scholarly journals The implications of intensive care unit capacity strain for the care of critically ill patients

Author(s):  
Rachel Kohn ◽  
Scott D. Halpern ◽  
Meeta Prasad Kerlin
TH Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. e134-e138
Author(s):  
Anke Pape ◽  
Jan T. Kielstein ◽  
Tillman Krüger ◽  
Thomas Fühner ◽  
Reinhard Brunkhorst

AbstractThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has a serious impact on health and economics worldwide. Even though the majority of patients present with moderate and mild symptoms, yet a considerable portion of patients need to be treated in the intensive care unit. Aside from dexamethasone, there is no established pharmacological therapy. Moreover, some of the currently tested drugs are contraindicated for special patient populations like remdesivir for patients with severely impaired renal function. On this background, several extracorporeal treatments are currently explored concerning their potential to improve the clinical course and outcome of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Here, we report the use of the Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity filter, which is licensed in the European Union for the removal of pathogens. Authorization for emergency use in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit with confirmed or imminent respiratory failure was granted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on April 17, 2020.A 53-year-old Caucasian male with a severe COVID-19 infection was treated with a Seraph Microbind Affinity filter hemoperfusion after clinical deterioration and commencement of mechanical ventilation. The 70-minute treatment at a blood flow of 200 mL/minute was well tolerated, and the patient was hemodynamically stable. The hemoperfusion reduced D-dimers dramatically.This case report suggests that the use of Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity filter hemoperfusion might have positive effects on the clinical course of critically ill patients with COVID-19. However, future prospective collection of data ideally in randomized trials will have to confirm whether the use of Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity filter hemoperfusion is an option of the treatment for COVID-19.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephana J. Moss ◽  
Krista Wollny ◽  
Therese G. Poulin ◽  
Deborah J. Cook ◽  
Henry T. Stelfox ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Informal caregivers of critically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICUs) experience negative psychological sequelae that worsen after death. We synthesized outcomes reported from ICU bereavement interventions intended to improve informal caregivers’ ability to cope with grief. Data sources MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to October 2020. Study selection Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bereavement interventions to support informal caregivers of adult patients who died in ICU. Data extraction Two reviewers independently extracted data in duplicate. Narrative synthesis was conducted. Data synthesis Bereavement interventions were categorized according to the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence three-tiered model of bereavement support according to the level of need: (1) Universal information provided to all those bereaved; (2) Selected or targeted non-specialist support provided to those who are at-risk of developing complex needs; and/or (3) Professional specialist interventions provided to those with a high level of complex needs. Outcome measures were synthesized according to core outcomes established for evaluating bereavement support for adults who have lost other adults to illness. Results Three studies of ICU bereavement interventions from 31 ICUs across 26 hospitals were included. One trial examining the effect of family presence at brain death assessment integrated all three categories of support but did not report significant improvement in emotional or psychological distress. Two other trials assessed a condolence letter intervention, which did not decrease grief symptoms and may have increased symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, and a storytelling intervention that found no significant improvements in anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, or complicated grief. Four of nine core bereavement outcomes were not assessed anytime in follow-up. Conclusions Currently available trial evidence is sparse and does not support the use of bereavement interventions for informal caregivers of critically ill patients who die in the ICU.


2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prashant Parulekar ◽  
Ed Neil-Gallacher ◽  
Alex Harrison

Acute kidney injury is common in critically ill patients, with ultrasound recommended to exclude renal tract obstruction. Intensive care unit clinicians are skilled in acquiring and interpreting ultrasound examinations. Intensive Care Medicine Trainees wish to learn renal tract ultrasound. We sought to demonstrate that intensive care unit clinicians can competently perform renal tract ultrasound on critically ill patients. Thirty patients with acute kidney injury were scanned by two intensive care unit physicians using a standard intensive care unit ultrasound machine. The archived images were reviewed by a Radiologist for adequacy and diagnostic quality. In 28 of 30 patients both kidneys were identified. Adequate archived images of both kidneys each in two planes were possible in 23 of 30 patients. The commonest reason for failure was dressings and drains from abdominal surgery. Only one patient had hydronephrosis. Our results suggest that intensive care unit clinicians can provide focussed renal tract ultrasound. The low incidence of hydronephrosis has implications for delivering the Core Ultrasound in Intensive Care competencies.


Author(s):  
Yasotha Rajeswaran ◽  
Brooke Hill ◽  
Anthony Gemignani ◽  
Scott Friedman ◽  
Robert Palac ◽  
...  

Background: There is increasing concern regarding the value and cost of using transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) to assess volume status in critically ill patients. Using clinical and echocardiographic parameters, we assessed whether TTE changed clinical management of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: Using the Dartmouth-Hitchcock echocardiography database, we identified 218 ICU patients whose TTE was performed to assess volume status from 4/1/11 to 3/31/14. The following TTE parameters were assessed: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), diastolic function parameters, left atrial size, significant valvular disease, pericardial effusion, inferior vena cava (IVC) size and collapsibility, right ventricular (RV) function and pulmonary artery systolic pressure. In addition, clinical data were collected from review of the medical record including: age, vitals, intubation status, labs, and management change after TTE results became available. Results: Of the 218 patients, cardiac tamponade was present in 6 patients and right heart strain suggestive of pulmonary embolus was present in 2 patients. Of the remaining 210 patients, TTE did not affect clinical management in 186 (88.6%), led to administration of diuretics in 8 (3.8%), and intravenous fluids in 16 (7.6%). Of the 218 total patients, 123 (56.4%) were intubated. Compared to non-intubated patients, intubated patients were more likely to have elevated right atrial pressure, RV dysfunction, IVC size and collapsibility index (p<0.05). There was no difference in the severity of pulmonary hypertension, LVEF, or indices of elevated left ventricular filling pressure (p=NS). Although the echo parameters were different, the decision by physicians to administer intravenous fluids or diuretics was similar for both groups (p=NS). Conclusions: Transthoracic echocardiogram is commonly ordered to assess volume status in the ICU. The use of echocardiographic parameters to assess volume status did not change clinical management in majority of patients and should be used with caution in this cohort. Continued investigation to identify the best modality to assess volume status in critically ill patients is warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document