scholarly journals Bayesian Model Averaging for Selection of a Risk Prediction Model for Death within Thirty Days of Discharge: The SILVER-AMI Study

Author(s):  
Terrence E. Murphy ◽  
◽  
Sui W. Tsang ◽  
Linda S. Leo-Summers ◽  
Mary Geda ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel P Dreyer ◽  
Terrence E Murphy ◽  
Valeria Raparelli ◽  
Sui Tsang ◽  
Gail Onofrio ◽  
...  

Introduction: Although readmission over the first year following hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is common among younger adults (18-55 yrs), there is no available risk prediction model for this age group. Existing risk models have been developed in older populations, have modest predictive ability, and exhibit methodological drawbacks. We developed a risk prediction model that considered a broad range of demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors for readmission within 1-year of hospitalization for AMI among young adults. Methods: Young AMI adults (18-55 yrs) were enrolled from the prospective observational VIRGO study (2008-2012) of 3,572 patients. Data were obtained from medical record abstraction, interviews, and adjudicated hospitalization records. The outcome was all-cause readmission within 1-year. We used a two-stage selection process (LASSO followed by Bayesian Model Averaging) to develop a risk model. Results: The median age was 48 years (IQR: 44,52), 67.1% were women, and 20.1% were Non-white or Hispanic. Within 1-year, 906 patients (25.3%) were readmitted. Patients who were readmitted were more likely to be female, black, and had a clustering of adverse risk factors and co-morbidities. From 61 original variables considered, the final multivariable model of readmission within 1-year of discharge consisted of 14 predictors (Figure) . The model was well calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow P >0.05) with moderate discrimination (C statistic over 33 imputations: 0.69 development cohort). Conclusion: Adverse clinical risk factors such as diabetes, hypertension and prior AMI, but also female sex, access to specialist care, and major depression were associated with a higher risk of readmission at 1-year post AMI. This information is important to inform the development of interventions to reduce readmissions in young patients with AMI.


Lung Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 31-40
Author(s):  
Martin C. Tammemägi ◽  
Gail E. Darling ◽  
Heidi Schmidt ◽  
Diego Llovet ◽  
Daniel N. Buchanan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Don van den Bergh ◽  
Merlise A. Clyde ◽  
Akash R. Komarlu Narendra Gupta ◽  
Tim de Jong ◽  
Quentin F. Gronau ◽  
...  

AbstractLinear regression analyses commonly involve two consecutive stages of statistical inquiry. In the first stage, a single ‘best’ model is defined by a specific selection of relevant predictors; in the second stage, the regression coefficients of the winning model are used for prediction and for inference concerning the importance of the predictors. However, such second-stage inference ignores the model uncertainty from the first stage, resulting in overconfident parameter estimates that generalize poorly. These drawbacks can be overcome by model averaging, a technique that retains all models for inference, weighting each model’s contribution by its posterior probability. Although conceptually straightforward, model averaging is rarely used in applied research, possibly due to the lack of easily accessible software. To bridge the gap between theory and practice, we provide a tutorial on linear regression using Bayesian model averaging in , based on the BAS package in . Firstly, we provide theoretical background on linear regression, Bayesian inference, and Bayesian model averaging. Secondly, we demonstrate the method on an example data set from the World Happiness Report. Lastly, we discuss limitations of model averaging and directions for dealing with violations of model assumptions.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Don van den Bergh ◽  
Merlise Aycock Clyde ◽  
Akash Raj ◽  
Tim de Jong ◽  
Quentin Frederik Gronau ◽  
...  

Linear regression analyses commonly involve two consecutive stages of statistical inquiry. In the first stage, a single ‘best’ model is defined by a specific selection of relevant predictors; in the second stage, the regression coefficients of the winning model are used for prediction and for inference concerning the importance of the predictors. However, such second-stage inference ignores the model uncertainty from the first stage, resulting in overconfident parameter estimates that generalize poorly. These drawbacks can be overcome by model averaging, a technique that retains all models for inference, weighting each model’s contribution by its posterior probability. Although conceptually straightforward, model averaging is rarely used in applied research, possibly due to the lack of easily accessible software. To bridge the gap between theory and practice, we provide a tutorial on linear regression using Bayesian model averaging in JASP, based on the BAS package in R. Firstly, we provide theoretical background on linear regression, Bayesian inference, and Bayesian model averaging. Secondly, we demonstrate the method on an example data set from the World Happiness Report. Lastly, we discuss limitations of model averaging and directions for dealing with violations of model assumptions.


Author(s):  
Nuur Azreen Paiman ◽  
◽  
Azian Hariri ◽  
Ibrahim Masood ◽  
Arma Noor ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Lorenzo Bencivelli ◽  
Massimiliano Giuseppe Marcellino ◽  
Gianluca Moretti

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document