scholarly journals Molecular Types and Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer- While Molecular Shifting is More Common in Luminal a Tumors, The Pathologic Complete Response is Most Frequently Observed in Her-2 Like Tumors

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (21) ◽  
pp. 9379-9383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derya Kivrak Salim ◽  
Hasan Mutlu ◽  
Melek Karakurt Eryilmaz ◽  
Fatma Yalcin Musri ◽  
Deniz Tural ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11582-e11582
Author(s):  
J. Lee ◽  
W. Min ◽  
S. Kim ◽  
B. Son

e11582 Background: Serum Her-2/neu has been known as molecular surrogating marker of predicting treatment response in Her-2 positive breast cancer. We compare the change of serum Her-2/neu during neoadjuvant chemotherapy between trastuzumab(H) and anthyracyline(A) based treatment. Methods: All breast cancers were tested by immunohistochemical stain and FISH for Her-2/neu before treatment. Serum Her-2/neu was twice measured by Chemiluminescence immunoassay(ADVIA centaurTMsystem) before neoadjuvant chemotherapy and before operation. The cutoff value was 10.2 mg/ml according to previous study. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was considered as no residual tumor or remnant ductal carcinoma in situ, partial response (PR) was less than 50% decrease in maximal diameter in pathologic tumor size. Results: Serum Her-2/neu of trastuzumab group was more decreased than of anthyracyline group (H; 12.9 ± 14.5 ng/mL vs. A; 2.2 ± 1.2 ng/mL, p=0.024). In trastuzumab group, pCR was relatively correlated with decrease of serum Her-2/neu (PR: 0.8 ± 0.84 ng/ml vs. pCR: 21.1 ± 13.2 ng/ml, p=0.08). Conclusions: A decrease in serum Her-2/neu levels during treatment was associated with pathologic response in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, particularly, trastuzumab-based regimen. Serum Her-2/neu levels may serve to monitoring neoadjuvant therapy in Her-2/neu positive breast cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 536-536
Author(s):  
Agnes Ducoulombier ◽  
Aurelie Dumont ◽  
Emmanuelle Tresch ◽  
Jinying Chen ◽  
Diane Pannier ◽  
...  

536 Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) is the main prognostic factor after preoperative chemotherapy. Predictive factors of pCR are mainly histological type, hormonal status, HER2 overexpression. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in genes encoding drug transporters, drug metabolizing enzymes and target genes can affect drug efficacy and may explain therapeutic failures. The aim of the study was to identify SNPs associated with pCR in breast cancer (BC) patients (PTS) with HER-2 overexpression and treated with sequential neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Among PTS treated with NCT and included between 2007 and 2012, 46 PTS had HER-2 overexpressing BC, mostly ductal carcinoma (91.3%), greater than or equal to T2 (97.7%) and N1 (65.2%).91.3% of PTS received 3 FEC 100 - 3 Taxotere and 18 cycles of trastuzumab (3-18). Genotyping of 46 SNPs was performed on germline DNA using real time PCR. pCR was correlated with clinicopathologic features and genotypes using logistic regression. Results: pCR was evaluable for 45 PTS according to Sataloff criteria: pCR rate was 40% (95% CI 25.7-55.7%) and was significantly associated with hormonal status: 60.9% in negative hormone receptor tumors and 18.2% in positive hormone receptor tumors (p = 0.004). Four SNPs were significantly associated with pCR. All patients homozygotes CC for ERCC1-rs11615 respond to NCT (p=0.024). The response rate was higher for patients homozygotes TT for NQO2-rs1143684 (59.1%; p=0.018), PTS carrying one or two C allele for DNASE2B-rs3738573 (50%; p=0.025) and PTS carrying one or two C allele for MDR1-rs1045642(51.5%; p=0.012). Conclusions: In this pilot study 4 SNPs were significantly associated with pCR and may be useful to predict response to NCT (Anthracyclines/Taxanes/Trastuzumab regimen) for HER-2 overexpressing breast tumors. Moreover, DNASE2B-rs3738573 and ERCC1-rs11615, two polymorphisms located in genes involved in DNA reparation, have never been described as predictive markers for BC neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (The first 3 authors contributed equally to this work.)


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1122-1122
Author(s):  
Rachel Adams Greenup ◽  
Aditya Bardia ◽  
Julliette M Buckley ◽  
Andrzej Niemierko ◽  
Melissa Camp ◽  
...  

1122 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly being used in the treatment of breast cancer, yet data on efficacy and significance of pathologic complete response (pCR) is limited among young women. We sought to determine whether timing of chemotherapy impacted disease-free (DFS) or overall survival (OS), and whether pCR is associated with improved prognosis among young women with breast cancer. Methods: We performed an IRB-approved review of women ≤40 years old who received treatment for stage I-III breast cancer during 1996-2008 at our institution. DFS and OS were determined through use of state tumor registry, death certificate data, and Social Security Master Death Index. Tumor biology was categorized as hormone receptor positive (HR+), HER-2+, or triple negative (TN) breast cancer. pCR was defined as lack of invasive cancer in the breast and axilla on final pathologic review. Cox regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the hazard ratios (HRs) of the association between chemotherapy and outcomes. Results: 370 women ≤40 years old (median age = 36.5, range: 22-40) were treated with systemic therapy for stage I-III breast cancer. 54.7% of tumors were HR+, 20.9% were HER-2+, and 24.4% were TN. After adjusting for stage, there was no difference in DFS or OS among women who received neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.6 and 0.5 respectively). pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy was higher among HER-2+ (50%) and TN (28.6%) tumors when compared to HR+ tumors (17.6%). Among women who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 10-year DFS and OS rates were significantly higher when pCR was achieved when compared to lack of pCR (HR=0.20, p value=0.01 and HR=0.13, p=0.05). pCR with neoadjuvant chemotherapy trended towards higher 10-year DFS and OS when compared to women who received adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=0.30, p value=0.08 and HR=0.20, p=0.1). Conclusions: pCR after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved disease-free and overall survival in young women with breast cancer. Pathologic complete response may be a valuable surrogate marker for survival, and aid in the evaluation of therapeutic efficacy in young breast cancer patients.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 608
Author(s):  
Toshiaki Iwase ◽  
Aaroh Parikh ◽  
Seyedeh S. Dibaj ◽  
Yu Shen ◽  
Tushaar Vishal Shrimanker ◽  
...  

Our previous study indicated that a high amount of visceral adipose tissue was associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with early breast cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, inconsistency was observed in the prognostic role of body composition in breast cancer treatment outcomes. In the present study, we aimed to validate our previous research by performing a comprehensive body composition analysis in patients with a standardized clinical background. We included 198 patients with stage III breast cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy between January 2007 and June 2015. The impact of body composition on pathologic complete response and survival outcomes was determined. Body composition measurements had no significant effect on pathologic complete response. Survival analysis showed a low ratio of total visceral adipose tissue to subcutaneous adipose tissue (V/S ratio ≤ 34) was associated with shorter overall survival. A changepoint method determined that a V/S ratio cutoff of 34 maximized the difference in overall survival. Our study indicated the prognostic effect of body composition measurements in patients with locally advanced breast cancer compared to those with early breast cancer. Further investigation will be needed to clarify the biological mechanism underlying the association of V/S ratio with prognosis in locally advanced breast cancer.


Oncotarget ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (41) ◽  
pp. 26406-26416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Santonja ◽  
Alfonso Sánchez-Muñoz ◽  
Ana Lluch ◽  
Maria Rosario Chica-Parrado ◽  
Joan Albanell ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document