scholarly journals The Role of the Primary Care Physician in the Management of Parkinson’s Disease Dementia

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin-Nong Li ◽  
Dawei Zheng

Dementia is a frequent complication of Parkinson’s disease with an annual incidence of around 10% of patients with Parkinson’s disease. If dementia occurs in patients with Parkinson’s disease, it is typically many years or decades after the onset of Parkinson’s disease. It is devastating for both patient and family or caretaker when a patient with Parkinson’s disease develops dementia. Primary care physician is at the center of the care team for the patient. This chapter discusses the pivotal role of the primary care physicians in the management of patients with Parkinson’s disease dementia. A guide is provided to emphasize the art of practice for Primary care physicians which consists of knowing when and how to introduce a comprehensive ongoing care plan for individual patient with Parkinson’s disease dementia. Recommendations for maintaining some patients with Parkinson’s disease dementia in a status of relative independence are discussed. Indications for initiation of palliative care are also discussed.

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M F M Mendes ◽  
I C Samico ◽  
Z M A Hartz

Abstract Background Problems linked to the coordination of care may represent a lack of communication between levels of care and reflect diagnostic errors, duplication of tests and unnecessary hospitalizations. This study aims to understand the role of communicational relationships between professionals and their influence on coordination between levels of care. Methods An evaluative and qualitative nature research. 24 interviews were carried out, with primary care physicians and specialists, institutional supporters and managers of a public health network in Pernambuco, Brazil. The content thematic analysis worked out sought to identify synergies and contradictions in the relationships between the actors. Results Knowledge about the role of primary care was incomplete, not being understood its primary role as a care provider. The primary care physician was not recognized as the responsible physician by most professionals. The specialists considered the references poorly filled out and showed a lack of confidence in the primary care physician, who in turn revealed that he did not receive any counter-reference and difficulty in contacting a specialist. Few articulation mechanisms have been reported between levels and the use of informal communication mechanisms. The managers acknowledged the existence of problems, but highlighted the commitment of management in the actions for organizing the network. The “goodwill” of the professionals was considered an articulation facilitator, but not a sufficient practice. Conclusions The results allowed to deepen the look at the complexity of the relationships between the actors and how they can influence coordination. Since is perceived the communicational tensions and weaknesses, it is urgent to think of strategies that establish institutionalized spaces for meetings and dialogues that allow articulation among professionals. Key messages The study analyzes communicational relationships between primary and specialized care professionals and their influence on the coordination of care. Strategies for mutual collaboration are mandatory.


Author(s):  
Carole A. Cohen ◽  
Dorothy Pringle ◽  
Linda LeDuc

Background:Family and friends play an important role in caring for individuals with dementia living in the community. In preparation for the Canadian Consensus Conference on Dementia held in Montreal, Canada in February 1998, the subject of dementia caregiving was reviewed in order to provide primary care physicians with some guidelines for their practice. The review was updated in June 2000 in preparation for this article.Method:Pertinent English-language publications and resources from the Alzheimer Society of Canada were reviewed from 1985 onwards. Findings related to the consequences of caregiving, services for caregivers and recommendations regarding the role of the primary care physician were reviewed.Findings:Dementia caregivers experience many positive and negative consequences of caregiving. Some comprehensive services for caregivers have been shown to delay institutionalization and reduce negative consequences of caregiving. The primary care physician has a role to play in working with families and should address the following issues: 1) education about dementia; 2) psychological support for caregivers; 3) assistance mobilizing caregiver social support networks.Conclusion:Primary care physicians have an important role to play in acknowledging and supporting the caregiving provided by family and friends to individuals with dementia.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-290
Author(s):  
Paul C. Young ◽  
Yu Shyr ◽  
M. Anthony Schork

Objective. To determine the roles of primary care physicians and specialists in the medical care of children with serious heart disease. Setting. Pediatric Cardiology Division; Tertiary Care Children's Hospital. Subjects. Convenience sample of parents, primary care physicians, and pediatric cardiologists of 92 children with serious heart disease. Design. Questionnaire study; questionnaires based on 16 medical care needs, encompassing basic primary care services, care specific to the child's heart disease and general issues related to chronic illness. Results. All children had a primary care physician (PCP), and both they and the parents (P) reported high utilization of PCP for basic primary care services. However, there was little involvement of PCP in providing care for virtually any aspect of the child's heart disease. Parents expressed a low level of confidence in the ability of PCP in general or their child's own PCP to meet many of their child's medical care needs. Both PCP and pediatric cardiologists (PC) were significantly more likely than parents to see a role for PCP in providing for care specific to the heart disease as well as more general issues related to chronic illness. PC and PCP generally agreed about the role PCP should play, although PC saw a bigger role for PCP in providing advice about the child's activity than PCP themselves did. PC were less likely to see the PCP as able to follow the child for long term complications than PCP did. PC were more likely than PCP to believe that PCP were too busy or were inadequately reimbursed to care for children with serious heart disease. Only about one-third of parents reported discussing psychosocial, family, economic, or genetic issues with any provider, and PCP were rarely involved in these aspects of chronic illness. Conclusions. Primary care physicians do not take an active role in managing either the condition-specific or the more general aspects of this serious chronic childhood illness. With appropriate information and support from their specialist colleagues primary care physicians could provide much of the care for this group of children. Generalists and specialists are both responsible for educating and influencing parents about the role primary care physicians can play in caring for children with serious chronic illness.


2021 ◽  
pp. 155982762110412
Author(s):  
Anne Sprogell ◽  
Allison R. Casola ◽  
Amy Cunningham

As the healthcare system evolves, it is becoming more complicated for physicians and patients. Patients might have had one doctor in the past, but now are likely to regularly see several specialists along with their primary care physician. Patients can access their health records online, which increases transparency and accountability, but adds more information they have to interpret. This is the concept of health literacy—the ability to obtain, process, and act upon information regarding one’s health. This article will characterize health literacy in primary care and provide three areas that primary care physicians and researchers can direct their focus in order to increase health literacy among patients: community engagement, trainee education, and examination of personal bias.


2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 122-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah A. Morrow ◽  
Marcelo Kremenchutzky

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common disabling neurologic disease with an overall prevalence in Canada of 240 in 100,000. Multiple sclerosis clinics are located at tertiary-care centers that may be difficult for a patient to access during an acute relapse. Many relapses are evaluated by primary-care physicians in private clinics or emergency departments, but these physicians' familiarity with MS is not known. Therefore, a survey was undertaken to determine the knowledge and experience of primary-care physicians regarding the diagnosis and treatment of MS relapses. A total of 1282 licensed primary-care physicians in the catchment area of the London (Ontario, Canada) Multiple Sclerosis Clinic were identified and mailed a two-page anonymous survey. A total of 237 (18.5%) responses were obtained, but only 216 (16.8%) of these respondents were still in active practice. Of these 216 physicians, only 9% reported having no MS patients in their practice, while 70% had one to five patients, 16.7% had six to ten, and 1.9% had more than ten (3.7% did not respond to this question). Corticosteroids were recognized as an MS treatment by 49.5% of the respondents, but only 43.1% identified them as a treatment for acute relapses. In addition, 31% did not know how to diagnose a relapse, and only 37% identified new signs or symptoms of neurologic dysfunction as indicating a potential relapse. Despite the high prevalence of MS in Canada, primary-care physicians require more education and support from specialists in MS care regarding the diagnosis and treatment of MS relapses.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 460-469
Author(s):  
Jerzy Białecki ◽  
◽  
Marcin Para ◽  
Paweł Bartosz ◽  
Wojciech Marczyński ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 215013271988483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepika Slawek ◽  
Senthil Raj Meenrajan ◽  
Marika Rose Alois ◽  
Paige Comstock Barker ◽  
Irene Mison Estores ◽  
...  

Medical cannabis use is common in the United States and increasingly more socially acceptable. As more patients seek out and acquire medical cannabis, primary care physicians will be faced with a growing number of patients seeking information on the indications, efficacy, and safety of medical cannabis. We present a case of a patient with several chronic health conditions who asks her primary care provider whether she should try medical cannabis. We provide a review of the pharmacology of medical cannabis, the state of evidence regarding the efficacy of medical cannabis, variations in the types of medical cannabis, and safety monitoring considerations for the primary care physician.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document