scholarly journals Tradición romanística y perspectivas de reforma en sede de cláusula penal

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Valiño Arcos
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
General Rule ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
European Contract ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Specific Performance ◽  
El Sistema ◽  
The Common ◽  
Civil Codes ◽  
Preliminary Draft

El autor analiza el tratamiento legal de la cláusula penal en el Derecho civil español, con especial atención a la regulación que ofrece el Código civil en los artículos 1152 a 1154, las diferentes funciones que la cláusula penal cumple y el distinto régimen presente en la Lex 518 del Fuero Nuevo de Navarra, lo cual evidencia el dualismo habido en el sistema jurídico español entre el Derecho civil común (representado por el Código civil) y el derecho foral o especial (representado por distintas compilaciones de ámbito regional). La regulación del Código civil español configura la pena contractual en primer término como sustitutiva de la indemnización de daños y perjuicios prevista en el artículo 1101 del Código civil para el caso de incumplimiento contractual o para los supuestos de cumplimiento deficiente o tardío por parte del deudor. De este modo, se dispensa al acreedor de tener que recurrir a una valoración del daño efectivamente causado, de modo que la cláusula penal viene a ser una estimación anticipada del daño que sustrae al acreedor de la prueba de su existencia. Esta regulación, que se ha mantenido invariable desde la promulgación del Código civil, ha sido objeto de especial atención por parte del Anteproyecto de Modernización del Derecho de Obligaciones elaborado por la Comisión de Codificación del Ministerio de Justicia en 2009, siguiendo las orientaciones presentes en otros Códigos civiles europeos así como las aportaciones de prestigiosos académicos, que son expresión del esfuerzo en pro de la armonización del Derecho contractual europeo.The author analyses the legal treatment of the penalty clause into Spanish Civil Law, with special attention to the regulation offered by the Civil Code in their articles 1152 to 1155, the differents functions which the penalty clause achieves and the differentiated regulation into Fuero Nuevo of Navarra in the Lex 518. All of this can be seen as a reflection of the dualism in Spanish Legal System between the Common Civil Law (represented by the Spanish Civil Code) and the Foral or Special Law (represented by differents regionals compilations). The regulation of the Spanish civil code sets as general rule the contractual penalty as substitute of the regime of compensation into the article 1101 of spanish Civil Code in case of breach of contract or in case of defective or untimely performance by the debtor. This provision allows to the creditor to avoid a real damage assessment, so that the penalty clause lets a advanced estimate of damages without needing to prove them. But also admits the regulation of the penalty clause into the spanish Civil Code other functions, for instance the cumulative penalty (with the legal and previously valued compensation of damages or with the specific performance). This regulation, unchanged since the enactment of the spanish Civil Code, has been object of special attention by the preliminary draft to modernisation of the law of obligations drawn up by the Commission of Codification of the Ministry of Justice in 2009, picking up some of the guidelines present in other European Civil Codes as well as in the contributions of prestigiouses scholars, which are expression of the effort aimed at the harmonisation of European Contract Law.

La nueva perspectiva de la tutela del error en el moderno derecho de los contratos

2014 ◽  
pp. 863
Author(s):  
Rocío Herrera Blanco
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
European Contract ◽  
Legal Effect ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Impact ◽  
European Contract Law

Premio de artículos jurídicos «GARCÍA GOYENA» (Curso 2013-2014). Primer accésit Todos los ordenamientos jurídicos europeos prevén normas relativas a la ineficacia de los contratos por vicios del consentimiento, sin embargo, existen entre ellos diferencias bastante significativas, especialmente cuando se comparan el Common Law y los derechos continentales. El presente estudio comparado parte del tratamiento de esta cuestión en la regulación española y se centra en las propuestas que el moderno Derecho de la contratación proporciona en materia de vicios del consentimiento, con particular atención a la figura del error, así como en el Derecho anglosajón, por su eventual influencia en la regulación de estos instrumentos. De manera muy amplia, podríamos decir que el Common Law enfatiza la seguridad de las transacciones, mientras que los sistemas del Civil Law, quizás todavía marcados por las huellas de las llamadas teorías voluntaristas, son más transigentes en permitir la ineficacia de los contratos por defectos del consentimiento. Partiendo de esta premisa, intentaremos evidenciar que las soluciones brindadas por el Derecho anglosajón y los diferentes instrumentos de unificación para la determinación de los efectos jurídicos del error son muy similares. Asimismo, en este trabajo se defiende la tesis de la obsolescencia del Código Civil español en esta materia, y la consecuente necesidad de adaptación del mismo a la actual realidad social, a través de un propósito de homogeneización del Derecho contractual europeo. Para ello, igualmente estudiaremos la Propuesta de modernización del Código civil en materia de obligaciones y contratos, cuya regulación del error, en particular, merece ser objeto de estudio y confrontación de ideas.The legal systems of all european countries provide rules regarding the inefficacy of contracts due to defects of consent, however, there are very significant differences between them, with the deepest differences when Common law and continental systems are contrasted. The present comparative study focuses on the proposals that the modern contract law (PECL, Unidroit Principles, DCFR, CESL) provides with regard to defects of consent and, particularly, to the doctrine of mistake, as well as the Common law for its eventual influence on the regulation of these projects. Very generally, we could say that Common Law emphasizes the security of transactions, while Civil law systems, perhaps still under the impact of the eroded voluntarist theories, are more generous in allowing the inefficacy of contracts due to defects consent. Given these premises, we will try to evidence that the solutions provided by the Common law and the different unifying instruments in order to determinate the legal effect of the defects of consent are very similar. Furthermore, this survey defends the thesis of obsolescence of the spanish Civil Code respecting defects of consent, and the ensuing need for adapting it to the current social reality through a purpose of homogenization of european contract law. Due to this fact, we will also study the Proposal for the modernization of the Civil Code on obligations and contracts, whose regulation of defects of consent, particularly, diserves to be analyzed.

scholarly journals The Case for Specific Performance as the Primary Remedy for Breach of Contract in New Zealand

2004 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 657
Author(s):  
Fionnghuala Cuncannon
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Historical Development ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
Specific Performance ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Right ◽  
Practical Impact

This article examines the appropriateness of damages as the primary remedy for breach of contract in New Zealand. It argues that the civil law approach to contractual remedies, which gives primacy to performance of the obligation, is superior to New Zealand's common law position, which merely seeks to replace the right to performance with an award of damages. The importance of both the normative and practical impact of the remedial framework is examined in order to demonstrate that specific performance is better able to facilitate commercial endeavours. The three justifications for the primacy of damages in the common law (the historical development, the economic theory of efficient breach, and the concern that specific performance will overburden the administration of justice) are examined but rejected as adequate justification for the common law position. It contends that specific performance should be the primary remedy because it is more consistent with the principles that underlie the law of contract. It also contends that specific performance is more practical because it reduces conflict and promotes efficiency. The recommendation is that any change should be through appropriate legislation.

The Efficient Breach Theory under Jordanian Civil Law

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 336-356
Author(s):  
Yusuf Mohammed Gassim Obeidat
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Law System ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
Specific Performance ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Right

This study examined the ‘efficient breach’ theory and its possible application under Jordanian Civil Law. The theory says the promisor has the right to breach a contract and pay damages whenever his profit from breach exceeds his expected profits from performance. As a prerequisite for its application, the theory requires the general remedy for breach to be the payment of damages, rather than forced performance. Thus, the main area for its application is the common law system, since it favours damages as a primary remedy. This study reached the conclusion that the theory cannot work under Jordanian Civil Law, where the primary remedy for breach of contract is specific performance, that forces the promisor to complete the contract. In addition, it contradicts the good faith principle that Jordanian law is based upon, amongst other principles, and goes against the history of Jordanian legal rules.

Claims for Performance

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hein Kötz
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Contract Law ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Specific Performance ◽  
The Common ◽  
The Difference

This chapter examines what the contract law says about claims for performance. It first considers the difference between the civil law in which claims for the performance of the contract are generally admitted, and the common law where ‘specific performance’ is awarded only exceptionally. A closer analysis shows, however, that the gap between the civil law and the common law is not as great as it might appear, and it is on that basis that the chapter discusses in some detail the harmonisation of the European rules on claims for the performance of contracts. The chapter also looks at the idea of an ‘efficient breach of contract’ as it relates to claims for performance.

Enforced Performance in Common Law Versus Civil Law Systems: An Empirical Study of a Legal Transformation

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-54
Author(s):  
Leon Yehuda Anidjar ◽  
Ori Katz ◽  
Eyal Zamir
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Lab Experiments ◽  
Specific Performance ◽  
Lively Debate ◽  
The Common ◽  
Injured Party ◽  
Equitable Relief

Abstract Legal systems differ about the availability of specific performance as a remedy for breach of contract. While common law systems deny specific performance in all but exceptional cases, civil law systems generally award enforcement remedies subject to some exceptions. However, there is an ongoing debate about the extent to which the practice of litigants and courts actually reflects the doctrinal divergence. An equally lively debate revolves around the normative question: Should the injured party be entitled to enforced performance or rather content itself with monetary damages? Very few studies have used qualitative methods, vignette surveys, or incentivized lab experiments to empirically study these issues, and none has quantitatively analyzed actual court judgments. Against the backdrop of the comparative law and theoretical debates, this Article describes the findings of a quantitative analysis of judgments concerning remedies for breach of contract in Israel during a sixty-nine-year period (1948–2016). The judicial and scholarly consensus is that the Remedies Law of 1970 revolutionized Israeli law by turning enforced performance from a secondary, equitable relief to the primary remedy for breach of contract. We nevertheless hypothesized that no such revolution has actually occurred. In fact, neither the common wisdom that the resort to enforced performance has significantly increased following the 1970 Law, nor our skeptic hypothesis that no such increase has occurred, were borne out. According to our findings, the resort to enforced performance actually decreased considerably after 1970. We examine several explanations for this result, and show that this unexpected phenomenon is associated with the increasing length of adjudication proceedings. The theoretical and policy implications of these findings are discussed.

Part VIII Remedies For Default, 27 Debt and Other Agreed Sums

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrews Neil
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Practical Importance ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Fundamental Principle ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Self Help ◽  
Liquidated Damages ◽  
Specific Performance ◽  
The Common ◽  
Judicial Remedies

This Part mostly concerns judicial remedies for breach of contract (the self-help remedy of forfeiture of a deposit is noted at [27.109]). The chapter sequence reflects both the division between Common Law (chapters 27 and 28) and Equity (chapter 29) but, more importantly, the practical importance of the judicial remedies, debt mattering more than damages, and in turn damages more than specific performance or injunctions. And so chapter 27 concerns ‘Debt’ (but agreed damages, ie liquidated damages clauses, are treated in the same chapter because the sum payable is, by definition, fixed or calculable in advance; but technically, agreed damages are damages and not a cause of action sounding in debt). Chapter 28 concerns damages, that is, compensation. Damages is a branch of the law which continues to generate a mass of intricate case law. Finally, chapter 29 concerns the equitable remedies of specific performance, injunctions, account of profits, and declarations. It is a fundamental principle that specific performance can be granted only if the Common Law remedies (debt and damages) are inadequate on the relevant facts. Chapter 27: The predominant claim for contractual default is the action for debt, to compel payment. Statistically this is the front-runner amongst remedies for breach. The availability of interest is also noted in this chapter.

scholarly journals La necesidad De Una Reforma Al Código Civil De Hidalgo En Materia De Sucesiones

Xihmai ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Carlos Negrete Vázquez
Keyword(s):  
Key Words ◽  
Local Level ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Authority ◽  
Palabras Clave ◽  
Distrito Federal ◽  
The Common ◽  
Civil Codes

  Resumen El Código Civil de Hidalgo como la mayorí­a de los Códigos Civiles estatales se basa en el Código Civil de 1928 que tení­a aplicación federal y aplicación del fuero común en el Distrito Federal, lo que al trasladarse a la materia local crea confusiones como la indebida regulación de materias federales en el ámbito local, además de lo anterior existe una evidente incongruencia de dicho ordenamiento con la figura de la Fe Pública de la que están investidos los Notarios ya que exige la comparecencia de testigos al otorgamiento de testamentos, todo esto se traduce en la necesidad de una reforma en su capí­tulo relativo a las sucesiones.   Palabras clave: Código civil, sucesiones, necesidad de reforma, fe pública, testamento.   Abstract The Civil Code of Hidalgo as the majority of The State Civil codes is based on the Civil Code of 1928 which had federal implementation and application of the common law in the Federal District, creating confusion for the undue regulation of federal matters at the local level, in addition to the above there is a clear inconsistency of said Ordinance with the figure of the legal authority that notaries are vested with since it requires the attendance of witnesses to the granting of wills, this translates into the need for a reform in its chapter on successions.   Key words: Civil code, inheritance, legal authority, will, last will.

Recodification of the Civil Code of Ukraine and modernisation of the Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan: A comparative analysis of the main ideas

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 190-199
Author(s):  
Nataliia S. Kuznietsova ◽  
Maidan K. Suleimenov ◽  
Farkhad S. Karagusov
Keyword(s):  
System Analysis ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Current State ◽  
Clear Guideline ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Civil Codes ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Main Ideas

Systematic updating of the civil legislation of Ukraine and modernisation of the civil legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan are time-consuming tasks as evidenced by the analysis of changes that were made to the civil codes of Ukraine and the Republic of Kazakhstan and their law enforcement practice. Work on updating civil legislation requires an assessment of the current state and prospects of socio-economic development of Ukrainian society and the state, in particular the development of such an important component as the national legal system, which is presented in the concept of updating the Civil Code of Ukraine. It is crucial that the main areas of the concept orient the development of civil law in Ukraine, considering the current experience of recodification of civil codes of other states within the continental legal family. Considering that civil legislation is also being modernised in the Republic of Kazakhstan, the purpose of this study is to compare the main ideas of recodification of the Civil Code of Ukraine and modernisation of the Civil Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan to establish a systematic approach and a unified concept for the development of civil law and form a clear guideline for the improvement of civil legislation. The study analyses the areas of updating the civil legislation of Ukraine and the Republic of Kazakhstan based on both general (historical, comparative, system analysis) and special (specific-sociological, formal legal, legal-technical, etc.) methods. One of the most reasonable ways to ensure continuity of legal regulation of civil relations and ensure the modernisation of the legal basis for the development of the sphere of social and legal relations in the long term is the approach that should preserve all the achievements of existing civil codes, considering modern European approaches and the specific features of civil and business turnover

scholarly journals KEABSAHAN TANDA TANGAN ELEKTRONIK PADA PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI BARANG DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PERDATA

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thamaroni Usman
Keyword(s):  
Digital Signature ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Breach Of Contract ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Information Law ◽  
Legal Consequence ◽  
Legal Consequences

Electronic transaction agreement between PT. Juang Abadi Alam with Australian Rural Exports Pty. Ltd in the perspective of the ITE Law is legal and has consequences. In another perspective, Article 1320 of the Civil Code sees that an agreement will be valid when two conditions are fulfilled, namely subjective and objective conditions. The focus of this study is related to the validity of the digital signature (scanner) of an agreement in the perspective of civil law as well as the legal consequences of the agreement carried out online / electronically when one party defaults/breach of contract. The legal research method used in this study is normative juridical.The results of this study showed that the process of electronic commerce transactions (e-commerce) is carried out with 4 stages of the agreement theory namely supply, acceptance, payment and delivery. The validity of agreement with digital signatures in the perspective of civil law is referring to the National Electronic Transaction Information law and Government Regulations as implementing regulations of Electronic Transactions, which are associated with the principles of agreement in the Civil Code. In addition, the legal consequences of an agreement made online/electronically when one of the parties to the default/breach of contract is that a cancellation of the agreement can be requested from the judge as a legal consequence or the legal consequences of the contract in the sale and purchase agreement of goods online.

scholarly journals Garanțiile negative

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 955-976
Author(s):  
Adrian Tamba ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
The Common

"My work, called „Negative Pledges”, aims at some interesting legal beings. Mainly, they are used by banks. Yet, negative pledges may very well be placed in the hands of entities that are not banks; this is pointed out by, e.g., First Wyoming Bank, Casper v. Mudge. Negative pledges are encountered both in the Civil Law and the Common Law traditions. Of course, it is my view that the Romanian Civil Code embraces the so-called negative pledges, though it does not use such an expression. At the end of this paper, the abandonment of orthodoxy is highlighted: no explicit conclusions can be noticed."

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document