 1 or 2, respectively, across the evaluated parameters. Overall, the candidate method 1 modification parameters and candidate method 2 sample parameters for the Atlas Listeria Environmental LE Detection Assay were statistically equivalent to or better than the reference method for detection of Listeria spp. on stainless steel, PVC, and sealed concrete surfaces, providing greater flexibility in method application for end users.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the GENE-UP ®E. coli O157:H7 Method for the Detection of E. coli O157:H7 in Select Foods: Collaborative Study, 2019.03

2020 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
pp. 1338-1347
Author(s):  
Ronald Johnson ◽  
John Mills ◽  
Jean-Louis Pittet ◽  
Maryse Rannou ◽  
Patrick Bird ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Control Level ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Contamination Level ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Contamination Levels

Abstract Background The GENE-UP®E. coli O157:H7 2 (ECO 2) assay (Performance Tested MethodSM 121805) incorporates Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer hybridization probes into its proprietary PCR technology for the rapid detection of E. coli O157:H7 in select foods. Objective The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method’s interlaboratory performance and submit the result to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as First Action Official MethodSM for the detection of E. coli O157:H7 in select foods. Method The GENE-UP® method was evaluated in a multi-laboratory study as part of the MicroVal validation process using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, raw milk cheese (Comté, 34% fat, 0.8% salt). The candidate method was compared to the ISO 16654:2001 reference method. Fourteen participants from 13 laboratories throughout the European Union participated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a non-inoculated control level (0 colony-forming units (CFU)/test portion), a low contamination level (∼5 CFU/test portion), and a high contamination level (∼10 CFU/test portion). Data from that study were analyzed according to the Probability of Detection (POD) statistical model as presented in the AOAC validation guidelines. The difference in laboratory POD (dLPODC) values with 95% confidence interval across collaborators was calculated for each level between the candidate and reference method results, and between the candidate presumptive and confirmed results. Results The dLPODC values with 95% confidence interval were; 0.00 (–0.04, 0.04), 0.27 (0.04, 0.49), and 0.17 (0.01, 0.33) for the non-inoculated, low and high contamination levels respectively. Conclusions The dLPODC results indicate a significant difference between the candidate method and the reference method for both the low and high contamination levels, with the candidate method producing higher recovery of the target organism at both levels. Highlights The GENE-UP E. coli O157:H7 assay provides industry with a rapid, accurate detection method for E. coli O157:H7 in a broad range of foods.

Evaluation of the GENE-UP® EHEC Detection Method for the Detection of Enterohemorrhagic E. coli in Select Foods: Collaborative Study: First Action Method 2020.06

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Johnson ◽  
John Mills ◽  
Jean-Louis Pittet ◽  
Maryse Rannou ◽  
Patrick Bird
Keyword(s):  
Detection Method ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Control Level ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Probability Of Detection ◽  
Contamination Level ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Test Portion ◽  
E Coli

Abstract Background The GENE-UP® EHEC assay (Performance Tested MethodSM 121806) is a real-time PCR molecular detection method that utilizes Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer proprietary hybridization probes for the rapid detection of Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) in select foods. Objective The purpose of this validation was to evaluate the method’s interlaboratory performance and submit the results to AOAC INTERNATIONAL for adoption as First Action Official Method of AnalysisSM for the detection of EHEC in select foods. Method The GENE-UP® method was evaluated in a multi-laboratory study as part of the MicroVal VALIDATION certification process using unpaired test portions for one food matrix, raw ground beef (85% lean). Collaborators evaluated the candidate method using either an automated or manual lysis procedure. The candidate method was compared to the ISO/TS 13136:2012 method. Data from 17 participants from 15 laboratories throughout the European Union was evaluated. Three levels of contamination were evaluated: a non-inoculated control level (0 CFU/test portion), a low contamination level (∼1 CFU/test portion) and a high contamination level (∼10 CFU/test portion). Data from the study were analyzed according to the probability of detection (POD) statistical model. Results The dLPODC values with 95% confidence interval between the candidate and reference method results were; –0.01 (–0.04, 0.02), 0.23 (0.07, 0.39) and 0.06 (0.01, 0.12) for the non-inoculated, low and high contamination levels, respectively. Conclusion For the candidate method, values obtained for repeatability and reproducibility were similar to the reference method and indicated minimal variation between samples or between laboratories. No discrepant results (false positive or false negative) were observed for each contamination. A statistical difference was calculated between the candidate and reference method at the low and high inoculation levels, with the candidate method detecting a higher number of positive samples indicating a higher sensitivity than the reference method. No differences in the recovery of the target analyte were observed between the manual and automated lysis procedures. Highlights The GENE-UP EHEC Detection Method provides end users a rapid, easy-to-use workflow for the detection of EHEC in food matrices.

scholarly journals Direct 24-Hour Presumptive Enumeration of Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in Foods Using Hydrophobic Grid Membrane Filter Followed by Serological Confirmation: Collaborative Study

1998 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 403-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phyllis Entis ◽  
◽  
D Bryant ◽  
J Bryant ◽  
R G Bryant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Membrane Filter ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Cottage Cheese ◽  
Apple Cider ◽  
Dairy Foods ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Repeatability And Reproducibility

abstract Fifteen laboratories took part in a collaborative study to validate a method for enumerating Escherichia coli 0157:H7. The method is based on use of a hydrophobic grid membrane filter and consists of 24 h presumptive enumeration on SD-39 Agar and serological confirmation to yield a confirmed E. coli 0157:H7 count. Six food products were analyzed: pasteurized apple cider, pasteurized 2% milk, cottage cheese, cooked ground pork, raw ground beef, and frozen whole egg. The test method produced significantly higher confirmed count results than did the reference method for milk, pork, and beef. Test method results were numerically higher than but statistically equivalent to reference method results for cheese, cider, and egg. The test method produced lower repeatability and reproducibility values than did the reference method for most food/inoculation level combinations and values very similar to those of the reference method for the remaining combinations. Overall, 94% of presumptive positive isolates from the test method were confirmed serologically as E. coli 0157:H7, and 98% of these were also biochemically typical of E. coli 0157:H7 (completed test). Corresponding rates for the reference method were 69 and 98%, respectively. On the basis of the results of this collaborative study and the precollaborative study that preceded it, it is recommended that this method be adopted official first action for enumeration of E. coli 0157:H7 in meats, poultry, dairy foods, infant formula, liquid eggs, mayonnaise, and apple cider

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document