scholarly journals Zeta potential of Escherichia coli DH5α grown in different growth media

Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Proteins and metabolites typically adsorb to bacterial cell surface through a variety of mechanisms such as van der Waals attraction and electrostatic interactions, and forms a layer of nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules on the cell surface. Thus, the bacterial cell surface charge comprised the contribution from the cell wall as well as layers of nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules on the cell surface. This is the cell surface charge perceived by other bacterial cells in the growth medium. Given that different growth medium comprises different ensemble of proteins and metabolites that could adsorb onto the cell surface of bacteria, it is important to examine the effect of growth in different medium on the cell surface characteristics of bacterial cells using zeta potential as the proxy parameter. Defined at the shear plane, zeta potential provides a comprehensive view of the cell surface charge that include the nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules on the cell surface and the intrinsic electric charges in the cell wall. Using Escherichia coli DH5α (ATCC 53868) as model organism, experiments performed with deionized water as wash and resuspension buffer revealed that the zeta potential-pH profiles of cells grown in LB Lennox, and LB Lennox with 2 g/L glucose overlapped each other over the entire pH range from 2 to 9. This suggested that there was little physiological adaptation of the cell envelope of cells grown in LB Lennox supplemented with 2 g/L glucose, which indicated that the medium could be used for increasing biomass yield without affecting cell surface characteristics. Similarly, the zeta potential-pH profiles of E. coli DH5α grown in LB Lennox and LB Lennox buffered with 89 mM potassium hydrogen phosphate buffer also overlapped each other, which highlighted that the buffered medium did not elicit physiological adaptation of the cell envelope. However, supplementation of the LB Lennox (buffered) medium with 6 g/L glucose resulted in a more negatively charged zeta potential-pH profile in the pH range from 4 to 12 compared to that during growth in LB Lennox. Growth of E. coli DH5α in other media such as Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB), formulated medium, and formulated medium with 6 g/L glucose also resulted in more negatively charged zeta potential-pH profiles compared to that during growth in LB Lennox medium. However, the point-of-zero-charge (pHzpc) of cells grown in TSB and formulated medium were the same as that of cells grown in LB Lennox medium. Collectively, physiological adaptation to growth in different media as well as different ensemble of proteins and metabolites nonspecifically adsorbed to the cell surface would generally result in different zeta potential-pH profiles of bacteria cultivated in growth media of different compositions. Understanding the cell surface charge characteristics of E. coli DH5α grown in different media would thus help unveil the mysteries of cell-cell interactions in the medium.

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Proteins and metabolites typically adsorb to bacterial cell surface through a variety of mechanisms such as van der Waals attraction and electrostatic interactions, and forms a layer of nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules on the cell surface. Thus, the bacterial cell surface charge comprised the contribution from the cell wall as well as layers of nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules on the cell surface. This is the cell surface charge perceived by other bacterial cells in the growth medium. Given that different growth medium comprises different ensemble of proteins and metabolites that could adsorb onto the cell surface of bacteria, it is important to examine the effect of growth in different medium on the cell surface characteristics of bacterial cells using zeta potential as the proxy parameter. Defined at the shear plane, zeta potential provides a comprehensive view of the cell surface charge that include the nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules on the cell surface and the intrinsic electric charges in the cell wall. Using Escherichia coli DH5α (ATCC 53868) as model organism, experiments performed with deionized water as wash and resuspension buffer revealed that the zeta potential-pH profiles of cells grown in LB Lennox, and LB Lennox with 2 g/L glucose overlapped each other over the entire pH range from 2 to 9. This suggested that there was little physiological adaptation of the cell envelope of cells grown in LB Lennox supplemented with 2 g/L glucose, which indicated that the medium could be used for increasing biomass yield without affecting cell surface characteristics. Similarly, the zeta potential-pH profiles of E. coli DH5α grown in LB Lennox and LB Lennox buffered with 89 mM potassium hydrogen phosphate buffer also overlapped each other, which highlighted that the buffered medium did not elicit physiological adaptation of the cell envelope. However, supplementation of the LB Lennox (buffered) medium with 6 g/L glucose resulted in a more negatively charged zeta potential-pH profile in the pH range from 4 to 12 compared to that during growth in LB Lennox. Growth of E. coli DH5α in other media such as Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB), formulated medium, and formulated medium with 6 g/L glucose also resulted in more negatively charged zeta potential-pH profiles compared to that during growth in LB Lennox medium. However, the point-of-zero-charge (pHzpc) of cells grown in TSB and formulated medium were the same as that of cells grown in LB Lennox medium. Collectively, physiological adaptation to growth in different media as well as different ensemble of proteins and metabolites nonspecifically adsorbed to the cell surface would generally result in different zeta potential-pH profiles of bacteria cultivated in growth media of different compositions. Understanding the cell surface charge characteristics of E. coli DH5α grown in different media would thus help unveil the mysteries of cell-cell interactions in the medium.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 2023-2029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsea Catania ◽  
Alexander W. Thomas ◽  
Guillermo C. Bazan

Conjugated oligoelectrolytes intercalate into and associate with membranes, thereby changing the surface charge of microbes, as determined by zeta potential measurements.


2009 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 1181-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. N. WAN NORHANA ◽  
REBECCA M. GOULTER ◽  
SUSAN E. POOLE ◽  
HILTON C. DEETH ◽  
GARY A. DYKES

Listeria and Salmonella are important foodborne pathogens normally associated with the shrimp production chain. This study investigated the potential of Salmonella Typhimurium, Salmonella Senftenberg, and Listeria monocytogenes (Scott A and V7) to attach to and colonize shrimp carapace. Attachment and colonization of Listeria and Salmonella were demonstrated. Shrimp abdominal carapaces showed higher levels of bacterial attachment (P < 0.05) than did head carapaces. Listeria consistently exhibited greater attachment (P < 0.05) than did Salmonella on all surfaces. Chitinase activity of all strains was tested and found not to occur at the three temperatures (10, 25, and 37°C) tested. The surface physicochemical properties of bacterial cells and shrimp carapace were studied to determine their role in attachment and colonization. Salmonella had significantly (P < 0.05) more positive (−3.9 and −6.0 mV) cell surface charge than Listeria (−18 and −22.8 mV) had. Both bacterial species were found to be hydrophilic (<35%) when measured by the bacterial adherence to hydrocarbon method and by contact angle (θ) measurements (Listeria, 21.3 and 24.8°, and Salmonella, 14.5 and 18.9°). The percentage of cells retained by Phenyl-Sepharose was lower for Salmonella (12.8 to 14.8%) than it was for Listeria (26.5 to 31.4%). The shrimp carapace was found to be hydrophobic (θ = 74.5°), and a significant (P < 0.05) difference in surface roughness between carapace types was noted. There was a linear correlation between bacterial cell surface charge (r2 = 0.95) and hydrophobicity (r2 = 0.85) and initial attachment (P < 0.05) of Listeria and Salmonella to carapaces. However, the same properties could not be related to subsequent colonization.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Bacterial cell surface carries an electrical charge due to the myriad functional groups present, as well as assortment of ions and molecules nonspecifically adsorbed to the cell surface. Thus, solution in contact with the bacterial cell surface play a critical role in influencing the overall surface charge characteristics through conferring nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules. Various wash buffers are commonly used in removing nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules for revealing the real surface charge of the bacterium. Using electrophoretic mobility measurement of zeta potential, this study attempted to understand the surface charge characteristics of Bacillus subtilis NRS-762 (ATCC 8473) with the help of three wash buffers: deionized (DI) water, 0.1M sodium nitrate, and 9 g/L sodium chloride. Experiment results revealed that B. subtilis NRS-762 was negatively charged over the entire pH range from 1.5 to 12. Specifically, with deionized water as wash buffer, the point-of-zero-charge (pHzpc) was at pH 1.5, which indicated that large amount of negatively charged functional groups were present on the cell surface. Comparison between the zeta potential-pH profiles of B. subtilis NRS-762 cultivated at 30 oC and 37 oC revealed that the profile for growth at 37 oC was more negatively charged over the entire pH range compared to that for growth at 30 oC. This highlighted that physiological adaptation might had occurred on the cell surface for coping with growth at a higher temperature. Zeta potential-pH profiles obtained revealed that DI water could not remove significant quantities of the nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules. On the other hand, the zeta potential-pH profiles of cells washed with 0.1M sodium nitrate and 9 g/L sodium chloride overlapped each other substantially, and were more negatively charged over the pH range from 2 to 11, compared to that of cells washed with DI water. This revealed substantial removal of nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules with the use of 0.1M sodium nitrate (0.1M ionic strength) and 9 g/L sodium chloride (0.15M ionic strength), which helped reveal the actual surface charge of B. subtilis NRS-762 cells. Collectively, actual surface charge of B. subtilis NRS-762 was masked by nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules, which could be removed by 0.1M sodium nitrate and 9 g/L sodium chloride wash buffer. Thus, in the case of B. subtilis NRS-762, 0.1M ionic strength wash buffer was the threshold at which there was complete removal of nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules from the cell surface.


2001 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.William Wilson ◽  
Mary Margaret Wade ◽  
Steven C. Holman ◽  
Franklin R. Champlin

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Bacterial cell surface carries an electrical charge due to the myriad functional groups present, as well as assortment of ions and molecules nonspecifically adsorbed to the cell surface. Thus, solution in contact with the bacterial cell surface play a critical role in influencing the overall surface charge characteristics through conferring nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules. Various wash buffers are commonly used in removing nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules for revealing the real surface charge of the bacterium. Using electrophoretic mobility measurement of zeta potential, this study attempted to understand the surface charge characteristics of Bacillus subtilis NRS-762 (ATCC 8473) with the help of three wash buffers: deionized (DI) water, 0.1M sodium nitrate, and 9 g/L sodium chloride. Experiment results revealed that B. subtilis NRS-762 was negatively charged over the entire pH range from 1.5 to 12. Specifically, with deionized water as wash buffer, the point-of-zero-charge (pHzpc) was at pH 1.5, which indicated that large amount of negatively charged functional groups were present on the cell surface. Comparison between the zeta potential-pH profiles of B. subtilis NRS-762 cultivated at 30 oC and 37 oC revealed that the profile for growth at 37 oC was more negatively charged over the entire pH range compared to that for growth at 30 oC. This highlighted that physiological adaptation might had occurred on the cell surface for coping with growth at a higher temperature. Zeta potential-pH profiles obtained revealed that DI water could not remove significant quantities of the nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules. On the other hand, the zeta potential-pH profiles of cells washed with 0.1M sodium nitrate and 9 g/L sodium chloride overlapped each other substantially, and were more negatively charged over the pH range from 2 to 11, compared to that of cells washed with DI water. This revealed substantial removal of nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules with the use of 0.1M sodium nitrate (0.1M ionic strength) and 9 g/L sodium chloride (0.15M ionic strength), which helped reveal the actual surface charge of B. subtilis NRS-762 cells. Collectively, actual surface charge of B. subtilis NRS-762 was masked by nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules, which could be removed by 0.1M sodium nitrate and 9 g/L sodium chloride wash buffer. Thus, in the case of B. subtilis NRS-762, 0.1M ionic strength wash buffer was the threshold at which there was complete removal of nonspecifically adsorbed ions and molecules from the cell surface.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Bacteria surface charge derives its meaning from the cell’s environment; thus, there is no one specific surface charge. Determining the surface charge of bacteria in its native environment requires measuring the proxy variable, zeta potential, using cells obtained from field studies. However, lack of adequate cell mass and concerns over measurement of a mixed species consortia rather than a specific species meant that bacteria surface charge measurement require biomass obtained from laboratory shake flask pure culture. Often grown in rich medium where myriad proteins and ions nonspecifically adsorbed on the cell envelope or peptidoglycan layer, standard procedures for preparing the cell mass require repeated steps of washing and centrifugation with various wash buffers, the efficacies of which are poorly understood. This report describes a systematic study on how wash buffers of different composition and salinity affect the efficiency of removing nonspecifically adsorbed biomolecules and ions from Escherichia coli DH5a (ATCC 53868) cultured aerobically (shake flask, 37 oC and 230 rpm) in LB Lennox medium. Using zeta potential-pH profiles over pH 1 to 12 as readout, proxy measurement of wash buffers’ efficacies showed that efficiency of removing nonspecifically adsorbed ions and metabolites positively correlates with wash buffer ionic strength. More importantly, 0.15M ionic strength (i.e., 9 g/L NaCl and phosphate buffer saline) seems to be the minimum below which there appeared to be little removal of nonspecifically adsorbed biomolecules (deionized water wash as control). On the other hand, high ionic strength of 0.6M (0.1M sodium citrate) significantly changed the point of zero charge (pHzpc), a reference marker for the removal of ions intrinsic to the cell envelope; thus, indicating significant cell surface damage. Collectively, results obtained provided important pointers for wash buffer choice concerning preservation of cell envelope integrity. Finally, is there a true cell surface charge? Yes, but how to define it? How many “layers” of adsorbed biomolecules? Philosophically, cells in culture broth are coated with layers of metabolites, proteins and ions; hence, desire to reveal the true surface charge is essentially a decoating process, where wash buffers of increasing ionic strength could remove each layer through charge screening. Where is the endpoint? This research suggests that ionic strength of wash buffers chosen should be similar to that of the environment the research is seeking to address. Imagine a single bacterium suspended in LB medium, what is its relevant surface charge? It is the one where the loosely associated ions and metabolites can be removed, similar to the constant adsorption and desorption processes that the cell experiences in its growth environment. Thus, deionized water wash provides a good estimate of the bacteria surface charge as grown in specific medium.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenfa Ng

Bacteria surface charge derives its meaning from the cell’s environment; thus, there is no specific surface charge. Determining the surface charge of bacteria in its native environment requires measuring the proxy variable, zeta potential, using cells obtained from field studies. However, lack of adequate cell mass and concerns over measurement of a mixed species consortia rather than a specific species meant that bacteria surface charge measurement require biomass obtained from pure culture. Often grown in rich medium where myriad proteins and ions nonspecifically adsorbed onto the cell envelope or peptidoglycan layer, standard procedures for preparing the cell mass incorporate repeated steps of washing and centrifugation with various wash buffers, the efficacies of which are poorly understood. This report describes a systematic study on how wash buffers of different composition and salinity affect the efficiency of removing nonspecifically adsorbed biomolecules and ions from Escherichia coli DH5α (ATCC 53868) cultured aerobically (shake flask, 37 oC and 230 rpm) in LB Lennox medium. Using zeta potential-pH profiles over pH 1 to 12 as readout, proxy measurement of wash buffers’ efficacies showed that efficiency of removing nonspecifically adsorbed ions and metabolites positively correlates with wash buffer ionic strength. More importantly, 0.15M ionic strength (i.e., 9 g/L NaCl and phosphate buffer saline) seems to be the minimum below which there appeared to be little removal of nonspecifically adsorbed biomolecules. On the other hand, high ionic strength of 0.6M (e.g., 0.1M sodium citrate) significantly changed the point of zero charge (pHzpc), a reference marker for removing ions intrinsic to the cell envelope; thus, indicating significant cell surface damage. Collectively, results obtained inform wash buffer choice with regards to preserving cell envelope integrity. But, is there a true cell surface charge? Yes, but how do we define it in number of “layers” of adsorbed biomolecules? Philosophically, cells in culture broth are coated with layers of metabolites, proteins and ions; hence, desire to reveal the true surface charge is essentially a decoating process, where wash buffers of increasing ionic strength remove each layer via charge screening. However, where is the endpoint? This research offers a different perspective and answer: i.e., ionic strength of wash buffers chosen should be similar to that of the environment the research is seeking to address. Imagine a single bacterium suspended in LB medium, where there is constant adsorption and desorption of biomolecules as the cell grows: what is its relevant surface charge? It is the one where the loosely associated ions and metabolites is removed. Thus, deionized water wash provides a good estimate of the bacteria surface charge as grown in specific medium.


Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1519
Author(s):  
Leixin Ouyang ◽  
Rubia Shaik ◽  
Ruiting Xu ◽  
Ge Zhang ◽  
Jiang Zhe

Many bio-functions of cells can be regulated by their surface charge characteristics. Mapping surface charge density in a single cell’s surface is vital to advance the understanding of cell behaviors. This article demonstrates a method of cell surface charge mapping via electrostatic cell–nanoparticle (NP) interactions. Fluorescent nanoparticles (NPs) were used as the marker to investigate single cells’ surface charge distribution. The nanoparticles with opposite charges were electrostatically bonded to the cell surface; a stack of fluorescence distribution on a cell’s surface at a series of vertical distances was imaged and analyzed. By establishing a relationship between fluorescent light intensity and number of nanoparticles, cells’ surface charge distribution was quantified from the fluorescence distribution. Two types of cells, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and HeLa cells, were tested. From the measured surface charge density of a group of single cells, the average zeta potentials of the two types of cells were obtained, which are in good agreement with the standard electrophoretic light scattering measurement. This method can be used for rapid surface charge mapping of single particles or cells, and can advance cell-surface-charge characterization applications in many biomedical fields.


2016 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 548-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debasis Mandal ◽  
Sandeep Kumar Dash ◽  
Balaram Das ◽  
Sourav Chattopadhyay ◽  
Totan Ghosh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document