scholarly journals Direct neural pathways convey distinct visual information to Drosophila mushroom bodies

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Vogt ◽  
Yoshinori Aso ◽  
Toshihide Hige ◽  
Stephan Knapek ◽  
Toshiharu Ichinose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Information ◽  
Mushroom Body ◽  
Mushroom Bodies ◽  
Small Subset ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Neural Pathways ◽  
Associative Memories ◽  
Visual Projection ◽  
Olfactory Input ◽  
Odor Representation

Previously, we demonstrated that visual and olfactory associative memories of Drosophila share mushroom body (MB) circuits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib46">Vogt et al., 2014</xref>). Unlike for odor representation, the MB circuit for visual information has not been characterized. Here, we show that a small subset of MB Kenyon cells (KCs) selectively responds to visual but not olfactory stimulation. The dendrites of these atypical KCs form a ventral accessory calyx (vAC), distinct from the main calyx that receives olfactory input. We identified two types of visual projection neurons (VPNs) directly connecting the optic lobes and the vAC. Strikingly, these VPNs are differentially required for visual memories of color and brightness. The segregation of visual and olfactory domains in the MB allows independent processing of distinct sensory memories and may be a conserved form of sensory representations among insects.

scholarly journals Author response: Direct neural pathways convey distinct visual information to Drosophila mushroom bodies

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katrin Vogt ◽  
Yoshinori Aso ◽  
Toshihide Hige ◽  
Stephan Knapek ◽  
Toshiharu Ichinose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Information ◽  
Author Response ◽  
Mushroom Bodies ◽  
Neural Pathways

scholarly journals Evolution, Discovery, and Interpretations of Arthropod Mushroom Bodies

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-37
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Strausfeld ◽  
Lars Hansen ◽  
Yongsheng Li ◽  
Robert S. Gomez ◽  
Kei Ito
Keyword(s):  
Mushroom Body ◽  
Social Insect ◽  
Single Species ◽  
Mushroom Bodies ◽  
Sensory Stimuli ◽  
Anatomical Studies ◽  
History Of Research ◽  
History Of ◽  
Olfactory Input ◽  
Innate Behaviors

Mushroom bodies are prominent neuropils found in annelids and in all arthropod groups except crustaceans. First explicitly identified in 1850, the mushroom bodies differ in size and complexity between taxa, as well as between different castes of a single species of social insect. These differences led some early biologists to suggest that the mushroom bodies endow an arthropod with intelligence or the ability to execute voluntary actions, as opposed to innate behaviors. Recent physiological studies and mutant analyses have led to divergent interpretations. One interpretation is that the mushroom bodies conditionally relay to higher protocerebral centers information about sensory stimuli and the context in which they occur. Another interpretation is that they play a central role in learning and memory. Anatomical studies suggest that arthropod mushroom bodies are predominately associated with olfactory pathways except in phylogenetically basal insects. The prominent olfactory input to the mushroom body calyces in more recent insect orders is an acquired character. An overview of the history of research on the mushroom bodies, as well as comparative and evolutionary considerations, provides a conceptual framework for discussing the roles of these neuropils.

scholarly journals Structured sampling of olfactory input by the fly mushroom body

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihao Zheng ◽  
Feng Li ◽  
Corey Fisher ◽  
Iqbal J. Ali ◽  
Nadiya Sharifi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Network Structure ◽  
Mushroom Body ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Fruit Fly ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Unified View ◽  
Olfactory Input ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Random Connectivity

AbstractAssociative memory formation and recall in the adult fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is subserved by the mushroom body (MB). Upon arrival in the MB, sensory information undergoes a profound transformation. Olfactory projection neurons (PNs), the main MB input, exhibit broadly tuned, sustained, and stereotyped responses to odorants; in contrast, their postsynaptic targets in the MB, the Kenyon cells (KCs), are nonstereotyped, narrowly tuned, and only briefly responsive to odorants. Theory and experiment have suggested that this transformation is implemented by random connectivity between KCs and PNs. However, this hypothesis has been challenging to test, given the difficulty of mapping synaptic connections between large numbers of neurons to achieve a unified view of neuronal network structure. Here we used a recent whole-brain electron microscopy (EM) volume of the adult fruit fly to map large numbers of PN- to-KC connections at synaptic resolution. Comparison of the observed connectome to precisely defined null models revealed unexpected network structure, in which a subset of food-responsive PN types converge on individual downstream KCs more frequently than expected. The connectivity bias is consistent with the neurogeometry: axons of the overconvergent PNs tend to arborize near one another in the MB main calyx, making local KC dendrites more likely to receive input from those types. Computational modeling of the observed PN-to-KC network showed that input from the overconvergent PN types is better discriminated than input from other types. These results suggest an ‘associative fovea’ for olfaction, in that the MB is wired to better discriminate more frequently occurring and ethologically relevant combinations of food-related odors.

scholarly journals Long-range projection neurons in the taste circuit of Drosophila

eLife ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heesoo Kim ◽  
Colleen Kirkhart ◽  
Kristin Scott
Keyword(s):  
Mushroom Body ◽  
Conditioned Aversion ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Neural Pathways ◽  
Learning Centers ◽  
Feeding Behaviors ◽  
Learned Behavior ◽  
Learned Behaviors ◽  
Receptor Neurons ◽  
Lateral Protocerebrum

Taste compounds elicit innate feeding behaviors and act as rewards or punishments to entrain other cues. The neural pathways by which taste compounds influence innate and learned behaviors have not been resolved. Here, we identify three classes of taste projection neurons (TPNs) in Drosophila melanogaster distinguished by their morphology and taste selectivity. TPNs receive input from gustatory receptor neurons and respond selectively to sweet or bitter stimuli, demonstrating segregated processing of different taste modalities. Activation of TPNs influences innate feeding behavior, whereas inhibition has little effect, suggesting parallel pathways. Moreover, two TPN classes are absolutely required for conditioned taste aversion, a learned behavior. The TPNs essential for conditioned aversion project to the superior lateral protocerebrum (SLP) and convey taste information to mushroom body learning centers. These studies identify taste pathways from sensory detection to higher brain that influence innate behavior and are essential for learned responses to taste compounds.

scholarly journals Olfactory Learning in Drosophila

Physiology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 338-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Germain U. Busto ◽  
Isaac Cervantes-Sandoval ◽  
Ronald L. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Dopaminergic Neurons ◽  
Mushroom Body ◽  
Sensory Information ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Olfactory Learning ◽  
Mushroom Bodies ◽  
Neural Pathways ◽  
Olfactory Information ◽  
Appetitive Stimuli ◽  
The Brain

Studies of olfactory learning in Drosophila have provided key insights into the brain mechanisms underlying learning and memory. One type of olfactory learning, olfactory classical conditioning, consists of learning the contingency between an odor with an aversive or appetitive stimulus. This conditioning requires the activity of molecules that can integrate the two types of sensory information, the odorant as the conditioned stimulus and the aversive or appetitive stimulus as the unconditioned stimulus, in brain regions where the neural pathways for the two stimuli intersect. Compelling data indicate that a particular form of adenylyl cyclase functions as a molecular integrator of the sensory information in the mushroom body neurons. The neuronal pathway carrying the olfactory information from the antennal lobes to the mushroom body is well described. Accumulating data now show that some dopaminergic neurons provide information about aversive stimuli and octopaminergic neurons about appetitive stimuli to the mushroom body neurons. Inhibitory inputs from the GABAergic system appear to gate olfactory information to the mushroom bodies and thus control the ability to learn about odors. Emerging data obtained by functional imaging procedures indicate that distinct memory traces form in different brain regions and correlate with different phases of memory. The results from these and other experiments also indicate that cross talk between mushroom bodies and several other brain regions is critical for memory formation.

scholarly journals Dissecting neural pathways for forgetting in Drosophila olfactory aversive memory

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (48) ◽  
pp. E6663-E6672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yichun Shuai ◽  
Areekul Hirokawa ◽  
Yulian Ai ◽  
Min Zhang ◽  
Wanhe Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reversal Learning ◽  
Dopaminergic Neurons ◽  
Mushroom Body ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Molecular Pathways ◽  
Neural Pathways ◽  
Active Process ◽  
Glutamatergic Neurons ◽  
Memory Decay ◽  
Over Time

Recent studies have identified molecular pathways driving forgetting and supported the notion that forgetting is a biologically active process. The circuit mechanisms of forgetting, however, remain largely unknown. Here we report two sets of Drosophila neurons that account for the rapid forgetting of early olfactory aversive memory. We show that inactivating these neurons inhibits memory decay without altering learning, whereas activating them promotes forgetting. These neurons, including a cluster of dopaminergic neurons (PAM-β′1) and a pair of glutamatergic neurons (MBON-γ4>γ1γ2), terminate in distinct subdomains in the mushroom body and represent parallel neural pathways for regulating forgetting. Interestingly, although activity of these neurons is required for memory decay over time, they are not required for acute forgetting during reversal learning. Our results thus not only establish the presence of multiple neural pathways for forgetting in Drosophila but also suggest the existence of diverse circuit mechanisms of forgetting in different contexts.

scholarly journals Divergent neural pathways emanating from the lateral parabrachial nucleus mediate distinct components of the pain response

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Chiang ◽  
Eileen K. Nguyen ◽  
Andrew E. Papale ◽  
Sarah E. Ross
Keyword(s):  
Ventromedial Hypothalamus ◽  
Parabrachial Nucleus ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Pain Response ◽  
Neural Pathways ◽  
Bed Nucleus ◽  
Lateral Parabrachial Nucleus ◽  
Efferent Projections ◽  
Efferent Neurons ◽  
Nociceptive Input

ABSTRACTThe lateral parabrachial nucleus (lPBN) is a major target of spinal projection neurons conveying nociceptive input into supraspinal structures. However, the functional role of distinct lPBN efferents for diverse nocifensive responses have remained largely uncharacterized. Here, we show that two populations of efferent neurons from different regions of the lPBN collateralize to distinct targets. Activation of efferent projections to the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) or lateral periaqueductal gray (lPAG) drive escape behaviors, whereas the activation of lPBN efferents to the bed nucleus stria terminalis (BNST) or central amygdala (CEA) generates an aversive memory. Finally, we provide evidence that dynorphin expressing neurons span cytoarchitecturally distinct domains of the lPBN to coordinate these distinct aspects of the nocifensive response.HIGHLIGHTSSpatially segregated neurons in the lPBN collateralize to distinct targets.Distinct output pathways give rise to separate aspects of the pain response.Dynorphin neurons within the lPBN convey noxious information across subdivisions.eTOC BLURBChiang et al. reveal that neurons in spatially segregated regions of the lateral parabrachial nucleus collateralize to distinct targets, and that activation of distinct efferents gives rise to separate components of the nocifensive response.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document