Determination of Ethanol in Kombucha, Juices, and Alcohol-Free Beer by EnzytecTMLiquid Ethanol: Single-Laboratory Validation, First Action 2017.07

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 1101-1111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Lacorn ◽  
Thomas Hektor

Abstract EnzytecTMLiquid Ethanol is an enzymatic test for the determination of ethanol in kombucha, juices, and alcohol-free beer. The kit contains two components in a ready-to-use format. Quantification is based on the catalytic activity of alcohol dehydrogenase, which oxidizes ethanol to acetaldehyde and converts NAD+ to NADH. Measurement is performed in 3 mL cuvettes at 340 nm within 20 min. Samples with alcohol contents around 0.5% alcohol by volume need to be diluted 1:20 or 1:50 with water before measurement. Acetaldehyde interferes at concentrations higher than 3000 mg/L, whereas sulfite interferes at concentrations higher than 300 mg/L. The linear measurement range is from 0.03 up to 0.5 g/L ethanol, whereas LOD and LOQ are 1.9 and 3.3 mg/L ethanol, respectively. Kombucha with concentrations between 2.85 and 5.82 g/L showed relative repeatability standard deviation around 1%, whereas juices were below 2%. Results from a reproducibility experiment revealed that at a concentration of 0.1 g/L, the RSDR was at 2.5%, whereas at higher concentrations between 0.2 and 0.3 g/L, coefficients around 1% were obtained. Trueness was checked by using Cerilliant aqueous ethanol solutions and beer with concentration of 0.4 and 4 g/L (BCR-651 and BCR-652). Spiking of kombucha and juice samples resulted in recoveries between 95% and 104%. Acceptable stability was found for the whole test kit under accelerated conditions at 37°C for 2 weeks. The kit is also not susceptible to short freezing–thawing cycles and harsh transport conditions.

1989 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Zaalberg

Abstract To determine the precision of standardized analytical methods, interlaboratory experiments are carried out in which several laboratories analyze identical samples from well homogenized batches of material. From the test results, estimates of the standard deviations under repeatability as well as under reproducibility conditions are calculated. In the present work, the experimental designs recommended in the International Standard ISO 5725 have been compared with a design proposed in the draft Netherlands Standard NEN 6303. This has been done by comparing their mathematical models as well as by applying them to the results of a recent collaborative study on the determination of heavy metals in edible oils and fats. The reproducibility standard deviation is estimated equally well with both Standards, but it appeared that the designs given in ISO 5725 can lead to serious underestimation (uniform-level design) or overestimation (split-level design) of the repeatability standard deviation. By using the design proposed in NEN 6303, these biases can be avoided. Hence, it is recommended that interlaboratory studies be organized according to the design of NEN 6303.


2008 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 777-785 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Andrieux ◽  
Tamara Kilinc ◽  
Christian Perrin ◽  
Esther Campos-Giménez

Abstract A single-laboratory validation study was conducted for a liquid chromatographic/mass spectrometric (LC/MS) method for the simultaneous determination of the free carnitine and total choline in milk-based infant formula and health-care products. The sample preparation used for both carnitine and choline was adapted from AOAC Official Method 999.14, with an acidic and enzymatic hydrolysis of esterified forms of choline. Carnitine and choline were quantified by ion-pair chromatography with single-quadrupole MS detection, using their respective deuterated internal standards. The repeatability relative standard deviation was 2.5 and 2.1, respectively, for carnitine and choline. The intermediate reproducibility relative standard deviation was <4.7 and 2.4, respectively, for carnitine and choline. The ranges of the average product-specific recoveries were 9298 and 94103, respectively, for carnitine and choline. Choline concentration determined in infant formula reference material SRM 1846 was in agreement with the reference value. The proposed method was compared with the enzymatic methods for a range of products; good correlation (r = 0.99) was obtained, although a significant bias was observed for both analytes. The method, with a short chromatographic run time (7 min), is convenient for routine analysis to enhance analytical throughput and is a good alternative to enzymatic assays.


1980 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-179
Author(s):  
William P Clinton ◽  
Paul H Manni ◽  
John M Ferry

Abstract A collaborative study was undertaken to define an acceptable routine working method for determination of mass loss in instant coffee. Fourteen laboratories of 24 invited to participate submitted results. The repeatability standard deviation and coefficient of variation were 0.026 and 0.7%, respectively. The reproducibility standard deviation and coefficient of variation were 0.153 and 3.8%, respectively. The method has been adopted as official first action.


1995 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristi A Boehm ◽  
P Frank Ross

Abstract Twelve collaborating laboratories analyzed 5 blind duplicate samples of human urine for total nitrogen using a pyrochemiluminescence method. The nitrogen content ranged from low (650 mg/L) to high levels (8800 mg/L) in urine samples of people under moderate to severe stress. In addition to test samples, collaborators also received a certified standard (sodium nitrite in water) as an external control. The pyrochemiluminescence assay was performed on urine samples diluted in water within a range of 1:50 to 1:100. The method detects total nitrogen by reaction of the product of high temperature oxidative pyrolysis and ozone. Repeatability standard deviation values (RDSr) ranged from 1.49 to 3.91% and reproducibility standard deviation values (RSDR) ranged from 3.66 to 9.57%. The average recovery of total nitrogen was 99.9%. The pyrochemiluminescence method for determination of total nitrogen in urine was adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.


Author(s):  
Ruth Ivory ◽  
Elaine Delaney ◽  
David Mangan ◽  
Barry V McCleary

Abstract Kombucha is a fermented, lightly effervescent sweetened black or green tea drink. It is marketed as a functional beverage based on its proposed health benefits. Kombucha is produced by fermenting tea using a “symbiotic colony of bacteria and yeast” (SCOBY). Kombucha is marketed as a non-alcoholic beverage, however due to the production process employed, there is a high possibility that the Kombucha products will contain low levels of ethanol. Kombucha is sold in a raw and unpasteurized form and, if kept at temperatures above 4 °C, the possibility exists that it will continue to ferment, producing ethanol. This possibility of continued fermentation may lead to an increase in ethanol content from levels below 0.5%ABV at time of production to higher levels at time of consumption. Thus, there is a potential for levels rising to greater than 0.5%ABV, the threshold for certification as a non-alcoholic beverage. It is essential that Kombucha manufacturers have the capacity to accurately and quickly test for ethanol in their products.  The Ethanol Assay Kit is an enzymatic test kit developed by Megazyme for the determination of ethanol in a variety of samples. The kit has been validated in a single laboratory for use with Kombucha fermented drinks, fruit juices, and low-alcohol beer samples. The commercially available Ethanol Assay Kit (Megazyme catalogue no. K-ETOH) contains all components required for the analysis. Quantification is based on the oxidation of ethanol to acetaldehyde by alcohol dehydrogenase and further oxidation of acetaldehyde by acetaldehyde dehydrogenase with conversion of NAD+ to NADH. The single laboratory validation (SLV) outlined in this document was performed on a sample set of eight different commercial Kombucha products purchased in Ireland, a set of five Cerilliant aqueous ethanol solutions, two BCR low-alcohol beer reference materials, two alcohol-free beer samples, and two fruit juice samples against SMPR 2016.001 (1). Parameters examined during the validation included Working range, Selectivity, Limit of Detection (LOD), Limit of Quantification (LOQ), Trueness (bias), Precision (reproducibility and repeatability), Robustness, and Stability. The Ethanol Assay is a robust, quick and easy method for the measurement of ethanol in Kombucha. Our data suggests this method is also reliable for similar matrices, such as low-alcohol beer and fruit juice. The assay meets all requirements set out in in AOAC SMPR 2016.001.


1981 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 1021-1026
Author(s):  
Robert W Dabeka ◽  
Arthur D Mckenzie ◽  
◽  
R A Baetz ◽  
D W Bingham ◽  
...  

Abstract Twelve laboratories analyzed (1 replicate) 12 samples of infant foods – milk, pears, and peas – containing 0.2-5 ppm F. There was one laboratory outlier. Mean coefficients of variation were 7.06% for intralaboratory determination of 3 sets of blind duplicates and 21.6% for interlaboratory determination of 12 samples. Variance analysis for all samples yielded a reproducibility standard deviation of 0.41 ppm; for 3 sets of blind duplicates, repeatability standard deviation was 0.26 ppm and reproducibility standard deviation was 0.32 ppm.


2019 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 883-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry V McCleary ◽  
Lucie M J Charmier ◽  
Vincent A McKie ◽  
Ciara McLoughlin ◽  
Artur Rogowski

Abstract Traditional enzyme-based methods for measurement of fructan were designed to measure just inulin and branched-type (agave) fructans. The enzymes employed, namely exo-inulinase and endo-inulinase, give incompletely hydrolysis of levan. Levan hydrolysis requires a third enzyme, endo-levanase. This paper describes a method and commercial test kit (Megazyme Fructan Assay Kit) for the determination of all types of fructan (inulin, levan, and branched) in a variety of animal feeds and pet foods. The method has been validated in a single laboratory for analysis of pure inulin, agave fructan, levan, and a range of fructan containing samples. Quantification is based on complete hydrolysis of fructan to fructose and glucose by a mixture of exo-inulinase, endo-inulinase, and endo-levanase, followed by measurement of these sugars using the PAHBAH reducing sugar method which gives the same color response with fructose and glucose. Before hydrolysis of fructan, interfering sucrose and starch in the sample are specifically hydrolyzed and removed by borohydride reduction. The single-laboratory validation (SLV) outlined in this document was performed on commercially available inulin (Raftiline) and agave fructan (Frutafit®), levan purified from Timothy grass, two grass samples, a sample of legume hay, two animal feeds and two barley flours, one of which (Barley MAX®) was genetically enriched in fructan through plant breeding. Parameters examined during the validation included working range, target selectivity, recovery, LOD, LOQ, trueness (bias), precision (repeatability and intermediate precision), robustness, and stability. The method is robust, quick, and simple.


1982 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1178-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B Gallagher ◽  
Paul W Love ◽  
Linda L Knotts ◽  
◽  
M Allred ◽  
...  

Abstract A liquid chromatographic technique for the determination of bacitracin in finished feeds and premix feeds consists of an isocratic reverse phase, ion-suppressed technique. The chromatography can be completed in less than 25 min. In a collaborative study involving 9 laboratories and 3 samples of bacitracin methylene disalicylic acid and 3 samples of bacitracin zinc premixes covering the range of 10-50 g/lb, the repeatability standard deviation was 0.55, and the reproducibility standard deviation was 1.35. The average recovery of the bacitracin was 102.0%. The method has been adopted official first action for bacitracin in premix feeds.


1997 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 469-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan S Palmer ◽  
Nancy Thiex ◽  
R Allen ◽  
E Alley ◽  
N Anderson ◽  
...  

Abstract A total of 17 laboratories participated in a collaborative study for the determination of selenium in feeds and premixes using either a fluorometric or a continuous hydride generation atomic absorption (HGAA) method. Each collaborator analyzed 16 blind duplicate samples of feed and premixes from various feed manufacturers. The amount of Se in these materials ranged from 0.2 to 5500 μg/g. Six laboratories used only the fluorometric procedure, 8 laboratories used only the hydride generation atomic absorption procedure, and 3 laboratories used both procedures. One laboratory in the fluorometric study and 3 laboratories in the HGAA study were initially excluded because of invalid data. Poor agreement between the blind duplicates indicated probable sample interchange and/or dilution error. The data from 8 laboratories were submitted to statistical analysis, including data from 2 laboratories participating in both studies. The repeatability standard deviation (RSDr) for samples analyzed by the fluorometric procedure ranged from 5.9 to 33%, and the reproducibility standard deviation (RSDR) ranged from 12 to 33%. RSDf for samples analyzed by HGAA ranged from 2.8 to 18%, and RSDR ranged from 4.0 to 36%. Both fluorometric and continuous hydride generation atomic absorption methods for the determination of Se in feeds and premixes have been adopted first action by AOAC INTERNATIONAL.


1982 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1222-1224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Shang J Shen ◽  
Isabel S Chen ◽  
Alan J Sheppard

Abstract The quantitative determination of cholesterol in egg yolk by using an enzymatic test kit is described. Cholesterol in the egg yolk is extracted with other lipid components by methylene chloride-methanol (2 + 1) and is enzymatically determined after saponification of the lipid extract. The method is relatively rapid, simple, and accurate and gives results which agree with those obtained by using a gas-liquid chromatographic (GLC) method. The mean cholesterol content of egg yolk determined by the enzymatic and GLC methods was 1237 and 1240 mg/100 g, respectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document