scholarly journals Eradication Rates of Clarithromycin Triple Therapy in Korea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-47
Author(s):  
Seung Joo Kang ◽  
Hye-Kyung Jung ◽  
Yong Chan Lee ◽  
Hyo-Joon Yang ◽  
Seon-Young Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Standard Triple Therapy

Background/Aims: Standard triple therapy, including a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin, has been recommended as the first-line for <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> infection. However, the eradication rate of standard triple therapy has declined over the past years because of the increasing resistance to clarithromycin in Korea. We analyzed the eradication rates and the 10-year change in the eradication rates in Korea.Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed were searched for studies published between January 2007 and June 2018. The pooled eradication rates and their 95% CIs were estimated using a random-effect logistic regression model.Results: Twenty-six randomized controlled studies on standard triple therapy conducted in Korea were selected. The intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol analyses showed pooled eradication rates of standard triple therapy of 71.6% (95% CI, 69.9~73.3%) and 79.6% (95% CI, 76.6~82.2%), respectively. The eradication rate decreased with time. The ITT analysis showed that the 14-day therapy (78.1% [95% CI, 75.2~80.7%]) had significantly higher eradication rates than the 7-day therapy (70.0% [95% CI, 68.5~71.4%]) (<i>P</i><0.01).Conclusions: These results suggest that the eradication rate of standard triple therapy, as the first-line therapy, has shown an unacceptable decrease. The eradication rate increased when the duration of therapy was increased to 14 days, but it was not satisfactory. Therefore, other treatment regimens or therapies based on susceptibility tests should be considered for the first-line therapy.

scholarly journals Is It Time for Quadruple Therapy to be First Line?

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (suppl b) ◽  
pp. 33B-35B ◽  
Author(s):  
Loren Laine
Keyword(s):  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
First Line ◽  
Quadruple Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Clarithromycin Resistance ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Metronidazole Resistance ◽  
H Pylori

The most commonly used regimen forHelicobacter pyloritherapy at present is twice-daily proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy. Bismuth-based therapy is the next most common treatment used by gastroenterologists. When a PPI is combined with bismuth-based triple therapy (quadruple therapy), eradication rates are increased as compared with the triple therapy alone. Three separate randomized trials from three continents that compare quadruple therapy and PPIbased triple therapy revealed remarkably similar results. Eradication rates with PPI-based triple therapy and quadruple therapy were not significantly different. The eradication rates with quadruple therapy were 3% to 6% higher than PPI triple therapy, indicating that quadruple therapy should be no less effective than PPI triple therapy. Furthermore, these two therapies had similar rates of compliance and adverse events.The major potential benefit of the quadruple therapy relates to antibiotic resistance. In patients with clarithromycin resistance, PPIbased triple therapy, but not quadruple therapy, had a significantly lower eradication rate. However, due to its ability to largely overcome metronidazole resistance, quadruple therapy had little if any decrement in eradication rates compared with PPI triple therapy in patients with metronidazole-resistantH pylori. Therefore, quadruple therapy can be considered a first line therapy forH pylori.

Comparison of docetaxel and vinca alkaloid, alone or in combination with other chemotherapy agents, in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A meta-analysis

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7034-7034 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Y. Douillard ◽  
F. Fossela ◽  
V. Georgoulias ◽  
J. L. Pujol ◽  
K. Kubota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vinca Alkaloid ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Platinum Compound ◽  
Vinca Alkaloids ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

7034 Background: Taxanes and vinca alkaloids are commonly used agents, in first-line therapy of advanced NSCLC. As some data in comparative studies have suggested possible differences in survival and safety, we performed a meta-analysis in order to assess the potential benefit of docetaxel-based regimens in comparison with vinca alkaloid-based regimens, in terms of overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Methods: MEDLINE, CANCERLIT and Cochrane Library searches were supplemented by information from clinical study reports and by manual searching of relevant meeting proceedings. Only randomized trials comparing docetaxel-based chemotherapy to vinorelbine- or vindesine-based chemotherapy were included. Outcomes recorded were OS and neutropenia. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were used to estimate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) of OS and the odds ratio (OR) of neutropenia. A HR or OR less than 1 indicates that docetaxel is superior to vinca alkaloids. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q-test. Results: The seven selected trials (six using vinorelbine as vinca alkaloid) yielded a total of 2,867 patients (docetaxel regimens: 1,638; vinca alkaloid regimens: 1,229). Docetaxel was combined with a platinum compound in three trials, with gemcitabine in two trials and used as monotherapy in two trials. The vinca alkaloid was combined with a platinum compound in six trials, and used alone (vinorelbine) in one. The pooled estimate of the OS shows a significant improvement in favor of docetaxel (HR=0.89, 95%CI [0.82;0.96], p=0.03), this benefit persisting after exclusion of the vindesine study (HR=0.90 [0.83;0.98]) and also after excluding monotherapy regimens (HR=0.89 [0.82;0.97]. While neutropenia was common, it was significantly less frequent with docetaxel (OR=0.60 [0.39;0.92], p=0.019), as was febrile neutropenia (OR=0.60 [0.39;0.96], p=0.034). Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis support the superior efficacy (OS) and safety (neutropenia and febrile neutropenia) of docetaxel in first-line therapy of advanced NSCLC as compared with vindesine or vinorelbine. Detailed results, as well as subgroup analyses, will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Clarithromycin Versus Metronidazole in First-Line Helicobacter Pylori Triple Eradication Therapy Based on Resistance to Antimicrobial Agents: Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaki Murata ◽  
Mitsushige Sugimoto ◽  
Hitomi Mizuno ◽  
Takeshi Kanno ◽  
Kiichi Satoh
Keyword(s):  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Eradication Therapy ◽  
First Line ◽  
Sensitivity Testing ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Resistant Strains ◽  
Resistance Rates

Background: International treatment guidelines for Helicobacter pylori infection recommend a proton pump inhibitor (PPI)/amoxicillin/clarithromycin (CAM) regimen (PAC) or PPI/amoxicillin/metronidazole (MNZ) regimen (PAM) as first-line therapy based on culture and sensitivity testing. As incidence rates of antimicrobial agent-resistant strains are changing year by year, it is important to reevaluate the efficacy of eradication regimens. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PAC and PAM based on different locations categorized by the reported incidence of CAM- and MNZ-resistant strains. Methods: Randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing eradication rates between PAC and PAM first-line treatment up to December 2018 were included. We divided RCTs into four groups based on resistance to CAM (< 15% or ≥ 15%) and MNZ (< 15% or ≥ 15%). Results: A total of 27 studies (4825 patients) were included. Overall eradication rates between PAC and PAM were similar (74.8% and 72.5%, relative risk (RR): 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91–1.39, P = 0.27) in the intention-to-treat analysis. In areas with low MNZ- and high CAM-resistance rates, PAM had a significantly higher eradication rate than PAC (92.5% vs. 70.8%, RR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.13–0.68). In areas with high MNZ- and low CAM-resistance rates, the eradication rate with PAC was only 72.9%. Conclusions: Overall eradication rates with PAC and PAM were equivalent worldwide. In low MNZ-resistance areas, PAM may be recommended as first-line therapy. However, the efficacy of PAC may be insufficient, irrespective of susceptibility to CAM.

EFFICACY OF MODIFIED BISMUTH QUADRUPLE THERAPY (RBMA) AS FIRST-LINE THERAPY FOR ERADICATION OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC GASTRITIS

2019 ◽  
pp. 28-32
Author(s):  
Van Huy Tran
Keyword(s):  
Helicobacter Pylori ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Chronic Gastritis ◽  
Eradication Rate ◽  
High Rate ◽  
First Line ◽  
Helicobacter Pylori Eradication ◽  
Quadruple Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy

Background and aims: Efficacy with substitution of tetracycline with amoxicillin, an antibiotics having a very low resistance rate and a high tolerability, in bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) have not been studied in Vietnam. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of modified BQT vs. standard BQT for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication. Patients and methods: This is a randomized, prospective study. 120 patients with H.pylori positive-chronic gastritis were randomly divided into two groups. The RBMA group containing rabeprazole 20 mg, bismuth subsalicylic 524mg, metronidazole 500mg, amoxicillin 1000mg, all 2 times a day, for 14 days. The RBMT group received rabeprazole, bismuth subsalicylic, metronidazole and tetracycline. Evaluation for compliance and drug-related side effects were evaluated at the end of two weeks. 4-6 weeks after the end of treatment, the H.pylori eradication rate was determined by the C13urease breath test. Results: Eradication rate was not statistically significative different between the RBMA and the RBMT: 91.2%; 95% confidence interval, 78.2% - 96.7%) vs. 90%; 95% CI, 81.6% - 96.3%) by per-protocol analysis (p = 0.42) and 86.7% (95%CI, 75.84% - 93.09%) vs. 75% (95%CI, 62.1% - 85.3%) by intention-to-treat analysis (ITT, p = 0.06). Adverse effects were significant higher in the RBMT group than in the RBMA group (48.3% vs. 26.7%; p = 0.071) and rate of good compliance was significantly higher in RBMA group than in RBMT group (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The modified BQT including rabeprazole, bismuth, metronidazole and amoxicillin achieved a fairly high rate of H.pylori infection eradication with a higher compliance and lower rate of adverse effects compared to the BQT in patients with chronic gastritis. Further studies need to conduct to confirm this new regimens as a first-line therapy in our country. Key words: Modified bismuth quadruple therapy, BQT, Helicobacter pylori eradication

Is first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) beneficial to platinum-eligible patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC)? a meta-analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16506-e16506
Author(s):  
Ce Cheng ◽  
Iloabueke Gabriel Chineke ◽  
Ali McBride ◽  
Juan Chipollini ◽  
Edward Paul Gelmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Publication Bias ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Fixed Effect Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
First Line ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Line Setting

e16506 Background: ICI have proven to benefit patients diagnosed with aUC who are platinum-ineligible. The role of platinum-eligible patients, in the first-line setting is being further elucidated after single positive randomized clinical trial (RCT) with ICI. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to interpret the association of Overall Survival (OS) and PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line therapies in platinum-eligible patients with aUC. Methods: Randomized controlled trials were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library according to established inclusion criteria. Each article was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The Hazard Risk (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Random effect or fixed-effect model was used to calculate the pooled HR, based on heterogeneity significance. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias detection were performed. All statistical analysis were performed using RevMan software (v5.4; Cochrane library) and R Core Team (2016, Vienna, Austria), and all p-values were two-tailed, and the significance level was 0.05. Results: Sixty-seven articles were obtained from the database search, and based on inclusion/exclusion criteria, five RCTs were selected involving 4063 patients. All studies were considered moderate to high quality. A statistically significant association was found between initiation of immunotherapy as first-line treatment to platinum-eligible patients and increased OS (HR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.81,0.94, p = 0.004, I2= 38%). The subgroup analysis included positive PD1 (HR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.70,0.94, p = 0.004, I2= 34%) vs. negative expression (HR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.83,1.11, p = 0.58, I2= 0%); cisplatin (HR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.69,0.96, p = 0.02, I2= 47%) vs. carboplatin administration (HR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.76,1.01, p = 0.06, I2= 21%); male (HR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.77,0.97, p = 0.01, I2= 44%) vs. female (HR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.70,1.04, p = 0.11, I2= 0%); ECOG score 0 (HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.67,0.89, p = 0.0005, I2= 0%) vs. ≥ 1 (HR 0.90; 95% CI: 0.78,1.02, p = 0.11, I2= 6%); Caucasian (HR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.73, 0.91, p = 0.0003, I2= 39%) vs. other race (HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.75, 1.13, p = 0.44, I2= 0%). Similar association regardless of visceral lesion or age. Funnel plot, Egger's test (p = 0.6944), and Begg's test (0.7726) found no publication bias of analysis. Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed improved OS in platinum-eligible patients receiving first-line ICI in aUC. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis yielded an increased OS and cisplatin, positive PD1 status, ECOG 0, male gender, and Caucasian race. In this rapidly evolving clinical practice changes, our meta-analysis provides support to currently recommended avelumab maintenance after platinum induction therapy in the first-line setting and further provide guidance on patient selection for aUC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document