scholarly journals The Use of Flow Cytometry to Monitor T cell Responses in Experimental Models of Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Author(s):  
Bryan A. ◽  
Gregg A.
Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 123 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Charlotte Brüggen ◽  
Irene Klein ◽  
Hildegard Greinix ◽  
Wolfgang Bauer ◽  
Zoya Kuzmina ◽  
...  

Key Points Distinct T-cell patterns characterize the acute and chronic forms of cutaneous GVHD. Increased TSLP expression is an indicator of acute cutaneous GVHD development.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (11) ◽  
pp. 1314-1323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongxia Wu ◽  
Jessica Heinrichs ◽  
David Bastian ◽  
Jianing Fu ◽  
Hung Nguyen ◽  
...  

Key Points miR-17-92 is required for T cells to mediate GVHD but not the GVL effect. Targeting miR-17-92 with antagomirs efficiently alleviates GVHD.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 109 (9) ◽  
pp. 3830-3838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moniek A. de Witte ◽  
Mireille Toebes ◽  
Ji-Ying Song ◽  
Monika C. Wolkers ◽  
Ton N. M. Schumacher

Abstract Minor histocompatibility antigen (MiHAg) differences between donor and recipient in MHC-matched allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) often result in graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). While MiHAg-specific T-cell responses can in theory be directed against a large number of polymorphic differences between donor and recipient, in practice, T-cell responses against only a small set of MiHAgs appear to dominate the immune response, and it has been suggested that immunodominance may predict an important contribution to the development of GVHD. Here, we addressed the feasibility of graft engineering by ex vivo removal of T cells with 1 or more defined antigen specificities in a well-characterized experimental HSCT model (B6 → BALB.B). We demonstrate that immunodominant H60- and H4-specific CD8+ T-cell responses can be effectively suppressed through MHC class I tetramer–mediated purging of the naive CD8+ T cell repertoire. Importantly, the development of GVHD occurs unimpeded upon suppression of the immunodominant MiHAg-specific T-cell response. These data indicate that antigen-specific graft engineering is feasible, but that parameters other than immunodominance may be required to select T-cell specificities that are targeted for removal.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3067-3067
Author(s):  
Gerhard C. Hildebrandt ◽  
Sung Choi ◽  
Krystyna M. Olkiewicz ◽  
Stephen W. Chensue ◽  
Chen Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD) is the major complication of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) and limits the utility of this treatment strategy. The pathophysiology of aGVHD involves injury to host tissues by inflammatory cytokines and donor-derived cellular effectors, the recruitment of which is likely mediated by chemokine receptor: ligand interactions. CCR1 is expressed on various cell types such as T cells, monocytes and macrophages and binds to a group of CC chemokines that includes RANTES (CCL5) and Mip-1a (CCL3). In light of the previously described role for both donor T cells and monocytes in the development of aGVHD, we tested the hypothesis that CCR1 expression on donor leukocytes contributes to systemic and target organ inflammation that occurs in this setting by using a well established murine SCT model (B6→B6D2F1) and mutant mice deficient in CCR1. Lethally (1100cGy) irradiated B6D2F1 mice received SCT either from syngeneic (B6D2F1) or allogeneic (B6) CCR1+/+ or CCR1−/− donors. The severity of GVHD was assessed after SCT by survival and a clinical scoring system that incorporates changes in weight loss, fur texture, skin integrity, mobility and posture. As expected, syngeneic SCT recipients all survived and where indistinguishable from naïve, untransplanted controls, whereas animals receiving allo-SCT from CCR1+/+ donors developed significant GVHD and only 50% of animals survived by day 35. By contrast, allo-SCT with CCR1−/− donor cells resulted in significantly improved survival (92% vs. 50%) and less severe clinical GVHD (1.0±0.3 vs. 3.0±0.5) compared to allo-CCR1+/+ controls. In addition, serum TNFa levels were significantly decreased by day +7 following CCR1−/− SCT (4.7±2.7 vs. 55.3±14.4 pg/ml) and correlated with a significant reduction in intestinal histopathology both on day 7 (16.3±1.0 vs. 21.5±0.9) and on day 14 (15.8±1.8 vs. 23.8±1.0). GVHD injury to liver and skin was mild at these time points and did not differ between allo groups. Next we investigated the impact of CCR1 expression on allo-specific T cell responses in vivo and found that by day +7 after SCT both splenic T cell expansion (3.7±0.4 vs. 9.6±0.9 x 106 cells) and serum IFNγ levels (4561±559 vs. 10028±681 pg/ml) were significantly lower when CCR1 was absent on donor cells. In summary, we describe a heretofore unknown role for CCR1 on donor leukocytes in the development of aGVHD. The improvement in systemic and target organ disease observed after CCR1−/− SCT may be attributed to 1) alterations in leukocyte recruitment to the intestinal tract resulting in improved intestinal integrity, reduced translocation of endotoxin and decreased TNFa production and 2) modulation of donor T cell responses to host allo-antigens. Experiments are ongoing to determine whether strategies targeting CCR1 signalling can be exploited to prevent GVHD but maintain GVL effects and thereby improve overall survival after allo-SCT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document