scholarly journals The kinetochore prevents centromere-proximal crossover recombination during meiosis

eLife ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadine Vincenten ◽  
Lisa-Marie Kuhl ◽  
Isabel Lam ◽  
Ashwini Oke ◽  
Alastair RW Kerr ◽  
...  

During meiosis, crossover recombination is essential to link homologous chromosomes and drive faithful chromosome segregation. Crossover recombination is non-random across the genome, and centromere-proximal crossovers are associated with an increased risk of aneuploidy, including Trisomy 21 in humans. Here, we identify the conserved Ctf19/CCAN kinetochore sub-complex as a major factor that minimizes potentially deleterious centromere-proximal crossovers in budding yeast. We uncover multi-layered suppression of pericentromeric recombination by the Ctf19 complex, operating across distinct chromosomal distances. The Ctf19 complex prevents meiotic DNA break formation, the initiating event of recombination, proximal to the centromere. The Ctf19 complex independently drives the enrichment of cohesin throughout the broader pericentromere to suppress crossovers, but not DNA breaks. This non-canonical role of the kinetochore in defining a chromosome domain that is refractory to crossovers adds a new layer of functionality by which the kinetochore prevents the incidence of chromosome segregation errors that generate aneuploid gametes.

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 212-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rupert Öllinger ◽  
Manfred Alsheimer ◽  
Ricardo Benavente

Synaptonemal complexes (SCs) are evolutionary conserved, meiosis-specific structures that play a central role in synapsis of homologous chromosomes, chiasmata distribution, and chromosome segregation. However, it is still for the most part unclear how SCs do assemble during meiotic prophase. Major components of mammalian SCs are the meiosis-specific proteins SCP1, 2, and 3. To investigate the role of SCP1 in SC assembly, we expressed SCP1 in a heterologous system, i.e., in COS-7 cells that normally do not express SC proteins. Notably, under these experimental conditions SCP1 is able to form structures that closely resemble SCs (i.e., polycomplexes). Moreover, we show that mutations that modify the length of the central α-helical domain of SCP1 influence the width of polycomplexes. Finally, we demonstrate that deletions of the nonhelical N- or C-termini both affect polycomplex assembly, although in a different manner. We conclude that SCP1 is a primary determinant of SC assembly that plays a key role in synapsis of homologous chromosomes.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (15) ◽  
pp. 1798-1810
Author(s):  
Meenakshi Agarwal ◽  
Hui Jin ◽  
Melainia McClain ◽  
Jinbo Fan ◽  
Bailey A. Koch ◽  
...  

The budding yeast centrosome, often called the spindle pole body (SPB), nucleates microtubules for chromosome segregation during cell division. An appendage, called the half bridge, attaches to one side of the SPB and regulates SPB duplication and separation. Like DNA, the SPB is duplicated only once per cell cycle. During meiosis, however, after one round of DNA replication, two rounds of SPB duplication and separation are coupled with homologue segregation in meiosis I and sister-chromatid segregation in meiosis II. How SPB duplication and separation are regulated during meiosis remains to be elucidated, and whether regulation in meiosis differs from that in mitosis is unclear. Here we show that overproduction of the half-bridge component Kar1 leads to premature SPB separation during meiosis. Furthermore, excessive Kar1 induces SPB overduplication to form supernumerary SPBs, leading to chromosome missegregation and erroneous ascospore formation. Kar1-­mediated SPB duplication bypasses the requirement of dephosphorylation of Sfi1, another half-bridge component previously identified as a licensing factor. Our results therefore reveal an unexpected role of Kar1 in licensing meiotic SPB duplication and suggest a unique mechanism of SPB regulation during budding yeast meiosis.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Previato de Almeida ◽  
Jared M. Evatt ◽  
Hoa H. Chuong ◽  
Emily L. Kurdzo ◽  
Craig A. Eyster ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTFaithful chromosome segregation during meiosis I depends upon the formation of connections between homologous chromosomes. Crossovers between homologs connect the partners allowing them to attach to the meiotic spindle as a unit, such that they migrate away from one another at anaphase I. Homologous partners also become connected by pairing of their centromeres in meiotic prophase. This centromere pairing can promote proper segregation at anaphase I of partners that have failed to become joined by a crossover. Centromere pairing is mediated by synaptonemal complex (SC) proteins that persist at the centromere when the SC disassembles. Here, using mouse spermatocyte and yeast model systems, we tested the role of shugoshin in promoting meiotic centromere pairing by protecting centromeric synaptonemal components from disassembly. The results show that shugoshin protects centromeric SC in meiotic prophase and, in anaphase, promotes the proper segregation of partner chromosomes that are not linked by a crossover.SIGNIFICANCEMeiotic crossovers form a connection between homologous chromosomes that allows them to attach to the spindle as a single unit in meiosis I. In humans, failures in this process are a leading cause of aneuploidy. A recently described process, called centromere pairing, can also help connect meiotic chromosome partners in meiosis. Homologous chromosomes become tightly joined by a structure called the synaptonemal complex (SC) in meiotic prophase. After the SC disassembles, persisting SC proteins at the centromeres mediate their pairing. Here, studies in mouse spermatocytes and yeast are used to show that the shugoshin protein helps SC components persist at centromeres and helps centromere pairing promote the proper segregation of yeast chromosomes that fail to become tethered by crossovers.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran Challa ◽  
V Ghanim Fajish ◽  
Miki Shinohara ◽  
Franz Klein ◽  
Susan M. Gasser ◽  
...  

AbstractSister chromatid cohesion on chromosome arms is essential for the segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis I while it is dispensable for sister chromatid separation during mitosis. It was assumed that, unlike the situation in mitosis, chromosome arms retain cohesion prior to onset of anaphase-I. Paradoxically, reduced immunostaining signals of meiosis-specific cohesin, including the kleisin Rec8, from the chromosomes were observed during late prophase-I of budding yeast. This decrease is seen in the absence of Rec8 cleavage and depends on condensin-mediated recruitment of Polo-like kinase (PLK/Cdc5). In this study, we confirmed that this release indeed accompanies the dissociation of acetylated Smc3 as well as Rec8 from meiotic chromosomes during late prophase-I. This release requires, in addition to PLK, the cohesin regulator, Wapl (Rad61/Wpl1 in yeast), and Dbf4-dependent Cdc7 kinase (DDK). Meiosis-specific phosphorylation of Rad61/Wpl1 and Rec8 by PLK and DDK collaboratively promote this release. This process is similar to the vertebrate “prophase” pathway for cohesin release during G2 phase and pro-metaphase. In yeast, meiotic cohesin release coincides with PLK-dependent compaction of chromosomes in late meiotic prophase-I. We suggest that yeast uses this highly regulated cleavage-independent pathway to remove cohesin during late prophase-I to facilitate morphogenesis of condensed metaphase-I chromosomes.Author SummaryIn meiosis the life and health of future generations is decided upon. Any failure in chromosome segregation has a detrimental impact. Therefore, it is currently believed that the physical connections between homologous chromosomes are maintained by meiotic cohesin with exceptional stability. Indeed, it was shown that cohesive cohesin does not show an appreciable turnover during long periods in oocyte development. In this context, it was long assumed but not properly investigated, that the prophase pathway for cohesin release would be specific to mitotic cells and will be safely suppressed during meiosis so as not to endanger the valuable chromosome connections. However, a previous study on budding yeast meiosis suggests the presence of cleavage-independent pathway of cohesin release during late prophase-I. In the work presented here we confirmed that the prophase pathway is not suppressed during meiosis, at least in budding yeast and showed that this cleavage-independent release is regulated by meiosis-specific phosphorylation of two cohesin subunits, Rec8 and Rad61(Wapl) by two cell-cycle regulators, PLK and DDK. Our results suggest that late meiotic prophase-I actively controls cohesin dynamics on meiotic chromosomes for chromosome segregation.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon David Brown ◽  
Olga Dorota Jarosinska ◽  
Alexander Lorenz

AbstractHop1 is a component of the meiosis-specific chromosome axis and belongs to the evolutionarily conserved family of HORMA domain proteins. Hop1 and its orthologs in higher eukaryotes are a major factor in promoting double-strand DNA break formation and inter-homolog recombination. In budding yeast and mammals they are also involved in a meiotic checkpoint kinase cascade monitoring the completion of double-strand DNA break repair. We used the fission yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, which lacks a canonical synaptonemal complex to test whether Hop1 has a role beyond supporting the generation of double-strand DNA breaks and facilitating inter-homolog recombination events. We determined how mutants of homologous recombination factors genetically interact with hop1, studied the role(s) of the HORMA domain of Hop1, and characterized a bio-informatically predicted interactor of Hop1, Aho1 (SPAC688.03c). Our observations indicate that in fission yeast, Hop1 does require its HORMA domain to support wild-type levels of meiotic recombination and localization to meiotic chromatin. Furthermore, we show that hop1Δ only weakly interacts genetically with mutants of homologous recombination factors, and in fission yeast likely has no major role beyond break formation and promoting inter-homolog events. We speculate that after the evolutionary loss of the synaptonemal complex, Hop1 likely has become less important for modulating recombination outcome during meiosis in fission yeast, and that this led to a concurrent rewiring of genetic pathways controlling meiotic recombination.


2015 ◽  
Vol 209 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Yang ◽  
Dai Tsuchiya ◽  
Soni Lacefield

The spindle checkpoint ensures accurate chromosome segregation by sending a signal from an unattached kinetochore to inhibit anaphase onset. Numerous studies have described the role of Bub3 in checkpoint activation, but less is known about its functions apart from the spindle checkpoint. In this paper, we demonstrate that Bub3 has an unexpected role promoting metaphase progression in budding yeast. Loss of Bub3 resulted in a metaphase delay that was not a consequence of aneuploidy or the activation of a checkpoint. Instead, bub3Δ cells had impaired binding of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) with its activator Cdc20, and the delay could be rescued by Cdc20 overexpression. Kinetochore localization of Bub3 was required for normal mitotic progression, and Bub3 and Cdc20 colocalized at the kinetochore. Although Bub1 binds Bub3 at the kinetochore, bub1Δ cells did not have compromised APC/C and Cdc20 binding. The results demonstrate that Bub3 has a previously unknown function at the kinetochore in activating APC/C-Cdc20 for normal mitotic progression.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1249-1249
Author(s):  
Jagannath Pal ◽  
Jie Ding ◽  
Subodh Kumar ◽  
Zachary Hunter ◽  
Teresa Calimeri ◽  
...  

Abstract We previously reported that telomerase activity is elevated in multiple myeloma (MM), and its inhibition induces telomere shortening and growth arrest in cancer cells. We have now gone on to study the role of telomerase in DNA break repair and genome maintenance in MM cells. To demonstrate the role of telomerase in DNA break repair: 1) We used g-H2AX staining (marker for DNA breaks) and comet assay, a gel-based technique for detection of DNA breaks in individual cells, and observed that telomerase inhibition leads to significantly increased DNA breaks in MM cells; 2) We have confirmed the repair and re-circularization of a linearized plasmid by telomerase in MM cell extracts; and 3) Demonstrated increased genomic instability, especially deletions, upon telomerase inhibition in MM cells. This does not necessarily suggest role of telomerase in DNA repair as telomerase inhibition with attrition of telomeres can also lead to increased instability. To confirm the direct role of telomerase in DNA repair in MM, we now present the evidence and mechanism of DNA break repair by telomerase by demonstrating: 1) The presence of “TTAGGG” repeats at non-telomeric sites at higher frequency in cancer vs normal cells; and 2) Decline in “TTAGGG” insertions at non-telomeric sites in MM cells following suppression of telomerase. To evaluate rare telomeric insertions in the cancer genome, we created libraries of genomic DNA fragments enriched for “TTAGGG” sequences from primary MM and matching normal PBMCs derived from the same patient. The libraries were sequenced using Illumina platform and reads containing 4 or more telomeric repeats were filtered for further analysis. Telomeric insertion sites were located from unique genomic sequences immediately following TTAGGG at one end of each read. By subtracting telomeric insertions detected in normal cells, from MM cells of same patent, we identified 94 unique loci with telomeric insertion in the primary MM cells. To investigate if telomerase inserts new “TTAGGG” repeats within cancer genome following DNA breaks, UV-treated RPMI cells were incubated with and without telomerase inhibitor for 4 days, cultured without telomerase inhibition for another 6 days, harvested and DNA libraries prepared and enriched for telomeric fragments and subjected to sequencing. DNA from cells preserved before UV treatment (day 0) was used as baseline control and their telomeric insertions were subtracted from UV-treated control and telomerase-inhibited cells. Following induction of DNA breaks by UV, 21 and 3 new telomeric insertions were detected in control and telomerase-inhibited MM cells, respectively, indicating 86% reduction of telomeric insertions within MM cell genome upon telomerase inhibition. Analyses of flanking sequences indicated that 71% of the new telomeric insertions in the UV-treated control cells occurred at sites which did not have any pre-existing “TTAGGG” repeats. Similarly in primary MM cells, 67%, 29% and 4% of the new insertions were observed at positions containing 0, 1 and 2 copies of “TTAGGG” repeats, respectively, indicating that telomerase could use both telomeric as well as non-telomeric DNA as substrate for interstitial telomeric sequence insertions. Evaluation of a few telomeric insertions by Q-PCR confirmed the sequencing data. For an insertion on chr16 (q24.1), a 9.2-fold increase in telomeric signal in UV-treated control relative to background (day 0) cells was observed, whereas the same locus in telomerase-inhibited sample showed near background amplification. We also looked for somatic telomere insertions in 55 largely untreated patients with Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia for whom whole genome sequencing data was available. The absolute number of telomere insertions correlated with the number of somatic structural variants (translocation, inversions, and large deletions) per genome (tau = 0.3 p=0.001) indicating a possible role in DNA double stranded break repair. Thus telomerase contributes to survival of MM and other cancer cells, not only by preventing telomere attrition, but also the repair of DNA breaks which involves the insertion of telomeric repeats within genome. Inhibition of telomerase therefore, may increase the efficacy of chemotherapeutic agents targeting DNA repair. Evaluating interstitial telomeric insertion pattern in cancer could also be a potentially useful tool to study tumor progression or evolution upon treatment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (19) ◽  
pp. 9417-9422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Previato de Almeida ◽  
Jared M. Evatt ◽  
Hoa H. Chuong ◽  
Emily L. Kurdzo ◽  
Craig A. Eyster ◽  
...  

Faithful chromosome segregation during meiosis I depends upon the formation of connections between homologous chromosomes. Crossovers between homologs connect the partners, allowing them to attach to the meiotic spindle as a unit, such that they migrate away from one another at anaphase I. Homologous partners also become connected by pairing of their centromeres in meiotic prophase. This centromere pairing can promote proper segregation at anaphase I of partners that have failed to become joined by a crossover. Centromere pairing is mediated by synaptonemal complex (SC) proteins that persist at the centromere when the SC disassembles. Here, using mouse spermatocyte and yeast model systems, we tested the role of shugoshin in promoting meiotic centromere pairing by protecting centromeric synaptonemal components from disassembly. The results show that shugoshin protects the centromeric SC in meiotic prophase and, in anaphase, promotes the proper segregation of partner chromosomes that are not linked by a crossover.


Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (4) ◽  
pp. 1547-1560
Author(s):  
Cesar E Guerra ◽  
David B Kaback

AbstractDuring meiosis, homologous chromosomes pair and then segregate from each other at the first meiotic division. Homologous centromeres appear to be aligned when chromosomes are paired. The role of centromere alignment in meiotic chromosome segregation was investigated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae diploids that contained one intact copy of chromosome I and one copy bisected into two functional centromere-containing fragments. The centromere on one fragment was aligned with the centromere on the intact chromosome while the centromere on the other fragment was either aligned or misaligned. Fragments containing aligned centromeres segregated efficiently from the intact chromosome, while fragments containing misaligned centromeres segregated much less efficiently from the intact chromosome. Less efficient segregation was correlated with crossing over in the region between the misaligned centromeres. Models that suggest that these crossovers impede proper segregation by preventing either a segregation-promoting chromosome alignment on the meiotic spindle or some physical interaction between homologous centromeres are proposed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
Régis E. Meyer ◽  
Jamin Brown ◽  
Lindsay Beck ◽  
Dean S. Dawson

In budding yeast meiosis, homologous chromosomes become linked by chiasmata and then move back and forth on the spindle until they are bioriented, with the kinetochores of the partners attached to microtubules from opposite spindle poles. Certain mutations in the conserved kinase, Mps1, result in catastrophic meiotic segregation errors but mild mitotic defects. We tested whether Dam1, a known substrate of Mps1, was necessary for its critical meiotic role. We found that kinetochore–microtubule attachments are established even when Dam1 is not phosphorylated by Mps1, but that Mps1 phosphorylation of Dam1 sustains those connections. But the meiotic defects when Dam1 is not phosphorylated are not nearly as catastrophic as when Mps1 is inactivated. The results demonstrate that one meiotic role of Mps1 is to stabilize connections that have been established between kinetochores and microtubles by phosphorylating Dam1.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document